Nothing, I apologise.
Nathan E Norman wrote:
> What does this have to do with the original topic anyway?
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 01:05:56AM +0100, Jeff Green wrote:
> Try remote rebooting a server with a 120Gig Raid array and 1GB Ram takes
> several hours to come up if wants an fsck!
Not if you're using reiserfs or some other journalling filesystem on
the RAID array!
What does this have to do with t
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000 17:13:21 -0700, Joe Emenaker said:
> > On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Joe Emenaker wrote:
> >
> > > and a couple of others. In other words, upon reboot, there was no
> > > network connectivity and no way to GET network connectivity without
> > > bringing in netbase and it's dependen
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 05:13:21PM -0700, Joe Emenaker wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Joe Emenaker wrote:
> > So uh, why did you let it?
> I presume this would have been your response if I had reported that 'vi' had
> deleted my kernel images, too? :)
> Why did I "let" it?!?! Because I was neve
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Joe Emenaker wrote:
> It seems so basic. When you say "apt-get install ..." the "plan" is clearly
> the addition of software to the system. Removal is patently "not part of the
> plan", unless explicitly acknowledged by the user.
If apt executed removals you were prompted an
> Just out of curiosity; what did you install that conflicted with netbase
and
> friends?
I was upgrading mysql-server, of all things. Granted, this was on a system
that hadn't been refreshed in about 3 months or so, so there were about 100
packages that dselect wanted to bring up-to-date.
That
Just out of curiosity; what did you install that conflicted with netbase and
friends?
Brent
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Joe Emenaker wrote:
>
> > and a couple of others. In other words, upon reboot, there was no
> > network connectivity and no way to GET network connectivity without
> > bringing in netbase and it's dependencies via floppy disk.
>
> So uh, why did you let it?
I presume this wo
Try remote rebooting a server with a 120Gig Raid array and 1GB Ram takes
several hours to come up if wants an fsck!
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
>
> another reason why you shouldnt reboot a box from remote :) when one of my
> servers needs a reboot i always make sure someone is nearby incase
> some
another reason why you shouldnt reboot a box from remote :) when one of my
servers needs a reboot i always make sure someone is nearby incase
something goes bad. for the same reason i refuse to attempt a
slink->potato upgrade from remote, too risky.
of course i also pray whenever rebooting a serve
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Jeff Green wrote:
> Surely a quick trip to /var/cache/apt/archives and a run of dpkg -i with
> the right package names would have fixed this, if apt-get doesn't
apt-get install with the right package names would have also fixed it, and
told you when you finally got the right
Surely a quick trip to /var/cache/apt/archives and a run of dpkg -i with
the right package names would have fixed this, if apt-get doesn't
install without some extra fiddling this is usually a message to you.
Make damn sure you know what it is doing, especially if you, like me are
several thousand
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Joe Emenaker wrote:
> It seems that apt-get decided to UNINSTALL:
> o netkit-inetd
> o ipchains
> o netbase
> and a couple of others. In other words, upon reboot, there was no
> network connectivity and no way to GET network connectivity without
> bringing in netbase
I tried to install a package using apt-get
yesterday. It complained about dependencies for some stuff. It suggested that I
use "apt-get -f install {packagename}".
So I did
It downloaded a bundle of packages, whizzed through
the configurations for them in no time at all.
Everything s
14 matches
Mail list logo
