Nothing, I apologise. Nathan E Norman wrote: > What does this have to do with the original topic anyway?
- Re: Apt should be called "inapt" (rhy... Brent Buchholz
- Re: Apt should be called "inapt" ... Joe Emenaker
- Re: Apt should be called "inapt" (rhy... Jason Gunthorpe
- Re: Apt should be called "inapt" (rhy... Mark Brown
- Re: Apt should be called "inapt" (rhy... mike
- Re: Apt should be called "inapt" (rhymes with ... Jeff Green
- Re: Apt should be called "inapt" (rhymes ... Jason Gunthorpe
- Re: Apt should be called "inapt" (rhymes with ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Apt should be called "inapt" (rhymes ... Jeff Green
- long fsck [was Re: Apt should be called "i... Nathan E Norman
- Jeff Green
