On Thursday, December 05, 2013 05:05:12 PM Rick Thomas wrote:
> Naming no names; There have been a couple of what I would regard as
> belligerent and confrontational replies to this posting. I found Ralph's
> original apology to be gentlemanly and entirely appropriate. The
> belligerent replies
Naming no names; There have been a couple of what I would regard as belligerent
and confrontational replies to this posting. I found Ralph's original apology
to be gentlemanly and entirely appropriate. The belligerent replies were
completely out of place.
We're all friends here. Let's keep
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 09:14:24PM +0630, AP wrote:
> I really had no issues posting queries to the deb-off list, provided I knew
> the
> option of its existence
That's because you never bothered to look for it, just like you never
bother to look for answers yourself by searching. Do you eve
I really had no issues posting queries to the deb-off list, provided I knew the
option of its existence
Well, I today itself joined the debian off-topic. But as a matter of interest,
would like to ask that is rarely used by guys? Since there was no message I
got...or may be none posted ther
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 20:05:50 +0530
AP wrote:
> And if any one of the folks here might have told me initially that it
> could be asked in off list, I had no issues asking there!
>
> I just thought things work in Linux anywhere and everywherewe need
> to select the things...so I just though
And if any one of the folks here might have told me initially that it
could be asked in off list, I had no issues asking there!
I just thought things work in Linux anywhere and everywherewe need
to select the things...so I just thought this for questions too!!! But
now its known.
--
Regar
On Wed 04 Dec 2013 at 15:00:49 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 12/4/2013 5:18 AM, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 04:52:06PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> >>
> >> Many threads will wonder a bit and everyone accepts this. Just try to
> >
> > Agreed! Also ... wander. :)
>
> Th
On 12/4/2013 5:18 AM, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 04:52:06PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>
>> Many threads will wonder a bit and everyone accepts this. Just try to
>
> Agreed! Also ... wander. :)
Those damn homonyms...
Heheh, just caught it myself on a re-read of my posts
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 04:52:06PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
> Many threads will wonder a bit and everyone accepts this. Just try to
Agreed! Also ... wander. :)
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are
On Tue 03 Dec 2013 at 23:06:07 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> no doubt about it, many of my mails were unneeded, but the most mails
> for "the thread", some from me, many from others, were absolutely ok.
Most mails were OK?
The original questions concerned
(i) Which Distribution:
and
(ii)
On 12/3/2013 4:06 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> no doubt about it, many of my mails were unneeded, but the most mails
> for "the thread", some from me, many from others, were absolutely ok.
Agreed, and thank you Ralf.
> If I should write again too much off-topic, please send me a note
> off-list. If
no doubt about it, many of my mails were unneeded, but the most mails
for "the thread", some from me, many from others, were absolutely ok.
If I should write again too much off-topic, please send me a note
off-list. If a newbie does ask something that is not Debian related
enough for your taste, p
.
My apologies.
Ethan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50b7d3ea.6080...@hygeiabiomedical.com
The content of the previous email is not true. It was posted by
mistake from this account.
I do not know this person and it was just a case of mistaken identity.
OMKAR BELKHEDE, FLAIR TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD, PUNE
(http://in.linkedin.com/pub/omkar-belkhede/b/23a/37b
http://www.facebook.com/people/Om
On Mi, 01 iun 11, 15:48:31, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> >>The email you sent to debian-user@lists.debian.org was rejected because
> >>there
> >>was a validation error.
> >>
> >>In order for emails to be accepted by debianHELP:
> >>- They must be sent in re
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
The email you sent to debian-user@lists.debian.org was rejected because there
was a validation error.
In order for emails to be accepted by debianHELP:
- They must be sent in reply to a valid notification email.
- The reply must be done from the same emai
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 21:07 -0500, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> So sorry for posting the same thing more then once, I kept getting a
> DSN like this:
>
> Whomever runs this should include a message ID or something more then
> the subject in the response because I can't discover what email didn't
> make i
So sorry for posting the same thing more then once, I kept getting a DSN
like this:
Whomever runs this should include a message ID or something more then
the subject in the response because I can't discover what email didn't
make it(if any) to the list.
Original Message
Subject:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Andrei Popescu
wrote:
> On Mon,12.Oct.09, 13:33:46, Paul E Condon wrote:
>> I have not reported them to anyone because I had no idea who to report
>> them to, and I'm always tinkering with my set-up, so I'm never surprised
>> to discover a few dozen hours after a
On Mon,12.Oct.09, 13:33:46, Paul E Condon wrote:
> I have not reported them to anyone because I had no idea who to report
> them to, and I'm always tinkering with my set-up, so I'm never surprised
> to discover a few dozen hours after a puzzling event that it was caused
> by something that I did,
Many thanks for all the replies.
I have had a busy day and did not notice that the bounces were not
from debian.org... :(
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 02:24:58PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> I think the mms.mycricket.com server is misconfigured; I would expect DSNs to
> go to the mailing list software. Mailman et. al. have some support for
> handling such messages and auto-unsubscribing troublesome addresses.
On Monday 12 October 2009 21:08:21 Nuno Magalhães wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 20:33, Paul E Condon
> wrote: [...]
>
> > I have been receiving such bounces with almost every email I have sent
> > since Saturday, noon. My bounce messages are all coming from
> >
> > system-u...@mms.mycricket.com
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 20:33, Paul E Condon wrote:
[...]
> I have been receiving such bounces with almost every email I have sent
> since Saturday, noon. My bounce messages are all coming from
>
> system-u...@mms.mycricket.com
Same here, no (recent) system-fiddling.
--
() ascii-rubanda kampaj
On 20091012_201915, Tom H wrote:
> I sent four emails to the list today.
>
> They all bounced with "Your message was not delivered successfully"
> but they are all in the archive.
>
> Did anyone receive them?
>
I have been receiving such bounces with almost every email I have sent
since Saturda
On Monday 12 October 2009 14:01:42 Tim Beauregard wrote:
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > from a "sprint" "mms" or something like that, I think someone just
> > subscribed to the list incorrectly.
>
> These bounces are quite annoying-would they be considered spam?
They aren't spam the way I und
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> from a "sprint" "mms" or something like that, I think someone just subscribed
> to the list incorrectly.
These bounces are quite annoying-would they be considered spam? And
from debian-user?!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
On Monday 12 October 2009 13:19:15 Tom H wrote:
> I sent four emails to the list today.
>
> Did anyone receive them?
Yes. 4 messages from you today, plus this one. If the bounces are coming
from a "sprint" "mms" or something like that, I think someone just subscribed
to the list incorrectly.
I sent four emails to the list today.
They all bounced with "Your message was not delivered successfully"
but they are all in the archive.
Did anyone receive them?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lis
On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 14:21 -0700, tom arnall wrote:
> I sent the following mail this a.m. after looking via google for help on the
> issue. but i forgot to look on this user list and just now stumbled onto a
> lot of posts on the topic. i need of course to read these before posting new
> quest
I sent the following mail this a.m. after looking via google for help on the
issue. but i forgot to look on this user list and just now stumbled onto a
lot of posts on the topic. i need of course to read these before posting new
questions.
=
I'm trying to
Julian De Marchi wrote:
> I have found my out spoken "opinion" of OT threads to be quiet mistaken.
> After having the time to read the non "god" related ones, they actually
> do by time in between REAL threads. They have also proven to be quite
> interesting to read, and I have now realized that t
> So, are you going to join in on the discussion?
> :-)
When I see it fit. :-)
Julian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
have also proven to be quite
> interesting to read, and I have now realized that they help the Debian
> Users "grow" as a community.
>
> I do send out my most sincere apologies for my bias opinion relating to
> this subject.
>
So, are you going to join in on the discussi
e Debian
Users "grow" as a community.
I do send out my most sincere apologies for my bias opinion relating to
this subject.
SORRY!
Julian
hosting.jdcomputers.com.au
This email and any attached files are
* confidential and intended solely for the use of the intended recipient
I sincerely apologize for sending a message to the list with
"reply requested". The other mail echoes I use strip such
requests before forwarding. Now that I know that this echo
does not do that, I shall endeavor not to burden you all
again with that.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);
sorry about the last mail being in HTML, I've switched my evil client to
send ASCII
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 07:20:33PM +0200, Rogier Wolff wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 05:13:22PM +, zoe wrote:
> > apologies for my post yesterday
>
> Accepted.
>
> > red hat, suse, mandrake, caldera, and half a dozen
> > other distributions all crashed or
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003 01:20 am, Rogier Wolff wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 05:13:22PM +, zoe wrote:
> > red hat, suse, mandrake, caldera, and half a dozen
> > other distributions all crashed or became unworkable)
>
> Sounds like a hardware problem in your computer.
I second this. Everything yo
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 05:13:22PM +, zoe wrote:
> apologies for my post yesterday
Accepted.
> red hat, suse, mandrake, caldera, and half a dozen
> other distributions all crashed or became unworkable)
Sounds like a hardware problem in your computer.
> But then the desk
apologies for my post yesterday
new ignorant user, who has broken both her
wrist and her debian
plus did not think I was ready yet for your list.
over the weekend my capable linux buddy installed
woody for me, its my tenth + try with linux
(I think I am cursed.. we have previous tried
red hat
it was just a mistake using the addressbook
i am sorry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Thursday, 2002-12-12 at 13:02:41 -0600, Jeffrey Taylor wrote:
>> Sorry for the multiple sends. Some of the original addresses had
>> typos that I corrected and resent. Bad dog!
>
> Still no cookie, bad dog :-P
>
> http://ipsec.wit.antd.nist.gov/ Host does not resolve
> http://i
On Thursday, 2002-12-12 at 13:02:41 -0600, Jeffrey Taylor wrote:
> Sorry for the multiple sends. Some of the original addresses had
> typos that I corrected and resent. Bad dog!
Still no cookie, bad dog :-P
http://ipsec.wit.antd.nist.gov/ Host does not resolve
http://isakmp.test.ssh.fi/
Sorry for the multiple sends. Some of the original addresses had
typos that I corrected and resent. Bad dog!
Apologies,
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
A note about Outlook Express and html
M$ obligingly left html as the default setting to ensure that they
could impose html as the new email standard and thus usurp the rich-text
standard previously used for jollying up plain text emails.
Even if you do not embolden one single line your Outlo
had a baby and I suddenly had a week off work.
>
Congratulations - and given the circumstances apologies for my curt reply
when I received your out of office.
(But then again - you won't have any time to read this list any more:-) )
- --
Alan - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.chandlerfam
Title: RE: Many apologies for auto-reply spam
> -Original Message-
> From: ben [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 04 February 2002 10:34
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Many apologies for auto-reply spam
>
> given that all of the time you though
On Monday 04 February 2002 01:51 am, Stephenson, Paul wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I understand from some private mails that my Outlook has been spamming
> every one of you who has posted to debian-user in the last week with Out of
> Office Auto-Replies.
>
> Please accept my since
Title: Many apologies for auto-reply spam
Hi folks,
I understand from some private mails that my Outlook has been spamming every one of you who has posted to debian-user in the last week with Out of Office Auto-Replies.
Please accept my sincerest apologies.
I don't usually bother tu
Hi,
A friend of mine just told me what happened in Florida. My apologies for
the inappropriate signature. I've changed it to something more fitting
to the world out there today. I hope I didn't hurt anyone's feelings,
that certainly wasn't what I was looking for.
Sincerely,
on Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 07:43:29PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
>
> Thanks, debian-users for putting up with my half-baked squeakings. I
> finally figured out what I was doing wrong, and have wiped the offending
> package from my system, unto eternity.
Don't keep us all in
Thanks, debian-users for putting up with my half-baked squeakings. I
finally figured out what I was doing wrong, and have wiped the offending
package from my system, unto eternity.
Embarrassedly,
Glenn Becker
++
http://www.burningclown.com
"Everyone's Portal to Nothing At All"
+
Hi Karsten !!
- It broke my lilo, leaving me with a missing library
(/lib/ld-linux.so.2).
> I got the file mailed to me by another user, boot using floppies, and
> managed to repair the boot.
So...is your problem resolved or not?
- I managed to solve my missing library problem, but not m
on Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 02:13:26PM -0300, Daniel Toffetti ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> I added testing (woody) to my sources.list some days ago and carried
> out an upgrade of my potato box. I got two main problems (amongst others I
> may not noticed so far):
>
> - It broke my lilo, leav
Hi all !
I've been gently adviced to post messages in text only mode, I
apologize for any inconvenience. I'm posting in text only in other Linux
oriented lists already, but I'm new to this list and I forgot to select text
only as default.
Thanks for the responses I already got to m
on Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 11:37:45AM -0500, Chris Kesler ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> We apologize for the intrusion to your mailing list. Your list address
> (debian-user@lists.debian.org) was added to our mailing list in error by one
> of our interns and we have proactively removed it from our li
We apologize for the intrusion to your mailing list.
Your list address (debian-user@lists.debian.org) was
added to our mailing list in error by one of our interns and we have
proactively removed it from our list.
The Earthlogic Team
* 5% of our profit is donated to environmental and humani
them, but from
> elsewhere. My apologies again for starting all this, and for
> crediting this to Debian. In fact they took no action except to
> unsubscribe me.
>
> Jim Kroger
Yes
--
So here we are then.
Dear list,
My confusion is lessing somewhat...I just want to restate that Debian
did not take any action against me. I had received voice mail and
copies of mails that were sent to my boss, several professors, etc
etc, and thought they were from Debian, but apparently the sender
(Karsten M.
Dear List,
I incorrectly stated that the managers of the Debian list sent copies
of all my emails to several professors, my boss, and Princeton. That
was incorrect, this and the voice mail were not from them, but from
elsewhere. My apologies again for starting all this, and for
crediting
Paul Huygen wrote:
> On the other hand, if you did send the virus warning, you didn't do a
> bad thing, because it seems, that "alphaholidays" sent a message to
> this list (header: Linux on HP 9000 C-Class) that contains a kind of
> virus or trojan horse.
alphaholidays' message was html and conta
Pollywog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, after I calmed down, I looked at my headers and saw that I did not
> send the virus warning. [..]
> *sigh of relief*
On the other hand, if you did send the virus warning, you didn't do a
bad thing, because it seems, that "alphaholidays" sent a mes
On 26-Sep-2000 Robert Waldner wrote:
> Well, if you´re not connected with
> X-envelope-sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I wouldn´t think you´d be responsible ;-)
Thanks, after I calmed down, I looked at my headers and saw that I did not
send the virus warning. I thought I would get people all upse
Well, if you´re not connected with
X-envelope-sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wouldn´t think you´d be responsible ;-)
cheers,
&rw
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000 20:02:06 -, Pollywog writes:
>Oh wait, I am not sure that I was responsible for this virus warning message,
>now that I have looked at my header
Oh wait, I am not sure that I was responsible for this virus warning message,
now that I have looked at my headers. Can anyone tell me if I was the one who
sent it?
--
Andrew
On 26-Sep-2000 Pollywog wrote:
> I apologize for this error. I just switched from Exim to Postfix and this
> took my by
I apologize for this error. I just switched from Exim to Postfix and this
took my by surprise. I will modify my configs to prevent recurrence.
--
Andrew
On 26-Sep-2000 wrote:
> WARNING!
>
> This mail is generated automatically by virus-scanning software.
>
> There was virus found in one or m
Had mutt set to save mail to "outbox" and was trying to get KMail to get
my work mail. Of course it uses "outbox" to store messages to be sent. I
caught it before too many were sent out, my apologies to all.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest,
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 10:54:30AM +1000, John Griffiths wrote:
> apologies if this is rtfm
>
> if it is can someone please tell me *which* FM i should be RT'ing
>
> is there an easy way to bring a stormix box over to full debian?
>
> i know there is a howt
apologies if this is rtfm
if it is can someone please tell me *which* FM i should be RT'ing
is there an easy way to bring a stormix box over to full debian?
i know there is a howto on doing this with corel...
last time i tried simply changing the sources.list and things got ugly but
I apologize: I originally sent this mail while logged in as root; reply
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] will not be deliverable.
>From the ftpd man page (netstd 3.07-7slink.3):
~ftp/etc Make this directory owned by ``root'' and unwritable by
anyone (mode 511). The file
I think in the recent thread about GUI's the list may recieve more than
one email from me. Sorry, Netscape said they weren't being sent when
they were.
Sorry.
George Russell
to start with, the debian-rsync script should point to 'debian/', not
'/debian/'. i realize the entire problem has to do with blocking out
'binary-*/' and 'disks-*' and then attempting to allow just the i386
stuff through with '+ *i386/'. the rsync works fine if i manually
specify the directories
At 02:09 PM 03-08-98 -0300, you wrote:
>Ivan writes:
> > At 09:10 AM 03-08-98 -0700, you wrote:
> > >Try Star Office. <<<- COMMERCIAL
> >
> > Only available FREE as part of the Caldera distribution !
>
>Not at all. You can download staroffice 4.0 and install in your box, if you
>don't use it
On Mon, 17 Nov 1997, Dima wrote:
> I upgraded fetchmail to 4.3.2-1 and did some rtfm'ing -- that
> helped. New fetchmail wants to be told where to deliver mail:
> add eg. "smtphost localhost" to your .fetchmailrc. Don't forget
> to check if your MTA knows "localhost" is "this box here".
> It tur
Apologies to Raul and everyone who got bounces from me.
I upgraded fetchmail to 4.3.2-1 and did some rtfm'ing -- that
helped. New fetchmail wants to be told where to deliver mail:
add eg. "smtphost localhost" to your .fetchmailrc. Don't forget
to check if your MTA knows &quo
On This Day, In The Year of Our Lord 9 May 97, 20:56
"Re: deselect" By G.V.Livingston II:
OOOpps, I apologize about that. I have a filter set up so that all
incoming mail from usa.net is automatically answered. I keep on
getting flooded from tons of spams by various usa.net addresses that
77 matches
Mail list logo
