Re: Printing in Cups -- Almost there -- an apology

2005-07-19 Thread Chris Bannister
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 05:59:58AM -0500, Benjamin Sher wrote: > Dear friends: > > My apology for double posting of my message concerning my printer issue. > I sent the first message by mistake from my first email address > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). This is not my Debian address, and I assumed > tha

Re: Printing in CUPS -- almost there!

2005-07-19 Thread Chris Bannister
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 04:16:35PM -0500, Benjamin Sher wrote: > >peter colton wrote: > > On Wednesday 13 July 2005 16:46, Clive Menzies wrote: > > > On (13/07/05 13:19), michael wrote: > > > On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 06:28 -0500, Benjamin Sher wrote: > > > michael wrote: >

Re: Printing in CUPS -- almost there!

2005-07-13 Thread Anthony Campbell
On 13 Jul 2005, Benjamin Sher wrote: > > > > > > > Dear friends: > > I am still struggling with making my printer work. I installed all of > the cups files instructed to both by our list members and online at: > > http://qref.sourceforge.net/Debian/reference/ch-install.en.html#s-cups > > I the

Re: Printing in CUPS -- almost there!

2005-07-13 Thread Clive Menzies
On (13/07/05 16:16), Benjamin Sher wrote: > peter colton wrote: > > >On Wednesday 13 July 2005 16:46, Clive Menzies wrote: > > have look at the link below for the packages you need to install for > >cups. I did not use the install the Recommended packages and all work well. > > > >http://qre

Re: Printing in CUPS -- almost there!

2005-07-13 Thread Benjamin Sher
peter colton wrote: On Wednesday 13 July 2005 16:46, Clive Menzies wrote: On (13/07/05 13:19), michael wrote: On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 06:28 -0500, Benjamin Sher wrote: michael wrote: On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 05:32 -0500,

Re: Printing in CUPS -- almost there!

2005-07-13 Thread Paul Scott
Benjamin Sher wrote: Clive Menzies wrote: Did you follow: http://excess.org/docs/linux_windows_printing.html Every printer I've set up using it was pretty painless. You need the following packages. 'cupsys-bsd' is important and before changing anything make sure it's installed. cupsy

Re: Printing in CUPS -- almost there!

2005-07-13 Thread Benjamin Sher
Clive Menzies wrote: On (13/07/05 13:19), michael wrote: On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 06:28 -0500, Benjamin Sher wrote: michael wrote: On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 05:32 -0500, Benjamin Sher wrote: Dear friends: I've spent the past hour searching in Google for articles that will

Re: Printing in CUPS -- almost there!

2005-07-13 Thread michael
> Dear Michael: > > I will check linuxprinting shortly. What do you mean by the > CUPS web interface, please? In any web browser on the machine running cups, go to http://localhost:631/ Michael PS: pls don't bother to CC me since I read the d-u emails regularly. ta. > > Thank you. > > Benja

Re: Printing in CUPS -- almost there!

2005-07-13 Thread michael
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 14:31 -0500, Benjamin Sher wrote: > michael wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 06:28 -0500, Benjamin Sher wrote: > > > > > michael wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 05:32 -0500, Benjamin Sher wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear friends: > > > > >

Re: Printing in CUPS -- almost there!

2005-07-13 Thread Benjamin Sher
michael wrote: On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 06:28 -0500, Benjamin Sher wrote: michael wrote: On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 05:32 -0500, Benjamin Sher wrote: Dear friends: I've spent the past hour searching in Google for articles that will explain to me

Re: Printing in CUPS -- almost there!

2005-07-13 Thread peter colton
On Wednesday 13 July 2005 16:46, Clive Menzies wrote: > On (13/07/05 13:19), michael wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 06:28 -0500, Benjamin Sher wrote: > > > michael wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 05:32 -0500, Benjamin Sher wrote: > > > > > Dear friends: > > > > > > > > > > I've spent the pas

Re: Printing in CUPS -- almost there!

2005-07-13 Thread Clive Menzies
On (13/07/05 13:19), michael wrote: > On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 06:28 -0500, Benjamin Sher wrote: > > michael wrote: > > > On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 05:32 -0500, Benjamin Sher wrote: > > > > > > > Dear friends: > > > > > > > > I've spent the past hour searching in Google for articles that will > > >

Re: Printing in CUPS -- almost there!

2005-07-13 Thread michael
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 06:28 -0500, Benjamin Sher wrote: > michael wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 05:32 -0500, Benjamin Sher wrote: > > > > > Dear friends: > > > > > > I've spent the past hour searching in Google for articles that will > > > explain to me how to install my printer in Debian

Re: Printing in CUPS -- almost there!

2005-07-13 Thread michael
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 05:32 -0500, Benjamin Sher wrote: > Dear friends: > > I've spent the past hour searching in Google for articles that will > explain to me how to install my printer in Debian 3.1. I'm literally 99% > of the way there. > > First, I found out that Debian 3.1 does not include

Printing in Cups -- Almost there -- an apology

2005-07-13 Thread Benjamin Sher
Dear friends: My apology for double posting of my message concerning my printer issue. I sent the first message by mistake from my first email address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). This is not my Debian address, and I assumed that it would be bounced back to me as they always are. So, I resent it from

Printing in CUPS -- almost there!

2005-07-13 Thread Benjamin Sher
Dear friends: I've spent the past hour searching in Google for articles that will explain to me how to install my printer in Debian 3.1. I'm literally 99% of the way there. First, I found out that Debian 3.1 does not include the CUPS server by default. So, I downloaded that via Synaptic. The

Printing in CUPS -- almost there!

2005-07-13 Thread Benjamin Sher
Dear friends: I've spent the past hour searching in Google for articles that will explain to me how to install my printer in Debian 3.1. I'm literally 99% of the way there. First, I found out that Debian 3.1 does not include the CUPS server by default. So, I downloaded that via Synaptic. Then I

RE: Mach64 DRI -- almost there, but ...

2004-07-01 Thread David Baron
One other problem. One an Xsession has restarted or even simply logged in and out, dri comes up disabled. The Glx libary returns that the system cannot do it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Mach64 DRI -- almost there, but ...

2004-07-01 Thread David Baron
< I actually got a mach64.ko to compile and load. Congratulations. Unfortunately, the xfree and mesa versions on that CVS would no compile. I do have mesa-dri-mach64 and dri-trunk stuff from Sid. So I load at start up agpgart, ati-agp and the mach64 modules. Agpgart and mach64 are acknowled

Mach64 DRI -- almost there, but ...

2004-07-01 Thread David Baron
I actually got a mach64.ko to compile and load. Congratulations. Unfortunately, the xfree and mesa versions on that CVS would no compile. I do have mesa-dri-mach64 and dri-trunk stuff from Sid. So I load at start up agpgart, ati-agp and the mach64 modules. Agpgart and mach64 are acknowledged in

Almost there: CUPS, Samba 3.0 !

2004-05-10 Thread Mark M
Hello all, I can't connect to my shared printers. There. Thats the problem ;-) Details: I get a "Unable to connect, Access is denied" when I double click on the shared "Xerox" printer from Network Neighboorhood. The Printer will print from the CUPS administration reached via: http://debian:631

Re: workstations syslogging to server (almost there)

2002-09-26 Thread nate
D. J. Bolderman said: > You were right, i'm using UDP now, and messages from my client are placed > in /var/log-ng :) However, it doesn't create log-files with the hostname > in it, it just puts them in the existing logs of the server... yeah, only syslog entries that are not caught by any of th

Re: workstations syslogging to server (almost there)

2002-09-26 Thread D. J. Bolderman
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, nate wrote: > > Do you mean you are running BOTH syslog-ng and syslogd ? > on my syslog server yes, you don't have to, but I think you may have > to reconfigure syslog-ng so it listens on /dev/log to recieve local > events(maybe thats what internal() does ..) According to t

Re: Almost there!

2002-03-22 Thread Shri Shrikumar
- Original Message - From: "John Bruner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 4:54 AM Subject: Almost there! > Hi, > > I have received help getting this far, but now am stuck. > > On my Mac IIfx, I can get to the configuration scree

Almost there!

2002-03-21 Thread John Bruner
Hi, I have received help getting this far, but now am stuck. On my Mac IIfx, I can get to the configuration screen. I tell the installer which keyboard I have. The next thing the installer wants to do is partition the Hard drive. I select that option. When the screen changes, I lose approximately

Re: Almost there!

2001-02-13 Thread Jimmy Kaplowitz
If I recall correctly you can change the "exec gnome-session" to "gnome-session &" and then add another line "exec enlightenment". This assumes you have installed the enlightenment package. I am not sure if this is currently the preferred window manager for GNOME, but it should work. YMMV. - Jimmy

Re: Almost there!

2001-02-13 Thread Vadim Kutsyy
Phil Murphy wrote: > > I have recently installed Debian, (Yes, I DID it!) :) , and had my X > session running fine. I was able to run GMC, from WindowMaker, but would > prefer to start up Gnome automatically. you probably would want to run gdm then (apt-get istall gdm). gdm will allow you to

Almost there!

2001-02-13 Thread Phil Murphy
I have recently installed Debian, (Yes, I DID it!) :) , and had my X session running fine. I was able to run GMC, from WindowMaker, but would prefer to start up Gnome automatically. Having done a fair bit of reading, :) , including http://www.newriders.com/debian/html/noframes/node76.html, I ad

Re: PPP - almost there, but stuck on routing table :(

1999-11-07 Thread Raghavendra Bhat
John Miskinis has no clue of pppconfig: > I tried "pon" but it complained about some things > that I have not yet configured (in diald?). > AFAIK 'pon/poff' are in no way connected with diald. Have U installed 'pppconfig' package ? If not do it and I find it such an elegant one for ppp dial-up

Re: PPP - almost there, but stuck on routing table :(

1999-11-06 Thread Martin Fluch
On Sat, 6 Nov 1999, John Miskinis wrote: > That makes sense, I can see where /dev/modem is useful once things > are working. I did remember seeing a note somewhere (I've been > up all night reading stuff, I forget where) where they discouraged > the use of /dev/modem, and /dev/mouse however! A L

Re: PPP - almost there, but stuck on routing table :(

1999-11-06 Thread John Hasler
Nick Phillips writes: > Indeed. On the subject of automating, I recommend: > options common to *all* possible connections go in /etc/ppp/options > options for any particular connection go in /etc/ppp/peers/connectionname > symbolic link to favourite dialout connection goes in > /etc/ppp/peers/pr

Re: PPP - almost there, but stuck on routing table :(

1999-11-06 Thread John Hasler
Nick Phillips writes: > Either at the command line, or in one of its config files, pppd needs the > "defaultroute" option to tell it to make the ppp link the default route. Pppconfig provides it by default in the provider file. > BTW, don't be happy to leave it as it is (starting ppp manually onc

Re: PPP - almost there, but stuck on routing table :(

1999-11-06 Thread John Hasler
John Miskinis writes: > No default route "stuff" shows up, and I'm wondering if the debian > distribution sets up something that I must change. Did you set up an ethernet card when you installed? If you did the install will have set up a defaultroute to the ethernet. Pppd won't override an exist

Re: PPP - almost there, but stuck on routing table :(

1999-11-06 Thread John Hasler
John Miskinis writes: > I tried "pon" but it complained about some things that I have not yet > configured (in diald?). Pppconfig configures everything that 'pon' needs. Exactly what pon complain about? (pon is just a wrapper around pppd.) Diald is not involved here. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PRO

Re: PPP - almost there, but stuck on routing table :(

1999-11-06 Thread John Miskinis
Hi, That makes sense, I can see where /dev/modem is useful once things are working. I did remember seeing a note somewhere (I've been up all night reading stuff, I forget where) where they discouraged the use of /dev/modem, and /dev/mouse however! I'm still accepting recommendations for slink-c

Re: PPP - almost there, but stuck on routing table :(

1999-11-06 Thread Martin Fluch
On Sat, 6 Nov 1999, Nick Phillips wrote: > > I noticed that the /dev/modem worked also, but I wanted to be > > sure that it was using ttyS2 for now. > > Good. /dev/modem is usually a symlink to wherever your modem is, and my > advice would be to delete it right away - if one program thinks it's u

Re: PPP - almost there, but stuck on routing table :(

1999-11-06 Thread Nick Phillips
> I noticed that the /dev/modem worked also, but I wanted to be > sure that it was using ttyS2 for now. Good. /dev/modem is usually a symlink to wherever your modem is, and my advice would be to delete it right away - if one program thinks it's using /dev/modem, and another thinks it's using /dev/

Re: PPP - almost there, but stuck on routing table :(

1999-11-06 Thread Martin Fluch
On Sat, 6 Nov 1999, John Miskinis wrote: > I noticed that the /dev/modem worked also, but I wanted to be > sure that it was using ttyS2 for now. I am also trying everything > as root for now. I tried "pon" but it complained about some things > that I have not yet configured (in diald?). About w

Re: PPP - almost there, but stuck on routing table :(

1999-11-06 Thread John Miskinis
Hi, I noticed that the /dev/modem worked also, but I wanted to be sure that it was using ttyS2 for now. I am also trying everything as root for now. I tried "pon" but it complained about some things that I have not yet configured (in diald?). I figured it would be best to get the manual connec

Re: PPP - almost there, but stuck on routing table :(

1999-11-06 Thread Nick Phillips
> Anyone have any clues as to why the default route is not setup? Either at the command line, or in one of its config files, pppd needs the "defaultroute" option to tell it to make the ppp link the default route. BTW, don't be happy to leave it as it is (starting ppp manually once connected) - it

Re: PPP - almost there, but stuck on routing table :(

1999-11-06 Thread Martin Fluch
It is quite a long time ago, I used a PCMCIA modem, but as far as I remember, it was quit easy to get it work: In order to make it possible, that non root user can initiate a ppp conection, add the desired user to the group 'dip' adduser username dip In the file /etc/pcmcia/serial.opts the l

PPP - almost there, but stuck on routing table :(

1999-11-06 Thread John Miskinis
Hello, I have recently aquired a PPP-based ISP, in hopes to get linux network connectivity. I have been working with the PPP howto, and got PPP somewhat working. I am stuck at the point where a "route -n" only shows ONE ppp0 connection, where the howto says it should show TWO. I am able to pin

Re: Sendmail questions (almost there!) Followup

1999-07-15 Thread Bob Nielsen
Relaying is now turned off by default in sendmail 8.9.3 (the version in slink). I added the following to /etc/mail/sendmail.mc: FEATURE(access_db, hash -o /etc/mail/access)dnl I then ran sendmailconfig to create sendmail.cf In /etc/mail/access, I have: host.domain RELAY where host.domain

Re: Sendmail questions (almost there!) Followup

1999-07-15 Thread Richard A Nelson
On Thu, 15 Jul 1999, Mike Patterson wrote: > Ok, black is actually the 0.69, a machine dialing in with ppp. 0.1, the > relay, is "white". cool, we're on the same page then (I'm suddenly reminded of a Three Dog Night song ;-} ) > So I made the change above on white in the file /etc/mail/sendm

Sendmail questions (almost there!) Followup

1999-07-15 Thread Mike Patterson
Richard A Nelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: : 1) Make sure /etc/resolv.conf is setup correctly :if you can't do `host xxx.yyy.zzz', sendmail can't find :it either : 2) sendmail is restrictive by design - you have to tell it :that you know the blood is upon your hands ;-} : :

Re: Sendmail questions (almost there!)

1999-07-14 Thread Richard A Nelson
1) Make sure /etc/resolv.conf is setup correctly if you can't do `host xxx.yyy.zzz', sendmail can't find it either 2) sendmail is restrictive by design - you have to tell it that you know the blood is upon your hands ;-} on the black machine (your apparent gateway), make sure

Sendmail questions (almost there!)

1999-07-14 Thread Mike Patterson
Ok, after a few modifications I'm now getting some semblance of useful logging. So I attempted to email from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The first time I did it, I got this: Jul 13 15:15:43 white sendmail[16713]: PAA16713: ruleset=check_mail, arg1=, relay=black.chroamtic.org [192.168

Almost There...

1999-06-15 Thread jeff k
Thanks to the help of E.Paris and Shaleh, I've got my problem pretty much narrowed down; hopefully someone can get me through the last bit. I am using an IBM 755Thinkpad with a Megahertz XJ1144 modemcard. The modemcard is not a winmodem as was suggested to me-- Eloy Paris dug out a XJ1144 card h

Re: Almost there. . .HELP

1998-08-19 Thread Ed Cogburn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I was able to ping 130.207.7.21 as ftp.debian.org but when I run dselect, > choose ftp access enter 130.207.7.21 as address, select anonymous login, > the default directories and no proxies, I get the following: > > Using FTP to check directories. . .(stop with C) >

RE: Almost there. . .HELP

1998-08-17 Thread Frederic Breitwieser
>Checking dists/stable/main/binary-i386. . .FTP ERROR - Can't call method Hey John. I just FTP'd to the server, and while I got in, and you have the directories correct, I will say the server is agonizingly slow. Of course, this results in many more debian users :) Frederic Breitwieser Bridgep

RE: Almost there. . .HELP

1998-08-17 Thread John_Gay
I was able to ping 130.207.7.21 as ftp.debian.org but when I run dselect, choose ftp access enter 130.207.7.21 as address, select anonymous login, the default directories and no proxies, I get the following: Using FTP to check directories. . .(stop with C) Connecting to 130.207.7.21. . . Login as

Re: almost there--getting local machine to start ppp at end of script

1998-08-17 Thread Jens B. Jorgensen
Yup. It looks like you're almost there. It looks like your chat script is waiting too long though because it's printing out the 'text' of the LCP configure requests the other end is sending. I'm guessing the other end is timing out. What's your chat script look

almost there--getting local machine to start ppp at end of script

1998-08-15 Thread Richard E. Hawkins Esq.
I almost seem to be there now--judging from the log file, I have the remote machine attemtpting to start. But they're still not talking. Here's the end of the file: Aug 14 14:38:16 hawkins chat[338]: Last login: Fri Aug 14 15:21:00 on ttyp0 from xts3c9.tele.iastate.edu.^M Aug 14 14:38:16 h

RE: Almost there. . .HELP

1998-08-13 Thread Midgley John
d also whether the route persists over a reboot), but perhaps someone will set us both straight? Regards John Midgley >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 12 August 1998 21:06 >To:Midgley John >Cc:The recipient's addres

RE: Almost there. . .HELP

1998-08-13 Thread John_Gay
I'm not sure what type of firewall we have but, I was able to re login to the IP address and execute the commands after I wrote the last E-Mail. I assume I would just need to run dselect, choose ftp for access mode, enter the IP address and then just accept the defaults for everything else. Is this

RE: Almost there. . .HELP

1998-08-13 Thread jeff . hurst
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On 13-Aug-98 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > John sends: > > As you can see, I'm NOT very NET literate. Work uses WindowsNT and most of > the info is restricted to Administrator access, which I don't have. I > should be able to use the IP address you have given me t

RE: Almost there. . .HELP

1998-08-13 Thread John_Gay
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 12/08/98 21:10:39 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org cc: John Gay/IE/3Com Subject: RE: Almost there. . .HELP Hi John, > I have been trying to set-up a PC here at work without connecting to > the > NET( Boss won't let me :< ). After trying to copy

Re: Almost there. . .HELP

1998-08-13 Thread jeff . hurst
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On 13-Aug-98 Helge Hafting wrote: > The nslookup command is available on most machines and > os'es that connect to the internet. It could be > missing on dos/windows though. Just to add a bit of help, I've found that on a dos/windows machine, the easiest way

Re: Almost there. . .HELP

1998-08-13 Thread Helge Hafting
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/12/98 at 09:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Not using the nameservers isn't hard - you simply type IP addresses instead of names. Instead of www.debian.org you type 209.81.8.242 for example. This works with ftp and lots of other software. The problem is of cour

RE: Almost there. . .HELP

1998-08-12 Thread TBaetzle
Hi John, > I have been trying to set-up a PC here at work without connecting to > the > NET( Boss won't let me :< ). After trying to copy the files from a > Windows > PC via a null-modem cable, I found I didn't have enough room on the > hard > drive for ALL the debian packages. I've decided to 'bo

Almost there. . .HELP

1998-08-12 Thread John_Gay
I have been trying to set-up a PC here at work without connecting to the NET( Boss won't let me :< ). After trying to copy the files from a Windows PC via a null-modem cable, I found I didn't have enough room on the hard drive for ALL the debian packages. I've decided to 'borrow' an IP address from

RE: Zip and CD-rom (almost there)

1998-06-11 Thread Mark Ciciretti
Try mount -t iso9660 /dev/hdd /mnt The file system on a CD is in the ISO 9660 format not fat. You also don't have to specify a partition. > for CD: > mount -t msdos /dev/hdd4 /mnt > this does not work. Same with vfat > I tried fdisk on /dev/hdd. Here's the output. ---

Zip and CD-rom (almost there)

1998-06-09 Thread Marc van der Vossen
> Just plug in a zip-disk and check with fdisk that it can be read (at least > the partition table on the disk). > Ok, just tried, worked OK, it is hdc4. tried to vfat mount it and I can now read the disk. things are progressing fast now. > How are you trying to mount them ? The exact commands ? >