also sprach DEFFONTAINES Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.09.13.1129
+0200]:
> Which version of spamassassin do you have there?
> Author emailed me SA 2.31 was reported to have problems with spampd when
> network tests are enabled.
yup. sarge features 2.31-2. i'll hold off the packaging until t
mber 2002 14:29
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: About spamassassin
>
>
> also sprach DEFFONTAINES Vincent
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.09.12.1418 +0200]:
> > I have a quite similar message here when starting it with
> --debug, but its
> &
also sprach DEFFONTAINES Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.09.12.1418
+0200]:
> I have a quite similar message here when starting it with --debug, but its
> starts fine...
> (last line I get is "debug: is spam? score=-3.8 required=5")
> The only real difference in my setup here is that I pass it
perl version problem... I run spamassassin on a woody box
here.
Vincent
> -Original Message-
> From: martin f krafft [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday 12 September 2002 13:58
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: About spamassassin
>
>
> als
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.09.12.1329 +0200]:
> > spampd can be found at this address :
> > http://www.worlddesign.com/index.cfm/rd/mta/spampd.htm
>
> Anyway, I'll package it but rely on your input to make it better
> suited for actual use since I am not going to employ
also sprach DEFFONTAINES Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.09.12.1311
+0200]:
> spampd can be found at this address :
> http://www.worlddesign.com/index.cfm/rd/mta/spampd.htm
It looks nice. I would be happy to package it. However, glancing over
it, it doesn't seem very good for the productive en
For those running spamassassin and caring about performance, there is
another solution than running spamd daemon and running spamc for each email
to analyse.
There is a perl dameon called spampd that uses spamassassin Perl modules to
do the job, and it talks SMTP. This way no process needs to be
7 matches
Mail list logo
