On 05/08/12 18:39, John Kapnogiannis wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 1:36 PM, John Kapnogiannis wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Adrian Fita wrote:
>>> On 05/08/12 11:59, John Kapnogiannis wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
My problem on all this is that after a while my laptop starts to gain
On 05/08/12 15:42, Petr Voralek wrote:
>Hello!
>
>On 08/05/2012 12:10 PM, *Adrian Fita* wrote, and I quote (in part):
>
>> The best solution that I found was to downgrade to xorg 1.11 and hold
>> the packages from upgrading so I can use the fglrx driver. Some
>> instructions on how to do
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Adrian Fita wrote:
> On 05/08/12 11:59, John Kapnogiannis wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> My problem on all this is that after a while my laptop starts to gain
>> high temperature leading to a complete cut of power. Suppose this is a
>> failsafe method for it to avoid permane
On 05/08/12 11:59, John Kapnogiannis wrote:
[...]
> My problem on all this is that after a while my laptop starts to gain
> high temperature leading to a complete cut of power. Suppose this is a
> failsafe method for it to avoid permanent damage. I have searched but
> I have found no solution. An
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
> On 05/08/12 04:59 AM, John Kapnogiannis wrote:
>>
>> Hello. I own a dell studio 1555 laptop with an ATI Mobility Radeon HD
>> 4570 (RV710) gpu and I have problems configuring it. I recently found
>> out that support has been dropped from fglrx an
On 05/08/12 04:59 AM, John Kapnogiannis wrote:
Hello. I own a dell studio 1555 laptop with an ATI Mobility Radeon HD
4570 (RV710) gpu and I have problems configuring it. I recently found
out that support has been dropped from fglrx and that the only
solution for me is the open source radeon drive
Hello. I own a dell studio 1555 laptop with an ATI Mobility Radeon HD
4570 (RV710) gpu and I have problems configuring it. I recently found
out that support has been dropped from fglrx and that the only
solution for me is the open source radeon driver. Here's my story:
I edited the xorg.conf file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well let's try.
$ cd ~/fglrx-driver-debian-package/fglrx-driver-11-5
$ debuild
This will take some time, but it will produce the .debs in
~/fglrx-driver-debian-package. Please post any errors you may encounter.
If there are none, my congratulations
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
dch is basically an editor for debian/changelog.
Can you edit this file by hand and remove the '*' line?
- --
Best regards,
Panayiotis Karabassis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Moz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You don't need root priviliges to build a debian package. Use chown to
change the owner of fglrx-driver-debian-package and contents. If your
username is lina:
$ sudo chown -R lina:lina ~/fglrx-driver-debian-package
Please use dch to remove the 1:11-4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Step 4: Update the changelog
-
a) Install the package devscripts.
$ sudo apt-get install devscripts
b) Tell devscripts who you are:
$ export DEBEMAIL="${YOUR_EMAIL}"
$ export DEBFULLNAME="${YOUR_FULL_NAME}"
You can put t
exit 1 ; \
fi)
# Make sure the .run package is in the proper place,
# but first try to look in the "cache".
# For some reason wget refuses to clobber and restarts everytime.
# wget
www2.ati.com/drivers/linux/ati-driver-installer-11-5-x86.x86_64.run -c
- -O /tmp/ati-driver-inst
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/14/2011 05:11 PM, lina wrote:
> I am not sure in which directory,
Not important.
> :/var/local/cache/apt-build/buildATI/fglrx-driver-11-4/debian# apt-get
> build-dep fglrx-driver
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Read
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Haha, you almost got it.
The short version:
apt-get -t unstable source fglrx-driver
But you need the deb-src line in your sources.list. See my previous
message. Also please forget about dch for now, we need to do something
else first. My mistake!
W
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/14/2011 01:25 PM, lina wrote:
> # ls fglrx-driver_11-4
> fglrx-driver_11-4-2.debian.tar.gz fglrx-driver_11-4.orig.tar.bz2
> fglrx-driver_11-4-2.dsc
>
> and then?
You should have (if you ran apt-get source) or must create - by
extracting the .t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/14/2011 07:07 AM, lina wrote:
> :/etc/apt# more sources.list
> deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian sid main contrib non-free
> deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org wheezy main non-free
deb http://ftp.it.debian.org/debian/ sid main contrib non-f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/13/2011 08:12 PM, lina wrote:
> I am not a smart person at all.
Don't say that!!! Rather I suck at explaining! :-)
> I failed to catch the meaning of
> "modify it to reflect Stable's requirements", can you tell me a bit
> slowly.
Basically mod
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/13/2011 07:46 PM, lina wrote:
> That's very nice of you. If you'd like I wish you can tell me how to
> package it next time when it come out. I mean, the step.
1. You basically download the latest package source from Debian, say
Testing. You mod
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/13/2011 07:35 PM, lina wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do you still remember that one month ago you suggested me to post
> again in the middle of Jun about whether there is new version of ATI
> driver come out?
>
> in case you forg
Let me repeat: Some details may need tweaking. I am not sure if the
correct ati driver is still called "r128", and I think your video card
is not AGP, that may make some difference.
Look at your monitor's settings.
MAA
On 6/12/2010 3:25 PM, Mark Allums wrote:
You pasted
You pasted a version with both the vesa driver and the ati, and seem to
be commenting/uncommenting parts. Are there any differences beside the
driver?
Try replacing the relevant section of xorg.conf (XF86Config) with
something like the following (and make sure the ati x driver is
available)
On 06/11/2010 10:31 PM, Long Wind wrote:
the ati card is AGP
let me repeat my problem clearly
the card/driver work in etch with kernel 2.6
they work in sarge with kernel 2.4
but they don't work in etch with kernel 2.4
though x server does not change!
Then why not use a 2.6 kernel?
--
"There
the ati card is AGP
let me repeat my problem clearly
the card/driver work in etch with kernel 2.6
they work in sarge with kernel 2.4
but they don't work in etch with kernel 2.4
though x server does not change!
below is /etc/X11/xorg.conf
# /etc/X11/xorg.conf (xorg X Window System server config
On 6/11/2010 8:18 PM, Long Wind wrote:
Thank Mark Allums !
I use kernel 2.4 because of producer, a video capturing application
video capturing is hard to learn and config
As I'm happy with the old producer
I'm unwilling to spend more energy on learning/upgrading
My machine is HP vl420 running P
On 06/11/2010 08:18 PM, Long Wind wrote:
Thank Mark Allums !
I use kernel 2.4 because of producer, a video capturing application
video capturing is hard to learn and config
Are you implying that there's some specialized PCI card for which
there's no known 2.6 driver?
As I'm happy with the
Thank Mark Allums !
I use kernel 2.4 because of producer, a video capturing application
video capturing is hard to learn and config
As I'm happy with the old producer
I'm unwilling to spend more energy on learning/upgrading
My machine is HP vl420 running P4
with 128Mx3 memory
On 6/11/10, Mark
On 6/11/2010 7:54 PM, Mark Allums wrote:
On 6/11/2010 7:04 PM, Long Wind wrote:
My reason for using old s/w doesn't matter
There are plenty of reason for running old s/w
that's why archive.debian.org exists
not only to offer sarge
but potato and rex!
but a random check of a
few sites revea
On 6/11/2010 7:04 PM, Long Wind wrote:
My reason for using old s/w doesn't matter
There are plenty of reason for running old s/w
that's why archive.debian.org exists
not only to offer sarge
but potato and rex!
Yes. We don't need to know specific reasons. However, just knowing, as
an examp
On 06/11/2010 07:04 PM, Long Wind wrote:
My reason for using old s/w doesn't matter
Only if you're paying us lots of money for sustaining *really* way
past EOL kit.
But you aren't...
There are plenty of reason for running old s/w
that's why archive.debian.org exists
not only to offer sarg
My reason for using old s/w doesn't matter
There are plenty of reason for running old s/w
that's why archive.debian.org exists
not only to offer sarge
but potato and rex!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas.
On 6/11/2010 4:12 PM, Long Wind wrote:
I have HP VL420 and etch
ati rage 128 pro (or ultra?) works fine in kernel 2.6
but in kernel 2.4, it displays strangely
I have to return to text mode (Ctrl+Alt+F1) and reboot
and I have to use vesa driver in kernel 2.4
ati driver works fine in sarge
On 06/11/2010 04:12 PM, Long Wind wrote:
I have HP VL420 and etch
ati rage 128 pro (or ultra?) works fine in kernel 2.6
but in kernel 2.4, it displays strangely
I have to return to text mode (Ctrl+Alt+F1) and reboot
and I have to use vesa driver in kernel 2.4
ati driver works fine in sarge
I have HP VL420 and etch
ati rage 128 pro (or ultra?) works fine in kernel 2.6
but in kernel 2.4, it displays strangely
I have to return to text mode (Ctrl+Alt+F1) and reboot
and I have to use vesa driver in kernel 2.4
ati driver works fine in sarge, which use kernel 2.4
Can you help?
--
To
I installed the Catalyst driver (from manufacturer) for my ATI Radeon
HD 4550 card and it is working (X acceleration works, good resolution,
etc.) but I noticed something weird. Now when I move a window it no
longer shows the window static as it is being moved, it's like it
keeps redrawing it as I
In <49e7477f.07a5660a.2080.2...@mx.google.com>, Sthu Deus wrote:
>1. Where I can report the bug for the driver developers and not debian
>team - as the same I've seen in Fedora and kUbuntu?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/
I don't have an account, but when you start filing the bug it will probably
Good day.
I have problem with working of open ATI driver driver for X1100 on
laptop - when I switch to termial (console), I see white screen with
multiple vertical lines on it - until I switch back to X. - It is not
so with the closed ATI driver, or VESA. But I would use the open one.
So, my
--- On Fri, 11/28/08, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Ati driver stopped working after update
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Received: Friday, November 28, 2008, 12:58 PM
mk escreveu:
> Hello,
>
> Yesterday, I updated my flgrx drivers on Lenny, using synaptics. Now, the
> driver doesn't work. I had to go back to radeonhd driver to be able to use
> the system. Has anyone experienced similar glitches? Could anyone suggest a
> solution to this problem?
> Before the
Hello,
Yesterday, I updated my flgrx drivers on Lenny, using synaptics. Now, the
driver doesn't work. I had to go back to radeonhd driver to be able to use the
system. Has anyone experienced similar glitches? Could anyone suggest a
solution to this problem?
Before the update the driver worked f
Sorry, but this is Debian Mailinglist and a Ubuntu one...
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
24V Electronic Engineer
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
-
If you want to install ATI's proprietary driver you can follow
this guide:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/BinaryDriverHowto/ATI
-
Enviado desde Correo Yahoo!
El correo favori
with solution 1).
This is not the first time I encounter problems with the ATI driver from
xorg. I have a AMD64 system with an ATI Mobility Radeon 9200. The
xorg's ATI driver simply doesn't work at all. Only the driver from the
fglrx package seems to do the job...
Conclusion: the xorg AT
; Here is the relevant setting:
>
> CONFIG_DRM=y
> # CONFIG_DRM_TDFX is not set
> # CONFIG_DRM_R128 is not set
> # CONFIG_DRM_RADEON is not set
>
> Should I even disable CONFIG_DRM?
>
> Regards,
>
Build these as modules in order to have the choice to use the ati driver
a
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 03:37:21PM +0100, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> Since you are using a self compiled kernel could it be you built the
> radeon support into it?
> Look for DRM_RADEON in your kernel config file.
>
Here is the relevant setting:
CONFIG_DRM=y
# CONFIG_DRM_TDFX is not s
Since you are using a self compiled kernel could it be you built the
radeon support into it?
Look for DRM_RADEON in your kernel config file.
--
Regards,
Jörg-Volker.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 07:46:18PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> Like most other utilities, modprobe has a --verbose qualifier. Now,
> maybe it won't print anything more than what you now see, but maybe
> it will. Always use the --verbose qualifier.
>
You are right. It did not gi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/13/07 19:14, Sridhar M.A. wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 04:11:08PM +0100, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
[snip]
> # modprobe fglrx
> FATAL: Error inserting fglrx (/lib/modules/2.6.19-mas/misc/fglrx.ko):
> Operation not permitted
Like most other uti
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 04:11:08PM +0100, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
>
> Could it be that the radeon module is still loaded?
> What is the output of /sbin/lsmod ?
>
# lsmod
Module Size Used by
thermal14472 0
fan 4996 0
button
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
> Feb 13 06:54:40 kernel: [fglrx:firegl_init_module] *ERROR*
> firegl_stub_register failed
> FATAL: Error inserting fglrx (/lib/modules/2.6.19-mas/misc/fglrx.ko):
> Operation not permitted
...
Could it be that the radeon module is still loaded?
What is the output of /sb
I have a laptop with Ati Xpress 200 graphics (onboard) card. I am
trying to install the latest (8.33-6) driver from ati. Presently, I am
running debian testing with a self compiled kernel (2.6.19).
Everything goes well, debs are created and install without any problems.
But, when I try to modprobe
Mike & Erik
You guys rocks ! Thank you so much. I simply had to translate to zsh ;-P
Mathieu
On 8/9/06, Erik Steffl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mitch wrote:
> On 08/09/06 00:12 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Has anyone tried the new ati drive
Mitch wrote:
On 08/09/06 00:12 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Hello,
Has anyone tried the new ati driver installer. Here is what I did:
Well now all I get is: Mesa GLX Indirect (*). Is there a step that I
am missing ?
I use those drivers on two machines. I build my modules with make-kpkg
On 08/09/06 00:12 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Has anyone tried the new ati driver installer. Here is what I did:
>
> Well now all I get is: Mesa GLX Indirect (*). Is there a step that I
> am missing ?
>
I use those drivers on two machines. I build my module
Hello,
Has anyone tried the new ati driver installer. Here is what I did:
mkdir /tmp/ati
cd /tmp/ati
sudo apt-get install fakeroot gcc-3.4 module-assistant build-essential debhelper
fakeroot sh ./ati-driver-installer-8.27.10-x86.run --buildpkg Debian/testing
sudo dpkg -i fglrx*.deb
sudo
wehn wrote:
Changing to VESA driver makes it all usable again. I have a Compaq N160
laptop, with a "ATI Technologies, Inc. Radeon Mobility M6 LY"
Discovered that changing UseFBDev to false seems to fix things with the
ati driver. Hmm. strange.
Section "Device"
For a year or more I have noticed X freezes for 10-30 seconds on
changing screen modes or starting. I haven't bothered doing much to
investigate it since I don't Ctrl Alt +/- much, and can wait a bit on boot.
However it seems (on doing a testing update for the first time in
months) that recent
biosedit wrote:
> how can to install ati driver with gcc-4.0.2
> i am uses ati9600(RV350) and install driver 8.14.13
> with gcc3.4.3 kernel 2.6.8 the driver is work well
> but now i am update gcc to 4.0.2 kernel to 2.6.13 the driver is not work
> and can't install the driver
how can to install ati driver with gcc-4.0.2
i am uses ati9600(RV350) and install driver 8.14.13
with gcc3.4.3 kernel 2.6.8 the driver is work well
but now i am update gcc to 4.0.2 kernel to 2.6.13 the driver is not work
and can't install the driver
assuming new VMA API since we do have k
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 11:48 +0800, 张勇顺 wrote:
> hi
> first i am install ati driver8.14.13 in 2.6.8 with starge
> and uses work well
> but now i ues 2.6.13 kernel and gcc gcc version 4.0.2 (Debian 4.0.2-2)
> the driver is not work
> i am install driver
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mo
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 11:48:36AM +0800, 张勇顺 wrote:
> hi
> first i am install ati driver8.14.13 in 2.6.8 with starge
> and uses work well
> but now i ues 2.6.13 kernel and gcc gcc version 4.0.2 (Debian 4.0.2-2)
> the driver is not work
> i am install driver
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/lib/modules/fglrx/b
hi
first i am install ati driver8.14.13 in 2.6.8 with starge
and uses work well
but now i ues 2.6.13 kernel and gcc gcc version 4.0.2 (Debian 4.0.2-2)
the driver is not work
i am install driver
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod11:45:22# ./make.sh
gcc: couldn't run 'i486-linux-gnu-gcc-3
I am new to linux so please forgive me for this noob question. I have
installed the driver for my ati videocard I downloaded from ati.com but
I still can't change the resolution of the screen to anything higher
than 800*600 my friend has the same problem. How come that not even the
newest versions
Hi,
I'm new to linux, by the way I managed to install the driver for my ati
videocard(Ati radeon 9550 128mb), but I still cannot change the resolution
to anything higher than 800*600.
Look at /var/log/XFree86.0.log. If necessary post it here.
Florian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
Hi,
I'm new to linux, by the way I managed to install the driver for my ati
videocard(Ati radeon 9550 128mb), but I still cannot change the
resolution to anything higher than 800*600. -- Áron
Hello Li!
> I have installed Debian(sid) on my thinkpad T42.I want to install "fglrx"
> dirver for my ATI Mobility Radeon 9600.
>
> But when I type "debian -i fglrx-4-3-0_8.12.10-2_i386.deb",there is a error as
> below:
>
> (Reading database ... 105166 files and directories currently installed.)
On Thursday 16 June 2005 11:07 pm, Li Tian wrote:
> Hi,all
>
> I have installed Debian(sid) on my thinkpad T42.I want to install
> "fglrx"
> dirver for my ATI Mobility Radeon 9600.
> But when I type "debian -i fglrx-4-3-0_8.12.10-2_i386.deb",there is a
> error as below:
> (Reading data
Hi,all
I have installed Debian(sid) on my thinkpad T42.I want to install "fglrx" dirver for my ATI Mobility Radeon 9600.
But when I type "debian -i fglrx-4-3-0_8.12.10-2_i386.deb",there is a error as below:
(Reading database ... 105166 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking fglr
18
11:55:01) and thery seem to be printed even if there's no openGL app
running.
relevant system info:
debian unstable
kernel 2.6.9
Radeon 9800 Pro
ati driver: fglrx_4_3_0-8.10.19-1.i386.rpm (via alien)
more details: openGL used to work before last upgrade, no error
messages. It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
i had the same problem with my radeon 9000.
i looked at the output from "lspci" and changed the BusID in XF86Config-4 to the other
one from lspci.
cu Tommi
Marcus Lundblad wrote:
| By the way, about that message about "No device section finined for Bus
...i quite forgot:
i'm using debian unstable and a 2.6.6 kernel
--- Begin Message ---
i'm by no means an expert on things like these, but i successfully
managed to install a radeon 9600 with ati's proprietary drivers.
if that's what you want, i recommend the instructions on
http://xoomer.virgilio.i
i'm by no means an expert on things like these, but i successfully
managed to install a radeon 9600 with ati's proprietary drivers.
if that's what you want, i recommend the instructions on
http://xoomer.virgilio.it/flavio.stanchina/debian/fglrx-installer.html .
i had to compile the kernel modules a
By the way, about that message about "No device section finined for BussID
PCI:1:0:1,
I tried to add that to the device section in the XFree86 config file, but
then it bails out on not finding a device section for BusID PCI:1:0:0.
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Marcus Lundblad wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have b
Hi!
I have been struggling for 3 weeks to get my Radeon 9600 working.
I'm running Sarge and kernel 2.6.6
I've installed the drivers from ATI and compiled the kernel module (fglrx)
and it loads correctly (as shown from lsmod).
The logs shows this:
-
Sounds like what the doctor ordered. Read over the man page but do not
understand which commands to use. I want to install the
xlibmesa-gl1-dri-mach64 or the flgr equivalent without having apt-get remove
half my system :-).
On Monday 29 March 2004 09:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Actually the
On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 05:42, Nicos Gollan wrote:
> After installing the ATI fglrx driver and modifying the xlibmesa-gl-dev
> package not to depend on a specific version of xlibmesa-gl, each time I
> want to dist-upgrade, a new version of xlibmesa-gl-dev is to be
> installed and apt wants to remove
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 12:42:28PM +0200, Nicos Gollan wrote:
> After installing the ATI fglrx driver and modifying the xlibmesa-gl-dev
> package not to depend on a specific version of xlibmesa-gl, each time I
> want to dist-upgrade, a new version of xlibmesa-gl-dev is to be
> installed and apt wan
After installing the ATI fglrx driver and modifying the xlibmesa-gl-dev
package not to depend on a specific version of xlibmesa-gl, each time I
want to dist-upgrade, a new version of xlibmesa-gl-dev is to be
installed and apt wants to remove the fglrx package.
How do I tell apt that it can shove x
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 11:19:08PM +0100, Nicos Gollan wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 20:52:52 +
> Antony Gelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (EE) fglrx(0): [agp] unable to acquire AGP, error "xf86_ENOMEM"
> > (EE) fglrx(0): cannot init AGP
> > (II) fglrx(0): [drm] removed 1 reserved context fo
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 01:47:40PM -0800, Erik Steffl wrote:
> Antony Gelberg wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I'm trying to move from the OS radeon driver to the ATI fglrx one, to
> >get better 3D support. I've built the module and installed it, but 3D
> >performance is no better. fglrxinfo says:
> >
>
Antony Gelberg wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to move from the OS radeon driver to the ATI fglrx one, to
get better 3D support. I've built the module and installed it, but 3D
performance is no better. fglrxinfo says:
display: :0.0 screen: 0
OpenGL vendor string: Mesa project: www.mesa3d.org
I thin
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 20:52:52 +
Antony Gelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (EE) fglrx(0): [agp] unable to acquire AGP, error "xf86_ENOMEM"
> (EE) fglrx(0): cannot init AGP
> (II) fglrx(0): [drm] removed 1 reserved context for kernel
> (II) fglrx(0): [drm] unmapping 8192 bytes of SAREA 0xe0996000
Antony Gelberg wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to move from the OS radeon driver to the ATI fglrx one, to
get better 3D support. I've built the module and installed it, but 3D
performance is no better. fglrxinfo says:
Why? I get 25% better performance with DRI drivers on my Radeon 9000.
-Roberto
p
Hi all,
I'm trying to move from the OS radeon driver to the ATI fglrx one, to
get better 3D support. I've built the module and installed it, but 3D
performance is no better. fglrxinfo says:
display: :0.0 screen: 0
OpenGL vendor string: Mesa project: www.mesa3d.org
OpenGL renderer string: Mesa
> I just got my brand new PCI Radeon 7000. I popped it in and it booted
> However, X won't use the ati driver. It keeps saying no devices found. I
> can get it to at least
> start if I use the ati driver with framebuffer disabled, but then it spews
> garbage on the screen
&
Have you tried the radeonfb driver?
...mjb
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 19:47, Finny Merrill wrote:
> I just got my brand new PCI Radeon 7000. I popped it in and it booted
> (thank god, I've had much
> worse happen).
>
> However, X won't use the ati driver. It keeps saying n
I just got my brand new PCI Radeon 7000. I popped it in and it booted
(thank god, I've had much
worse happen).
However, X won't use the ati driver. It keeps saying no devices found. I
can get it to at least
start if I use the ati driver with framebuffer disabled, but then it spews
On Sunday 09 February 2003 01:06 pm, Virginia Escuder wrote:
> Hello,
> The attached text file is the output from the XF86Config-4 utility.
> We have the Card called: ATI Tech INc. Rage 128 Pro TF and this one seems
> not to be in the the list attempted by the installation (in the text).
> Monitor
usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libxie.a
(II) Module xie: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
compiled for 4.1.0.1, module version = 1.0.0
Module class: XFree86 Server Extension
ABI class: XFree86 Server Extension, version 0.1
(II) Loading extension XIE
(II) LoadModule: &qu
Hi yall,
well, I fixed problem two, by checking the syntax closely, of the
"make.sh" file & found the drm file name it was looking for & then
included the path to that file in the "drmincludes=/"
This location, was effected by using Trunk-dri stuff from the dri
sourcforge
Progress.
Hi all & Nikita,
thanx man, it fixed that problem, by installing the "headers" & then
pointing make.sh to them, only to produce a new error message
Error:
XFree86 drm includes at
/usr/src/kernel-headers-2.4.18-bf2.4/include/../drivers/char/drm do not
fit this driver.
This driver is desig
#include
* Nikita V. Youshchenko [Fri, Nov 22 2002, 11:15:24AM]:
> > kernel includes at /usr/src/linux/include not found or incomplete
> > file: /usr/src/linux/include/linux/version.h
> > haralambos:/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod#
> >
>
> The mentioned file is auto-generated on kernel build.
> So
>
> Hi yall,
>
> I am trying to install the new ATI stuff & get the following error
> message
>
>
> haralambos:/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod# ./make.sh
> ATI module generator V 2.0
> ==
> kernel includes at /usr/src/linux/include not found or incomplete
> file: /usr/s
Hi yall,
I am trying to install the new ATI stuff & get the following error
message
haralambos:/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod# ./make.sh
ATI module generator V 2.0
==
kernel includes at /usr/src/linux/include not found or incomplete
file: /usr/src/linux/include/linux/
93 matches
Mail list logo
