On Sun, 09 Sep 2012 16:44:35 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Sep 2012 10:27:50 -0400 (EDT), Camaleón wrote:
>> On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 16:19:17 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
>>> I said the computer was new TO ME. I never said it was NEW. This is a
>>> server machine literally thrown away by
On Sun, 2012-09-09 at 19:16 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 04:24:00PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> >
> > I wonder why people is so reluctant about installing packages from the
> > outside when this involves upstream projects which are well-known and
> > trustworthy :-?
>
>
On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 16:19 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
> > I will add this one:
> >
> > http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/DriTroubleshooting
>
> I can't seem to connect to the site right now. I get a
> "503 Service Unavailable". I'll try again later.
It's up now.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sun, 09 Sep 2012 19:16:47 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 04:24:00PM +, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> I wonder why people is so reluctant about installing packages from the
>> outside when this involves upstream projects which are well-known and
>> trustworthy :-?
>
> It a
On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 16:19:17 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 12:24:00 -0400 (EDT), Camaleón wrote:
>> ...
>> the VGA chipset is about 8 years (or so) old so don't expect
>> astonishing results :-)
>
> I said the computer was new TO ME. I never said it was NEW. This is a
> serv
Am Samstag, 8. September 2012 schrieb Stephen Powell:
> On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 12:24:00 -0400 (EDT), Camaleón wrote:
> > ...
> > the VGA chipset is about 8 years (or so) old so
> > don't expect astonishing results :-)
>
> I said the computer was new TO ME. I never said it was NEW.
> This is a serve
Am Samstag, 8. September 2012 schrieb Stephen Powell:
> On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 13:18:43 -0400 (EDT), Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > Is that chip on a graphics card?
>
> No, it is built into the motherboard.
Is this a server board?
What do you want to use it for?
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - h
On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 04:24:00PM +, Camaleón wrote:
>
> I wonder why people is so reluctant about installing packages from the
> outside when this involves upstream projects which are well-known and
> trustworthy :-?
It adds another layer of unnecessary complexity. If you can do
everythin
On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 13:18:43 -0400 (EDT), Martin Steigerwald wrote:
>
> Is that chip on a graphics card?
No, it is built into the motherboard.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubsc
On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 12:24:00 -0400 (EDT), Camaleón wrote:
> ...
> the VGA chipset is about 8 years (or so) old so
> don't expect astonishing results :-)
I said the computer was new TO ME. I never said it was NEW.
This is a server machine literally thrown away by a business.
But it is now the mos
Am Samstag, 8. September 2012 schrieb Stephen Powell:
> Hello, list. I've recently installed Debian Wheezy on a "new" (to me)
> computer with an ATI Rage XL video chip. Here is an excerpt from
> the output of "lspci -nn -vv". (Line wraps have been inserted to
&
On 08/09/12 11:13 AM, Stephen Powell wrote:
Hello, list. I've recently installed Debian Wheezy on a "new" (to me)
computer with an ATI Rage XL video chip. Here is an excerpt from
the output of "lspci -nn -vv". (Line wraps have been inserted to
keep well within the
On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 11:13:53 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
> Hello, list. I've recently installed Debian Wheezy on a "new" (to me)
> computer with an ATI Rage XL video chip. Here is an excerpt from the
> output of "lspci -nn -vv". (Line wraps have been
Hello, list. I've recently installed Debian Wheezy on a "new" (to me)
computer with an ATI Rage XL video chip. Here is an excerpt from
the output of "lspci -nn -vv". (Line wraps have been inserted to
keep well within the customary 80-column limit.)
05:03.0 VGA co
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:31:33 -0400, co...@esid.gecgr.co.cu wrote in
message
<4ae059fcfc262fd39f8bd71a9798a9a2.squir...@sax.esid.gecgr.co.cu>:
> Hello
>
> I use Debian Squeeze
>
>
> Where I can find drivers for ATI Rage 128 PF / PRO AGP 4x TMDS for
> Linux??
..e.g.
On 21/09/11 08:31, co...@esid.gecgr.co.cu wrote:
> Hello
>
> I use Debian Squeeze
>
>
> Where I can find drivers for ATI Rage 128 PF / PRO AGP 4x TMDS for Linux??
>
> At AMD, there is nothing of this.
AMD?
Do you mean ATI?
>
>
> I tried with 2 ATI cards and
Hello
I use Debian Squeeze
Where I can find drivers for ATI Rage 128 PF / PRO AGP 4x TMDS for Linux??
At AMD, there is nothing of this.
I tried with 2 ATI cards and I want to work the TV but I have not done
anything:
1 - R200 BB [Radeon All in Wonder 8500DV]
2 - Rage 128 PF / PRO AGP 4x
Jude DaShiell wrote:
> Several times I've tried to configure X and failed. The complaints
> now are that a device is missing from the /etc/x11.xorg.conf file at
> least one must be present and another part of the error message says
> no screens can be found. It makes no difference whether I use t
Several times I've tried to configure X and failed. The complaints now
are that a device is missing from the /etc/x11.xorg.conf file at least one
must be present and another part of the error message says no screens can
be found. It makes no difference whether I use the frame buffer or
monito
> > > > > 1) For some cards there is a command available to switch LCD and
> > > > >external video on and off. Using ACPI and a bit of scripting you
> > > > > can
> > > > >even assign this to special keys.
> > > >
&g
d
> > > >external video on and off. Using ACPI and a bit of scripting you can
> > > >even assign this to special keys.
> > >
> > > Does anyone know how to do this with an ATI Rage graphicscard? What
> > > packet to install? What command to
can
> > >even assign this to special keys.
> >
> > Does anyone know how to do this with an ATI Rage graphicscard? What
> > packet to install? What command to use?
>
>
>
> On my laptop's ATI M200 graphics card, I use the fglrx-control GUI to do this
might work:
>
> 1) For some cards there is a command available to switch LCD and
>external video on and off. Using ACPI and a bit of scripting you can
>even assign this to special keys.
Does anyone know how to do this with an ATI Rage graphicscard? What
packet to install? What co
On Thursday 29 December 2005 05:33,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >There are debian packages which are more up-to-date than those sited
> > above. Add to your sources.list:
> >#new DRI locations?
> >deb http://www.nixnuts.net/files/ ./
> >deb-src http://www.nixnuts.net/files/ ./
> >
> >There are thre
On Wednesday 28 December 2005 00:24,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Mark Grieveson wrote:
> > Hello. Is it possible for me to enable 3d acceleration with the hardware
> > I have? Right now, there is absolutely no 3d acceleration. I feel that
> > if it was present, e
n 5.0 seconds = 120.000 FPS
I think I am close to achieving 3d acceleration, but not quite there yet
(unless this is the best a Mach 64 video card can do). If people have
any further hints on getting 3d acceleration for a Mach 64 ATI rage pro,
I definitely appreciate it.
Below is the result o
On Wednesday 28 December 2005 00:24,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Mark Grieveson wrote:
> > Hello. Is it possible for me to enable 3d acceleration with the hardware
> > I have? Right now, there is absolutely no 3d acceleration. I feel that
> > if it was present, even though my hardware is old, I at
Philip Christian wrote:
I still cannot watch DVD movies. I can hear the audio
but I get xvideo errors and a blank screen.
I can watch divx movies fine.
Have other people got DVD playback working with Rage
128 based cards ?
It works for me with ogle, on stock sarge.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Philip Christian wrote:
>I still cannot watch DVD movies. I can hear the audio
>but I get xvideo errors and a blank screen.
>
>I can watch divx movies fine.
>
>Have other people got DVD playback working with Rage
>128 based cards ?
>
>I have tried ogle (crashes) and kaffeine(audio only).
>Both giv
I still cannot watch DVD movies. I can hear the audio
but I get xvideo errors and a blank screen.
I can watch divx movies fine.
Have other people got DVD playback working with Rage
128 based cards ?
I have tried ogle (crashes) and kaffeine(audio only).
Both give the same xvid errors.
Thanks, Ph
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 11:40:39PM -0800, Ken Bloom wrote:
> I recently (last week) figured out how to configure my computer's ATI
> Rage 128 card to work with DRI and use 3D acceleration. I have a
> problem now that if I let xscreensaver launch and start doing
> screen savers,
I recently (last week) figured out how to configure my computer's ATI
Rage 128 card to work with DRI and use 3D acceleration. I have a
problem now that if I let xscreensaver launch and start doing
screen savers, eventually one of the OpenGL screensavers will
completely lock up my screen (I
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 11:20, George App wrote:
> How do you configure opengl support for debian? I am currently running
> sarge and my computer has a ATI rage 128 video card.
I presume by sarge you mean the testing distribution, with XFree86 4.2.
You need to configure XFree86 to load bo
How do you configure opengl support for debian? I am currently running sarge and
my computer has a ATI rage 128 video card.
-- G.A
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone have managed to enable dri with Ati rage mobility M1 or similar
(its a rage 128).
I loaded the dri module under X and have mtrr, drm, agpart in the kernel
but keep getting the message
Xlib: extension "XFree86-DRI" missing on display ":0.0".
I load the following module
Anyone have any experience with using a frame buffer for ati rage
mobility video card, is it supported at all?
The only one that seems to be recognise is the mach64 frame buffer
(atyfb) but it doesn't function properly.
When I build it as a module and insert it on the console I lose all te
ATY128=y (under character devices ATI
Rage 128) and adding something along the lines of
append="video=aty128fb:[EMAIL PROTECTED]" to lilo. This will give you a decent
resolution. Otherwise, put vga=ask in your lilo and follow the prompts to
figure out what to replace the "ask" with
On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 20:44, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> I'm encountering a few problems with this product - on two different
> machines (with the same kind of video card)
>
> In MODCONF, there's an option for framebuffers. If I choose to install
> the Rage 128 - my screen goes "nuts". If I memori
I'm encountering a few problems with this product - on two different
machines (with the same kind of video card)
In MODCONF, there's an option for framebuffers. If I choose to install
the Rage 128 - my screen goes "nuts". If I memorized the keystrokes, I
can remove the framebuffer module and get
Quoting Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 06:58:49PM +0100, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
> > Quoting Jean-Marc Liotier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Now my question : when will a version of XFree equal or
> > > posterior to 4.2.1-11 hit Sid ? Is there somewhere I
> > > can find
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 06:58:49PM +0100, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
> Quoting Jean-Marc Liotier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Now my question : when will a version of XFree equal or posterior to
> > 4.2.1-11 hit Sid ? Is there somewhere I can find it even before ?
>
> I tried to have a look in incoming
Quoting Jean-Marc Liotier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Now my question : when will a version of XFree equal or posterior to
> 4.2.1-11 hit Sid ? Is there somewhere I can find it even before ?
I tried to have a look in incoming.debian.org but XFree was not there. Is it
reasonnable to install the binar
Running XFree 4.2.1-5 from Sid on an Inspiron 4000 with a Rage 128 M3 onboard.
X won't start. Here is the unusual stuff I have in /var/log/XFree86.0.log :
Symbol drmFreeBufs from module
/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved!
Symbol drmFreeBufs from module
/usr/X1
Can someone please tell me what the options for Direct Rendering Manger
and Video under modconf are for?
Specifically, when utilizing an ATI card. If I enable the ATI under
Direct Rendering Manager, it doesn’t seem to make much difference. But
if I enable the ATI under the Video drive
On Saturday 18 Jan 2003 12:00 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> perhaps glx gears is designed to run in software
No it isnt. If you X is in anything other thatn 16bpp then you 3d acceleration
will be shite with this card.
The simple test is to run glxinfo and see if you have the line:
Direct Rende
HI,
I have a sony vaio laptop pcg-fxa36 aka fx405 .
I think it has ATI Rage Mobility M1 graphics chip .
so I downloaded Mach64 version of DRI binaries.
untared it in X11R6 directory and did the installation
.
it seemed to have installed ok, but when I rebooted,
there was no 3D accerelation.
I ran
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 23:51, Sorin MANOLESCU wrote:
> The summary of the problems is as follows:
> I can not get, under X Windows, both 3D acceleration and xawtv, at
> the same time.
>
> - I mean, when I have 3D acceleration, if I start xawtv, m
mented, (??) unknown.
(==) ServerLayout "Simple Layout"
(**) |-->Screen "Screen 1" (0)
(**) | |-->Monitor "Philips 15A"
(**) | |-->Device "ATI Rage Fury 32Mb"
(**) |-->Input Device "Mouse1"
(**) |-->Input Device "Keyboard1"
mented, (??) unknown.
(==) ServerLayout "Simple Layout"
(**) |-->Screen "Screen 1" (0)
(**) | |-->Monitor "Philips 15A"
(**) | |-->Device "ATI Rage Fury 32Mb"
(**) |-->Input Device "Mouse1"
(**) |-->Input Device "Keyboard1"
Hi.
I have motherboard on VIA chipset (via vt82c866a).
Video card ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage Pro AGP 1X/2X.
And I see message when system setup:
Linux agpgart interface v0.99 (c) Jeff Hartmann
agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 203M
agpgart: Unsupported Via chipset (device id: 06
Egor Tur wrote on Saturday, September 21st 2002 at 00.20 h (+0300):
> Hi Folks!
> I have ati rage iIIc graphics controller, 2M memory. I use "ati"
> driver. Now I have only 800x600 resolution & 24 bit depth. I want to
> use 1024x768 resolution. How can I p
Hi Folks!
I have ati rage iIIc graphics controller, 2M memory.
I use "ati" driver. Now I have only 800x600 resolution & 24 bit depth.
I want to use 1024x768 resolution. How can I possibly do it?
I try this resolution with other depth (8, 16, 15) & I hav only black screen.
I f
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 07:52:55AM +0100, Peter Whysall wrote:
>
> I've had success using this mirror:
>
> deb ftp://ftp.nlc.no/pub/debian/x4.2 sid/$(ARCH)/
I get the same error there; "no such file or directory" for the package
listing.
I think it's not a mirror problem so much as ignorance on
On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 00:29, Michael Jinks wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 11:15:05AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> >
> > If you're on the verge of doing 2, it might be better to help test
> > Branden's 4.2 packages. Mirrors are listed here:
> >
> >
> > http://www.debianplanet.org/article.php?
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 11:15:05AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> If you're on the verge of doing 2, it might be better to help test
> Branden's 4.2 packages. Mirrors are listed here:
>
> http://www.debianplanet.org/article.php?sid=696&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0
Trying to do this and running
Quoting Omen Wild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, Jun 26 12:13:
>
[ snip ]
> I just cannot use the DRM 4.1 kernel driver for the Rage
> 128 or X locks up. Now that I think about it, using the kernel 4.1
> driver with X 4.2 seems like it could be a bad idea...
[ snip ]
Hmmm, talking to myself again.
Quoting Michael Jinks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, Jun 26 10:42:
>
> > 2. Download the binary distribution of XFree86 4.2 and install this over
> > your Debian install.
I'm jumping in a little late in this discussion, but I just solved this
problem on the Dell Optiplex GX240 with a ATI Technologies
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 10:22:36AM +0100, Peter Whysall wrote:
>
> I have one of these on my desk at work, it's running Sid/Windows XP. The ATI
> card is a strange Rage 128 Ultra TF, which isn't even listed on ATI's web
> site. I'm guessing that it's an OEM Spesh for Dell.
Figures...
> 1. use th
Colin Watson writes:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 10:22:36AM +0100, Peter Whysall wrote:
You have two options.
1. use the "vesa" driver and live with extremely shonky video performance.
2. Download the binary distribution of XFree86 4.2 and install this over
your Debian install.
If you're on the
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 10:22:36AM +0100, Peter Whysall wrote:
> You have two options.
>
> 1. use the "vesa" driver and live with extremely shonky video performance.
> 2. Download the binary distribution of XFree86 4.2 and install this over
> your Debian install.
If you're on the verge of doing 2
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Jinks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Helgi ?rn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Carlos Sousa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Debian User List"
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:59 PM
Subject: Re: ATI Rage 128 and XFr
on
You could also try without FBdev.
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 07:35:01PM +0200, Ernst-Magne Vindal wrote:
> >
> > I don't know if you are running laptop or not, but I have two different
> > laptops (an old compac armada and a new ibm thinkpadx20) with ati rage
> >
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 07:35:01PM +0200, Ernst-Magne Vindal wrote:
>
> I don't know if you are running laptop or not, but I have two different
> laptops (an old compac armada and a new ibm thinkpadx20) with ati rage
> mobility and x4.1 and -2 with no problems. I also have a sta
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 05:41:43PM +0200, Helgi ?rn wrote:
> >
> Is this on a laptop too? In Michaels case I think it was a laptop.
FYI no, it's a Dell Optiplex GX240. Mini desktop, video on the
motherboard.
-mrj
--
# Michael Jinks, IB # JFI/MRSEC/EFI Computing # University of Chicago #
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 07:00:14PM -0500, Steven A. Reisman wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 06:24:59PM -0500, Michael Jinks wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 08:41:06PM +0200, Helgi ?rn Helgason wrote:
> > >
> > > Section "Device"
> > > I
On Sat, 2002-06-22 at 22:26, Walter Reed wrote:
OK
Didn't know that Ati Rage Mobility was a mach64 chip, so that's
interesting info.
Anyway, I have it successfully used it at both woody and sid, and the
current installation on the x20 is woody, with a few sid packages :)
/ernst
>
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 07:35:01PM +0200, Ernst-Magne Vindal wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-06-22 at 17:41, Helgi Örn wrote:
>
> Hi
> I don't know if you are running laptop or not, but I have two different
> laptops (an old compac armada and a new ibm thinkpadx20) with ati rage
> m
On Sat, 2002-06-22 at 17:41, Helgi Örn wrote:
Hi
I don't know if you are running laptop or not, but I have two different
laptops (an old compac armada and a new ibm thinkpadx20) with ati rage
mobility and x4.1 and -2 with no problems. I also have a stationary, but
as "Driver" I use
On Sat, 2002-06-22 at 13:47, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> I have a similar problem with my ATI Rage 128 card, there's no way to
> make it work automatically with the r128 X driver (XFree 4.1.0).
>
> I googled the net and found a suggestion to use a ChipID line. My config
I had to ftp to the Xfree site and download 4.2 for my Rage 128 agp
card. Have not had a problem with it at all. let me know if you want my
config.
Larry
On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 12:58, Michael Jinks wrote:
> A group of my users have bought a big batch of Dell desktops with what
> appears to be an A
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 18:24:59 -0500 Michael Jinks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 08:41:06PM +0200, Helgi ?rn Helgason wrote:
> >
> > Section "Device"
> > Identifier "Ati Rage 128"
> > VideoRam
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 11:58:22AM -0500, Michael Jinks wrote:
> My usual process for getting acquainted with new hardware is to start by
> installing RedHat, archive /etc, install Debian, and then crib from the
> RedHat /etc for those bits of hardware that Debian doesn't autodetect.
> In the prese
the final "No devices detected."
>
> ?
[snip]
> Fatal server error:
> no screens found
How does the Screen section of the file look like? Is the Device there,
something like this:
Section "Screen"
Identifier "Default Screen"
Device
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 08:41:06PM +0200, Helgi ?rn Helgason wrote:
>
> Section "Device"
> Identifier "Ati Rage 128"
> VideoRam8192
> Driver "r128"
> Option "dpms"
> EndSection
nary box, it took a while to
tweak it in Woody and yes it was hard to believe that it would ever work
with the r128 driver, but in the end I copied some lines from a SuSE 8.0
file. Here's how it looks in my XF86Config-4 file:
---
Section "Device"
Identifier "Ati Ra
A group of my users have bought a big batch of Dell desktops with what
appears to be an ATI chipset soldered to the motherboard for video.
My usual process for getting acquainted with new hardware is to start by
installing RedHat, archive /etc, install Debian, and then crib from the
RedHat /etc
eems happy. You may have to
restart the machine; as I recall there was some compliant about the DRM
module version number after the upgrade and reinstall.
TRS
Graham Williams wrote:
Running Debian unstable up to date installation, Kernel 2.4.18.
Trying to get XFree86 on an ATI Rage 128
Running Debian unstable up to date installation, Kernel 2.4.18.
Trying to get XFree86 on an ATI Rage 128 Ultra Pro II.
Works just fine on a RedHat XFree86 4.1 installation. But can't get it
going with XFree86 4.1 on Debian. Seems that it is not supported under
4.1 but is on 4.2? Not sure w
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 16:18, Scott Henson wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 01:15, Peter Whysall wrote:
>
> > PS. Anyone have any clues as to why the disk performance on this box is
> > slow? This manifested itself on 2.2.19, 2.2.20, and 2.4.18. Very boggy
> > at times.
> I find all the debian kernel
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 01:15, Peter Whysall wrote:
> PS. Anyone have any clues as to why the disk performance on this box is
> slow? This manifested itself on 2.2.19, 2.2.20, and 2.4.18. Very boggy
> at times.
I find all the debian kernel packages slow on my machine. I think this
is because of how
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 07:46, Kent West wrote:
> Peter Whysall wrote:
> >What I /would/ appreciate is any clue on getting the Rage 128 to work
> >with XFree86 4.1 so I can stay Debianized?
> >
> If you're willing to try, I'd recommend copying your working
> XF86Config-4 file to a safe place, then r
Peter Whysall wrote:
"No screens found."
Sigh.
I broke. I sinned.
I downloaded the Linux binary distribution of XFree86 4.2.0, renamed
/etc/X11 and /usr/X11R6 out of the way, ran Xinstall.sh, and it worked
first time, giving me glorious 1280x1024x32bpp loveliness.
What I /would/ apprec
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 14:15, Peter Whysall wrote:
> PS. Anyone have any clues as to why the disk performance on this box is
> slow? This manifested itself on 2.2.19, 2.2.20, and 2.4.18. Very boggy
> at times.
DMA on IDE transfers not switched on?
When the disk is being hammered, is CPU usage goin
I decided to partition my work W2K machine (Dell Optiplex GX240 - 1.7GHz
P4, 256MB, the aforementioned ATI Rage 128 thingy) and install Debian.
Thought, "Hmm, this is a nice modern machine. Should be a doddle."
Ho ho. What a jape I was in for.
Installation went fine, a little da
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 01:21:50PM +0100, Hans Ekbrand wrote:
> > Sorry I wasn't clearer. I don't want to give up accelerated video
> > under X which I would have to do if I go the fb route, as I
> > understand it. But maybe I'm missing something.
>
> If you think that using framebuffers for
; > a video cards in the ATI Rage 128 series? I recently changed from
> > > an S3 card to the 128 Pro but can't figure out what settings to use
> > > now. I'd hate to part with the higher resolutions. (I can't find
> > > anything decent in the alternat
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 12:28:25AM +0100, Hans Ekbrand wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 04:11:15PM -0600, Curt Daugaard wrote:
> > Has anyone on the list had any luck in configuring svgatextmode with
> > a video cards in the ATI Rage 128 series? I recently changed from
> >
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 04:11:15PM -0600, Curt Daugaard wrote:
> Has anyone on the list had any luck in configuring svgatextmode with
> a video cards in the ATI Rage 128 series? I recently changed from
> an S3 card to the 128 Pro but can't figure out what settings to use
> now.
Has anyone on the list had any luck in configuring svgatextmode with
a video cards in the ATI Rage 128 series? I recently changed from
an S3 card to the 128 Pro but can't figure out what settings to use
now. I'd hate to part with the higher resolutions. (I can't find
anythin
Although this is late, I found the following website was extremely
useful in setting up my ATI Xpert 2000 card (AGP). This card uses an
ATI Rage 128 chip set
http://two.ucdavis.edu/~holland/unix/xpert2000.html
Although I am not a graphics card expert (no pun intended), it appears
that the XF86
On Wednesday 27 February 2002 07:42, Bill Triplett wrote:
> am not an expert, but barring the lack of any other useful advice to
> your question, it looks to me like the Rage 128 Pro TF chipset (from
> lspci) is not listed in the supported chipsets in the logfile. Check the
> XFree86 website and se
On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 11:33, Rainer Sigl wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a problem working with my ATI Rage 128 PRO TF card on my
> new DELL machine with a new Installation of Debian Linux and Xfree86-4
>
> Output of lspc :
>
> [ snip ]
>
> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: AT
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Rainer Sigl wrote:
> I have a problem working with my ATI Rage 128 PRO TF card on my
> new DELL machine with a new Installation of Debian Linux and Xfree86-4
Read your own posting! I quote:
> Logfile:
> This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supp
Hi,
I have a problem working with my ATI Rage 128 PRO TF card on my
new DELL machine with a new Installation of Debian Linux and Xfree86-4
Output of lspc :
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82845 845 (Brookdale) Chipset Host Bridge
(rev 03)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82845 845 (Brookdale
On Monday 03 December 2001 01:16 pm, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 10:27:33AM +0200, Dragos
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > hello,
> > I have the opportunity to buy an ATI RAGE FURRY MAXX card, and I'd like
> > to
>
> ...soft-focus, high-performan
on Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 10:27:33AM +0200, Dragos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> hello,
> I have the opportunity to buy an ATI RAGE FURRY MAXX card, and I'd like to
...soft-focus, high-performance, video?
--
Karsten M. Selfhttp://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What part of "Ge
hello,
I have the opportunity to buy an ATI RAGE FURRY MAXX card, and I'd like to
know if there is support for it in xfree (I understand that's based on rage
128 fury chip);
I want to know whether I'll have 2D&3D acceleration, and if there are
problems with the two-chip ren
Thus spake Stan Brown:
> I have a machine with an ATI Rage 128 video card. This machine has potato +
> Progeny + 2.4.13 kernel. I have manged to get frambuffer working, but I
> can't figure out how to use anything other than the default resolution/font
> size. I managed to amk
I have a machine with an ATI Rage 128 video card. This machine has potato +
Progeny + 2.4.13 kernel. I have manged to get frambuffer working, but I
can't figure out how to use anything other than the default resolution/font
size. I managed to amke it use a higher denisty font briefly, during
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 03:41:53PM -0400 or thereabouts, Stephen Gran wrote:
> First you have to double check with ATI - http:www.support.ati.com - to make
> sure that this is right, but I believe it uses the xserver-mach64
> server. Just apt-get install, and change your lines in XF86Config to
It
1 - 100 of 203 matches
Mail list logo
