Reco wrote:
> Please don't do so. Ssh only provides SOCKS4 proxy, and SOCKS4 can not tunnel
> DNS requests (or any UDP traffic for that matter).
How old is your information on that? Even in Squeeze the man-page for
ssh says:
,
| Currently the SOCKS4 and SOCKS5 protocols are supported, and s
Hi.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:36:37AM +0200, Frederic Marchal wrote:
> On Friday 19 June 2015 11:01:25 Reco wrote:
>
> > Hi.
>
> >
>
> > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 09:13:42AM +0200, Frederic Marchal wrote:
>
> > > On Friday 19 June 2015 09:24:34 Reco wrote:
>
> > > > On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 18:20:
On Friday 19 June 2015 11:01:25 Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 09:13:42AM +0200, Frederic Marchal wrote:
> > On Friday 19 June 2015 09:24:34 Reco wrote:
> > > On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 18:20:25 -0500
> > > Richard Owlett wrote:
> > > > Mike McClain wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 11:01:25 +0300
Reco wrote:
> >
> > When network.proxy.socks_remote_dns is set to true, the DNS
> > requests are sent through the SOCKS connection and delivered to
> > your computer at home (which ultimately is sent to your ISP but you
> > already thrust it with that informat
Hi.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 09:13:42AM +0200, Frederic Marchal wrote:
> On Friday 19 June 2015 09:24:34 Reco wrote:
>
> > Hi.
>
> >
>
> > On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 18:20:25 -0500
>
> >
>
> > Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> > > Mike McClain wrote:
>
> > > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:22:37PM -0500, Ri
On Friday 19 June 2015 09:24:34 Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 18:20:25 -0500
>
> Richard Owlett wrote:
> > Mike McClain wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:22:37PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > >> Scarletdown wrote:
> > >>> How about a portable wireless hotspot device and ser
Hi.
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 18:20:25 -0500
Richard Owlett wrote:
> Mike McClain wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:22:37PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >> Scarletdown wrote:
> >>> How about a portable wireless hotspot device and service?
> >>
> >> I was leaning away from that solution - unsure
Mike McClain wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:22:37PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
Scarletdown wrote:
How about a portable wireless hotspot device and service?
I was leaning away from that solution - unsure of security
implications when using personal hotspot.
The
way I understand how thos
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:22:37PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> Scarletdown wrote:
> >How about a portable wireless hotspot device and service?
>
> I was leaning away from that solution - unsure of security
> implications when using personal hotspot.
>
> >The
> >way I understand how those work, y
re good on multiple bands, and others which are tied to
a specific carrier.
LTE is often called 4G. Advanced CDMA and GSM services (high
speed, relatively) are called 3G. Basic CDMA and GSM services
are only slightly faster than a 56K modem, and are called 2G.
You might want to look at T-Mo
Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one physical
location.
You're in the US?
Yes
I
Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one physical
location.
You're in the US?
Yes
I
Scarletdown wrote:
How about a portable wireless hotspot device and service?
I was leaning away from that solution - unsure of security
implications when using personal hotspot.
The
way I understand how those work, you will have your Internet
service with you no matter where you are, as lon
bands. AT&T and T-Mobile use GSM
and LTE, again on different bands. You can buy some devices
which are good on multiple bands, and others which are tied to
a specific carrier.
LTE is often called 4G. Advanced CDMA and GSM services (high
speed, relatively) are called 3G. Basic CDMA and GSM services
ar
LTE. Verizon and Sprint
> use CDMA and LTE, on different bands. AT&T and T-Mobile use GSM
> and LTE, again on different bands. You can buy some devices
> which are good on multiple bands, and others which are tied to
> a specific carrier.
>
> LTE is often called 4G. Advanc
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
> Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
>
> I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one
> physical location.
>
> I was assuming that meant connecting via cell
Hi Richard.
I faced a similar situation although a bit differently a few months ago.
The only WISP in the area announced they were shutting down the present
service which ran at 512 kbps and would offer upgrades to a new service
that runs 10 Mbps. Fine, but what they did not say officially was th
How about a portable wireless hotspot device and service? The way I
understand how those work, you will have your Internet service with you
no matter where you are, as long as you can get a signal from your provider.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
> Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
>
> I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one physical
> location.
>
You're in the US?
I'd suggest that a laptop
s
which are good on multiple bands, and others which are tied to
a specific carrier.
LTE is often called 4G. Advanced CDMA and GSM services (high
speed, relatively) are called 3G. Basic CDMA and GSM services
are only slightly faster than a 56K modem, and are called 2G.
You might want to look at T-Mob
Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Wednesday 17 June 2015 17:11:11 Mark Allums wrote:
On 06/17/2015 11:03 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one
physical location.
Mark Allums wrote:
On 06/17/2015 11:03 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one
physical location.
I was assuming that meant connecting via cell network.
On Wednesday 17 June 2015 17:11:11 Mark Allums wrote:
> On 06/17/2015 11:03 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
> > Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
> >
> > I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one
> > physical location.
>
On 06/17/2015 11:03 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one
physical location.
I was assuming that meant connecting via cell network.
Is that correct?
Wh
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to
one physical location.
I was assuming that meant connecting via cell network.
Is that correct?
What questions should I be asking?
Please note
>
> > I know the Lucent 56k modem built into my Gateway Solo
5300cs is supported
> > under Linux, but I can't seem to find any information on
how to set it up.
> > Can anyone tell me, or point me to a good HOWTO? Thanks.
> >
If you have a winmodem
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Try www.google.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said thusly on [31/07/01 at 00:35]:
> I know the Lucent 56k modem built into my Gateway Solo 5300cs is supported
> under Linux, but I can't seem to find any information on how to set it up.
> Can anyo
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 07:41:51PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I know the Lucent 56k modem built into my Gateway Solo 5300cs is supported
> under Linux, but I can't seem to find any information on how to set it up.
> Can anyone tell me, or point me to a good HOWTO?
I know the Lucent 56k modem built into my Gateway Solo 5300cs is supported
under Linux, but I can't seem to find any information on how to set it up.
Can anyone tell me, or point me to a good HOWTO? Thanks.
-- Deven
Er... I forgot. you want to uncomment this also:
DATAINIT="$DATAOPT -j+FAA=1"# Class 2[.0] modem adaptive answer
DCMD="exec /sbin/getty -h $DEV %d vt100"# for getty_ps (Linux)
J.
--
Jeronimo Pellegrini
Institute of Computing - Unicamp - Brazil
http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~je
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 06:20:57PM -0800, Kenward Vaughan wrote:
> I'm very frustrated trying to get efax to properly receive faxes through my
> USR 56K modem (a v.90 type, now). All faxes come in appearing like something
> streaked out sideways. I'm allowing efax to determin
I'm very frustrated trying to get efax to properly receive faxes through my
USR 56K modem (a v.90 type, now). All faxes come in appearing like something
streaked out sideways. I'm allowing efax to determine the best fit with the
modem (instead of specifying the type myself).
Has any
ISAPNP won't pick it up because ISAPNP only works for ISA card. Your card is
PCI.
I've never heard of a PCI modem before. I can't say whether or not any kernel
supports or doesn't support it. The Hardware-HOWTO in my beta Hamm system
doesn't
indicate any support for PCI modems. If the device stil
I have a supra 56i PCI I just upgraded, and notices it not to work under
debian. ISAPNP doesn't even pickup on it. I don't think it's windows
hardware, but I didn't notices under win95 a PCI
modem enumerator isn't this something like the enumerators used for PNP,
if so there may be hope... Or may
can someone tell me how to use my Rockwell 56k Flex external modem under
linux...from what i have seen it takes ethernet but not a regular dial-up
modem like my modem..???thanx in advance.. : )
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
35 matches
Mail list logo
