On Du, 11 nov 12, 15:29:34, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> does the following output from "uname -a" identify if this server
> has been loaded with 32 bit or 64 bit Debian?
>
> Linux netmon 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem #1 SMP Sun Sep 23 10:27:25 UTC 2012
> i686 GNU/Linux
Since that kernel is available only on i386
32 bits.
There are many versions of intel processors, and they are usually
called "x86" familly.
When they are usual 32 bits, you will have things like i386, i486, i586
or i686 (i think the 'i' is for intel structure, the 86 for the family,
and 3,4,5 or 6 the version).
For 64 bits versions, I
On 11/11/12 17:29, Jim Pazarena wrote:
does the following output from "uname -a" identify if this server has
been loaded with 32 bit or 64 bit Debian?
Linux netmon 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem #1 SMP Sun Sep 23 10:27:25 UTC 2012
i686 GNU/Linux
32-bit. 64-bit would be x86_64 amd64
--
On Sunday 11 November 2012 23:29:34 Jim Pazarena wrote:
> does the following output from "uname -a" identify if this server has
> been loaded with 32 bit or 64 bit Debian?
>
> Linux netmon 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem #1 SMP Sun Sep 23 10:27:25 UTC 2012
> i686 GNU/Linux
> --
> Jim Pazarena deb...@pa
does the following output from "uname -a" identify if this server has
been loaded with 32 bit or 64 bit Debian?
Linux netmon 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem #1 SMP Sun Sep 23 10:27:25 UTC 2012
i686 GNU/Linux
--
Jim Pazarena deb...@paz.bz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debi
> Brad Alexander writes:
[…]
> Well, now 64bit is as stable as 32bit, and I want to upgrade my
> machine to 64bit userland. Is there a reliable way to upgrade
> existing packages? Or is a complete rebuild ("nuke and pave") the
> best way?
[…]
> Is there some middle ground?
It
Brad Alexander writes:
> I was just hoping for an undocumented way of doing it as an upgrade...
cdebootstrap??
--
Mahesh T. Pai ||
With freedom comes responsibility.
Do not use unauthorised copies of copyrighted material.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.or
>
> > Forwarded Message
> > From: Brad Alexander
> > To: Debian-user List
> > Subject: 32bit vs 64bit
> > Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:57:26 -0400
> >
> > means I would be without the machine for the duration of the build
No ti
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Michael Checca wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 17:14:48 -0400, Chris Brennan
> wrote:
>
>
>> To borrow your own phrase nuke and pave. Moving between
>> architectures is probably a very very bad idea :D (upgrade wise). While
>> not a guru, but a power user, this
Brad Alexander wrote:
>This is sort of an odd question, but my desktop is a core2duo machine, which
>means it is capable of 32 or 64 bit operation. The last time I rebuilt the
>machine in 2007, there were still a number of deficiencies in 64bit Linux.
>However, some time in the intervening time, m
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:57:26 -0400, Brad Alexander wrote:
> This is sort of an odd question, but my desktop is a core2duo machine,
> which means it is capable of 32 or 64 bit operation. The last time I
> rebuilt the machine in 2007, there were still a number of deficiencies
> in 64bit Linux. Howev
Dne 21.7.2011 22:57, piše Brad Alexander:
This is sort of an odd question, but my desktop is a core2duo machine,
which means it is capable of 32 or 64 bit operation. The last time I
rebuilt the machine in 2007, there were still a number of deficiencies
in 64bit Linux. However, some time in the
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 17:14:48 -0400, Chris Brennan
wrote:
On 7/21/2011 4:57 PM, Brad Alexander wrote:
This is sort of an odd question, but my desktop is a core2duo machine,
which means it is capable of 32 or 64 bit operation. The last time I
rebuilt the machine in 2007, there were still a num
On 7/21/2011 4:57 PM, Brad Alexander wrote:
> This is sort of an odd question, but my desktop is a core2duo machine,
> which means it is capable of 32 or 64 bit operation. The last time I
> rebuilt the machine in 2007, there were still a number of deficiencies
> in 64bit Linux. However, some time i
This is sort of an odd question, but my desktop is a core2duo machine, which
means it is capable of 32 or 64 bit operation. The last time I rebuilt the
machine in 2007, there were still a number of deficiencies in 64bit Linux.
However, some time in the intervening time, my clock started running fas
Le Wednesday 19 November 2008 15:06:40 Stackpole, Chris, vous avez écrit :
> From: Aioanei Rares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
>
> I was trying to read up on the subject as best as I could. From what I
> understand, most of what the 64bit format provides is bigger block sizes
> and a larger files
Stackpole, Chris escreveu:
>
> I was trying to read up on the subject as best as I could. From what I
> understand, most of what the 64bit format provides is bigger block
> sizes and a larger filesystem (+8TB). However, I only have drives in
> the hundreds of GB not in the TB range (I wish…but don’
From: Aioanei Rares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Adrian Levi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>>>2008/11/19 Stackpole, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
>>> The system started life out as a 32bit etch install. Then later I
did an upgrade to Lenny (~5 months ago) and it has
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Adrian Levi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/11/19 Stackpole, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > The system started life out as a 32bit etch install. Then later I did an
> upgrade to Lenny (~5 months ago) and it has been running smooth since.
> >
> > Since the drive
2008/11/19 Stackpole, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The system started life out as a 32bit etch install. Then later I did an
> upgrade to Lenny (~5 months ago) and it has been running smooth since.
>
> Since the drives were all formated as ext3 with a 32bit Etch install, should
> I expect any pro
Pardon me if these are basic questions, but I have only ever done clean
installs of 64bit Debian before and I am having difficulty getting the answers
I am looking for from Google.
I have a 32bit system with a bunch of 500GB hard drives. The system is 64bit
capable and so I would like to format
First off, please don't cross-post.
An amd64 host can be used to build i386 packages with ease (using
e.g. schroot), whereas amd64 packages cannot easily be built on an
i386 host. Thus, I suggest an amd64 machine with an i386 chroot.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the li
22 matches
Mail list logo
