On 01/28/2011 02:24 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Vi, 28 ian 11, 10:31:54, Paul Scott wrote:
How do I get a Debian 2.6.30 x86 kernel which may be the latest
kernel on which my Orinoco Silver wireless card works for secured
access points?
snapshot.debian.org, but that kernel does not
On Vi, 28 ian 11, 10:31:54, Paul Scott wrote:
> How do I get a Debian 2.6.30 x86 kernel which may be the latest
> kernel on which my Orinoco Silver wireless card works for secured
> access points?
snapshot.debian.org, but that kernel does not have security updates...
Regards,
Andrei
--
How do I get a Debian 2.6.30 x86 kernel which may be the latest kernel
on which my Orinoco Silver wireless card works for secured access points?
TIA,
Paul Scott
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Greetings all-
I am running the stock 2.6.30-2-amd64 kernel, largely because I have been
unable to compile a working 2.6.30 kernel of my own. (My travails on that
account are documented here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2009/09/msg01936.html .)
Bottom line on compiling my own: In
On 20.01.2010 12:39, Rémi Moyen wrote:
> 2010/1/20 Mart Frauenlob :
>
>>> So I first installed the new kernel (2.6.30), then wanted to reboot on
>>> this kernel (so still with the old udev) in order to complete the udev
>>> installation. When rebooting, the
2010/1/20 Mart Frauenlob :
>> So I first installed the new kernel (2.6.30), then wanted to reboot on
>> this kernel (so still with the old udev) in order to complete the udev
>> installation. When rebooting, the new kernel loads, one of the very
>> first thing it says is
e activated), I guess since I was not the current
> active kernel, this caused the error.
>
> So I first installed the new kernel (2.6.30), then wanted to reboot on
> this kernel (so still with the old udev) in order to complete the udev
> installation. When rebooting, the new kernel
o I first installed the new kernel (2.6.30), then wanted to reboot on
this kernel (so still with the old udev) in order to complete the udev
installation. When rebooting, the new kernel loads, one of the very
first thing it says is "udev: waiting for /dev to be fully populated",
but then no
Dear all,
A short report on my use of the Archos 3 vision.
I used the webpage:
http://www.linux-usb.org/FAQ.html#ts6
In my case, it seems the power supply was somewhat
faulty, so I got an external usb (2) hub with an independant
power plug (which I plugged on my usb2 port).
What happens then
Dear all,
About tests:
(1) I plugged the archos device on an old windows (vista) computer
and it worked, I copied some files and it plays music.
This satisfies me from another aspect: I was afraid the usb
plugs had evolved, but both these computers have about the
sam
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:00:21 +0100, Olivier Ramare wrote:
> Camaleón a écrit :
>> 1/ Try plug in the device into another usb port of the board.
>>
> Ok, I have a second usb2 port for the printing machine. So I unplugged
> this one and plugged my archos machine there, to no avail.
>
> I plugged
Camaleón a écrit :
1/ Try plug in the device into another usb port of the board.
Ok, I have a second usb2 port for the printing machine.
So I unplugged this one and plugged my archos machine there,
to no avail.
I plugged the printer to the usb-port I was using for the archos
and it works (I
ian
>
> Linux lib59-3-82-233-191-86 2.6.30-2-686 #1 SMP Fri Dec 4 00:53:20 UTC
> 2009 i686 GNU/Linux
>
> I added the usbmount module (hal and pmount were already aboard). I
> managed to see an icon once, and dmesg was saying it didn't like mu utf8
> for a FAT system. No
Dear friends,
I tried to enter the realm of mp3/mp4-reader utensils.
I bought an archos 3 vision:
http://www.archos.com/products/mp3_players/archos_3/specs.html?country=ng&lang=en
since it seems to work with my debian
Linux lib59-3-82-233-191-86 2.6.30-2-686 #1 SMP Fri Dec 4 00:53:20
Γιώργος Πάλλας schreef:
A strange problem is occuring: After a kernel upgrade from 2.6.30-2 to
2.6.32 on an updated debian testing system, the user auto-login feature
of KDE stopped working - instead I am presented with the kdm login
screen. If I reboot with the old kernel, kde auto-logins the
A strange problem is occuring: After a kernel upgrade from 2.6.30-2 to
2.6.32 on an updated debian testing system, the user auto-login feature
of KDE stopped working - instead I am presented with the kdm login
screen. If I reboot with the old kernel, kde auto-logins the user fine.
The problem is
Hi,
What might be the issue if stock kernel 2.6.30-1 boots my system just fine,
but the 2.6.30-2 version after leaving grub just sits around "loading" and
never recognizes my lvm2 volume group.
I'd appreciate any hints on how to troubleshoot this.
Thanks, Joh
--
To UNSUBS
On my X61s, since I upgraded to the latest kernel in sid, the system
immediately suspends on resuming. Booting with the older 2.6.30-1 fixes
the problem.
Are the hacks in acpi-support still necessary for s2disk or is there a
cleaner way to do suspend now ?
--
Alok
If time heals all wounds, how
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 20:42:00 -0400
Mitchell Laks wrote:
> On 15:47 Thu 15 Oct , Jack Schneider wrote:
> > Hi, Mitchell
> > FWIW I have exactly the same problem... Whew !!! I didn't cause
> > this messI hope!!!
> >
> > Thanks more that you know... BTW I haven't fix mine yet... But
> > g
/modules
> file and then
> did
> dpkg-reconfigure linux-image-2.6.30-2-686-bigmen
> and it regenerated the initrd.img file
> but then when I selected this kernel in grub2
> it still could not find the
> /dev/mapper/debian-root device.
> I was dumped by grub2 into Busybox
On 15:47 Thu 15 Oct , Jack Schneider wrote:
> Hi, Mitchell
> FWIW I have exactly the same problem... Whew !!! I didn't cause this
> messI hope!!!
>
> Thanks more that you know... BTW I haven't fix mine yet... But getting
> some help.
>
> Jack
I have identified the problem.
dist-upgrad
es?
>
> I have added
> dm_mod
> dm_log
> dm_snapshot
> dm_mirror
> to
> /etc/initramfs-tools/modules
> file and then
> did
> dpkg-reconfigure linux-image-2.6.30-2-686-bigmen
> and it regenerated the initrd.img file
> but then when I selected this kernel in gru
s/modules
file and then
did
dpkg-reconfigure linux-image-2.6.30-2-686-bigmen
and it regenerated the initrd.img file
but then when I selected this kernel in grub2
it still could not find the
/dev/mapper/debian-root device.
I was dumped by grub2 into Busybox
(initramfs)
and when I ran
(initramfs)
Hi,
I just upgraded my lvm based system
to the latest debian kernels and it will not boot from grub with the 2.6.30
kernels
which cannot find the /dev/mapper/debian-root partition on /dev/sda2 because
the dm-mod and other dm kernel
modules are not in the initrd-2.6.30-2-bigmem archive. Of
Andrew Perrin wrote:
> Appreciate all the replies. However I have never used an initrd in the
> past (been building kernels since the 2.0.x series) and don't want to
> this time. sata and ext3 drivers are built into the kernel (not
> modules) so I don't think I should need one. Any thoughts as t
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Alex Samad wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 09:51:12PM -0400, Andrew Perrin wrote:
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Alex Samad wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 05:46:47PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
[snip]
I was just seeing if I was missing something, it just seems like a pain
to hav
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 17:34 -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> Anyone else with grub2 have any advice for Andrew? Is it normal for grub2
> to show a blank screen when booting a kernel?
When I upgraded to Grub2 last week I was getting a completely blank
screen during kernel boot. Eventually I fixed th
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 09:51:12PM -0400, Andrew Perrin wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Alex Samad wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 05:46:47PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
[snip]
> >I was just seeing if I was missing something, it just seems like a pain
> >to have to recompile, although with all
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Alex Samad wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 05:46:47PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
[snip]
Alex,
How does having an initrd prove more or less beneficial than not
having one?
IMO I like simplicity and a straight forward boot configuration:
1. /boot/kernel
2. /boot/S
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 08:39:07AM +0800, Niu Kun wrote:
> Alex Samad 写道:
> >Hi
> >
> >question question to both of you guys, any reason not to use a initrd ?
> >
> >doesn't it limit your options a lot, I can understand a monolithic
> >kernel - but a partial one ?
> >
> >Alex
> >
> >On Tue, Sep 29,
Alex Samad 写道:
Hi
question question to both of you guys, any reason not to use a initrd ?
doesn't it limit your options a lot, I can understand a monolithic
kernel - but a partial one ?
Alex
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 01:33:57PM -0400, Andrew Perrin wrote:
I'm using grup-pc, which is grub2:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 05:46:47PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>
>
[snip]
> >>>
> >>
> >>Alex,
> >>
> >>How does having an initrd prove more or less beneficial than not
> >>having one?
> >>
> >>IMO I like simplicity and a straight forward boot configuration:
> >>
> >>1. /boot/kernel
> >>2. /boo
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Alex Samad wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 05:36:38PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Alex Samad wrote:
Hi
question question to both of you guys, any reason not to use a initrd ?
doesn't it limit your options a lot, I can understand a monolithic
kern
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 05:36:38PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Alex Samad wrote:
>
> >Hi
> >
> >question question to both of you guys, any reason not to use a initrd ?
> >
> >doesn't it limit your options a lot, I can understand a monolithic
> >kernel - but a partial o
ver- I will ask others on the list--
> >>>>
> >>>>If you are compiling (most) everything into the image
> >>>>itself, you probably don't need the insmod line below and I
> >>>>am not sure you want the search
> >
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Alex Samad wrote:
Hi
question question to both of you guys, any reason not to use a initrd ?
doesn't it limit your options a lot, I can understand a monolithic
kernel - but a partial one ?
Alex
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 01:33:57PM -0400, Andrew Perrin wrote:
I'm using g
2009, Justin Piszcz wrote:
Hi,
I have not used grub2, however- I will ask others on the list--
If you are compiling (most) everything into the image itself, you
probably don't need the insmod line below and I am not sure you want the
search
line either.
menuentry "Debian GNU/Linu
Hi
question question to both of you guys, any reason not to use a initrd ?
doesn't it limit your options a lot, I can understand a monolithic
kernel - but a partial one ?
Alex
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 01:33:57PM -0400, Andrew Perrin wrote:
> I'm using grup-pc, which is grub2:
>
> che:/home/aper
t need the insmod line below and I am not sure you want the search
line either.
menuentry "Debian GNU/Linux, Linux 2.6.30 (recovery mode)" {
insmod ext2 <- Remove
set root=(hd0,1)
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 19ee8fc7-d4b5-4ea3-86d9-eba7bf3b857e
linux /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.30 r
want the search
line either.
menuentry "Debian GNU/Linux, Linux 2.6.30 (recovery mode)" {
insmod ext2 <- Remove
set root=(hd0,1)
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 19ee8fc7-d4b5-4ea3-86d9-eba7bf3b857e
linux /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.30 root=/dev/sda1 ro single }
Please try the
uot;Debian GNU/Linux, Linux 2.6.30 (recovery mode)" {
insmod ext2 <- Remove
set root=(hd0,1)
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 19ee8fc7-d4b5-4ea3-86d9-eba7bf3b857e
linux /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.30 root=/dev/sda1 ro single }
Please try the following instead:
menuentry "Debian GNU/Linux, Li
Hi,
I have not used grub2, however- I will ask others on the list--
If you are compiling (most) everything into the image itself, you probably
don't need the insmod line below and I am not sure you want the search
line either.
menuentry "Debian GNU/Linux, Linux 2.6.30 (rec
CONFIG_ATA_SFF=y
# CONFIG_SATA_SVW is not set
CONFIG_ATA_PIIX=y
Your configuration appears to contain the necessary drivers.
Did you install your kernel correctly?
Well, I think I did - I did it the same way I've been doing it for years:
cd /usr/src/linux-source-2.6.30
make-kpkg clean ; make
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, Andrew Perrin wrote:
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, Andrew Perrin wrote:
Greetings-
Using a .config file based on past kernels that have worked fine (posted
at http://perrin.socsci.unc.edu/stuff/config), I am trying to compile
kernel 2.6.30 for an amd64 machine and NOT using
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, Andrew Perrin wrote:
Greetings-
Using a .config file based on past kernels that have worked fine (posted at
http://perrin.socsci.unc.edu/stuff/config), I am trying to compile kernel
2.6.30 for an amd64 machine and NOT using initrd. The essentials I know of
- sata
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, Andrew Perrin wrote:
Greetings-
Using a .config file based on past kernels that have worked fine (posted at
http://perrin.socsci.unc.edu/stuff/config), I am trying to compile kernel
2.6.30 for an amd64 machine and NOT using initrd. The essentials I know of -
sata
Greetings-
Using a .config file based on past kernels that have worked fine (posted
at http://perrin.socsci.unc.edu/stuff/config), I am trying to compile
kernel 2.6.30 for an amd64 machine and NOT using initrd. The essentials I
know of - sata, ext3, e1000e - are built into the kernel, so I
Arthur Marsh wrote:
> Elimar Riesebieter wrote, on 2009-09-26 23:21:
>> * Andrew Perrin [090926 09:08 -0400]
>> [...]
>>> Of interest is that the stock 2.6.30-amd64 kernel boots fine. I am
>>> posting my /boot/grub/grub.cfg file and the .config file to
>&
On Sat, Sep 26 2009, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * Andrew Perrin [090926 09:08 -0400]
> [...]
>> Of interest is that the stock 2.6.30-amd64 kernel boots fine. I am
>> posting my /boot/grub/grub.cfg file and the .config file to
>> http://perrin.socsci.unc.edu/stuff/grub
Elimar Riesebieter wrote, on 2009-09-26 23:21:
* Andrew Perrin [090926 09:08 -0400]
[...]
Of interest is that the stock 2.6.30-amd64 kernel boots fine. I am
posting my /boot/grub/grub.cfg file and the .config file to
http://perrin.socsci.unc.edu/stuff/grub.cfg and
I guess you need an initrd
* Andrew Perrin [090926 09:08 -0400]
[...]
> Of interest is that the stock 2.6.30-amd64 kernel boots fine. I am
> posting my /boot/grub/grub.cfg file and the .config file to
> http://perrin.socsci.unc.edu/stuff/grub.cfg and
I guess you need an initrd image which isn't mention
Hey all - I'm having more trouble than I ever have before booting my
newly-compiled 2.6.30 kernel. Typically make-kpkg linux-image makes a
usable .deb file, which I can install and be done with it. In this case I
keep getting:
kernel panic: no init found. Unable to mount root fs on
un
On 0, Andrew Perrin wrote:
> kernel panic: no init found. Unable to mount root fs on
> unknown-block(0,0).
>
Have you tried actually building an initrd? I always get a problem mounting root
until I build my initrd. (man mkinitramfs, or just `mkinitramfs -o
initrd.2.6.30-amd64 2.6
Andrew Perrin wrote:
Hey all - I'm having more trouble than I ever have before booting my
newly-compiled 2.6.30 kernel. Typically make-kpkg linux-image makes a
usable .deb file, which I can install and be done with it. In this
case I keep getting:
kernel panic: no init found. Unab
- CB#3210, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3210 USA
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009, mess-mate wrote:
Andrew Perrin wrote:
Hey all - I'm having more trouble than I ever have before booting my
newly-compiled 2.6.30 kernel. Typically make-kpkg linux-image makes a
usable .deb file, which I can install and be done w
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 02:00:20PM +0200, Rob Gom wrote:
> Hi there,
Hi,
> I can't write iso image to blank cd under Linux. Under windows xp the
> same works fine.
OK. Then maybe this ...
> ~# hdparm -i /dev/sr0
> /dev/sr0:
> Model=HL-DT-ST DVD+/-RW GH50N , FwRev=B102,
> Ser
Those are brand CDs (TDK), not causing any problems elsewhere.
Regards,
Robert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
reads, concluding:
- user error
- wodim errors, suggesting using cdrtools instead
- kernel regression (2.6.29->2.6.30, however reporter didn't say enough)
What else can I do? I can wait for 2.6.31 and see if it helps. But I
would like not to waste too much cds ...
Regards,
Robert
I
user error
- wodim errors, suggesting using cdrtools instead
- kernel regression (2.6.29->2.6.30, however reporter didn't say enough)
What else can I do? I can wait for 2.6.31 and see if it helps. But I
would like not to waste too much cds ...
Regards,
Robert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
ould be any better/different.
I've tried both. I edit the fstab while running 2.6.26 so it's a proper
error and reboot with the UUID spec in fstab instead of /dev/sda1 or
/dev/hda1 and I still get the same result: it doesn't find the root file
system.
>
>> What'
o check on the syntax
> for specifying UUID in the fstab file.
Hadn't thought of passing the UUID as a boot option. Not sure that the
fstab would be any better/different.
> What's funny is that Sidux, using 2.6.30 finds the hard drive with no
> problem at /dev/sda1 and yet Squee
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2009-09-11 09:00, Jonathan Kaye wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I'm runny Debian Testing (Squeeze) and have been for years. Since linux-
>> image-2.6.30-686 has now trickled down to Squeeze, I thought it was time
>> to upgrade from 2.6.26. I in
en I don't understand how editing fstab would make a
>> difference to being able to boot in 2.6.30.
>> Thanks again
>> jonathan
>
> First of all, back up your fstab /before/ you start messing with it.
>>From busybox you can always manually mount the drive and rev
fstab would make a difference to being able to
> boot in 2.6.30.
> Thanks again
> jonathan
First of all, back up your fstab /before/ you start messing with it.
>From busybox you can always manually mount the drive and revert to the
present semi-working version.
>From what you'v
Paul Gallaway wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Jonathan Kaye
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I'm runny Debian Testing (Squeeze) and have been for years. Since linux-
>> image-2.6.30-686 has now trickled down to Squeeze, I thought it was time
>> to upgrade f
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Jonathan Kaye wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm runny Debian Testing (Squeeze) and have been for years. Since linux-
> image-2.6.30-686 has now trickled down to Squeeze, I thought it was time to
> upgrade from 2.6.26. I installed linux-image-2.6.30-1-68
On 2009-09-11 09:00, Jonathan Kaye wrote:
Hi all,
I'm runny Debian Testing (Squeeze) and have been for years. Since linux-
image-2.6.30-686 has now trickled down to Squeeze, I thought it was time to
upgrade from 2.6.26. I installed linux-image-2.6.30-1-686 (keeping my old
kernel of c
Hi all,
I'm runny Debian Testing (Squeeze) and have been for years. Since linux-
image-2.6.30-686 has now trickled down to Squeeze, I thought it was time to
upgrade from 2.6.26. I installed linux-image-2.6.30-1-686 (keeping my old
kernel of course ) and rebooted. The new kernel will not boo
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> On Sep 10, 2009, at 7:30 AM, Javier Barroso wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:03 AM, Rick Thomas wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> The 2.6.30 kernel seems to have ipv6 turned on and
On Sep 10, 2009, at 7:30 AM, Javier Barroso wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:03 AM, Rick Thomas
wrote:
The 2.6.30 kernel seems to have ipv6 turned on and compiled-in --
i.e. not a
module.
Does this make it impossible to turn off IPv6? Or am I missing
something...
At least in
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:03 AM, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
>
> The 2.6.30 kernel seems to have ipv6 turned on and compiled-in -- i.e. not a
> module.
>
> Does this make it impossible to turn off IPv6? Or am I missing something...
At least in sid:
head -3 /etc/modutils/alia
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:52, Rick Thomas wrote:
> On Sep 8, 2009, at 10:02 PM, Mark wrote:
>
>> Rick Thomas wrote:
>>>
>>> The 2.6.30 kernel seems to have ipv6 turned on and compiled-in -- i.e.
>>> not a module.
>>> Does this make it impossible
_ipv6
Is this new with 2.6.30 (Squeeze) kernels? Or is it a feature of
having ipv6 compiled in?
Very curious!
Rick
On Sep 8, 2009, at 10:02 PM, Mark wrote:
Rick Thomas wrote:
The 2.6.30 kernel seems to have ipv6 turned on and compiled-in --
i.e. not a module.
Does this ma
eks ago.
lsmod | grep ipv
gives nothing.
Note that we have "CONFIG_IPV6=y" not "=m" in the config file...
Curiouser and curiouser!
Rick
======
rbtho...@frogpond:~$ uname -a
Linux frogpond 2.6.30-1-amd64 #1 SMP Sat Aug 15 18:09:19
On Sep 9, 2009, at 12:04 AM, Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 15:03, Rick Thomas wrote:
The 2.6.30 kernel seems to have ipv6 turned on and compiled-in --
i.e. not a
module.
Does this make it impossible to turn off IPv6? Or am I missing
something...
net.ipv6
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 15:03, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
>
> The 2.6.30 kernel seems to have ipv6 turned on and compiled-in -- i.e. not a
> module.
>
> Does this make it impossible to turn off IPv6? Or am I missing something...
net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1
in /etc/sysctl.c
The 2.6.30 kernel seems to have ipv6 turned on and compiled-in -- i.e.
not a module.
Does this make it impossible to turn off IPv6? Or am I missing
something...
I'm on a network where the router advertises an ipv6 prefix and route,
but that route is flakey (it's been out
I reply myself
It is a known probem:
http://groups.google.co.kr/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/000eb65f2fbe06a8
So I guess I must wait for it to be fixed.
Thierry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Following my previous post (2.6.30 -> Brightness does not work) I contacted
the maintainer of acer-wmi. Here is the content of my mail and his quick
answer:
Hi Carlos
First, let me thank you for your work on getting Acer laptop working with
Linux.
Now, since my Debian Squeeze kernel went f
On Friday 21 August 2009 17:04:43 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> In <200908211043.44820.tchate...@free.fr>, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
SNIP
> >I found that:
> >~$ dmesg |grep brightness
> >[ 26.758710] ACPI Error (video-0537): Current brightness invalid
> > [20090320]
>
> That looks like either the
On Friday 21 August 2009 17:00:52 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> In <200908211029.38273.tchate...@free.fr>, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
> >On Friday 21 August 2009 10:16:41 Thierry Chatelet wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> After upgrade, my squeede does not start the wifi. I have to do a
> >> modprobe to get it g
In <200908211043.44820.tchate...@free.fr>, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
>On Friday 21 August 2009 10:28:20 Thierry Chatelet wrote:
>> Next problem (and last) I have is that I cannot set the brightness on my
>> laptop. Kpowersave setting indicate: Your Hardware currently not support
>> changing the brigh
In <200908211029.38273.tchate...@free.fr>, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
>On Friday 21 August 2009 10:16:41 Thierry Chatelet wrote:
>> Hi,
>> After upgrade, my squeede does not start the wifi. I have to do a
>> modprobe to get it going. It is OK with kernel 2.6.28.
>> Any tips??
>> Thierry
>
>Same as fir
On Friday 21 August 2009 10:28:20 Thierry Chatelet wrote:
> Hi,
> Next problem (and last) I have is that I cannot set the brightness on my
> laptop. Kpowersave setting indicate: Your Hardware currently not support
> changing the brightness o your display.
> What is missing, as it works with kernel
On Friday 21 August 2009 10:16:41 Thierry Chatelet wrote:
> Hi,
> After upgrade, my squeede does not start the wifi. I have to do a modprobe
> to get it going. It is OK with kernel 2.6.28.
> Any tips??
> Thierry
Same as first, but with a "f" in wifi.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ.
Hi,
Next problem (and last) I have is that I cannot set the brightness on my
laptop. Kpowersave setting indicate: Your Hardware currently not support
changing the brightness o your display.
What is missing, as it works with kernel 2.6.28?
Thanks
Thierry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-
Hi,
After upgrade, my squeede does not start the wii. I have to do a modprobe to
get it going. It is OK with kernel 2.6.28.
Any tips??
Thierry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
So this is a kernel related question.
What is the best way to see the difference between:
the 2.6.30 kernel source from Sid:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/linux-source-2.6.30
and 2.6.30 kernel source from Debian backports:
http://packages.debian.org/lenny-backports/linux-source-2.6.30
Just
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:00:27PM +0300, Γιώργος Πάλλας wrote:
> Hello to all!
>
> With kernel 2.6.26-2 I used the nvidia packets: nvidia-glx,
> nvidia-kernel-2.6.26-2-686 in order to have 3D acceleration.
> Now that testing was upgraded to 2.6.30 I can't find the equival
2009/8/17 Γιώργος Πάλλας :
> Hello to all!
>
> With kernel 2.6.26-2 I used the nvidia packets: nvidia-glx,
> nvidia-kernel-2.6.26-2-686 in order to have 3D acceleration.
> Now that testing was upgraded to 2.6.30 I can't find the equivalent
> 'nvidia-kernel-2.6.30-
Hello to all!
With kernel 2.6.26-2 I used the nvidia packets: nvidia-glx,
nvidia-kernel-2.6.26-2-686 in order to have 3D acceleration.
Now that testing was upgraded to 2.6.30 I can't find the equivalent
'nvidia-kernel-2.6.30-1-686' packet. Should I wait?
I tried to build
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi,
I installed linux-image-2.6.30-1-686 on Sid and got an error:
In the very beginning at the initramfs phase only one of my 2 USB disks
shows up, causing the boot to fail because partitions from that drive
are in /etc/fstab. It's always the same one that fai
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi,
Has anybody used mondoarchive with the latest 2.6.30 Debian kernel?
For me it fails with that he cannot figure out the filesystem that is
used for initrd.
That's because the phrase that mindi looks for in the krnel image to see
what fs initrd is usin
Hi,
Has anybody used mondoarchive with the latest 2.6.30 Debian kernel?
For me it fails with that he cannot figure out the filesystem that is
used for initrd.
Hugo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Roger Leigh wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:06:35PM -0700, Jimmy Johnson wrote:
I thought "linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64" had ext4 support built into it or
what I'm I doing wrong? I can't mount ext4.
This kernel is working fine for me with ext4. What errors are you
get
Roger Leigh wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:06:35PM -0700, Jimmy Johnson wrote:
I thought "linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64" had ext4 support built into it or
what I'm I doing wrong? I can't mount ext4.
This kernel is working fine for me with ext4. What errors are you
get
Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:06:35PM -0700, Jimmy Johnson wrote:
>> I thought "linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64" had ext4 support built into it or
>> what I'm I doing wrong? I can't mount ext4.
>
> This kernel is working fine for me with ex
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Jimmy Johnson wrote:
> I thought "linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64" had ext4 support built into it or
> what I'm I doing wrong? I can't mount ext4.
kernel.org(
http://ext4.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Ext4_Howto#For_people_who_are_running_
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:06:35PM -0700, Jimmy Johnson wrote:
> I thought "linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64" had ext4 support built into it or
> what I'm I doing wrong? I can't mount ext4.
This kernel is working fine for me with ext4. What errors are you
getting?
I thought "linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64" had ext4 support built into it or
what I'm I doing wrong? I can't mount ext4.
--
Jimmy Johnson
Debian Sid at sda8
Registered Linux User #380263
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &q
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
