hello,
i have two different gpg commands which i would like to use for gnupg
encryption/signing depending on the from: header.
as the mutt configuration has lots of variables set for gnupg support,
a send-hook which defines all of them would be very complex.
is it possible to set a userdefined v
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 07:12:54PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 05:35:53PM -0700, Paul E Condon wrote:
> > My first email was actually a resend after I got a bounce. I must have
> > answered a question wrongly during setup of exim. When I copied the
> > exim setup from th
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 05:35:53PM -0700, Paul E Condon wrote:
> My first email was actually a resend after I got a bounce. I must have
> answered a question wrongly during setup of exim. When I copied the
> exim setup from the old system, the new started sending email
> properly. If I really want
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 10:44:52AM -0700, Rob Sims wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 05:35:53PM -0700, Paul E Condon wrote:
> > Thanks for the help. I had not known of these, but ... On my computer
> > the two installation Muttrc files are identical (no differences
> > di
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 05:35:53PM -0700, Paul E Condon wrote:
> Thanks for the help. I had not known of these, but ... On my computer
> the two installation Muttrc files are identical (no differences
> discovered by diff) and there is no Muttrc.d directory in either
> installation.
t have
answered a question wrongly during setup of exim. When I copied the
exim setup from the old system, the new started sending email
properly. If I really want a clean new system (and I do) I'll probably
end up re-doing last nights work.
>
> > > all done in ~/.muttrc and that
condon
> > ..." Why? My reading of the man page is that mutt configuration is
Your earlier mail had no From: line.
> > all done in ~/.muttrc and that there is not a master config file in
> > /etc. Am I mistaken? Where is another that mutt config is stored? What
> > is the sour
listed as "To:
> debian-user..." and in the other they are listed as "From: pecondon
> ..." Why? My reading of the man page is that mutt configuration is
> all done in ~/.muttrc and that there is not a master config file in
> /etc. Am I mistaken? Where is another that mutt
two. For
example, in one installation my posts to this list are listed as "To:
debian-user..." and in the other they are listed as "From: pecondon
..." Why? My reading of the man page is that mutt configuration is
all done in ~/.muttrc and that there is not a master confi
On Wednesday, 21.09.2005 at 10:23 -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> The only things it has ever failed to do out-of-the-box for me are *
> identify which mailing lists I've subscribed to (so I can use L for
> rep,y-to-list)
I agree that by parsing the List-ID headers, Mutt should be able to do
that ..
It should work out-of-the-box.
It's always worked out-of-the-box for me, on many installations,
on several Linux distributions. In fact, it's been so out-of-the-box
that I've been running for years without a .muttrc.
The only things it has ever failed to do out-of-the-box for me
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 09:50:28PM +, Sam Rosenfeld wrote:
> Precisely what information do I need to get a working mutt for Debian
> 3.1? Once I get it working I think I can tailor it for my needs.
It should work out-of-the-box.
--
Jon Dowland
http://jon.dowland.name/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
http://www.mutt.org
Read the User Config File Samples of Wiki Section carefully, if you meet
some problem, please man muttrc. I think that's enough.
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 09:50:28PM +, Sam Rosenfeld wrote:
> Precisely what information do I need to get a working mutt for Debian 3.1?
+--
| On (17/09/05 21:50), Sam Rosenfeld wrote:
|
| From: "Sam Rosenfeld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
| Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 21:50:28 +
| Subject: configuring muttrc
|
ery Agent. Configuration will depend on which MTA and MDA
you're using. After that, you may or may not need to tweak a couple
of settings in your ~/.muttrc file.
There was relevant discussion a while ago in this thread on the Mutt
Users' list:
<http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.mutt.
Sam Rosenfeld wrote:
Precisely what information do I need to get a working mutt for Debian 3.1?
Once I get it working I think I can tailor it for my needs.
I think the best thing to do is google. There's a lot of good muttrcs
out there, ready for adaptation.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
Precisely what information do I need to get a working mutt for Debian 3.1?
Once I get it working I think I can tailor it for my needs.
Thanks.
sam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 11:53:54AM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 05:50:11 -0400, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> > Has anyone fixed this bug, other than commenting the alternates lines?
>
> Yes, those who have read /usr/share/doc/mutt/NEWS.Debian.gz .
>
He he, thank you.
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 05:50:11 -0400, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> Has anyone fixed this bug, other than commenting the alternates lines?
Yes, those who have read /usr/share/doc/mutt/NEWS.Debian.gz .
HTH,
Ray
--
Linux is many, many years away from being an enterprise-ready operating
system that
Has anyone fixed this bug, other than commenting the alternates lines?
I browsed the mutt.org sites (linked) and didn't find the bug, except
in our debian site, where it is mentioned. Does it mean the bug is
ours, or that I missed it?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
on Wed, 03 Dec 2003 08:45:40AM -0800, Tom insinuated:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 11:40:41AM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> >
> > but how do i find out the name? $DISPLAY is just ":0.0"; $TERM
> > says "rxvt" ... if i do an `aterm -name foobar`, is there any way
> > i can access the name 'foobar' f
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 11:40:41AM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
>
> but how do i find out the name? $DISPLAY is just ":0.0"; $TERM says
> "rxvt" ... if i do an `aterm -name foobar`, is there any way i can
> access the name 'foobar' from within that, by means of setting some
> environment variable
the same functionality in my ~/.muttrc. looking at
> > the documentation, i can't see that it supports conditionals. does
> > it? if so, how can i put one in like that?
>
> You may be able to achieve the same effect using named x terminals.
>
> I have various colour schem
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 04:47:22PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> in my vim configuration files, i have different settings for dark and
> light terminal backgrouds
> i'd like to have the same functionality in my ~/.muttrc. looking at
> the documentation, i can't see that it
cterm=none
...
endif
i'd like to have the same functionality in my ~/.muttrc. looking at
the documentation, i can't see that it supports conditionals. does
it? if so, how can i put one in like that?
thanks,
--
.~. nori @ sccs.swarthmore.edu
/V\ http://www.sccs.
gt; causes mutt to do weird things (I don't remember exactly what, but it
> > > might have shown debian-user as the sender of all messages from
> > > debian-user, instead of the actual senders).
> >
> > You want this in ~/.muttrc:
> >
> > set in
; might have shown debian-user as the sender of all messages from
> > debian-user, instead of the actual senders).
>
> You want this in ~/.muttrc:
>
> set index_format="%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15F (%4l) %s"
I thought that was the default, I think.
I did not like it and
ir" because it's the standard name for Maildir storage in a
user's home directory
DEFAULT=$MAILDIR
^ because there's no point delivering mail to an mbox in /var/spool if
you want your mail in Maildir format
> , yet when I uncomment the Maildir lines in th
Adam asked:
> You'll notice that .procmail uses Maildir to define a mailbox, yet when
> I uncomment the Maildir lines in the .muttrc, I get the error message
> that "Maildir is not a mailbox".
MAILDIR is a *variable* under procmail, not an actual directory. It
makes
Hi, I have been frustrated because messages have not been going into
designated
folders. It may be due to a .procmailrc / .muttrc incompatibility.
Environment variables in .procmailrc are ...
PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin
MAILDIR=$HOME/Mail
DEFAULT=/var/spool/mail/adam
LOCKFILE=$HOME
ught popped
> into my head that i could remove the
> ~/vi.recover files, try to move the
> contents of .muttrc to a new filename,
> delete .muttrc, and then copy the con-
> tents of that new file back into a
> _new_ .muttrc.
>
> in other words:
>
> 1) rm /var/t
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 01:18:39AM +, p wrote:
> debs,
>
> my .muttrc is "read-only." i need to
> modify it, as i've been able to do
> in the past. i don't know what i
> did to make it r/o.
>
> (permissions = 666)
>
> $ ls -la .muttrc
&
-- Glyn Millington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Friday, 20 December 2002, 07:29 AM +):
> Are you editing .muttrc while mutt is running? Does mutt lock its config
> file when it is in action?
Mutt doesn't lock the config file while running - I've often made
changes to
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 04:21:28AM +, p wrote:
> anyway, i'm able to save changes to the file
> _if_ i use the "!" to the command, ":wq". i
> guess the file is locked because it's a "hid-
> den" file? (the message i get after vi
> .mut
p <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-12-20 04:21:28 +]:
> > my .muttrc is "read-only." I need to
> > > -rw-rw-rw-1 bt bt 8503 Oct 31 00:13 .muttrc
That does not look read-only to me. Looks very writable. Too
writable.
> ...oops, sorry about the
Are you editing .muttrc while mutt is running? Does mutt lock its config
file when it is in action?
Glyn
--
Debian Home http://www.debian.org
Debian Planet http://www.debianplanet.org/
For the children http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-jr/
In a hurry??? http
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 05:47:17PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 01:18:39AM +, p wrote:
> > debs,
> >
> > my .muttrc is "read-only." i need to
> > modify it, as i've been able to do
> > in the past. i don't know wh
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 01:18:39AM +, p wrote:
> debs,
>
> my .muttrc is "read-only." i need to
> modify it, as i've been able to do
> in the past. i don't know what i
> did to make it r/o.
>
> (permissions = 666)
>
> $ ls -la .muttrc
Hi,
* p <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-12-20 02:18]:
>my .muttrc is "read-only." i need to
>modify it, as i've been able to do
>in the past. i don't know what i
>did to make it r/o.
>
>(permissions = 666)
>
>$ ls -la .muttrc
>
>-rw-rw-rw-
debs,
my .muttrc is "read-only." i need to
modify it, as i've been able to do
in the past. i don't know what i
did to make it r/o.
(permissions = 666)
$ ls -la .muttrc
-rw-rw-rw-1 bt bt 8503 Oct 31 00:13 .muttrc
(i am user "bt," so i a
llections={mail.rdlg.net/novalidate-cert}[],
> > {mailhost.sea.rdlg.net}custmail/[],
> > {mailhost.sea.rdlg.net}corpmail/[],
> > {mailhost.sea.rdlg.net}provmail/[]
> >
> > I tried a number of combinations for such for "mailboxes" and &
net}custmail/[],
> {mailhost.sea.rdlg.net}corpmail/[],
> {mailhost.sea.rdlg.net}provmail/[]
>
> I tried a number of combinations for such for "mailboxes" and "folder"
> options under my .muttrc but obviously somethingi s missing. Anyone got
> a good guess? I've d
such for "mailboxes" and "folder"
options under my .muttrc but obviously somethingi s missing. Anyone got
a good guess? I've dug around the mutt home page without much luck as
well.
:wq!
---
Robert L.
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 10:12:58PM +, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 08:08:57PM +0100, Jens Kubieziel wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 05:17:20PM +, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
> > > When starting mutt, it barfs over the line
> > > send-hook "~b [EMAIL PROTECTED]" my_hdr
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 05:17:20PM +, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
> Hi all -
>
> I'm having a problem with my .muttrc config.
>
> When starting mutt, it barfs over the line
> send-hook "~b [EMAIL PROTECTED]" my_hdr From: Name Surname <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
> Hi all -
>
> I'm having a problem with my .muttrc config.
>
> When starting mutt, it barfs over the line
> send-hook "~b [EMAIL PROTECTED]" my_hdr From: Name Surname <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 08:08:57PM +0100, Jens Kubieziel wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 05:17:20PM +, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
> > When starting mutt, it barfs over the line
> > send-hook "~b [EMAIL PROTECTED]" my_hdr From: Name Surname <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ^ ^ ^
>
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 05:17:20PM +, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
> When starting mutt, it barfs over the line
> send-hook "~b [EMAIL PROTECTED]" my_hdr From: Name Surname <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
^ ^ ^
Delete the '"' and the Space.
> The online mutt manual gives the exam
Hi all -
I'm having a problem with my .muttrc config.
When starting mutt, it barfs over the line
send-hook "~b [EMAIL PROTECTED]" my_hdr From: Name Surname <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
complaining
"b: not supported in this mode".
What's wrong with it?
Can
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 09:10:56PM -0500, D-Man et al wrote:
>[...] commented out [...] default value [...]
Oh, thank you. I thought that all missing parameters like this commented out
one, would result in mutt complaining when sending mail.
> PS. I would guess that english isn't your native l
happens when I send mail with mutt, and the manual
> > > sends it sends a command to sendmail (in this case, aka exim). It seems
> > > that it's done through the option 'set sendmail' in /etc/Muttrc.
> > >
> > > But I have this option commented!
>
Hmm, not sure about what you meant in your messages, but I'll try to
help anyways. I use mutt on my linux box with sendmail and at work
with cygwin using ssmtp as the MTA. On my linux box I don't have the
"set sendmail" option in my mutt rc file. It uses the default value
given in the manual a
mail (in this case, aka exim). It seems
> > that it's done through the option 'set sendmail' in /etc/Muttrc.
> >
> > But I have this option commented!
> >
> > Can anyone tell me what I'm missing, in order to understand it?
>
> The Fine Man
hrough the option 'set sendmail' in
> /etc/Muttrc.
> But I have this option commented!
>
> Can anyone tell me what I'm missing, in order to understand it?
If you have the "sendmail" line in your muttrc file commented out,
then I assume that mutt is using the defa
seems that
> it's done through the option 'set sendmail' in /etc/Muttrc.
>
> But I have this option commented!
>
> Can anyone tell me what I'm missing, in order to understand it?
The Fine Manual says:
6.3.176. sendmail
Type: path
Default: "/usr/sbi
Dear colleagues,
I am able to send mail correctly with Mutt.
I take a look to what happens when I send mail with mutt, and the manual sends
it sends a command to sendmail (in this case, aka exim). It seems that it's
done through the option 'set sendmail' in /etc/Muttrc.
Damon Muller wrote:
>
> Quoth will trillich,
> > % mutt
> > Error in /home/will/.muttrc, line 20: pgp_default_version:
> > unknown variable
> > source: errors in /home/will/.muttrc
> > Press any key to continue...
>
> You can actually replace the pgp
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 06:32:23PM -0500, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> The truth is that I am not sure. I supposed that it was in .muttrc,
> that's probably the reason why I could not see anything in the
> documentation. Does it mean that mutt uses fetchmail to fetch the
>
> The fact is that mutt doesn't get your mail, it is simply a reader, you must
> use fetchmail or something like that to get your mail from the pop server.
He-he. Some lines from my .muttrc:
## The following options are only available if you have
## compiled in POP support
set pop
t was in .muttrc,
> that's probably the reason why I could not see anything in the
> documentation. Does it mean that mutt uses fetchmail to fetch the
> messages?
>
> Philipp Schulte wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 04:12:05PM -0500, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
>
Quoth will trillich,
> % mutt
> Error in /home/will/.muttrc, line 20: pgp_default_version:
> unknown variable
> source: errors in /home/will/.muttrc
> Press any key to continue...
You can actually replace the pgp_default_version with the following
line:
source /usr/share/do
The truth is that I am not sure. I supposed that it was in .muttrc,
that's probably the reason why I could not see anything in the
documentation. Does it mean that mutt uses fetchmail to fetch the
messages?
Philipp Schulte wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 04:12:05PM -0500, Antoni
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 04:12:05PM -0500, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> Would someone indicate the exact structure of the lines
> in .muttrc to be added that handle the server, username, and
> password for mail server?
Are you sure you want .muttrc and not .fetchmailrc?
fetchmailrc&#x
Would someone indicate the exact structure of the lines
in .muttrc to be added that handle the server, username, and
password for mail server?
Thanks
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 07:11:59AM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> # apt-get update
> # apt-get upgrade
>
> % mutt
> Error in /home/will/.muttrc, line 20: pgp_default_version:
> unknown variable
> source: errors in /home/will/.muttrc
> Press any key to continue...
one mor
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 07:11:59AM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> # apt-get update
> # apt-get upgrade
>
> % mutt
> Error in /home/will/.muttrc, line 20: pgp_default_version:
> unknown variable
> source: errors in /home/will/.muttrc
> Press any key to continue...
all the
# apt-get update
# apt-get upgrade
% mutt
Error in /home/will/.muttrc, line 20: pgp_default_version:
unknown variable
source: errors in /home/will/.muttrc
Press any key to continue...
the section in question is:
set pgp_verify_sig=no
set pgp_default_version=gpg
#set
I have solved the problem by changing muttrc files. All is working now.
On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 10:26:31AM -0700, Dale Morris wrote:
> 1.) Is there some type of securinty *switch* or configuration file in
> Woody that I didn't have in my potato distribution before that is
> stopping mail from being sent in my user directory?
Take a look in the contents of /var/log/ex
't seen any, so you system is as fsck'ed up it seems ;-)
> My problem is I can't send mail with mutt 1.2i using Thomas Rossler's
> (or any other, for that matter) ultimate muttrc config file. However I
> can send mail using Netscape and outgoing mail configured to b
#x27;s
(or any other, for that matter) ultimate muttrc config file. However I
can send mail using Netscape and outgoing mail configured to be sent
through local host. I have Exim configured and am updated Potato, to
Woody. Previously Potato worked fine with mutt. My questions are:
1.) Is there some
On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 01:37:59PM -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> First things. Mutt will create a directory called ~/.mutt and you
> can place muttrc in there (note there is no leading . on the filename).
or, use ~/.muttrc (and ~/.mutt/).
> Now, I know whereof you speak, so I
, Jun 28, 2000 at 12:37:24PM -0700, cls--colo spgs wrote:
> > debs,
> >
> > ...thought i'd devote some energy to get mutt 1.0.1-9
> > working on my potato deskbox.
> >
> > my issue is that the "from" addy isn't correct.
> >
> >
On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 12:37:24PM -0700, cls--colo spgs wrote:
> debs,
>
> ...thought i'd devote some energy to get mutt 1.0.1-9
> working on my potato deskbox.
>
> my issue is that the "from" addy isn't correct.
>
> the man, faq, and howto speci
On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 12:37:24PM -0700, cls--colo spgs wrote:
> debs,
>
> ...thought i'd devote some energy to get mutt 1.0.1-9
> working on my potato deskbox.
>
> my issue is that the "from" addy isn't correct.
>
> the man, faq, and howto speci
debs,
...thought i'd devote some energy to get mutt 1.0.1-9
working on my potato deskbox.
my issue is that the "from" addy isn't correct.
the man, faq, and howto specify to modify ~/.muttrc,
which i don't have.
i even tried setting my email addy (at "set hos
x27;t work. I've
tried each of the following entries in my $HOME/.muttrc.
send-hook user 'set pgp_autoencrypt'
send-hook '^user' 'set pgp_autoencrypt'
send-hook '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' 'set pgp_autoencrypt'
One
hi,
not having much time, i thought i could shortcut the process of creating
myself a muttrc by asking someone to send me theirs (preferably someone
who subscribes to a lot of lists). i'm somewhat fed up with pine, but
don't want to devote the necessary time to learning (yet anothe
78 matches
Mail list logo
