Re: problems with netscape

2000-12-11 Thread Ken Weingold
Sorry for the sort of OT, but does Mozilla (or NS6 for that matter) have the stupidly left out Open button from the later Netscape releases? -Ken -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]AIM: ScopusFest

Re: problems with netscape

2000-12-10 Thread Ken Weingold
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000, Randy Edwards wrote: > > IE has simply become a better browser. > >Sad, but probably true. Definitely. I use NT more than anything, and IE is a pleasure next to Netscape. I have played with Mozilla, but as many say, it is slower than Netscape, which is turn is slower t

Re: problems with netscape

2000-12-10 Thread Christopher W. Aiken
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 10:06:41AM -0500, Randy Edwards wrote: -|> I am no fan of Microsoft, but I have come to hate Netscape. -| -| I'm quite sure you're not the only one... :-( -| -|> IE has simply become a better browser. -| -| Sad, but probably true. -| -|> I hope I am wrong, but there real

Re: problems with netscape

2000-12-10 Thread Randy Edwards
> I am no fan of Microsoft, but I have come to hate Netscape. I'm quite sure you're not the only one... :-( > IE has simply become a better browser. Sad, but probably true. > I hope I am wrong, but there really is no alternative, is there? I'm hoping that Mozilla saves us. The latest

Re: problems with netscape

2000-12-09 Thread Jonathan Gift
> I am no fan of Microsoft, but I have come to hate Netscape. Since 3.0 > I think it is has gotten worse and worse and these days is a total > piece of shit. IE has simply become a better browser. I think it > sucks, too, that Netscape is the only browser you can use under Linux. > I hope I am w

Re: problems with netscape

2000-12-08 Thread Brad
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 04:50:30PM -0800, Lazar Fleysher wrote: > > 2. Actually, I have 2 similar machines running Linux on both of them > 99.99% of the time. I have noticed that if I try to run netscape from my > other machine via network, it actually starts on my local machine. I am > not crazy!

Re: problems with netscape

2000-12-08 Thread Ken Weingold
On Fri, Dec 8, 2000, Lazar Fleysher wrote: > > > Ken writes: > > > I think it sucks, too, that Netscape is the only browser you can use > > > under Linux. I hope I am wrong, but there really is no alternative, is > > > there? > > > > I've got five installed... > > And? "Installed" is not cons

Re: problems with netscape

2000-12-08 Thread Lazar Fleysher
> Ken writes: > > I think it sucks, too, that Netscape is the only browser you can use > > under Linux. I hope I am wrong, but there really is no alternative, is > > there? > > I've got five installed... And? "Installed" is not constructive info, sorry... does it work? how does it perform?

Re: problems with netscape

2000-12-08 Thread John Hasler
Ken writes: > I think it sucks, too, that Netscape is the only browser you can use > under Linux. I hope I am wrong, but there really is no alternative, is > there? I've got five installed... -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, Wisconsin

Re: problems with netscape

2000-12-08 Thread Ken Weingold
On Fri, Dec 8, 2000, Lazar Fleysher wrote: > I have 2 strange problems with netscape communicator 4.73 > > 1. It renders some web pages 50 to 100 times slower than Internet exploer > on win 98 on the same machine! (I have Pentium-75). I am not sure that > it is configuration problem, I am afr

Re: problems with netscape

1999-05-05 Thread MallarJ
You probably have the libc6 version of xpm - you'll need to get the libc5 version. -Jay