On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 02:27:49AM -0600, Gary Turner wrote:
> >Does mutt have a quadoption for this?
>
> Paul, didn't you have a bounce set up for HTML? Or was it the Dman?
> Wasn't that in Exim, or procmail? Seems like a confirmation could be
> set up based on the same kind of parameters. Sin
Paul Johnson wrote:
>On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 10:16:09PM -0600, Gary Turner wrote:
>> >By the way, your message asks for a return receipt, which I would
>> >guess isn't everyone's preferred setting for a mailing list.
>>
>> Maybe for mail-lists we should honor requests for return receipts. Talk
>
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 10:16:09PM -0600, Gary Turner wrote:
> >By the way, your message asks for a return receipt, which I would
> >guess isn't everyone's preferred setting for a mailing list.
>
> Maybe for mail-lists we should honor requests for return receipts. Talk
> about your self-induced D
Daniel Barclay wrote:
>Jack Nguy wrote:
>>
>> Why is this on this mailing list again?
>
>By the way, your message asks for a return receipt, which I would
>guess isn't everyone's preferred setting for a mailing list.
Maybe for mail-lists we should honor requests for return receipts. Talk
about
Jack Nguy wrote:
>
> Why is this on this mailing list again?
By the way, your message asks for a return receipt, which I would
guess isn't everyone's preferred setting for a mailing list.
Daniel
--
Daniel Barclay
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Why is this on this mailing list again?
-Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Sean Burlington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian-User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] Capitalism (was Re: columbia -- what really ha
Charlie Reiman wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sean Burlington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 11:45 AM
To: DvB
Cc: Debian-User
Subject: Re: [OT] Capitalism (was Re: columbia -- what really happened)
This whole thread seems to be treating the rest of the
> > This whole thread seems to be treating the rest of the world like some
> > distant scenery.
> >
>
> >From any given point on the world, the rest of the world _is_ distant
> scenery. For futher discussion, see "Here vs. There," and "Small or Far
> Away: A Case Study."
Depending on countries,
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean Burlington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 11:45 AM
> To: DvB
> Cc: Debian-User
> Subject: Re: [OT] Capitalism (was Re: columbia -- what really happened)
>
> This whole thread seems to be treating th
Sean Burlington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> DvB wrote:
>
> > AFAIK, many European countries have been doing that for some time
> > now. Their citizens have a relatively high purchasing power, yet they
> > still have relatively successful and extensive social programs.
> > The ideology that ther
DvB wrote:
AFAIK, many European countries have been doing that for some time
now. Their citizens have a relatively high purchasing power, yet they
still have relatively successful and extensive social programs.
The ideology that there must be something wrong with you if you don't
make enough mon
"Brooks R. Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | How the US can justify spending so much money on Space while 33 million US
> | citizens live below the poverty line amazes me.
>
>
> As hard as they try, putting a socialist blanket over capitalism will never
> work.
AFAIK, many European cou
12 matches
Mail list logo
