On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 02:27:49AM -0600, Gary Turner wrote: > >Does mutt have a quadoption for this? > > Paul, didn't you have a bounce set up for HTML? Or was it the Dman? > Wasn't that in Exim, or procmail? Seems like a confirmation could be > set up based on the same kind of parameters. Since I just barely have > Mutt and Exim working, I'll bow to your expertise on this. ;)
Yeah, well, I don't want *all* return receipts honored, just human ones. I want to veto the spam ones. Either way, it's not a big enough deal for me to devise my own solution if mutt can't be bothered; I typically find return receipts to be fairly annoying and don't use them myself, but to each thier own. -- .''`. Baloo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian admin and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than to fix a system
msg29595/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
