Perhaps the "form factory" kernel-image-2.2.10 does not contain
'msdos' support? If so, you can probably use the 'vfat' filesystem
(which is backwards compatible) instead. Or, yes, build your own
image (the best way to do that would be via 'make-kpkg').
As for going back to an older kernel-imag
Jonas Steverud wrote:
> Used OS/2's fdisk and boot manager if that matters.
Fair enough. I don't know anything about OS/2's fdisk. Your /dev/hda2
may be different.
Matthew
Jonas,
I don't think that your dos partition would be on /dev/hda2. Dos fdisk
only lets you have two primary partions, and the second one is an
extended partion, which cant be mounted itself as it is only a container
for logical partitions, which appear in linux as /dev/hda[5678].
Check your parti
Jonas Steverud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've just upgraded to the 2.2.10-kernel (using the
> kernel-image-package), I used 2.0.33 before and it worked without any
> problem.
>
> root% mount -t msdos /dev/hda2 /msdos -o noexec,ro,nosuid,blocksize=1024,auto
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option,
>
> I've just upgraded to the 2.2.10-kernel (using the
> kernel-image-package), I used 2.0.33 before and it worked without any
> problem.
>
> root% mount -t msdos /dev/hda2 /msdos -o noexec,ro,nosuid,blocksize=1024,auto
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda2,
>or
5 matches
Mail list logo
