Re: [FIXED] Re: lirc on Debian with AMD64

2007-10-01 Thread Brad Sawatzky
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 12:04:28AM -0400, Brad Sawatzky wrote: > > On Sat, 29 Sep 2007, Greg Vickers wrote: > > > > > OK, I found out that Debian Etch uses a new input layer, and that the IR > > > inputs are in /dev/input/eventX where X corresp

Re: [FIXED] Re: lirc on Debian with AMD64

2007-10-01 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 12:04:28AM -0400, Brad Sawatzky wrote: > On Sat, 29 Sep 2007, Greg Vickers wrote: > > > OK, I found out that Debian Etch uses a new input layer, and that the IR > > inputs are in /dev/input/eventX where X corresponds the event number of > > your input devices in 'cat /pro

Re: [FIXED] Re: lirc on Debian with AMD64

2007-09-30 Thread Brad Sawatzky
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007, Greg Vickers wrote: > OK, I found out that Debian Etch uses a new input layer, and that the IR > inputs are in /dev/input/eventX where X corresponds the event number of > your input devices in 'cat /proc/bus/input/devices' > > So my IR device is /dev/input/event1, instead of

[FIXED] Re: lirc on Debian with AMD64

2007-09-29 Thread Greg Vickers
Hi all, Marty wrote: Greg Vickers wrote: Hi Marty, Sorry. I'm not familiar with udev or lirc, nor how they interact in deciding device names. It's surprising to me because I'm using the upstream lirc, 0.8.2, and I get /dev/lirc0, as Debian's udev expects. I'll try my mitigation stra