Re: [!] 2.6.26 + vga=791

2008-08-03 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Ron Johnson wrote: On 08/02/08 09:06, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: [snip] Good clue! But I am no closer and consider giving up: it would only be useful if I found a kernel parameter for the cmdline to avoid being without framebuffers. Any other "fix" entails recompiling the Debian Kernel, e.g. in or

Re: [!] 2.6.26 + vga=791

2008-08-02 Thread Ron Johnson
On 08/02/08 09:06, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: [snip] Good clue! But I am no closer and consider giving up: it would only be useful if I found a kernel parameter for the cmdline to avoid being without framebuffers. Any other "fix" entails recompiling the Debian Kernel, e.g. in order to install uvesf

Re: [!] 2.6.26 + vga=791

2008-08-02 Thread David Witbrodt
> From: David Witbrodt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, August 2, 2008 11:41:47 AM > Subject: Re: [!] 2.6.26 + vga=791 > > > > > David Witbrodt wrote: > > >>> So now I have to go item by i

Re: [!] 2.6.26 + vga=791

2008-08-02 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
David Witbrodt wrote: - Forwarded Message From: David Witbrodt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 1, 2008 10:34:51 PM Subject: Re: [!] 2.6.26 + vga=791 But I did something interesting: I recompiled 2.6.26-1-686 but changed

oldconfig (was Re: [!] 2.6.26 + vga=791)

2008-08-01 Thread Ron Johnson
On 08/01/08 21:35, David Witbrodt wrote: - Forwarded Message From: David Witbrodt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 1, 2008 10:34:51 PM Subject: Re: [!] 2.6.26 + vga=791 [snip] I use that after I compile my new kernels

Re: [!] 2.6.26 + vga=791

2008-08-01 Thread David Witbrodt
- Forwarded Message > From: David Witbrodt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, August 1, 2008 10:34:51 PM > Subject: Re: [!] 2.6.26 + vga=791 > > > > > But I did something interesting: I recompiled 2

Re: [!] 2.6.26 + vga=791

2008-08-01 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Hi, I reported here on 5/18/2008 that I couldn't use vga=791 with the Debian 2.6.25 kernel, but *could* with the 2.6.25 from kernel.org. Same issue with 2.6.26: vga=791 gets "undefined video mode". Yet it works fine with 2.6.26 from kernel.org, so

Re: 2.6.26 + vga=791

2008-08-01 Thread Chris Bannister
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:02:43AM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > Hi, > > I reported here on 5/18/2008 that I couldn't use vga=791 with the Debian > 2.6.25 kernel, but *could* with the 2.6.25 from kernel.org. Works here - stock Debian kernel: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# uname -a Linux box 2.6.25-2-68

Re: 2.6.26 + vga=791

2008-08-01 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: David Witbrodt wrote: And I tried vga=0x0317 and get "undefined videomode". Bummer. Just for sanity's sake, did you try "vga=0x317"? Yes. Same error. But I did something interesting: I downloaded http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/sid_d-i/arch-lates

Re: 2.6.26 + vga=791

2008-08-01 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
David Witbrodt wrote: And I tried vga=0x0317 and get "undefined videomode". Bummer. Just for sanity's sake, did you try "vga=0x317"? Yes. Same error. But I did something interesting: I downloaded http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/sid_d-i/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-tes

Re: 2.6.26 + vga=791

2008-07-31 Thread David Witbrodt
> And I tried vga=0x0317 and get "undefined videomode". Bummer. Just for sanity's sake, did you try "vga=0x317"? Dave W. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 2.6.26 + vga=791

2008-07-31 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Javier Vasquez wrote: On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 9:32 AM, David Witbrodt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I reported here on 5/18/2008 that I couldn't use vga=791 with the Debian 2.6.25 kernel, but *could* with the 2.6.25 from kernel.org. Same issue with 2.6.26: vga=791 gets "undefined

Re: 2.6.26 + vga=791

2008-07-31 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
David Witbrodt wrote: I reported here on 5/18/2008 that I couldn't use vga=791 with the Debian 2.6.25 kernel, but *could* with the 2.6.25 from kernel.org. Same issue with 2.6.26: vga=791 gets "undefined video mode". Yet it works fine with 2.6.26 from kernel.org, so

Re: 2.6.26 + vga=791

2008-07-31 Thread Javier Vasquez
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 9:32 AM, David Witbrodt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I reported here on 5/18/2008 that I couldn't use vga=791 with the Debian >> 2.6.25 kernel, but *could* with the 2.6.25 from kernel.org. >> >> Same issue with 2.6.26: vga=791 gets &

Re: 2.6.26 + vga=791

2008-07-31 Thread Bob Cox
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:02:43 -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hi, > > I reported here on 5/18/2008 that I couldn't use vga=791 with the Debian > 2.6.25 kernel, but *could* with the 2.6.25 from kernel.org. > > Same issue with 2.6.26: vga=791 get

Re: 2.6.26 + vga=791

2008-07-31 Thread David Witbrodt
> I reported here on 5/18/2008 that I couldn't use vga=791 with the Debian > 2.6.25 kernel, but *could* with the 2.6.25 from kernel.org. > > Same issue with 2.6.26: vga=791 gets "undefined video mode". Yet it > works fine with 2.6.26 from kernel.org, s

2.6.26 + vga=791

2008-07-31 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Hi, I reported here on 5/18/2008 that I couldn't use vga=791 with the Debian 2.6.25 kernel, but *could* with the 2.6.25 from kernel.org. Same issue with 2.6.26: vga=791 gets "undefined video mode". Yet it works fine with 2.6.26 from kernel.org, so it is clearly a Debian is