-free!).
When I boot, the b43 module is not auto-loading; I can drop into a
terminal and "sudo modprobe b43), and my wireless comes up.
So I added the single line:
b43
to the /etc/modules file, and on reboot, the module does not load:
"lsmod | grep b43" shows nothing. If I t
t; When I boot, the b43 module is not auto-loading; I can drop into a
> terminal and "sudo modprobe b43), and my wireless comes up.
>
> So I added the single line:
> b43
>
> to the /etc/modules file, and on reboot, the module does not load:
> "lsmod | grep b43"
On Tue, 06 May 2014 17:46:29 -0500
Kent West wrote:
>
> How can I get the module to load at startup instead of me having to
> manually modprobe it every time?
>
> Thanks!
>
Try this:
- On a freshly booted system, run
modprobe -v b43
- Add the printed modules in /et
dprobe b43), and my wireless comes up.
So I added the single line:
b43
to the /etc/modules file, and on reboot, the module does not load:
"lsmod | grep b43" shows nothing. If I then modprobe it, the lsmod
command shows 6 or 7 items and the network works.
How can I get the modul
From: Dave Witbrodt
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:54:12 -0500
> Dude, Liam explained that.
He did but my brain was fixed on the misconception that
loading the module would necessitate loading the library.
> ... 'v4l1compat.so' is a library file, ... not a module ...
So in this system v4l1_com
On 03/10/2011 09:46 PM, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote:
From: Liam O'Toole
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 22:24:29 + (UTC)
I'm not aware of a kernel module named v4l1compat, so I can't see how
explicitly loading such a module would have helped anyway.
[...]
The problem you were facing was a userspa
From: Liam O'Toole
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 22:24:29 + (UTC)
> I'm not aware of a kernel module named v4l1compat, so I can't see how
> explicitly loading such a module would have helped anyway.
OK, a spelling error.
peter@dalton:~$ egrep -v '(^ *#)|(^ *$)'
f interest, another approach which failed was to list
> v4l1compat in /etc/modules and invoke /usr/bin/skype in
> ~/.config/auto*/skype* .
>
> peter@dalton:~$ egrep -v '(^ *#)|(^ *$)' /etc/modules
> loop
> v4l1compat
>
> Why does this fail while use of LD_PRELOAD
From: Liam O'Toole
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:03:52 + (UTC)
> #!/bin/sh
> export LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libv4l/v4l1compat.so
> exec /usr/bin/skype
Works perfectly. Thanks.
For sake of interest, another approach which failed was to list
v4l1compat in /e
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 10:05:05AM -0600, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from David Jardine:
> > On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 03:08:02PM -0400, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> > > David Jardine wrote:
> > >
> > > >I've never had the courage to file a bug and wouldn't know where to
> > > >start, but I'm sur
Incoming from David Jardine:
> On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 03:08:02PM -0400, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> > David Jardine wrote:
> >
> > >I've never had the courage to file a bug and wouldn't know where to
> > >start, but I'm sure someone else on the list can explain.
> >
> >It is really easy to
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 03:08:02PM -0400, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> David Jardine wrote:
>
> >I've never had the courage to file a bug and wouldn't know where to
> >start, but I'm sure someone else on the list can explain.
> >
> >
>
> Hey,
>
>It is really easy to file a bug report. Just
David Jardine wrote:
I've never had the courage to file a bug and wouldn't know where to
start, but I'm sure someone else on the list can explain.
Hey,
It is really easy to file a bug report. Just install reportbug
package and it will do all the 'dirty' work. You need to have an active
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 09:01:05AM -0400, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> On Sat 21 May 05, 8:30 AM, Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 01:53:28PM +0200, David Jardine wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 03:25:21AM +0200, Jacobo221 wrote:
> >
On Sat 21 May 05, 8:30 AM, Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 01:53:28PM +0200, David Jardine wrote:
> > On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 03:25:21AM +0200, Jacobo221 wrote:
> > > In Debian Sarge, in /etc/modules out-of-the-box, the comments say that
&g
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 01:53:28PM +0200, David Jardine wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 03:25:21AM +0200, Jacobo221 wrote:
> > In Debian Sarge, in /etc/modules out-of-the-box, the comments say that
> > nything after '#' is ingored. But this is wrong. Only lines whi
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 03:25:21AM +0200, Jacobo221 wrote:
> In Debian Sarge, in /etc/modules out-of-the-box, the comments say that
> nything after '#' is ingored. But this is wrong. Only lines which BEGIN with
> '#' are ignored. This should be changed.
Hmm. &#
In Debian Sarge, in /etc/modules out-of-the-box, the comments say that nything
after '#' is ingored. But this is wrong. Only lines which BEGIN with '#' are
ignored. This should be changed.
Since /etc/modules appears to not be placed by any package but instead
dynamical
se modprobe: Can't locate module usbmouse
>
> and so on for every module that is now compiled in but used to be added
> in.
>
> These are the modules that are listed in /etc/modules. Is it safe to
> just manually edit that file and remove the entries?
Yes, of course. J
isc
> apm ppp_generic
> ppp_synctty msdos
> tulip
>
> Now, under the new kernel - 2.4.23 - I've got these compiled in. But
> when I boot, not unsurprisingly I get errors messages like:
>
> usbmouse modprobe: Can't locate module usbmouse
>
>
mouse
and so on for every module that is now compiled in but used to be added
in.
These are the modules that are listed in /etc/modules. Is it safe to
just manually edit that file and remove the entries?
Thanks
Kevin
--
Kevin Coyner
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
; modules at boot time and then load them. False?
>
> Is it correct that modules I wish to load at boot time need still be
> listed in /etc/modules? Are they other ways to load modules?
I don't know how Debian will be setting it up in the future, but for
kernel 2.6, the module handlin
; modules at boot time and then load them. False?
>
module-init-tools?
> Is it correct that modules I wish to load at boot time need still be
> listed in /etc/modules? Are they other ways to load modules?
true enough, but you probably need to bake your own kernel to select whatever modules
load at boot time need still be
listed in /etc/modules? Are they other ways to load modules?
Sorry but I now googled for days and couldn't find a documentation about
modules in Kernel 2.6.0 that could me explain these things in an easy
(for my bad brain) way.
Does anybody know such a doc
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 03:22:41AM -0800, Sebastia Altemir wrote:
> Thanks Bill and Marc - you are rigth : Andreas pointed to rcS.d, but I
> was fixed on looking into rc2.d !
> Now that it's clear that rcS.d does it, I dont understand the
> difference between level "1" and level "S" !
> I see rc1.d
Thanks Bill and Marc - you are rigth : Andreas pointed to rcS.d, but I
was fixed on looking into rc2.d !
Now that it's clear that rcS.d does it, I dont understand the
difference between level "1" and level "S" !
I see rc1.d is almost empty (?), but rcS.d not.
Can someone tell me the boot level sequ
27;d need to bother. Andreas told you quite plainly when
and where these modules get loaded:
> Andreas Janssen said :
> > Modules from /etc/modules are loaded by /etc/init.d/modutils. During
> > boot, it is executed through the symlink /etc/rcS.d/S20modutils.
So why don't y
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 04:58:59AM -0800, Sebastia Altemir wrote:
> Thanks Andreas, for your time !
> Here comes the problem : there is no link to MODUTILS in any "/etc/rcN.d".
/etc/rcS.d
--
Bill Moseley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
"kerneld" right now ...
Cheers !
Sebastian.
+++++++++
Andreas Janssen said :
> Modules from /etc/modules are loaded by /etc/init.d/modutils. During
> boot, it is executed through the symlink /etc/rcS.d/S20modutils.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hello
Sebastia Altemir (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I have solved my Ethernet startup problem by placing the line
> "fealnx" in the "/etc/modules" file. But I would like to know what
> Script ( as /etc/init.d/rc3.d/S05network -> /etc/init.d/network
I have solved my Ethernet startup problem by placing the line
"fealnx"
in the "/etc/modules" file.
But I would like to know what Script
( as /etc/init.d/rc3.d/S05network -> /etc/init.d/network under SuSE 8.2 )
uses this file to activate my Ethernet card at system startup
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 11:06:46AM -0700, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Trying to load a sound module that was in /etc/modules
> in 2.4.21 as cs4232.
> /etc/modules is no longer used in 2.6.0. Everything in
> the Debian Manual refers to /etc/modules.
Just as an aside, /etc/modules wasn
> Documentation on how to load modules in 2.6.0 on
> Debian is a mess.
Don't be too hard on Debian. Things have changed in 2.6.0, and it's true that
the docs haven't caught up yet. But this isn't surprising. Give the
maintainers some more time to catch up.
Meanwhile here's what I've figured
Hi,
Documentation on how to load modules in 2.6.0 on
Debian is a mess.
Maybe this is too advanced yet, who knows.
Trying to load a sound module that was in /etc/modules
in 2.4.21 as cs4232.
/etc/modules is no longer used in 2.6.0. Everything in
the Debian Manual refers to /etc/modules.
Now with
"J" == J F Gratton writes:
J> I might be using workarounds or not using my system effeciently
J> but I've never had to tamper with /etc/modules.conf.
J> All I did so far to get modules to load and to work was to put
J> them into /etc/modules.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 10:58:12PM -0500, J.F.Gratton wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 22:27, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
> > /etc/modules is used by Debian to manually add modules the user/sysadmin
> > wishes to load at boot time. After adding them, you then run
> >
On Thursday 20 February 2003 8:58 pm, J.F.Gratton wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 22:27, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
> > /etc/modules is used by Debian to manually add modules the
> > user/sysadmin wishes to load at boot time. After adding them, you
> > then run '
karounds or not using my system effeciently but
> >>I've never had to tamper with /etc/modules.conf.
> >>
> >>All I did so far to get modules to load and to work was to put them into
> >>/etc/modules.
> >>
> >>For instance: on a 2.
load and to work was to put them into
/etc/modules.
For instance: on a 2.2.x kernel, my NIC module is rtl8139.o . In the
2.4.x series, the module has been renamed to 8139too.o (actually it's a
new module, but let's not split hairs). All I did was to replace the
rtl8139 entry into /etc/mo
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 22:27, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
> /etc/modules is used by Debian to manually add modules the user/sysadmin
> wishes to load at boot time. After adding them, you then run
> 'update-modules' as root, which reads this, as well as some files in
>
J.F.Gratton wrote:
Good evening,
I might have missed that one, concerning /etc/modules, /etc/modules.conf
and modutils..
What does what in there ?
I might be using workarounds or not using my system effeciently but
I've never had to tamper with /etc/modules.conf.
All I did so far t
rk was to put them into
> /etc/modules.
>
> For instance: on a 2.2.x kernel, my NIC module is rtl8139.o . In the
> 2.4.x series, the module has been renamed to 8139too.o (actually it's a
> new module, but let's not split hairs). All I did was to replace the
> rtl8139 entry in
Good evening,
I might have missed that one, concerning /etc/modules, /etc/modules.conf
and modutils..
What does what in there ?
I might be using workarounds or not using my system effeciently but
I've never had to tamper with /etc/modules.conf.
All I did so far to get modules to loa
"Ross" == Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ross> I read the man pages. They didn't answer the questions I
Ross> had; the one for modules in particular is quite terse.
Yes, they are very terse and things are fairly confusing. When I said
"read the manuals for details" I meant j
I read the man pages. They didn't answer the questions I had; the one
for modules in particular is quite terse.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Ross" == Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ross> What is the relation of /etc/modules to /etc/modules.conf?
Ross> Which runs first?
/etc/modules.conf controls the behavior of modprobe.
/etc/modules is a list of modules loaded at system boot.
What is the relation of /etc/modules to /etc/modules.conf?
Which runs first?
Do options in modules.conf get picked up by the modules specified in
/etc/modules?
Do they get picked up even if the line in /etc/modules specifies some
options?
Do modules listed in /etc/modules get loaded by modprobe
x and reinstall from
| scratch, my module installation is faulty.
|
| For example, if I reboot say, 2.4.6, all is fine, but when I shut down
| and reboot with 2.4.17, almost no modules appear when I "lsmod" and cat
| /etc/modules shows nothing.
/etc/modules is a flat-list of modules you
en I create a link to /usr/src/linux and reinstall from
> scratch, my module installation is faulty.
>
> For example, if I reboot say, 2.4.6, all is fine, but when I shut down
> and reboot with 2.4.17, almost no modules appear when I "lsmod" and cat
> /etc/modules show
le, if I reboot say, 2.4.6, all is fine, but when I shut down
and reboot with 2.4.17, almost no modules appear when I "lsmod" and cat
/etc/modules shows nothing.
How can I install the modules correctly ?
Thank you,
Courtney
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
I don't know if this works in /etc/modules
but try it in the command line and
if this work put this line in
the boot scripts under /etc/init.d/
I use this option ( -f) with a Lucent Winmodem
driver that I have only in binary and compiled wit other kernel version,
and this work fine.
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: modconf ; etc/modules and loading modules at boot up
Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 09:28:37 -0300 (ARST)
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> #include
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon Feb 11, 2002 um 02:28:34PM:
>
&
> #include
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon Feb 11, 2002 um 02:28:34PM:
>
> > # /etc/modules : Kernel modules to load at boot time.
> > #
> > # This file should contain the name of kernel modules that are
> > # to be loaded at boot time, one per line.
> >
> #include
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon Feb 11, 2002 um 02:28:34PM:
>
> > # /etc/modules : Kernel modules to load at boot time.
> > #
> > # This file should contain the name of kernel modules that are
> > # to be loaded at boot time, one per line.
> >
#include
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon Feb 11, 2002 um 02:28:34PM:
> # /etc/modules : Kernel modules to load at boot time.
> #
> # This file should contain the name of kernel modules that are
> # to be loaded at boot time, one per line.
> 8139too.o
>
> Ok.
Not okay. T
Hi.
It´s me again.
I ve got another problem with my modconf and my /etc/modules.
I ve compiled the 2.4.17 Kernel.
One of my modules which have to be insmod at boot up is the 8139too.o modul.
If put it manually in the /etc/modules so it looks like this:
# /etc/modules : Kernel modules to load at
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 01:41:48PM +0200, THIVENT Pascal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using potato with a 2.4.12 kernel.
> At boot time, I can see a message like this one :
>
> #dmesg
> ...
> cat /etc/modules: no such file
> ...
>
> I don't remember having
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 01:41:48PM +0200, THIVENT Pascal wrote:
> Could someone tell me the structure, permissions, ownership of this file.
> Is is possible to generate this file or do I have to do it by hand ?
>
> It would be nice to recieve a /etc/modules in order to take
sorry for the third message:) see also man modules.conf
here's my /etc/modules
I load modules sb for awe32 sound card
# /etc/modules: kernel modules to load at boot time.
#
# This file should contain the names of kernel modules that are
# to be loaded at boot time, one per line. Comments begin with
# a `#', and everything on the line afte
well theres nothing special about this file. If you dont have it, the most
it can happen is that some modules are not loaded. The file /etc/modules
has in it ( one per line) the modules names of the modules which you want
to load automatically at startup. Do you have any problem about unloaded
Title: /etc/modules does not exists
Hello,
I'm using potato with a 2.4.12 kernel.
At boot time, I can see a message like this one :
#dmesg
...
cat /etc/modules: no such file
...
I don't remember having deleted this file but, indeed, this file is absent from my system.
I
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 08:18:44PM +0200, Martin F. Krafft wrote:
> what is the preferred method of loading modules? i guess /etc/modules
> will be the answer because of tool like modconf, but i don't generally
> use debian kernels or modconf, so i am interested on what you have to
wever, i have a question: take, for instance, an ethernet card
(let's assume a tulip). i can either add 'alias eth0 tulip' to
/etc/modutils/aliases and run `update-modules`, or i can add 'tulip' to
/etc/modules. in the end, it doesn't matter. the first method make
Quoting John Foster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I have changed the kernel modules several times and in looking over the
> various files that are used when the kernel boots..I noticed the the
> file /etc/modules has not changed since I installed the system
> Dec.18,2000. It seems that th
> I have changed the kernel modules several times and
> in looking over the various files that are used when the
> kernel boots..I noticed the the file /etc/modules has not
> changed since I installed the system Dec.18,2000. It
> seems that this should be altered as the kernel g
I have changed the kernel modules several times and in looking over the
various files that are used when the kernel boots..I noticed the the
file /etc/modules has not changed since I installed the system
Dec.18,2000. It seems that this should be altered as the kernel gives a
lot of boot messages
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
KW> So my question is: Why are the vfat and serial and smbfs loading when
KW> they are commented out of /etc/modules, but the 3c59x module does not
KW> load when it's commented out?
Because kmod doesn't know that your Ethernet card is
ndle on how modules work. I've commented out all
the items in /etc/modules, so that it is in essence an empty file. When
I reboot, my ethernet card doesn't work. Yet other items, like vfat and
serial and smbfs do load.
I thought since vfat and serial and smbfs were loading even tho
On Tue, Aug 24, 1999 at 09:25:16PM -0400, Hwei Sheng TEOH wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm running a system with a PNP network card that needs to be up before
> /etc/init.d/network executes. I need to execute `isapnp /etc/isapnp.conf'
> *before* /etc/modules is read by the kernel
*- On 24 Aug, Hwei Sheng TEOH wrote about "Configuring PNP card *before*
loading /etc/modules"
>
> So when is /etc/modules read/executed?? Is it possible to arrange stuff in the
> right order so that things happen in exactly this order: (1) isapnp executes,
> (2) the netwo
Hi!
I'm running a system with a PNP network card that needs to be up before
/etc/init.d/network executes. I need to execute `isapnp /etc/isapnp.conf'
*before* /etc/modules is read by the kernel (since the network driver cannot
do anything until isapnp configures the network card).
>> "RR" == Robert Rati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RR> Does anyone have the default /etc/modules file? Tia.
There is no such thing. You most likely need to load other modules
then I have to.
One thing to do is to just have "auto" in the file. This will enab
My /etc/modules file got erased somehow, and I know there were a lot of
modules that my system usually loads at boottime, although I only added
one. I'm not sure what they were, so could someone send me a copy of
there's so I have an idea of what to try to put back into it? Does anyon
On Tue, 28 Apr 1998, Ossama Othman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Perhaps we could consider having "make moudles_install" disable (ie
> > comment out) any modules mentioned in /etc/modules that are not compiled
> > into the current kernel. I would suggest that this s
Hi,
> Perhaps we could consider having "make moudles_install" disable (ie
> comment out) any modules mentioned in /etc/modules that are not compiled
> into the current kernel. I would suggest that this shouldn't be done
> automatically, but should instead prompt the
On Tue, 28 Apr 1998, Ossama Othman wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Yes .. ne was in /etc/modules .. and so it tried to load it on
> > top of the kernel one ..
> >
> > Shouldnt make modules_install write over this file or something .. or
> > be made too ?? wit
Hi all,
>
> Just a quicky, I have just compiled sound support (as a module) into my kernel
> and want to load the sound module everytime I boot, I places 'sound' in the
> /etc/modules files , where all the other modules are listed i.e. vfat, ne etc
> but when I boot i
Hi all,
Just a quicky, I have just compiled sound support (as a module) into my kernel
and want to load the sound module everytime I boot, I places 'sound' in the
/etc/modules files , where all the other modules are listed i.e. vfat, ne etc
but when I boot it says it can't find t
r-major-6 not being
> found. This fills up my log files. I probably have to stop kerneld and put
> a line in /etc/modules ( I have seen that on the list sometime ).
> Unfortunatyely I dont know the syntax ( something about alias module ) and
> can't find the relevant docs.
You w
line in /etc/modules ( I have seen that on the list sometime ).
Unfortunatyely I dont know the syntax ( something about alias module ) and
can't find the relevant docs.
Can anyone help ?? Thanks very much
G
At some point I absent-mindledly upgraded some package (modutils?) and
ended up losing the "io=0x300" option from the line in my /etc/modules
that loaded the ne2000 driver. It took me about an hour to figure out
because when my machine tried to boot and xdm started, my X server would
fai
82 matches
Mail list logo
