Hello debian-user,
I’m Jordan Patel from Federante Ltd. We’re interested in placing
an order and would love to see your latest product/service list
along with pricing.
Could you kindly send the details to ifalda...@federante.com.ar
at your earliest convenience?
Looking forward to your respons
Hi Michal,
Michal Maruska wrote:
> sid has version 1:2.47.2-0.1
> https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/git mentions as git source:
> https://repo.or.cz/w/git/debian.git/
>
> which indeed has the relevant branch:
> https://repo.or.cz/git/debian.git/shortlog/refs/heads/debian-sid
>
> but it's
Hi,
sid has version 1:2.47.2-0.1
https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/git mentions as git source:
https://repo.or.cz/w/git/debian.git/
which indeed has the relevant branch:
https://repo.or.cz/git/debian.git/shortlog/refs/heads/debian-sid
but it's not pointing to anything related to "1:2.47.2
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2024 at 9:18 PM
From: debianmailinglists.hz...@simplelogin.com
To: "debian-secur...@lists.debian.org"
Subject: Securing Debian Manual, Out of Date?
To whom it may concern:
I'm not sure if this is appropriate for the "security&quo
Hi,
> > I have been trying to get in contact with the maintainer of a package, but
> > they have not answered at all since my last mail a month ago. What should I
> > do about that?
>
> I'd probably wait another month and then contact the MIA team pointing
> them to the bug(s) I filed in the Debia
On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 14:55:24 +0200
emneo wrote:
Hello emneo,
>While I am thinking about it, is there some documentation to try and
>help on Debian (packaging or anything else).
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debmake-doc/index.en.html
You might also consider subscribing to the Debian Develo
On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 02:55:24PM +0200, emneo wrote:
> While I am thinking about it, is there some documentation to try and help on
> Debian (packaging or anything else).
>
> I definitely have some time to spare and would be glad to help where I can
> :)
Hm. I'm not the right person to explain,
While I am thinking about it, is there some documentation to try and
help on Debian (packaging or anything else).
I definitely have some time to spare and would be glad to help where I
can :)
On 07/10/2024 14:49, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 02:48:51PM +0200, emneo wrote:
That is a single maintainer package, and they are not in the list that
you just provided.
So I would guess that this is fine.
On 07/10/2024 14:44, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 02:17:15PM +0200, emneo wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for the answer, it is definitely not a highly imp
On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 02:48:51PM +0200, emneo wrote:
> That is a single maintainer package, and they are not in the list that you
> just provided.
I see. Anyway, thanks for making Debian better :)
Cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 02:17:15PM +0200, emneo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for the answer, it is definitely not a highly important update
> (Just a bump with some bug fixes, with some being crashes that are quite
> annoying to work around) but it can be dealt without.
>
> I'll be waiting for a
Hello,
Thank you for the answer, it is definitely not a highly important update
(Just a bump with some bug fixes, with some being crashes that are quite
annoying to work around) but it can be dealt without.
I'll be waiting for another month or so and then contact the MIA team
like you just w
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 10:24:54AM +0200, emneo wrote:
> I have been trying to get in contact with the maintainer of a package, but
> they have not answered at all since my last mail a month ago. What should I
> do about that?
I'd probably wait another month and then contact the MIA team poi
Hello,
I have been trying to get in contact with the maintainer of a package,
but they have not answered at all since my last mail a month ago. What
should I do about that?
I can provide patches for a specific package if needed but I am not
aware to whom I should contact regarding that matte
All the best
Keith Bainbridge
keithr...@gmail.com
keith.bainbridge.3...@gmail.com
+61 (0)447 667 468
UTC + 10:00
Forwarded Message
Subject: test sent date details
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 17:56:41 +1000
From: Keith Bainbridge
To: keithr...@gmail.com
All the best
Keith
It has worked
All the best
Keith Bainbridge
keithr...@gmail.com
keith.bainbridge.3...@gmail.com
+61 (0)447 667 468
UTC + 10:00
On 18/6/24 17:56, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
All the best
Keith Bainbridge
keith.bainbridge.3...@gmail.com
+61 (0)447 667 468
UTC + 10:00
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 11:22:17PM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 11/06/2024 06:45, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > Should you ever feel a need to read the longer version of the
> > documentation, it's in GNU info pages. So you would need to type
> > the command "info cor
On 11/06/2024 06:45, Greg Wooledge wrote:
Should you ever feel a need to read the longer version of the
documentation, it's in GNU info pages. So you would need to type
the command "info coreutils date" to get to it. And then you'd need
to figure out the user interface o
thanks roberto. that's exactly what i am looking for.
$ date +%a
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 07:19:42AM +0800, Jeff Peng wrote:
> While I expect the output should be:
>
> $ date +%such_a_option
> Tuesday
>
> or
> $ date +%such_a_option
> Tue
>
> does date command has this option?
You can run the command "man date" to rea
All the format codes are documented in the man page for date.
in particular:
+%a gives a short form, such as Mon
+%A gives full name, e.g. Monday
+%^a and +%^A as above, but all capital letters.
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Peng"
To: "debian-user"
> Wh
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 07:19:42AM +0800, Jeff Peng wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I run the folllowing command,
>
> $ date +%w
> 2
>
>
> While I expect the output should be:
>
> $ date +%such_a_option
> Tuesday
>
> or
> $ date +%such_a_option
> Tue
>
Hello,
I run the folllowing command,
$ date +%w
2
While I expect the output should be:
$ date +%such_a_option
Tuesday
or
$ date +%such_a_option
Tue
does date command has this option?
Thanks.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 01:39:34PM -, Curt wrote:
[...]
> It would've been clearer to have advised using another mail application,
> period [...]
> But no harm, no foul, and all is well. The only real mystery is how
> Tomas resisted getting yet another lick in against Gmail and Google, et
>
On 2024-04-16, John Crawley wrote:
>
> If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application
> that supports IMAP.
>
Gmail supports IMAP since more or less forever.
>>>
>>> AIUI the OP's problem was not when reading mail, but with mail
>>> submission of a
On 2024-04-16, Max Nikulin wrote:
>
> If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application
> that supports IMAP.
Gmail supports IMAP since more or less forever.
>>>
>>> AIUI the OP's problem was not when reading mail, but with mail
>>> submission of attachme
On Mon 15 Apr 2024 at 18:52:33 (-), Curt wrote:
> On 2024-04-15, David Wright wrote:
> > On Sun 14 Apr 2024 at 14:24:29 (-), Curt wrote:
> >> On 2024-04-04, Max Nikulin wrote:
> >> >
> >> > If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application
> >> > that supports IMAP.
On 16/04/2024 01:52, Curt wrote:
On 2024-04-15, David Wright wrote:
On Sun 14 Apr 2024 at 14:24:29 (-), Curt wrote:
On 2024-04-04, Max Nikulin wrote:
If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application
that supports IMAP.
Gmail supports IMAP since more or less forever
On 16/04/2024 03:52, Curt wrote:
On 2024-04-15, David Wright wrote:
On Sun 14 Apr 2024 at 14:24:29 (-), Curt wrote:
On 2024-04-04, Max Nikulin wrote:
If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application
that supports IMAP.
Gmail supports IMAP since more or less fore
On 2024-04-15, David Wright wrote:
> On Sun 14 Apr 2024 at 14:24:29 (-), Curt wrote:
>> On 2024-04-04, Max Nikulin wrote:
>> >
>> > If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application
>> > that supports IMAP.
>> >
>>
>> Gmail supports IMAP since more or less forever.
>
>
On Sun 14 Apr 2024 at 14:24:29 (-), Curt wrote:
> On 2024-04-04, Max Nikulin wrote:
> >
> > If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application
> > that supports IMAP.
> >
>
> Gmail supports IMAP since more or less forever.
AIUI the OP's problem was not when reading mail,
On 2024-04-04, Max Nikulin wrote:
>
> If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application
> that supports IMAP.
>
Gmail supports IMAP since more or less forever.
On 31/03/2024 22:35, David Wright wrote:
On Sun 31 Mar 2024 at 09:42:37 (+0300), Antti-Pekka Känsälä wrote:
But I'm worried my Gmail in Firefox is capable of stealing
files off my USB stick.
I've no answer for that, particularly in view of Max's reply
to my previous post.
I've always copied f
I filed bug report 1068122. I feel fine, despite my concern over my data.
Heartfelt thanks for all the advice!
On Sun 31 Mar 2024 at 09:42:37 (+0300), Antti-Pekka Känsälä wrote:
> I'm mounting and unmounting through the stick icon's menu on Xfce desktop.
> Maybe a fancy file chooser dialogue stays around analyzing the directory,
> as you suspect? But I'm worried my Gmail in Firefox is capable of stealing
>
I'm mounting and unmounting through the stick icon's menu on Xfce desktop.
Maybe a fancy file chooser dialogue stays around analyzing the directory,
as you suspect? But I'm worried my Gmail in Firefox is capable of stealing
files off my USB stick.
On 31/03/2024 11:46, David Wright wrote:
Double-clicking on the directory
mounts it and displays the files in it. Opening a text file
displays it. At least for a small file, FF does not hold the
file open, so I can immediately unmount the stick.
Gmail may do something more fancy
- https://devel
On Sat 30 Mar 2024 at 21:06:27 (+0200), Antti-Pekka Känsälä wrote:
> I was able to replicate this, by trying to send gmail to myself in Firefox,
> attaching a binary on a mounted USB stick.
Did you mount the stick yourself as a user (ie there's an
fstab entry for it), or as root, or does an automo
On 3/30/24 08:17, Antti-Pekka Känsälä wrote:
What could be the deal, when Firefox tries to stop me from unmounting a
stick, after I've accessed files on it through Firefox? I worry about my
stick security. Thanks.
Linux knows what files are open on each file system. If you try to
unmount a
I'd just like to add that I have seen the problem despite reinstalls with
Debian stable minor versions. Thanks!
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 07:32:16PM +0200, Antti-Pekka Känsälä wrote:
> Yes, closing Firefox does allow the stick to unmount cleanly, but I still
> worry.
To get an idea of what's going on, you can use "lsof":
tomas@trotzki:~$ lsof /dev/sda1
COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE
I can replicate this, by trying to send Gmail to myself in Firefox,
attaching a binary on a mounted USB stick. After the attachment supposedly
was uploaded, I tried to unmount the stick, but it blocked. "lsof | grep -i
KINGSTON" then shows a total of 129 lines from "x-www-browser". This lasted
for
I was able to replicate this, by trying to send gmail to myself in Firefox,
attaching a binary on a mounted USB stick. After the attachment supposedly
was uploaded, I tried to unmount the stick, but it blocks. "lsof | grep -i
KINGSTON" then shows a total of 129 lines from "x-www-browser". This last
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 17:17:52 +0200
Antti-Pekka Känsälä wrote:
> What could be the deal, when Firefox tries to stop me from unmounting
> a stick, after I've accessed files on it through Firefox? I worry
> about my stick security. Thanks.
It sounds like Firefox has a file open on the stick. To c
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 1:19 PM gene heskett wrote:
>
> On 3/30/24 11:36, Antti-Pekka Känsälä wrote:
> > What could be the deal, when Firefox tries to stop me from unmounting a
> > stick, after I've accessed files on it through Firefox? I worry about
> > my stick security. Thanks.
>
> Since this
Yes, closing Firefox does allow the stick to unmount cleanly, but I still
worry.
On 3/30/24 11:36, Antti-Pekka Känsälä wrote:
What could be the deal, when Firefox tries to stop me from unmounting a
stick, after I've accessed files on it through Firefox? I worry about
my stick security. Thanks.
Since this is normally a root operation, I'm confused. Likely what it
means i
What could be the deal, when Firefox tries to stop me from unmounting a
stick, after I've accessed files on it through Firefox? I worry about my
stick security. Thanks.
On 1/31/24 21:50, Max Nikulin wrote:
On 31/01/2024 20:24, didar wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 05:32:26AM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
How do I setup /etc/chrony/chrony.conf so it slams the system clock
to the
current time on the first cycle as its rebooting?
There was 20 yeas back, an ntpdate c
On 31/01/2024 20:24, didar wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 05:32:26AM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
How do I setup /etc/chrony/chrony.conf so it slams the system clock to the
current time on the first cycle as its rebooting?
There was 20 yeas back, an ntpdate command that would do that.
You can us
Darac Marjal wrote:
>
>The script works like this: if the root device is specified on the
>kernel command line AND the word "fixrtc" is specified, then get the
>time that the root file system was last mounted. The script then uses
>"date" to set the clock t
On Wed, 2024-01-31 at 12:56 -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> [...]
> Dec 30 03:15:42 bpi51e5p chronyd[1936]: Could not add source 192.168.71.3
> Dec 30 03:15:42 bpi51e5p chronyd[1936]: No suitable source for initstepslew
> Dec 30 03:15:42 bpi51e5p chronyd[1936]: Could not add source 192.168.71.3
> Dec
On 1/31/24 13:19, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 12:56:37PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
[...]
# Stop bad estimates upsetting machine clock.
maxupdateskew 10.0
initstepslew 30 192.168.71.3
# This directive enables kernel synchronisation (every 11 minutes) of the
# real-time clock
ine AND the word "fixrtc" is specified, then get the
time that the root file system was last mounted. The script then uses
"date" to set the clock to that date stamp.
I assume that the idea is that, rather than having the clock start at
1970, it's better to start it
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 12:56:37PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
[...]
> # Stop bad estimates upsetting machine clock.
> maxupdateskew 10.0
> initstepslew 30 192.168.71.3
> # This directive enables kernel synchronisation (every 11 minutes) of the
> # real-time clock. Note that it can’t be used alo
ed with result
'protocol'.
Dec 30 03:15:44 bpi51e5p systemd[1]: Failed to start chrony, an NTP
client/server.
What output did you get?
The time as reported by "date":
gene@bpi51e5p:~$ date
Sat Dec 30 05:30:58 AM EST 2023
gene@bpi51e5p:~$
gene@coyote:~$ date
Wed Jan 31 12:38
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:25:40AM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> On 1/31/24 08:53, John Hasler wrote:
> > Gene writes:
> > > How do I setup /etc/chrony/chrony.conf so it slams the system clock to
> > > the current time on the first cycle as its rebooting?
> >
> > initstepslew
> >
> > man chrony.co
On 1/31/24 08:53, John Hasler wrote:
Gene writes:
How do I setup /etc/chrony/chrony.conf so it slams the system clock to
the current time on the first cycle as its rebooting?
initstepslew
man chrony.conf
deprecated in favor of makestep, and did not work, John.
Thanks, John
Cheers, Gene He
Max Nikulin wrote:
> I think, the problem is no RTC on some *pi board, certainly chrony out of
> box setup is not ready to such environment and its solution is not
> maxstep.
That's what makestep (initstepslew now being deprecated) is for.
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On 1/31/24 07:13, Max Nikulin wrote:
On 31/01/2024 17:54, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
I think you want "maxstep". It's in the man page chrony.conf(5).
But if the time is "months off" perhaps you've got another problem
to fix first?
Well, I do have other probs with that machine, mostly with the phys
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 07:53:01AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> Gene writes:
> > How do I setup /etc/chrony/chrony.conf so it slams the system clock to
> > the current time on the first cycle as its rebooting?
>
> initstepslew
>
> man chrony.conf
Debian 12 has chrony 4.3, and in *that* version of
Gene writes:
> How do I setup /etc/chrony/chrony.conf so it slams the system clock to
> the current time on the first cycle as its rebooting?
initstepslew
man chrony.conf
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 05:32:26AM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> How do I setup /etc/chrony/chrony.conf so it slams the system clock to the
> current time on the first cycle as its rebooting?
> There was 20 yeas back, an ntpdate command that would do that.
> Now it appears to conflict with the other
On 31/01/2024 17:54, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
I think you want "maxstep". It's in the man page chrony.conf(5).
But if the time is "months off" perhaps you've got another problem
to fix first?
I think, the problem is no RTC on some *pi board, certainly chrony out
of box setup is not ready to su
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 05:32:26AM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> How do I setup /etc/chrony/chrony.conf so it slams the system clock to the
> current time on the first cycle as its rebooting?
> There was 20 yeas back, an ntpdate command that would do that.
> Now it appears to conflict with the other
How do I setup /etc/chrony/chrony.conf so it slams the system clock to
the current time on the first cycle as its rebooting?
There was 20 yeas back, an ntpdate command that would do that.
Now it appears to conflict with the other client/servers
Thanks
Cheers, Gene Heskett, CET.
--
"There are fo
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 08:17:21AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 02:07:14PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > I'm still amazed the OP hasn't understood that "date" can output
> > custom formats -- and that it's not always possible
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 01:51:41PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
[...]
> Originally it did only put out text in an xterm, but then i shamelessly
> exploited code from the exploitation chain xpppload <- xisdnload <- xload
> to give it a histogram in ain additional separate window.
Now this one bea
rrently have a laptop, so the
> battery-status part wouldn't currently apply, but this sounds like
> something I might like to try when that changes; any chance of sharing
> the specific details?
Glad to oblige.
The date part is the sma
On 2023-10-22 at 07:24, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> I better not tell. My clock is a... shell script in a tiny Xterm
> which also shows my battery status.
Ooo, that sounds interesting. I don't currently have a laptop, so the
battery-status part wouldn't currently apply, but this sounds like
somethi
Hi,
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> My clock is a... shell script in a tiny Xterm which
> also shows my battery status.
My digital clock with date display is a C program which mainly watches the
network traffic. It even has an own date format ("A0" = 2000, now is "C3"
ior from 10 years ago.
I came back to it some time last century, after a very instructive
travel which encompassed Gnome (Metacity), Xfce, Awesome and other
exotica (olwm, GWM...)
> My clock is FvwmXclock. It's an analog-style 12 hours without date
> display.
I better not tell. My clo
e last century. It's configured by a ~/.fvwm2rc
which is at least 20 years old with minor changes to adapt to changed
paths and to avoid some unwanted behavior from 10 years ago.
My clock is FvwmXclock. It's an analog-style 12 hours without date
display.
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 10:13:59 +0200
"Thomas Schmitt" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Charlie wrote:
> > The date on that system is one day in advance and one hour late. Not
> > terrible,
> > However after a short period 100% of one of the CPU cores is used,
> > noisy
Hi,
Charlie wrote:
> The date on that system is one day in advance and one hour late. Not
> terrible,
> However after a short period 100% of one of the CPU cores is used,
> noisy running, and top -c shows this as the user:
> /usr/libexe/fvwm2/2.7.0/FvwmScript 17 4 none 0 8 Fvwm
Hello All,
Have a a Dell Vostro laptop: Bookworm up to date and
upgraded operating system to that state. Using FVWM window
manager.
The date on that system is one day in advance and one hour late. Not
terrible,
However after a short period 100% of one of the
On 25/03/2023 10:39, Albretch Mueller wrote:
You can't physically alter a DVD[+|-]R once it is burned ...
Do you customize images to change preferences, e.g. to make OS aware
that hardware clock is set to local time? If you do not than OS almost
certainly assumes that system time is in UTC,
On 25/03/2023 10:39, Albretch Mueller wrote:
On 3/25/23, Max Nikulin wrote:
- Both Debian and Windows installed on the hard drive ...
Thank you for the steps and the logical elucidations that may
certainly help someone else, but I can't do that "because" all
electronic devices which I use are
David Wright composed on 2023-03-24 23:20 (UTC-0500):
> BTW I've only really trusted reading or setting the RTC by means of
> the CMOS screens, and treat it as a one-time only process (upon
> acquisition), assuming the coin-cell battery never needs replacing.
Lucky you. I can only dream of going
On Fri 24 Mar 2023 at 19:10:49 (-0400), Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > That works great for the Live OS, but not for the fixed-disk OS. If
> > the Live OS sets the HW clock to local upon shutdown, but the fixed-disk
> > OS expects the HW clock to be UTC, then the fixed-disk OS is wrong
> > every time i
, it is 5 hours ahead.
> I used logs which names a time a la:
>
> _DT=$(date +%Y%m%d%H%M%S)
> _BN=$(basename "${_SDIR}")
> _LOG_FL="${_BN}_${_DT}.log"
> ...
> If anything, timing is one of the aspects of reality which should be
> coordinated.
Hence the
On 3/25/23, Max Nikulin wrote:
> - Both Debian and Windows installed on the hard drive ...
Thank you for the steps and the logical elucidations that may
certainly help someone else, but I can't do that "because" all
electronic devices which I use are being kept.
You can't physically alter a DVD[
On 25/03/2023 07:07, Albretch Mueller wrote:
I am using right now a DELL laptop which had Windows 11 installed but
I expect that the following should work smoothly enough:
- Hardware clock is in UTC
- Both Debian and Windows installed on the hard drive are configured to
your local time zone
I am using right now a DELL laptop which had Windows 11 installed but
started to give me sh!t which I totally ignored and started to use my
good old friend Debian in order to "keep moving".
By the way, after a while as if for a magical reason the hw time
changed and now it is showing to me the sa
> That works great for the Live OS, but not for the fixed-disk OS. If
> the Live OS sets the HW clock to local upon shutdown, but the fixed-disk
> OS expects the HW clock to be UTC, then the fixed-disk OS is wrong
> every time it boots after the Live OS.
AFAIK the Linux kernel is pretty careful n
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 05:51:30PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > If your policy choice ends up being "set HW clock to local", then you
> > also have to make sure the correct time zone is set on each operating
> > system, each time it boots. I have no idea how one does that on Debian
> > Live, s
> If your policy choice ends up being "set HW clock to local", then you
> also have to make sure the correct time zone is set on each operating
> system, each time it boots. I have no idea how one does that on Debian
> Live, since I've never used Debian Live. So, I can hope for your sake
> that D
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 05:13:31PM +, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> I should have pointed out that I always go into exposed mode (use the
> Internet) with a live DVD. My laptop was always 6 hours ahead and now
> that they changed to summer time, it is 5 hours ahead.
So, you have at least two oper
I should have pointed out that I always go into exposed mode (use the
Internet) with a live DVD. My laptop was always 6 hours ahead and now
that they changed to summer time, it is 5 hours ahead.
I used logs which names a time a la:
_DT=$(date +%Y%m%d%H%M%S)
_BN=$(basename "${_SDIR}"
Hello,
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 09:41:40PM +, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> I am using this (yes, visually cr@ppy ;-)) code snippet to set back
> the time 5 hours. hwclock tells me it worked fine but the terminal
> windows opened before and after running hwclock still give me the
> "old" time sett
On Thu 23 Mar 2023 at 21:41:40 (+), Albretch Mueller wrote:
> I am using this (yes, visually cr@ppy ;-)) code snippet to set back
> the time 5 hours. hwclock tells me it worked fine but the terminal
> windows opened before and after running hwclock still give me the
> "old" time setting?
You'
On 3/23/23, Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
> On 3/23/23, Albretch Mueller wrote:
>> I am using this (yes, visually cr@ppy ;-)) code snippet to set back
>> the time 5 hours. hwclock tells me it worked fine but the terminal
>> windows opened before and after running hwclock still give me the
>> "old" tim
etting?
>
> _HRS_PM=-5
>
> ###
> #
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1092631/get-current-time-in-seconds-since-the-epoch-on-linux-bash
> _DTS=$(date +%s)
> echo "// __ \$_DTS: |${_DTS}|";
> _DTF=$(date --date @${_DTS})
> echo "// __ \$_DTF: |${_DTF}|";
&
NTP).
If you want to change the system's time, then change the system's time,
not the hardware clock.
To change the system's time, use `date` (see `man date` for the format
of its arguments).
But changing the system's time is very rarely a good idea.
If you want to change t
et-current-time-in-seconds-since-the-epoch-on-linux-bash
_DTS=$(date +%s)
echo "// __ \$_DTS: |${_DTS}|";
_DTF=$(date --date @${_DTS})
echo "// __ \$_DTF: |${_DTF}|";
_NEW_DTS=$((_DTS+3600*_HRS_PM))
echo "// __ \$_NEW_DTS: |${_NEW_DTS}|";
# Convert the number
On Sat, Nov 05, 2022 at 05:12:40PM +0100, local10 wrote:
> Nov 5, 2022, 15:30 by g...@wooledge.org:
>
> >> > > local10 wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Any ideas as to get the old syslog date format back?
> >>
> >
> > What
Nov 5, 2022, 14:53 by j...@k4vqc.com:
> On Sat, 2022-11-05 at 11:34 +0100, local10 wrote:
>
>> Nov 5, 2022, 09:55 by scdbac...@gmx.net:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > local10 wrote:
>> >
>> > > Any ideas as to get the old syslo
> > > local10 wrote:
> > >
> > > > Any ideas as to get the old syslog date format back?
What caused a change? What version of Debian are you running? What
happened on the date in question (November 4) -- were some packages
updated? Which ones?
Here in Debia
On Sat, 2022-11-05 at 11:34 +0100, local10 wrote:
> Nov 5, 2022, 09:55 by scdbac...@gmx.net:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > local10 wrote:
> >
> > > Any ideas as to get the old syslog date format back?
> > >
> >
> > The internet points to /etc/r
Nov 5, 2022, 09:55 by scdbac...@gmx.net:
> Hi,
>
> local10 wrote:
>
>> Any ideas as to get the old syslog date format back?
>>
>
> The internet points to /etc/rsyslog.conf and in there:
>
> #
> # Use traditional timestamp format.
> # To enable
1 - 100 of 1395 matches
Mail list logo
