At Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:56:07 -0400,
Tony Baldwin wrote:
>
> I have xautolock and slock installed, and have tried to use this:
> xautolock -time 5 -locker slock
> for those times I walk away and forget to engage slock.
> But it doesn't work.
> Any idea why?
Stupid question but are you sure slock i
sn't work.
> > Any idea why?
>
> No, but I can offer a solution. Try xscreensaver (and related). If
> you run Gkrellm, you can use Gkrellshoot to lock it at the click of a
> button, or it can be set up to autolock after inactivity.
OP should also fill a bug report in or
On 27 Jan 2004, Nori Heikkinen told this:
> hey all,
Yo,
> i'm running gaim 0.75-1, and haven't had any other problems with it of
> late. has anyone else notices this behaviour, and if so, do they know
> of a fix?
Dunno for your yahoo problem since I considerate it as non free and so
don't
I posted it to the "wrong" group, I hope I will be luckier here :/
zeDek
On 6 Jan 2004, Xavier Maillard<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mused:
> Hi,
>
> I have asked everywhere I could about that. Nobody until now could
> find a solution. So I am trying as a last resort here ;)
&
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 27 Dec 2003, Stephen Liu<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake:
> Hi folks,
Yo,
> OO1.1 failed to start.
k.
> On KDE desktop
> KStart -> OO 1.1.0 -> OO write
> It started and finally died.
>
> On Konsole window
> $ openoffice
> Starting configuration import into
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
<#secure method=pgpmime mode=sign>
Hi,
Just a quick message to ask whether there are people out there who are
using thttpd with CGI.
I ask this because I can't figure out how to tell it to handle cgi-bin
directories from my users.
Actually I permit to al
Christophe Courtois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le Vendredi 22 Août 2003 00:08, Alex Malinovich a déclamé :
> > Assuming you're exchanging messages with friends who have French,
> > Japanese, and English fonts installed, and that their mailers
> > support Unicode, you'll obviously have no pr
Hi,
Since ages now I am struggling to have a full Apache2/PHP4 safe,
reliable and _usable_ environment ready and running at home but not only.
What a surprise when I've seen the latest PHP4 package update was the
first to officially "embedd" (typo ?) Apache2 support !
Okay it is not used/built a
yoann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hello,
>
> Hello
Hi,
> > I know this has already been discussed here and there but I really
> > want to know why Debian doesn't provide PHP4 for Apache2.
>
> what is the reason Apache2 in debian don't support PHP4 ?
Joker :)
> > In fact I am
Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Xavier Maillard wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I know this has already been discussed here and there but I really
> > want
>
> > to know why Debian doesn't provide PHP4 for Apache2. In fact I am
> > in a desperate
Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 21:22:14 +0200
> Xavier Maillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I can understand your point but mine is different in which I _only_
> > want debian packages on those systems.
>
> Then make
Yves Goergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i have seen some time ago (as i was quite new to debian/linux) that
> debian packages are far not current or partially even over some years
> old. so i have decided for myself, to install only some uncritical
> packages like gcc/compilers and some oth
Hello,
I know this has already been discussed here and there but I really want
to know why Debian doesn't provide PHP4 for Apache2.
In fact I am in a desperate need of it for my personnal use and also
for my work.
So why ? I know PHP4 *IS* working pretty well in conjunction with
Apache2 (i had f
Alex Malinovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 00:59, Xavier Maillard wrote:
> --snip--
> > Hmm, would you mind expanding on how you did set it globally ? I am
> > quite interested even though it is not my main problem for
> > instance.
>
&
Alex Malinovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 12:37, Xavier Maillard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I had have already a discussion about this on the ding mailing-list
> > and
>
> > there opinions was quite different. So I am asking it
Robert Storey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 19:37:29 +0200 Xavier Maillard
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > It seems that 10 years after its creation, Unicode is not as used
> > as it should be (my opinion) and so, I am not su
Hi,
I had have already a discussion about this on the ding mailing-list and
there opinions was quite different. So I am asking it again here just
to get the maximum amount of informations before taking a decision.
In fact I want(ed) to know whether it is/was safe to use Unicode
(i.e. utf-8) encod
Hello,
Since ages, I wanted to replace CVS here.
I firstly tried to find out all the most interesting candidates for
this. I have now a list of 2 items: subversion and tla.
I tried to setup tla but didn't achieve totally this task.
So now I am facing a dilemna: what is the most appropriate soft
Hello,
This is no troll at all here ;)
I plan to switch from my current (basic) CVS server here to something
more elaborated.
I found out 2 possible replacements to it: subversion and tla.
I just wanted to have feedback on the use of each other by some of you.
IMO, tla seems much more simpler
19 matches
Mail list logo
