Robert Storey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 19:37:29 +0200 Xavier Maillard > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > It seems that 10 years after its creation, Unicode is not as used > > as it should be (my opinion) and so, I am not sure many software > > (communication software) are "aware" of Unicode stuff. Except > > bloated > piece of software such as Outlook, is there any risk I can encounter > by using utf-8 in my daily default encoding system ? > > Dear Xavier, > > I'd be interested to know how to use Unicode as the default > system. You mean just by setting the locale, or is there more? I'd be > interested in setting up all my apps to use it, and would report back > (on this list) how well it worked (or didn't work).
Actually this was not my intention :) Err.. I mean I can do it partially but my main attempt would be first to have it set to UTF-8 for my mail/usenets exchange. But why not, in a near future, I could be interested to just migrate definetely and get rid of all this bad mixture iso-soup encoding. So to ask again: is it safe to use any subset of the Unicode system to communicate on Usenets and more generally for the mail exchange ? > regards, Robert Regards, zeDek -- main(){printf(&unix["\021%six\012\0"],(unix)["have"]+"fun"-0x60);}
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature