> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 7:25 AM
> From: "Bret Busby"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal
> authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
>
>
> but, as you insist on whining, rather than making an effor
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 7:13 AM
> From: "Bret Busby"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal
> authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
>
>
> Then "fail" seems to be the appropriate word.
>
>
And you
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 7:16 AM
> From: "Bret Busby"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal
> authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
>
>
> It is unfortunate that you refused to read the Debian pack
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 7:14 AM
> From: "Pocket"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal
> authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
>
>
>
> Are you comparing the same package/version arch to debian?
tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 10:40:33PM +0100, Stella Ashburne wrote:
> >
> > This one?
> >
> >https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/wpasupplicant
> >
> > Cheers
>
> And, from the link that Tomas posted;
>
> "
> -- P
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 6:57 AM
> From: "Bret Busby"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal
> authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
>
>
> I do not know whether you have heard of the search engine
Hi Tomas
Thanks for your reply.
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 6:18 AM
> From: to...@tuxteam.de
> To: "Stella Ashburne"
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal
> authenticati
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 5:16 AM
> From: "Anssi Saari"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal
> authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
>
>
> Are you sure? WPA3-Personal is hardly new so Bookworm shou
Hi guys
My Debian distro has a kernel version of 6.1.69-1 and the installed
wpasupplicant's version for Debian Bookworm is 2:2.10-12.
I don't use Network Manager; instead I rely solely on the ifup and ifdown
scripts to bring up my network interfaces.
My wireless router in my BFF's residence is
Hi Greg
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2023 at 2:43 AM
> From: "Greg Wooledge"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: From which kernel should I upgrade my installed Debian to
> linux-image-6.1.0-15-amd64?
>
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 07:38:02PM +0100, St
Hi Andy
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 at 11:25 PM
> From: "Andrew M.A. Cater"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: From which kernel should I upgrade my installed Debian to
> linux-image-6.1.0-15-amd64?
>
>
> If you're not currently booted into the erroneous 6.1.0-14 - don't boo
Hi Greg
Thank you for taking the time to explain in detail.
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 at 10:16 PM
> From: "Greg Wooledge"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Release process notes [WAS Need clarifications about how to
> deal with the installed problematic kernel, linux-im
Hi Andy
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 at 3:13 PM
> From: "Andrew M.A. Cater"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Release process notes [WAS Re: Need clarifications about how to deal
> with the installed problematic kernel, linux-image-6.1.0-14-amd64 (6.1.64-1)]
>
>
> linux-image-[f
Hi
As of now, I'm quite hesistant to upgrade my installed Debian Bookworm to
linux-image-6.1.0-15-amd64 as there are two users who reported they have
problems with it (cf.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2023/12/msg00570.html and
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2023/12/msg00607.html)
Hi Andy
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 at 3:20 PM
> From: "Andrew M.A. Cater"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Need clarifications about how to deal with the installed
> problematic kernel, linux-image-6.1.0-14-amd64 (6.1.64-1)
> dpkg is low level: it will work to install o
ec 11, 2023 at 04:31:22AM +0100, Stella Ashburne wrote:
> > Someone on a social media platform stated that there are only two
> > "canonical" [sic] ways to verify the version of Debian installed on a
> > system. They are:
> >
> > uname -a
> >
> > /p
Hi Greg
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 at 11:27 AM
> From: "Greg Wooledge"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Need clarifications about how to deal with the installed
> problematic kernel, linux-image-6.1.0-14-amd64 (6.1.64-1)
>
>
> Well, the question is what you want.
*snip* *
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 at 11:05 AM
> From: "Yves Bellefeuille"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Debian 12.3 image release delayed
>
> Is the problem solved? Is it safe to upgrade?
According to Steve McIntyre, it is.
Click the following link to read his announcement:
Hi Michael
> Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2023 at 9:29 PM
> From: "Michael Kjörling" <2695bd53d...@ewoof.net>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Need clarifications about how to deal with the installed
> problematic kernel, linux-image-6.1.0-14-amd64 (6.1.64-1)
>
>
> This combinatio
Hi Greg
> Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2023 at 11:08 PM
> From: "Greg Wooledge"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Need clarifications about how to deal with the installed
> problematic kernel, linux-image-6.1.0-14-amd64 (6.1.64-1)
>
>
> Note that purging 6.1.0-14 will also remove t
Hi Greg
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 at 2:06 AM
> From: "Greg Wooledge"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Need clarifications about how to deal with the installed
> problematic kernel, linux-image-6.1.0-14-amd64 (6.1.64-1)
>
>
> In order to avoid having to remember to re-ins
Hi guys
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 at 9:17 AM
> From: "Steve McIntyre" <93...@debian.org>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: 12.4.0 point release published
>
> Hi folks,
>
> The new 12.4.0 point release is now out. It contains the needed fixes
> for the ext4 data corruption bug (
Hi,
I am using Debian Bookworm, the current stable release with the whole SSD being
encrypted with LUKS2. After decryption, the file system of the logical volume
is ext4.
This is what happened to my computer many hours ago.
My device upgraded to the latest kernel, linux-image-6.1.0-14-amd64 an
Mon cher
> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2022 at 11:26 PM
> From: "Charles Curley"
> To: "Debian Users"
> Subject: Re: What is the neat way of organizing files in
> /etc/network/interfaces.d ?
>
>
> Or put them all in /etc/network/unused-interfaces/, and manage the lot
> with symlinks in /etc/network/i
You're right, mon cher.
My typos have indeed led to confusion and they're inexcusable. Mea culpa
> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2022 at 7:15 PM
> From: "Greg Wooledge"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: What is the neat way of organizing files in
> /etc/network/interfaces.d ?
>
> Yo
Excuse me, how is the original post "Permanent email address?" relevant to this
mailing list?
Excuse me, Fero Dali, how is your post/question relevant to this mailing list?
Mon cher
It's been quite a while since I heard from you. I hope everything's well with
you and your family!
> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2022 at 11:42 AM
> From: "David Wright"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: What is the neat way of organizing files in
> /etc/network/interfaces.d
Mon cher
Thanks for your reply.
> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2022 at 9:33 AM
> From: "Charles Curley"
> To: "Debian Users"
> Subject: Re: What is the neat way of organizing files in
> /etc/network/interfaces.d ?
>
> Network Manager.
>
No thank you. I won't touch it with a ten-foot pole.
> If you i
Hi guys
I connect to the internet using one of the following methods:
1. LAN cable
2. Tethering to a mobile phone using a USB cable
3. Wireless (4 different wireless networks)
Based on the result of
ip addr show
my wireless interface is called wlo1
The contents of /etc/network/interfaces are
Mon cheri
> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2022 at 10:09 AM
> From: "David Wright"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Under each of these scenarios, what is the neatest and simplest
> way to manipulate the /etc/network/interfaces file?
>
> Please elaborate on what you mean by "correct" i
Mon cheri
> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2022 at 10:31 PM
> From: "David Wright"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Under each of these scenarios, what is the neatest and simplest
> way to manipulate the /etc/network/interfaces file?
>
> On Sat 19 Mar 2
Mon cheri
Your instructions and explanations are so clear and concise that even a
beginner (what's the urban slang for it? Is it n00b?) is able to follow them
without problems.
> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2022 at 10:31 PM
> From: "David Wright"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: U
Mon cheri
> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2022 at 2:40 AM
> From: "Brian"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd + systemd-networkd + resolvconf wrinkles
>
> In truth, it is not a biggie for my intended use of iwd on some
> non-roaming machines, although it did break my /e/n/i. A couple
Mon cheri
Thanks for your reply.
> Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:17 PM
> From: "Tim Woodall"
> To: "Stella Ashburne"
> Cc: "debian-user mailing list"
> Subject: Re: Under each of these scenarios, what is the neatest and simplest
> wa
Mon cheri
> Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 7:13 PM
> From: "Eduardo M KALINOWSKI"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Under each of these scenarios, what is the neatest and simplest
> way to manipulate the /etc/network/interfaces file?
>
>
> That's exactly the kind of situation
Hi
There are instances in which my machine is connected to a mobile hotspot. And
in some situations, it's connected to a smartphone via USB tethering. And when
I'm in the office, I may connect it to a LAN cable.
Below are the contents of my /etc/network/interfaces file:
# This file describes t
Mon cheri
> Sent: Friday, March 04, 2022 at 2:40 AM
> From: "Brian"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: What should I put inside the file called wlan0?
>
>
> So, having been given extensive advice in this thread - what is your
> plan of action?
>
> --
> Brian.
>
Firstly, I appreciat
Mon cheri
> Sent: Friday, March 04, 2022 at 2:43 AM
> From: "Brian"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: What should I put inside the file called wlan0?
>
>
> Indeed I do. ifupdown handles the lo interface without them.
>
> --
> Brian.
>
Thanks but I don't use ifupdown. Does that mea
Mon cheri
> Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2022 at 11:50 PM
> From: "David Wright"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: What should I put inside the file called wlan0?
>
> In addition, when using "source-directory"¹, you can leave all the
> configuration files in place, and deactivate the
Note: This reply is addressed specifically to Brian.
Mon cheri
> Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2022 at 1:59 AM
> From: "Brian"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: What should I put inside the file called wlan0?
>
>
> (Nothing to do with your question but these two lines are superfluous
Mon cheri
> Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2022 at 7:22 PM
> From: "Tim Woodall"
> To: "Stella Ashburne"
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: What should I put inside the file called wlan0?
>
> If you only have one interface then it probably d
Dearie
> Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2022 at 1:59 AM
> From: "Brian"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: What should I put inside the file called wlan0?
>
> On Wed 02 Mar 2022 at 09:01:55 +0100, Stella Ashburne wrote:
>
> > Are you saying that my
Dearie
> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2022 at 12:20 AM
> From: "David Wright"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: What should I put inside the file called wlan0?
>
>
> As long as you have "source /etc/network/interfaces.d/*" in your
> /e/n/interfaces file, then you can call the file w
Dearie
> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2022 at 12:16 AM
> From: "David Wright"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Authentication failed after su-
>
Please allow me to snip off large chunks of your tips in my reply.
> Substantively, they're all valid, but only under the circumstance
Dearie
Thanks for your clarification.
> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2022 at 8:16 PM
> From: "Tim Woodall"
> To: "Stella Ashburne"
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: What should I put inside the file called wlan0?
>
> On Mon, 28 Feb
Dearie
> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2022 at 8:13 PM
> From: "Brian"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: What should I put inside the file called wlan0?
>
>
> /e/n/i may contain PSKs for networks other than the home network;
> friens, relatives, work etc. A user, having been trusted wi
Dearie
> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2022 at 3:49 PM
> From: "Markus Schönhaber"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: What should I put inside the file called wlan0?
>
>
> No, 475 is the file's size.
> The numeric value for the permission "-rw-r--r--" is 0644.
> stat /etc/network/inter
Mein Schatzi
> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2022 at 5:28 PM
> From: "Sven Hartge"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Authentication failed after su-
>
>
> Use sudo.
>
> wpa_passphrase JupiterRising 1234567890 | sudo tee
> /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf
>
Thanks for your tip.
Dearie
> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2022 at 5:47 AM
> From: "Bob McGowan"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Authentication failed after su-
>
> On 2/28/22 13:09, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > sudo su - -l -c "rest of the line"
>
> Some comments on this, without knowing just how it failed:
Dearie
> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2022 at 7:13 AM
> From: "Dan Ritter"
> To: "Stella Ashburne"
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Authentication failed after su-
>
> >
> > In a terminal, I typed:
> >
> > username
Dear Ash
> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2022 at 5:36 AM
> From: "Ash Joubert"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: What should I put inside the file called wlan0?
>
>
> qrencode -s 20 -o wifi.png "WIFI:S:Your Wifi SSID;T:WPA;P:Your Wifi
> Passphrase;;"
>
Thanks for the tip.
Best regards
Dearie
> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2022 at 7:18 AM
> From: "Brian"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: What should I put inside the file called wlan0?
>
> Om all my systems:
>
> brian@5740:~$ ls -l /etc/network/interfaces
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 475 Nov 3 19:23 /etc/network/interfa
Dearie
> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2022 at 5:09 AM
> From: "Dan Ritter"
> To: "Stella Ashburne"
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Authentication failed after su-
>
> Stella Ashburne wrote:
> > sudo su - -l -c "rest of the line&q
Dearie
> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2022 at 4:21 AM
> From: to...@tuxteam.de
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: What should I put inside the file called wlan0?
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 09:20:07PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > (in Debian, at least) /etc/network/inte
Dearie
> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2022 at 4:20 AM
> From: to...@tuxteam.de
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: What should I put inside the file called wlan0?
>
>
> However, if I remember your original post correctly, there were security
> reasons mentioned (about a possibly world re
Dearie,
> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2022 at 4:08 AM
> From: "Brian"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: What should I put inside the file called wlan0?
>
>
> You do not want just anyone to read /etc/network/interfaces?
>
> chmod 600 /etc/network/interfaces
>
That's the recommended
Dearie
Thanks for your offer of help; however.
> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2022 at 3:10 AM
> From: "Andrew M.A. Cater"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Authentication failed after su-
>
>
> If you use sudo: prefix the above command with sudo
>
> It may be that you need
>
> su
Dearie,
Thanks for your reply.
> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2022 at 3:10 AM
> From: to...@tuxteam.de
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: What should I put inside the file called wlan0?
>
>
> So if you have this in your /etc/network/interfaces somewhere:
>
> ...
> ## Bahn ICE
> i
According to https://wiki.debian.org/WiFi/HowToUse,
"Use the WPA passphrase to calculate the correct WPA PSK hash for your SSID by
altering the following example"
the command to type is
su -l -c "wpa_passphrase myssid my_very_secret_passphrase >
/etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf"
The ou
I quote from Debian Wiki (https://wiki.debian.org/WiFi/HowToUse) :
"Restrict the permissions of /etc/network/interfaces, to prevent pre-shared key
(PSK) disclosure (alternatively use a separate config file such as
/etc/network/interfaces.d/wlan0 on newer Debian versions): "
What should I put in
Dearie
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 at 9:45 PM
> From: "The Wanderer"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Uninstalling a package removes other essential packages: What is
> the best course of action?
>
>
> There are a few possible answers.
>
I love reading your answers and
Dearie
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 at 10:05 PM
> From: to...@tuxteam.de
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Uninstalling a package removes other essential packages: What is
> the best course of action?
>
>
> So why not do your research yourself?
>
Honestly I don't know wher
Hello
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 at 10:04 AM
> From: "The Wanderer"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Uninstalling a package removes other essential packages: What is
> the best course of action?
>
> What if someone sends you a document that has one or more words writte
Dearie
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 at 1:55 AM
> From: to...@tuxteam.de
> To: "Stella Ashburne"
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Uninstalling a package removes other essential packages: What is
> the best course of action?
>
>
> H
Hello The Wanderer
> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2022 at 8:48 PM
> From: "The Wanderer"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Uninstalling a package removes other essential packages: What is
> the best course of action?
>
>
> Do you have any reason to believe that it might? As compare
Hi Andy
> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2022 at 9:05 PM
> From: "Andy Smith"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: You know what? Not only Debian but Fedora 35 has libthai
> tooand more
>
>
> systemd and all of Fedora is open source. While it's certainly not
> impossible to actively
Hi Andy
> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2022 at 2:22 AM
> From: "Andrew M.A. Cater"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: You know what? Not only Debian but Fedora 35 has libthai
> tooand more
>
> Very grateful to Simon McVitie (smcv) for pointing me to the original bug
> number in
> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2022 at 7:14 AM
> From: "David Wright"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Uninstalling a package removes other essential packages: What is
> the best course of action?
>
>
> But in view of that single letter in your reply, and another
> post on d-u, I'
Dearie,
Thanks for your reply.
> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2022 at 2:48 PM
> From: to...@tuxteam.de
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Uninstalling a package removes other essential packages: What is
> the best course of action?
>
>
> Please, hold your horses. Lack of knowledge
Hi guys
I ran some tests on almost all flavors of Fedora 35. They include:
"Default" edition
Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-35-1.2.iso
Network Installer
Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-35-1.2.iso
Fedora Spins such as
Fedora-Cinnamon-Live-x86_64-35-1.2.iso
Fedora-KDE-Live-x86_64-35-1.2.iso
F
Hi Andy
> Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2022 at 9:14 PM
> From: "Andrew M.A. Cater"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Uninstalling a package removes other essential packages: What is
> the best course of action?
>
> Stella (and others)
>
> This is apparently a long standing bug from
Dearie
> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2022 at 1:02 AM
> From: "David Wright"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Uninstalling a package removes other essential packages: What is
> the best course of action?
>
>
> Tee-hee. We Brits can sneak our code into Debian without arousing
> su
Hello Dearie
> Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2022 at 8:34 AM
> From: "David Wright"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Uninstalling a package removes other essential packages: What is
> the best course of action?
>
>
> Installing those two would add 170 more packages to my system, so
Hello Dearie
I am happy to hear from you again and hope that everything's fine with you and
your family.
> Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2022 at 6:23 AM
> From: "David"
> To: "debian-user"
> Subject: Re: Uninstalling a package removes other essential packages: What is
> the best course of action
Hi,
> Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2022 at 12:35 AM
> From: "Bijan Soleymani"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Uninstalling a package removes other essential packages: What is
> the best course of action?
>
>
> 3. Remove it some sneaky that only removes libthai but leaves everythi
I did a minimal install of LXQt:
sudo apt install lxqt-core lightdm
and discovered that the following two packages were installed as well:
libthai-data/stable,now 0.1.28-3 all [installed,automatic]
libthai0/stable,now 0.1.28-3 amd64 [installed,automatic]
*I do not speak or write Thai*
When I d
the net)
>
> On Thursday, September 30, 2021 10:54:17 AM Stella Ashburne wrote:
> Yes, their email address are displayed on the project's website.
> No, they didn't mention that any Tom, Dick and Harry are welcome to write
> to them. Well, thank goodness your name is Stella ;-
Hi Tomas
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 11:48 PM
> From: to...@tuxteam.de
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:14:05AM -0400, Henn
Hi Dan
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 11:15 PM
> From: "Dan Ritter"
> To: "Stella Ashburne"
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but unable to su
Hi Henning
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 10:14 PM
> From: "Henning Follmann"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
>
>
> That depends. How did you get their e-m
Oh dear! Oh dear!
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 1:22 PM
> From: "David Wright"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
>
> > [IPv4]
> > Address=192.168.30.115
> >
Hi Dan,
Thanks for your reply.
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 6:06 AM
> From: "Dan Ritter"
> To: "Stella Ashburne"
> Cc: "debian-user mailing list"
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Conn
Hi Reco
Thanks for sharing your experience with me.
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 9:52 PM
> From: "Reco"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 2 - DNS
> managers)
>
>
> The limitation of update-resolv-conf in its curren
Hola David
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 1:22 PM
> From: "David Wright"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
>
>
> So the WiFi's SSID is whitecollar (all low
Hi David
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 1:25 PM
> From: "David Wright"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
>
>
> Err, not with bullseye. That's why I'm intere
Hi Reco
I'm happy to hear from you again.
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 8:20 PM
> From: "Reco"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 2 - DNS
> managers)
>
>
> Works for me since Debian squeeze. The script in question do
Hi Anssi
Thanks for sharing your experience with me.
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 8:15 PM
> From: "Anssi Saari"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 2 - DNS
> managers)
>
> If you mean you want to use the old script u
Hi Greg
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 7:21 PM
> From: "Greg Wooledge"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 2 - DNS
> managers)
>
>
> This page doesn't talk about iwd... partly because I'd never heard of it
> at the time
Hi
Thanks for sharing your experience with me.
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 2:38 PM
> From: "riveravaldez"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
>
>
> Hi, my
Hi
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 2:29 PM
> From: to...@tuxteam.de
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
>
> I don't know about iwd specifically, but given addres
Hi David
Happy to hear from you again.
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 1:38 PM
> From: "David Wright"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 2 - DNS
> managers)
>
>
> My usual strategy is to let the Debian installer set th
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 3:36 AM
> From: "Greg Wooledge"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
>
> [.}
>
> It's also worth pointing out that these bitwi
Hi Dan
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 3:09 AM
> From: "Dan Ritter"
> To: "Stella Ashburne"
> Cc: "debian-user mailing list"
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but u
Hi Dan
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 at 10:08 PM
> From: "Dan Ritter"
> To: "Stella Ashburne"
> Cc: "debian-user mailing list"
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but un
Hi Dan
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 at 9:30 PM
> From: "Dan Ritter"
> To: "Stella Ashburne"
> Cc: "debian-user mailing list"
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but
I refer to the sub-section "Select DNS manager"
(https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Iwd), in which the statement reads as follows:
At the moment, iwd supports two DNS managers - systemd-resolved and resolvconf
Question: Which of the above two manages my DNS queries in a default Debian
with lxqt-c
Hi Dan
Thanks for your reply.
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 at 4:45 AM
> From: "Dan Ritter"
> To: "Stella Ashburne"
> Cc: "debian-user mailing list"
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Conn
Hi guys
Thanks for your replies.
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 at 6:20 AM
> From: "Jude DaShiell"
> To: "Dan Ritter" , "Stella Ashburne"
> , "debian-user mailing list"
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless netwo
Based on ArchLinux's tutorial on using iwd to connect to a wireless network
(https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Iwd), I managed to connect to my wireless
routeror so I thought :(
Below are the relevant outputs:
In Terminal #1
username@hostname:~$ iwctl
[iwd]# device wlan0 show
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
