Alright, after being flamed to a crisp...
I realize I shoudln't have sent that message to the list, perhaps
a brief snip and a pointer to it at most would have been appropriate.
I'm sorry for the wasted bandwidth; it won't happen again.
Simon Karpen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
some more ammo if anybody needs info to convince people of windows nt's
instability and not being suitable for tasks where reliability is
important...
Simon Karpen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Those that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safet
a Conner IDE that's OK too. My new 2.1GB
> laptop drive is a Seagate, and that works fine so far.
>
Simon Karpen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Those that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Which WD drives have you had good luck with?
I have yet to see a recent one last more than a year...
--Simon
On 10 Oct 1997, John Goerzen wrote:
> I've had nothing but good luck with Seagate and Western Digital.
> Conner, I agree has horrible problems.
>
> Simon Karpen
rn Digital
drives. The failure rates are *horrible*. I've also heard many good things
about the recent IBM drives.
Simon Karpen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Fixing Unix is easier than living with NT."
--Larry McVoy
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAIL
I've had extremely good luck with the Kingston Tulip based cards.
They're fairly cheap ($50 or so for 10mb, $90 or so for 100mb),
and i've found them to be very fast, reliable, and well-supported
by Linux.
The 10mb card is a combo card (aui, utp, coax all on one card).
Simon Ka
6 matches
Mail list logo
