RE: HELP: lilo wasn't able to install...

DOH! Smack me now... I think I burned the ISOs of the m68k CDs instead of the i386!! Auuugghh! /*Raj*/ > -Original Message- > From: Raj Wurttemberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 5:52 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-user@lists.debian.org >

HELP: lilo wasn't able to install...

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anita > Lewis > Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 7:09 AM > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: Help: lilo wasn't able to install... > > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 06:23:43AM -0400, Raj Wurttemberg wrote: > > Anita, > > > > I

Re: Undeliverable: Re: Help: lilo wasn't able to install...

help. /*Raj*/ Anita Lewis wrote: On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 06:23:43AM -0400, Raj Wurttemberg wrote: Anita, I tried the "root=/dev/sda1" process already. It too failed. I even tried making a small 10MB /boot partition, but Debian still refuses to install LILO. Thanks, /*Raj*/ So

RE: Help: lilo wasn't able to install...

Anita, I tried the "root=/dev/sda1" process already. It too failed. I even tried making a small 10MB /boot partition, but Debian still refuses to install LILO. Thanks, /*Raj*/ > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 6:05 AM

RE: Help: lilo wasn't able to install...

OK I will try that this afternoon. Thanks, /*Raj*/ > -Original Message- > From: Michael Heldebrant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 1:08 AM > To: Raj Wurttemberg > Cc: 'Miaoling Chiu'; debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: RE: Help:

RE: Help: lilo wasn't able to install...

ROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 8:34 PM > To: Debian-User > Subject: Re: Help: lilo wasn't able to install... > > > On 16 Aug 2001 09:33:18 -0400, Raj Wurttemberg wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have been trying to get Debian 2.2 r3 to install > all n

RE: Help: lilo wasn't able to install...

ebrant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 7:56 PM > To: Raj Wurttemberg > Subject: RE: Help: lilo wasn't able to install... > > > On 16 Aug 2001 19:02:02 -0400, Raj Wurttemberg wrote: > > Nope... Complete failure. :( Even with the rescue optio

RE: Help: lilo wasn't able to install...

. I've worked on this for almost two days now and nothing. I'm just about to give up, reformat the hard drive and go back to RedHat 7.1. /*Raj*/ > -Original Message- > From: Michael Heldebrant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 2:21 PM > To

RE: Need Motherboard input for evaluation with Debian Woody

John, For a multitasking, multithreaded OS like Linux I would probably go with the dual P-III. For example, I run Windows 2000 Pro. in the office on my dual 500MHz P-III but because of the extra threads It's actually faster than my single P-III 866 when running a lot of applications. Check out ht

Help: lilo wasn't able to install...

Hello, I have been trying to get Debian 2.2 r3 to install all night and have not had any luck. I made it all the way to the point where Debian is supposed to make itself bootable off of the hard drive. Every time it fails saying "lilo wasn't able to install...". It even failed when trying to make

Pico on Debian "Slink" v2.1 error message.

I just got Debian "Slink" 2.1 installed and it seems to be working fine but when I tried to run pico I get this error: Unknown terminal type vt100! Someone suggested changing the terminal type to "linux" by typing "export TERM=linux" but that just had pico return the error: Unknown terminal type