I think I have fixed the post now:
I have installed Google chrome v 77.0.3865.10 (Official Build) dev (64-bit)
>> in Debian buster.
>>
>> It's not chromium. If that is still OK I did as follows:
>>
>> Go here and download the dev channel version of chrome:
>>
>> https://www.chromium.org/getting-
On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 at 11:09, Michael Fothergill <
michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have installed Google chrome v 77.0.3865.10 (Official Build) dev
> (64-bit) in Debian buster.
>
> It's not chromium. If that is still OK I did as follows:
>
> Go here and dow
I have installed Google chrome v 77.0.3865.10 (Official Build) dev (64-bit)
in Debian buster.
It's not chromium. If that is still OK I did as follows:
Go here and download the dev channel version of chrome:
https://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/dev-channel
You should see a file like this i
I
have running on debian buster.
Chromium 77 is out there somewhere.
I am interested to try out bedrock linux at some point. I think it could
help get around some of these problems.
Regards
Michael Fothergill
install gentoo prefix on debian. But I have
figured out how to do it with the help of the gentoo prefix dev team.
I am grateful to them.
Cheers
Michael Fothergill
>
> Likewise, linux package in Buster lack recent fixes for SACKs
> Panic vulnerabilities. I hope it will also be uploaded soon.
>
> Regards,
> Lazar
>
>
On 23 February 2018 at 18:41, Michael Lange wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:27:23 +
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> >
> > Sure enough, looking at the spectre meltdown checker on the kernel I am
> > using in gentoo
> > shows the
> >
> > re
On 23 February 2018 at 16:28, Michael Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:52:12 +0100
> Felipe Salvador wrote:
>
> (...)
> > > CVE-2017-5715 [branch target injection] aka 'Spectre Variant 2'
> > > * Mitigated according to the /sys interface: YES (kernel confirms
> > > that the mitiga
On 23 February 2018 at 16:14, Michael Fothergill <
michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 23 February 2018 at 14:14, Michael Fothergill <
> michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 23 February 2018 at 14:05, mlnl wrote:
>>
&
On 23 February 2018 at 14:14, Michael Fothergill <
michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 23 February 2018 at 14:05, mlnl wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > Can it be true? A version of gcc that runs on stretch that will
>> > compile the latest fa
On 23 February 2018 at 14:05, mlnl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Can it be true? A version of gcc that runs on stretch that will
> > compile the latest fancy spectre fixes etc?
>
> with latest vanilla kernel 4.15.4 and updated gcc-6:
>
> CVE-2017-5753 [bounds check bypass] aka 'Spectre Variant 1'
> * Miti
On 23 February 2018 at 14:08, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 01:47:25PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > On 23 February 2018 at 13:42, Reco wrote:
> >
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 01:14:16P
On 23 February 2018 at 13:42, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 01:14:16PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > On 23 February 2018 at 12:43, Reco wrote:
> >
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at
On 23 February 2018 at 12:43, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 06:46:05PM +0100, Julien Aubin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Do you have any clue on when the gcc fix for stretch is to be released ?
> >
> > Actually the retpoline-compliant kernel is ready, and gcc fixes for
> stretch
On 22 February 2018 at 21:12, MarkusHiereth wrote:
> Hello,
>
> when updating the German translations of the shadow package, I
> encountered strange things in the documentation. For example an option
> --non-unique for the commands useradd and usermod. With the first, the
> system administrator i
On 21 February 2018 at 17:46, Julien Aubin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do you have any clue on when the gcc fix for stretch is to be released ?
>
> Actually the retpoline-compliant kernel is ready, and gcc fixes for
> stretch seem to have already been implemented. So I dunno what is still
> blocking the rel
On 21 February 2018 at 16:25, Jimmy Johnson
wrote:
> As reported by Linus kernel 4.15 would have the spectre-meltdown fix,
> Debian Sid just got 4.15 and I installed it on both AMD and Intel and then
> I ran the spectre-meltdown-checker and Sid is no longer vulnerable to
> Spectre-1,2 or 3/meltdo
On 20 February 2018 at 10:01, Michael Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 08:05:19 +
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > For me at any rate if the new version of gcc 4.9 makes it easier for a
> > new user to get access to that portion of Spectre vulnerabili
On 20 February 2018 at 05:09, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 09:03:20PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > On 19 February 2018 at 19:10, Michael Lange
> wrote:
> > > no, I meant to say that you were looking at the wrong place if you
&
On 19 February 2018 at 19:10, Michael Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 18:46:15 +
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > Are you saying that this link:
> >
> > https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-5753
> >
> > which looks
On 19 February 2018 at 18:24, Michael Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 16:40:19 +
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > On 19 February 2018 at 14:10, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 09:13:42PM +0800, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo E
On 19 February 2018 at 17:03, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 04:40:19PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > I had thought up to now that e.g. kernel 4.15.4-1 was new enough that if
> > you compiled it with gcc 7.3 then the spectre fix would then wor
On 19 February 2018 at 14:10, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 09:13:42PM +0800, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
> wrote:
> > What are the patches that I can download and install to be protected
> > against the Meltdown and Spectre security vulnerabilities?
>
> Meltdown patch went o
ld be there now and there may well be one that deals with
both the meltdown and spectre vaulbnerabilities jointly.
Regards
Michael Fothergill
On 15 February 2018 at 13:55, Ken Heard wrote:
> On 2018-02-08 15:57, Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > Actually Kali Linux [1] is pretty cool and definitely worth a look.
> > And, as a Debian derivative, it is a wonderful illustration of the
> > things the Debian culture
On 8 February 2018 at 12:30, Curt wrote:
> On 2018-02-08, deloptes wrote:
> > Michael Fothergill wrote:
> >
> >> I guess I could give it a try. I have run Bodhi Linux. That is quite
> >> good.
> >
> > Kali is excellent for network geeks
>
On 8 February 2018 at 08:01, Michelle Konzack <
linux4miche...@tamay-dogan.net> wrote:
> Good Morning,
>
> Am 2018-02-07 hackte Michael Fothergill in die Tasten:
> > On 7 February 2018 at 21:52, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >> However, though *derived from* Debian, it&#x
On 8 February 2018 at 07:37, wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 12:01:57AM +0000, Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > It sounds like a dietary supplement.
> >
> > MF
>
> ;-P
>
> Actually K
On 7 February 2018 at 21:52, Richard Owlett wrote:
> [Reply-to ]
>
> Good afternoon.
> You chose the wrong list for your particular question.
> Don't worry about it, it frequently happens.
>
> This list is specifically for:
>
>> Web pages design and maintenance
>> Design, structure and translatio
On 4 February 2018 at 22:50, Michael Fothergill <
michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 4 February 2018 at 15:20, Andy Smith wrote:
>
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 11:44:39PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
>> > On 3 Februar
On 4 February 2018 at 15:20, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 11:44:39PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > On 3 February 2018 at 23:14, Andy Smith wrote:
> > > If you want to make genuine constructive suggestions for how things
> > &g
On 3 February 2018 at 23:14, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 09:43:33PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > I am trying to suggest one would want to move faster than the approximate
> > cycle time of new stable releases here.
>
> You have be
On 3 February 2018 at 17:24, David Wright wrote:
> On Sat 03 Feb 2018 at 10:37:34 (-0500), Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> > On 2/3/18, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Saturday, February 03, 2018 02:47:43 AM Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > >> On 2 February 20
On 3 February 2018 at 21:43, Michael Fothergill <
michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 3 February 2018 at 17:12, David Wright
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat 03 Feb 2018 at 07:47:43 (+), Michael Fothergill wrote:
>> > On 2 February 2018 at 04:35,
On 3 February 2018 at 17:12, David Wright wrote:
> On Sat 03 Feb 2018 at 07:47:43 (+), Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > On 2 February 2018 at 04:35, Andy Smith wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 11:53:36AM +, Michael Fother
On 3 February 2018 at 15:37, Cindy-Sue Causey
wrote:
> On 2/3/18, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Saturday, February 03, 2018 02:47:43 AM Michael Fothergill wrote:
> >> On 2 February 2018 at 04:35, Andy Smith wrote:
> >> > Debian
> >> > already has a
On 2 February 2018 at 04:35, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 11:53:36AM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > Thus for anyone in the entire world who is new to linux,the most
> > efficient route at present could well be to install Fedora and be
&
On 30 January 2018 at 13:22, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 12:13:47PM +0100, Michael Lange wrote:
> > Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > > The response from Greg was the following:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 12:36:46PM +, Michael Fo
On 31 January 2018 at 23:13, Richard Hector wrote:
> On 01/02/18 11:51, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 31 January 2018 at 22:46, Richard Hector > <mailto:rich...@walnut.gen.nz>> wrote:
> >
> > On 01/02/18 11:20, Michael Fothergill wrot
On 31 January 2018 at 22:46, Richard Hector wrote:
> On 01/02/18 11:20, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > As it turns out I have installed debian on a usb before and booted it up
> > successfully.
> > It did occur to me that you could advise the new users to buy a
> > ra
On 31 January 2018 at 18:31, Michael Lange wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2018 17:54:36 +
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> >
> > What about if you became sid, made the spectre kernel and backed it up
> > on a usb drive
> > and then you backed up the work files
On 30 January 2018 at 13:22, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 12:13:47PM +0100, Michael Lange wrote:
> > Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > > The response from Greg was the following:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 12:36:46PM +, Michael Fo
On 30 January 2018 at 16:36, Michael Fothergill <
michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 30 January 2018 at 16:02, Michael Fothergill <
> michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 30 January 2018 at 15:23, Elimar Riesebieter
>>
On 30 January 2018 at 21:45, Michael Lange wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 19:14:36 +
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> >
> > I am not really so sure what the correct dosage ought to be now.
>
> Maybe just stick with the booze... ;-)
>
> scnr
>
> Michael
On 29 January 2018 at 18:02, Michael Lange wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 10:47:57 -0500
> rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Again, checking / confirming my understanding, if you download a kernel
> > image (which is normal for me), there is no need for me to have any
> > version of GCC as the image
On 30 January 2018 at 16:02, Michael Fothergill <
michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 30 January 2018 at 15:23, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>
>> * rhkra...@gmail.com [2018-01-29 10:47 -0500]:
>>
>> [...]
>> > On the other hand, if I do
On 30 January 2018 at 15:23, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * rhkra...@gmail.com [2018-01-29 10:47 -0500]:
>
> [...]
> > On the other hand, if I download kernel source, I would need GCC, and a
> > version that is sufficient for the code.
>
> One can check the compiler version the running kernel is
On 29 January 2018 at 12:49, Michael Fothergill <
michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 29 January 2018 at 10:17, Michael Lange wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 08:35:58 +
>> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>>
>> > Your ne
On 29 January 2018 at 13:35, Michael Fothergill <
michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 29 January 2018 at 13:28, deloptes wrote:
>
>> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>>
>> > I accept that are some kernels that you could run in stable apparently
>>
On 29 January 2018 at 13:28, deloptes wrote:
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > I accept that are some kernels that you could run in stable apparently
> > that address the security issue etc.
> > I apologise for inaccuracy there.
> > But perhaps not all of what I pos
On 29 January 2018 at 13:26, wrote:
> On Monday, January 29, 2018 06:22:50 AM Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > I accept that are some kernels that you could run in stable apparently
> > that address the security issue etc.
>
Do they work on spectre as well as meltdown?
Sorry f
On 29 January 2018 at 10:17, Michael Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 08:35:58 +
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > Your need to upgrade to unstable (Debian Sid). Then you need to get
> > the latest kernel from the kernel.org website.
> > You
On 29 January 2018 at 10:17, Michael Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 08:35:58 +
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > Your need to upgrade to unstable (Debian Sid). Then you need to get
> > the latest kernel from the kernel.org website.
> > You
On 29 January 2018 at 10:10, deloptes wrote:
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > Your need to upgrade to unstable (Debian Sid). Then you need to get the
> > latest kernel from the kernel.org website.
>
> worst BS ever seen - DON'T LISTEN TO THIS PLEASE
>
> Micha
able is it is gentoo testing. The
ebuild is there now and the latest version binunits (2.30) is getting
readied. I have installed
gcc 7.3 on it and soon I will uprade the kernel shortly. New kernels are
in the pipeline that will have more spectre fixes added.
I will fire them all in to my
On 27 January 2018 at 13:38, Michael Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 13:12:13 +
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > I think I will sign up on the gcc gnu help page and ask people if they
> > have a test case file I can run to 100% confirm the GCC 8 compi
On 27 January 2018 at 13:38, Michael Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 13:12:13 +
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > I think I will sign up on the gcc gnu help page and ask people if they
> > have a test case file I can run to 100% confirm the GCC 8 compi
On 27 January 2018 at 13:38, Michael Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 13:12:13 +
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > I think I will sign up on the gcc gnu help page and ask people if they
> > have a test case file I can run to 100% confirm the GCC 8 compi
On 27 January 2018 at 13:17, Michael Lange wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 12:32:24 +
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > On 27 January 2018 at 11:59, Michael Lange wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 11:26:25 +
> > &g
On 27 January 2018 at 12:43, Michael Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 12:12:57 +
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> >
> > Should the filename be something like linux-image-4.14.14.deb etc?
>
> With default settings for make-kpkg the filename is pr
It does seem as if make-kpkg has gone awol here.
MF
On 27 January 2018 at 12:43, Michael Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 12:12:57 +
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> >
> > Should the filename be something like linux-image-4.14.14.deb etc?
>
> With default settings for make-kpkg the filename is pr
On 27 January 2018 at 11:59, Michael Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 11:26:25 +
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> >
> > Where would the default location of such a file be if were created using
> > the make-kpkg command?
>
> the package should
On 27 January 2018 at 12:12, Michael Fothergill <
michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 27 January 2018 at 11:59, Michael Lange wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 11:26:25 +
>> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>>
>> >
>&g
On 27 January 2018 at 11:59, Michael Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 11:26:25 +
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> >
> > Where would the default location of such a file be if were created using
> > the make-kpkg command?
>
> the package should
On 27 January 2018 at 11:26, Michael Fothergill <
michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> When you install the kernel, the following page (
> https://www.debian.org/releases/jessie/i386/ch08s06.html.en) says you
> must run the following command:
>
> *dpkg -
When you install the kernel, the following page (
https://www.debian.org/releases/jessie/i386/ch08s06.html.en) says you must
run the following command:
*dpkg -i ../linux-image-3.16-subarchitecture_1.0.custom_i386.deb*.
Do I need to run mrproper beforehand?
I can't see any linux-image file in t
On 25 January 2018 at 23:28, Michael Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 22:23:38 +
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > Dear All,
> >
> > I am continuing the discussion of the kernel 4.14.15 compilation in the
> > Question on CVE-2017-5754 on Deb
On 26 January 2018 at 22:59, Michael Lange wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 23:41:07 +0100
> Michael Lange wrote:
>
> > When I check /proc/cpuinfo I see that "msr" is listed in the "flags"
> > section. So why doesn't the driver load automagically?
> > But then, at least with the version of the check
Dear All,
I have decided to get rid of GCC8 using ML's helpful command suggestion.
I will install gcc 7 again as sid and try again with kernel 4.14.15.
Cheers
MF
>
On 26 January 2018 at 17:18, tv.deb...@googlemail.com <
tv.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 26/01/2018 22:37, Michael Lange wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 22:19:27 +0530
>> "tv.deb...@googlemail.com" wrote:
>>
>>
>>> gcc-7[.2] was really gcc-7.3-rc for a while, and was doing a good job
>>> at
On 26 January 2018 at 16:49, tv.deb...@googlemail.com <
tv.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 26/01/2018 22:08, Michael Lange wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 21:34:51 +0530
>> "tv.deb...@googlemail.com" wrote:
>>
>> Hi, sorry to jump into the thread this late, I didn't follow the
>>> be
On 26 January 2018 at 16:37, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 04:17:27PM +0000, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > Is the sid gcc now 7.3 as someone said earlier even though it says it is
> > 7.2?
>
> Sid apparently has both "gcc" and "gcc-7"
But I'm flexible on this.
>
> Cheers,
> Paul
>
>
>
> On 26/01/2018 16:08, Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> Dear Paul,
>
> Many thanks for the offer.
>
> I need to think of a good place to have a meal round here.
>
> We could try e.g. the Beefeater at Presto
On 26 January 2018 at 16:26, Michael Fothergill <
michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 26 January 2018 at 16:17, Michael Fothergill <
> michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>> Hi, sorry to jump i
On 26 January 2018 at 16:17, Michael Fothergill <
michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>>
>> Hi, sorry to jump into the thread this late, I didn't follow the
>> beginning.
>> You can save yourself quite a bit of hassle by downloading the
>>
> Hi, sorry to jump into the thread this late, I didn't follow the beginning.
> You can save yourself quite a bit of hassle by downloading the upstream
> up-to-date vanilla kernel 4.15-rc9 and compile that with Unstable gcc-7.
> All you need is there already and you will get as good a mitigation
On 25 January 2018 at 23:28, Michael Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 22:23:38 +
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > Dear All,
> >
> > I am continuing the discussion of the kernel 4.14.15 compilation in the
> > Question on CVE-2017-5754 on Deb
On 25 January 2018 at 22:35, Michael Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 21:43:19 +
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > > Not sure, but didn't you want the very latest 4.15rc for some
> > > Meltdown/Spectre issues? Are these also in 4.14.15?
>
Dear All,
I am continuing the discussion of the kernel 4.14.15 compilation in the
Question on CVE-2017-5754 on Debian 8.9 post in a new post.
The reason I am running with this kernel and not the 4.15.0 rc9 kernel that
is now available on kernel.org is that:
1. It is stable
2. I have never tried
On 25 January 2018 at 22:04, Michael Fothergill <
michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I ran it again after deleting the .config file, copy the one /boot over
> again
> and running the yes """| oldconfig command and makekpkg
>
&g
Dear All,
I ran it again after deleting the .config file, copy the one /boot over
again
and running the yes """| oldconfig command and makekpkg
and it ran and crashed again:
https://pastebin.com/GJkEMVvc
Should I have run make clean or something before repeating everything?
Regards
MF
> Not sure, but didn't you want the very latest 4.15rc for some
> Meltdown/Spectre issues? Are these also in 4.14.15?
>
>
>
I copied the config file from the boot directory for the current 4.15.0
rc8 kernel as .config.
I then ran make menuconfig and then realised I didn't need to change
anythi
On 25 January 2018 at 20:33, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 08:14:24PM +0000, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > root@mikef-PC:/usr/src# tar -xf linux-4.14.15.tar.xz
> >
> > Can anyone think of a command that will let me know where the files
> > went/confi
On 25 January 2018 at 19:25, Brian wrote:
> On Thu 25 Jan 2018 at 18:15:29 +0000, Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > Also is fakeroot installed by default or do I need to install it
> > separately?
>
> apt show fakeroot | grep -i priority
>
> What do you think?
&
now where the files
went/confirm it ran properly?
Cheers
Michael Fothergill
I have been looking at the web page here:
https://wiki.debian.org/BuildADebianKernelPackage
and noticed that the source file is supposed to be put in /usr/src it says.
It thinks the file would have a format like this:
*linux-source-x.x.tar.bz2*
The file
I downloaded from the kernel.org site
On 25 January 2018 at 17:20, Michael Lange wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 15:59:04 +
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > I have become sid and installed a ton of dependencies from the
> > experimental respository and finally installed gcc 8.
>
> Oh, from a quick g
On 25 January 2018 at 15:59, Michael Fothergill <
michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 25 January 2018 at 13:14, Michael Fothergill <
> michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 25 January 2018 at 13:01, Greg Wooledge wrote:
&g
On 25 January 2018 at 13:14, Michael Fothergill <
michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 25 January 2018 at 13:01, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 12:36:46PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
>> > If I become sid and install the ker
On 25 January 2018 at 13:01, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 12:36:46PM +0000, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > If I become sid and install the kernel correctly, could I go back to
> being
> > just buster (sounds like an energy drink) and carry on using the ne
>>
> I tried installing gcc 8 on buster. It needs cpp8 which needs
> libmrpfr6
>
> ie this
>
> https://packages.debian.org/unstable/main/libmpfr6
>
> which looks like its about being sid again.
>
>
> I need to go to dependency rehab and sing the dem bones song again.
>
> Suggestions on avoidi
On 25 January 2018 at 09:50, Michael Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 09:15:59 +
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > >
> > >
> > > I have the same problem as in Gentoo.
> > >
> > > In order to install gcc 7.3 rc2 I think I
>
>
> I have the same problem as in Gentoo.
>
> In order to install gcc 7.3 rc2 I think I would need to be sid.
>
>
> I don't think I want to be sid at present.
>
But if I did want to be sid, would a source file like this suffice:
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non
On 24 January 2018 at 22:32, Michael Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2018 20:07:07 +
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> (...)
> > > I tried installing the headers file and it says I have dependency
> > > problems:
> > >
> > &
On 24 January 2018 at 18:12, Michael Fothergill <
michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 24 January 2018 at 18:00, Michael Fothergill <
> michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> W: Possible mis
On 24 January 2018 at 18:00, Michael Fothergill <
michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/rtl_nic/rtl8105e-1.fw for
> module r8169
>
>
> There is a gripe in there about the linux headers file not being i
On 24 January 2018 at 17:38, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 04:51:35PM +0000, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > root@mikef-PC:/etc/apt# apt-get -t experimental install
> > linux-headers-4.15.0-rc8-all-amd64
> > Reading package lists... Done
> >
>
On 24 January 2018 at 17:38, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 04:51:35PM +0000, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > root@mikef-PC:/etc/apt# apt-get -t experimental install
> > linux-headers-4.15.0-rc8-all-amd64
> > Reading package lists... Done
> >
>
On 24 January 2018 at 16:19, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 03:49:08PM +0000, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > If you can be sid and experimental together then I guess [...]
>
> Experimental is not a release. You can't "be experimental". It is
>
On 24 January 2018 at 16:19, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 03:49:08PM +0000, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > If you can be sid and experimental together then I guess [...]
>
> Experimental is not a release. You can't "be experimental". It is
>
1 - 100 of 473 matches
Mail list logo
