xt stable release.
>
> That's exactly what maintainers think. Me not. I use testing since it
> came up in potatoe times.
Which als means you are running an more or less unsupported development
snapshot.
Greetings
Martin
--
Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian
t
> least one of those A records contains the connecting IP.
You cannot enforce persons running their own mailservers to use their
ISP provider mailserver relays.
Greeting
Martin (Debian Listmaster)
--
Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Mem
Hi,
On Mon Jan 07, 2008 at 10:51:33 +0100, Jonathan Kaye wrote:
> I see we have been hit by another flood of spam. Who lowered the floodgates?
> ;-)
Should be fixed by now. See
http://cord.de/blog/index.php?entry=entry080108-144308
for more details.
Greetings
Martin
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /root
Hi,
On Sat Jan 05, 2008 at 13:06:25 +0200, Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
> Hello, I have 2 servers :
>
> Debian i386 Etch
> Debian i386 Lenny
>
> and both use ntp to synchronize time and configured on the same timezone
> Europe/Roma and use same time servers, but on Etch the time is 7 minutes
> be
Hi,
On Wed Oct 03, 2007 at 09:09:31 -0400, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> What's up (or should I say down?) with http://debaday.debian.net/? The
> site won't come up and email is rejected.
The machine running that host is currently down, i already pinged local
admins to reboot the machine. The last thing
Hi,
On Wed Sep 19, 2007 at 14:09:32 -0700, David Brodbeck wrote:
>
> On Sep 19, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Tue Sep 18, 2007 at 08:36:30 +0200, Peter Teunissen wrote:
> >>For directly blocking mail however, you'd be
Hi,
On Tue Sep 18, 2007 at 08:36:30 +0200, Peter Teunissen wrote:
> For directly blocking mail however, you'd be better of using the
> zen.spamhaus.org combined blocklist wich is very effective and has almost
> no false positives. I don't know how they do it, but it catches 90% of my
> spam on it
Hi,
On Tue Sep 11, 2007 at 01:05:13 +0600, S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu) wrote:
> Sarunas Burdulis wrote:
> >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >Chuck Payne wrote:
> >
> >>Guys,
> >>
> >>What is going on? Last three days, I got a increase of spam and it all
> >>coming from this list
Hi,
On Mon Sep 10, 2007 at 14:48:27 -0400, Chuck Payne wrote:
> Guys,
>
> What is going on? Last three days, I got a increase of spam and it all
> coming from this list. Are you guys working to fix it?
Please report spam to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And yes, we are working on that problem.
Greeting
Hi,
On Mon Sep 10, 2007 at 18:41:15 -, J wrote:
> Real problem with debian user is not spam, but that posts don' t get
> posted.
Can you please check if you are subscribed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The other thing that would help the listmasters is, if you could pass
the message-id to the listma
Hi,
> A thing every user can do is to bounce spam delivered to the lists to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Best you use mutt's bounce-function or
> Kmails redirect function for that, so the headers don't get modified, so
> we can directly us that emails to train our filters to do better.
Need to correct my
Hi,
On Sun Sep 09, 2007 at 18:12:28 -0500, Mumia W.. wrote:
> On 09/09/2007 03:08 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> >[...]
> >A thing every user can do is to bounce spam delivered to the lists to
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] Best you use mutt's bounce-function or
> >Kmail
Hi,
On Sun Sep 09, 2007 at 14:33:08 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 05:26:56PM -0400, KS wrote:
> >
> > No. That was a statement in addition to my earlier post asking if an
> > email client can also "report spam" just as we can do via the web
> > interface manually.
Hi,
On Sun Sep 09, 2007 at 15:48:33 -0500, Mumia W.. wrote:
> On the archives at http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/ , there is a
> button titled "Report as Spam." My understanding is that it's connected
> to a Bayesian filter and that is arranges for the spam message to be
> removed from the
Hi Nigel,
On Sun Sep 09, 2007 at 21:15:32 +0200, Nigel Henry wrote:
> This has got more than a joke now. We are being bombarded with s-x spam yet
> again. I can't send it to Spamcop because it will identify the list as the
> sender.
True, and you will most probably also get kicked from the lis
Hi,
On Fri Aug 17, 2007 at 15:55:02 +0200, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> V A R G U X wrote:
> > http://times.debian.net/1161-etch-r1
>
> Thanks.
>
> Any ideas, why it hasn't been announced via the main web site and
> 'debian-announce', as has been the custom before?
Yes, because I sent the rega
Hi,
On Fri Aug 17, 2007 at 10:14:03 +0200, abdelkader belahcene wrote:
> Hi,
> The first release of etch 4.0R1 was announced, but I can't find the
> images it the servers.
The CD image creation usually takes a while. give it til monday
Greetings
Martin / Debian Stable Release Manager
--
[E
Hi,
On Sun Jun 10, 2007 at 19:08:14 -0400, Tom Allison wrote:
> Anyone what what application drops this header into the email?
/me.
It is an information header for the listmasters saying something about
the status of some config files. Those headers can be ignored by end
users, it is just impor
Hi,
On Thu May 24, 2007 at 20:35:21 +0300, David Baron wrote:
> This is a test so please ignore.
Yes, you will be ignored now by lists.debian.org.
Greetings
Martin
Debian Listmaster of the Day.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# man real-life
No manual entry for real-life
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Hi,
On Thu Mar 29, 2007 at 14:57:47 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 06:50:40PM -0300, Fernando Cacciola wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> > I just installed Debian Sarge from a 1-year old netinst CD on a HP
> > Pavillion
> > 1125LA notebook.
> >
> > Then I run apt-get dist
On Fri Dec 29, 2006 at 00:09:19 -0600, Mumia W.. wrote:
> On 12/25/2006 05:16 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> >On Mon, 25 Dec 2006, Mumia W.. wrote:
> >>Although I'm a Sarge user, I want the full functionality of clamav, so I
> >>plan on compiling the source package from Sid.
> >
> >http:
On Wed Nov 29, 2006 at 15:33:15 +0800, Paolo Alexis Falcone wrote:
> I went back to debian sid after using ubuntu for a few months. So far,
> i've been able to configure my thinkpad t42p to resemble some ubuntu
> goodies except for fn-f12: nothing happens when i hit it, as supposed
> to hibernate u
On Mon Oct 30, 2006 at 23:21:06 +1100, Robert S wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestions. I had a bit of bother with
> volatile-sloppy - spamc started timing out and a lot of spam got
> through. I ended up downgrading back to the sarge version. It looks
> like the latest version in sloppy needs to be
On Thu Oct 26, 2006 at 17:48:07 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 10/26/06 17:09, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I submitted a bug report #393779: libglademm-2.4-1c2a: fails to load
> > .glade file. Later I've found that the problem was on my side. I've
> > added a note to the report.
> >
>
On Thu Oct 26, 2006 at 18:31:53 +0200, Andreas R?nnquist wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Todays (etch) update wants to update lots of xorg packages - and in the
> process remove (amongst other xserver-xorg-video-packages)
> xserver-xorg-video-nv because of unsatisfiable dependencies.
>
> Will this render my d
Hi Martijn,
On Friday, 24 Mar 2006, you wrote:
> On 3/23/06, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > The Australian timezone change is a couple of days away. If you are
> > running servers depending on acurrate time, you will need to check
> > or update them.
>
> Qui
to help us with Spamassassin in volatile.
Greetings
Martin
--
Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
debian-volatile team member
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Marty,
On Monday, 12 Sep 2005, you wrote:
> Could a list of md5sums be provided for this archive, like the file
> /debian/indices/md5sums.gz in the main (debian) archive? With the help
> of a simple script, this file allows me to check the package integrity in my
> mirror of the main debian ar
iteria.
Any ideas?
Greetings
Martin
--
Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.helas.net or http://mhelas.blogspot.com
GPGKey-Fingerprint: 14744CACEF5CECFAE29E2CB17929AB90F7AC3AF0
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
29 matches
Mail list logo
