Hi, On Wed Sep 19, 2007 at 14:09:32 -0700, David Brodbeck wrote: > > On Sep 19, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >On Tue Sep 18, 2007 at 08:36:30 +0200, Peter Teunissen wrote: > >>For directly blocking mail however, you'd be better of using the > >>zen.spamhaus.org combined blocklist wich is very effective and has > >>almost > >>no false positives. I don't know how they do it, but it catches > >>90% of my > >>spam on it's own. More info can be found on http://www.spamhaus.org > > > >The proiblem of using RBLs on SMTP-time is that the mail is gone, > >nevertheless it was UCE or not. > > That's true, although the sending server will generate a bounce back > to the sender. So the mail doesn't disappear down a black hole, at > least.
Great! with million senders being forged every day that helps a lot. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# man real-life No manual entry for real-life -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
