On 3/20/07, David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there any conflicts here? Keep getting failure to open existing /dev/kqemu
(regardless of permissions) with an rt-patched (Ingo) kernel.
I would assume that most out of tree modules won't work with -rt, and
even some in-tree stuff - for exam
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 16:47 +0200, David Baron wrote:
> Saw something interestic in my logchecks:
> kernel: Generic RTD Driver v1.07
>
> If I take this one off, the "real" one will modprobe :-)
> Question is, who is loading genrtc BEFORE /etc/modules gets
> referenced?
> Actually, I tried comment
On Sat, 2006-02-04 at 21:55 +0200, David Baron wrote:
> This has been in my /etc/modules from the start. For a while now, (most
> recent?) 2.6 kernels, this will not load "device not found". Since it did not
> seem to effect anything, I just let it be. (Note I have both a rtc.ko and
> rtcgen.ko
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 20:09 +0200, David Baron wrote:
>
> Made a kernel with alsa sound support compiled in! I also compiled in
> the
> "generic" devices. Result: NO UNDEFINED. My three (a set ncards = 3)
> became
> dummy, virmidi and the ensonic. The ensonic did not play, however, but
> the
>
On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 21:55 +0200, David Baron wrote:
> >Also a problem in 2.6.14. I am not using udev or devfs but have explicitely
> >created /dev nodes (old fashioned way and far far too many entries, but ...
> >always worked before).
>
> >Newer kernels boot with many undefines. They seem to
On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 21:55 +0200, David Baron wrote:
> >Also a problem in 2.6.14. I am not using udev or devfs but have explicitely
> >created /dev nodes (old fashioned way and far far too many entries, but ...
> >always worked before).
>
> >Newer kernels boot with many undefines. They seem to
On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 21:30 +0200, David Baron wrote:
> Also a problem in 2.6.14. I am not using udev or devfs but have explicitely
> created /dev nodes (old fashioned way and far far too many entries, but ...
> always worked before).
>
> Newer kernels boot with many undefines. They seem to corr
Ipchains alone won't do portforwarding. You need ipmasqadm as well. I
know it's braindead but that's how it is, hopefully in 2.4 there will be a
unified interface to all those nifty ip forwarding features.
HTH,
Lee
At 12:53 AM 6/29/2000, Nick wrote:
this is my situation:
i have a linux bo
Use ProFTPD. It has a MUCH better security record, is fast,
lightweight, and configuration is a breeze if you have ever configured
Apache. I made the switch several months ago and would never go back.
"Ralf G. R. Bergs" wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> my wu-ftpd is constantly crashing. :-(
>
> About
Hello,
I did apt-get update the other day, which informed me that the mailx
package was 'obsolete', so of course I purged it. Logrotate apparently
depended on this package, so I got rid of it too. Now when I try to
install logrotate again it says
logrotate depends on mailx
mailx does not appea
With VMWare 2.0 on my box (Celeron 300A @ 450mhz, 320MB RAM, Quantum 10K
RPM LVD SCSI drive on an AHA2940U2W, TNT2 Ultra w/ 32MB video ram),
Win98 SE is sluggish but usable, like on a P233. The thing that really
kills usability for me is that the mouse is slow to respond - there is a
noticeable la
Hello,
I have an old Ultrasparc with Red Hat 6.2 on it, which on this box is at
least as unstable as anything from Microsoft. Networking will
mysteriously stop working every few weeks for no reason. Changing
kernels has no effect. Maximized windows cover up the GNOME panel
regardless of my sett
I am having basically the same problem, except that I built XFree86 4.0
from source and I use that as my X server. Almost all packages built
against the older X libraries work fine, but dselect keeps bugging me to
install these packages. Is there a way to get it to stop bugging me
once and for al
Just a guess, but maybe they don't like people who sent HTML mail?
> Joseph Kafka wrote:
>
> Hello, I have been the subject of repeated scans of port 27374 on
> my system by the same IP address, over and over again.What
> might their intent be? Please advise. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I am trying to upgrade from Debian 2.1 to 2.2, and I am having a
problem. The libdb2 package upon which many others depend is not in the
right place on any debian mirror. All the links from the package
download page on www.debian.org are broken. This is the error that
apt-get upgrade giv
15 matches
Mail list logo
