Re: increment backup of home dir

2025-03-14 Thread Default User
On 2025-03-14 [FR], Russell Harris wrote: I use git. I keep terminal open running a ssh connection open to the backup system. Whenever I wish to save the state of the system, I switch to the terminal and execute git commit. To check the previous state of a file, Emacs provides git-timemachine.

Re: Problem with /var

2025-03-07 Thread Default User
On Fri, 7 Mar 2025, Chris Green wrote: --- "THe systemd journal file defaults for length of time they are kept and maximum size etc. are OK[ish] for systems with lots of disk space but are far too large for smaller systems. On systems I have with limited space I modify /etc/syste

Re: rsync: source and destination drive data used sizes differ

2025-01-18 Thread Default User
Hi, Charles! Thanks for the reply. I will have to ponder that.

Re: rsync: source and destination drive data used sizes differ

2025-01-18 Thread Default User
Hi, Eben! I hate to sound stupid, but how would I do that. I have never used mkfs before.

Re: rsync: source and destination drive data used sizes differ

2025-01-18 Thread Default User
Hi Andy! Thanks for the reply. I may just delete everything on DRIVE2 overnight, and then try rsync with: time sudo rsync -aHSxvvv --human-readable --delete --numeric-ids -- info=progress2,stats2,name2 -- exclude={"/dev/*","/proc/*","/sys/*","/tmp/*","/run/*","/mnt/*","/media /*","/lost+found"}

rsync: source and destination drive data used sizes differ

2025-01-18 Thread Default User
Hi! I have two identical 4Tb usb external drives, Western Digital Model WDC WD40NDZW-11A8JS1. My computer is a Dell Inspiron 15 3000 Model 3511 (a very modest laptop), from early 2024, running Debian 12 Stable, always kept updated. The first drive, Drive 1, is my "backup drive". I backup daily u

rsync: source and destination drive data used sizes differ

2025-01-18 Thread Default User
Hi! I have two identical 4Tb usb external drives, Western Digital Model WDC WD40NDZW-11A8JS1. My computer is a Dell Inspiron 15 3000 Model 3511 (a very modest laptop), from early 2024, running Debian 12 Stable, always kept updated. The first drive, Drive 1, is my "backup drive". I backup daily u

Re: Adding a new boot disk while keeping old disk

2024-11-25 Thread Default User
On Mon, 2024-11-25 at 18:59 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 12:36:55PM -0500, Default User wrote: > > [...] > > > Thomas, would you mind elaborating on, or give a link to an > > explanation of: > > > > "Of course, this UUID

Re: Adding a new boot disk while keeping old disk

2024-11-25 Thread Default User
On Mon, 2024-11-25 at 17:59 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 10:07:35AM -0500, e...@gmx.us wrote: > > On 11/25/24 02:26, George at Clug wrote: > > > I would create a folder into which to mount the HD's relevant > > > partition, then used "blkid" to find the UUID and manual

Re: backup of backup or alternating backups?

2024-10-01 Thread Default User
On Mon, 2024-09-30 at 21:55 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Mon Sep 30, 2024 at 5:39 PM BST, Default User wrote: > > So, is there a consensus on which would be better:  > > 1) continue to "mirror" drive A to drive B? > > or, > > 2) alternate backups daily

Re: backup of backup or alternating backups?

2024-09-30 Thread Default User
On Mon, 2024-09-30 at 19:54 +0300, Henrik Ahlgren wrote: > On Mon, 2024-09-30 at 12:39 -0400, Default User wrote: > > But of course, any errors on drive A propagate daily to drive B. > > Having both drives connected and spinning simultaneusly creates a > window of opportun

backup of backup or alternating backups?

2024-09-30 Thread Default User
Hi! On a thread at another mailing list, someone mentioned that they, each day, alternate doing backups between two external usb drives. That got me to thinking (which is always dangerous) . . . I have a full backup on usb external drive A, "refreshed" daily using rsnapshot. Then, every day, I

Re: time display was: Re: Maximum size .bash_aliases file

2024-06-22 Thread Default User
On Sat, 2024-06-22 at 18:11 +1000, Keith Bainbridge wrote: > > On 18/6/24 00:56, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote: > > Keith Bainbridge wrote: > > > On 16/6/24 23:50, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 06:13:36PM +1000, Keith Bainbridge > > > > wrote: > > > > > > It was late af

Re: Determining which file is at a given LBA offset; was: HDD error: Current_Pending_Sector

2024-02-20 Thread Default User
On Tue, 2024-02-20 at 21:36 +, Michael Kjörling wrote: > On 20 Feb 2024 12:51 -0500, from hunguponcont...@gmail.com (Default > User): > > But since the sector already can not be read, How can it be re- > > written > > to a "good" sector? > > Gen

HDD error: Current_Pending_Sector

2024-02-20 Thread Default User
Hi guys! I am running Debian 12 Stable, up to date, on a low-spec Dell Inspiron 15 3000 Model 3511. Firmware is also up to date. I have a 4 Gb Western Digital external usb SATA HDD, Model WDC WD40NDZW-11A8JS1. It has only one partition, formatted as ext4. The filesystem is labeled MSD00012. E

Re: hexchat being discontinued?

2024-02-17 Thread Default User
On Mon, 2024-02-12 at 09:16 +0900, Byunghee HWANG (황병희) wrote: > Hellow^^^ > > On Sat, 2024-02-10 at 19:54 -0500, Default User wrote: > > :( > > (...) > > Any recommendations for a GOOD alternative? > > How about Emacs? > > > Sincerely, Byunghee >

Re: hexchat being discontinued?

2024-02-11 Thread Default User
On Sun, 2024-02-11 at 10:15 +, Michael Kjörling wrote: > On 10 Feb 2024 19:54 -0500, from hunguponcont...@gmail.com (Default > User): > > Any recommendations for a GOOD alternative [IRC client]? > > If you describe what you like about hexchat and dislike about other > alt

hexchat being discontinued?

2024-02-10 Thread Default User
:( Well, it seems that hexchat is being discontinued. IMHO, it is/was the only IRC client that was actually usable.  Any recommendations for a GOOD alternative?

Re: rsync --delete vs rsync --delete-after

2024-01-18 Thread Default User
On Thu, 2024-01-18 at 21:44 +, Andy Smith wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 10:01:46PM +0100, Michel Verdier wrote: > > On 2024-01-18, Andy Smith wrote: > > > If you use --delete-after (and some other options) then rsync has > > > to > > > check every file before it can do any work,

Re: rsync --delete vs rsync --delete-after

2024-01-17 Thread Default User
On Wed, 2024-01-17 at 09:19 -0800, David Christensen wrote: > On 1/17/24 08:19, Default User wrote: > > Hello! > > > > Opinions, please. > > > > I use rsync to copy my primary backup drive to a secondary backup > > drive > > , so that the seco

Re: rsync --delete vs rsync --delete-after

2024-01-17 Thread Default User
On Wed, 2024-01-17 at 10:29 -0800, Kushal Kumaran wrote: > On Wed, Jan 17 2024 at 11:19:39 AM, Default User > wrote: > > Hello! > > > > Opinions, please. > > > > I use rsync to copy my primary backup drive to a secondary backup > > drive > > , so

rsync --delete vs rsync --delete-after

2024-01-17 Thread Default User
Hello! Opinions, please. I use rsync to copy my primary backup drive to a secondary backup drive , so that the secondary backup drive is theoretically always an exact copy of the primary backup drive. Here is the rsync command I use: time sudo rsync -aAXHxvv --delete-after --numeric-ids -- in

Re: I uninstalled OpenMediaVault (because totally overkill for me) and replaced it with borgbackup and rsyncq

2023-09-05 Thread Default User
On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 23:15 +0200, Linux-Fan wrote: > Default User writes: > > > On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 07:25 -0500, John Hasler wrote: > > > Jason writes: > > > > Or how does your backup look like? > > See https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2019/11/msg00

Re: I uninstalled OpenMediaVault (because totally overkill for me) and replaced it with borgbackup and rsyncq

2023-09-05 Thread Default User
On Tue, 2023-09-05 at 20:01 -0400, Default User wrote: > On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 22:44 +0200, Michel Verdier wrote: > > > > > On 2023-09-01, Default User wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, it does require considerable space (no d

Re: I uninstalled OpenMediaVault (because totally overkill for me) and replaced it with borgbackup and rsyncq

2023-09-05 Thread Default User
On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 22:44 +0200, Michel Verdier wrote: > > > > On 2023-09-01, Default User wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, it does require considerable space (no data > > > > > > > > de-duplication), > > > &g

Re: I uninstalled OpenMediaVault (because totally overkill for me) and replaced it with borgbackup and rsyncq

2023-09-01 Thread Default User
On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 07:25 -0500, John Hasler wrote: > Jason writes: > > Or how does your backup look like? > > Just rsync. Sorry, I just couldn't resist chiming in here. I have never used OpenMediaVault. I HAVE used a number of other backup methodologies, including Borgbackup, for which I

Re: Why or why not back up "/lost+found"

2023-08-11 Thread Default User
On Fri, 2023-08-11 at 14:45 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 01:30:13PM +0100, > debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote: > > [...] > > > One other consideration that I haven't seen mentioned elsewhere in > > this > > thread is what happens if you back up filesystems to filesyste

Re: Why or why not back up "/lost+found"

2023-08-10 Thread Default User
ash, the files there likely aren't relavent > and can be safely ignored. > > > On August 10, 2023 9:46:27 PM UTC, Default User > wrote: > > On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 21:45 +0200, Nicolas George wrote: > > > Default User (12023-08-10): > > > > And, if

Re: Why or why not back up "/lost+found"

2023-08-10 Thread Default User
On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 21:45 +0200, Nicolas George wrote: > Default User (12023-08-10): > > And, if /lost+found should be excluded, then shouldn't "lost+found" > > in > > any other directories be excluded from backups as well? Why/why > > not? > >

Why or why not back up "/lost+found"

2023-08-10 Thread Default User
Hi! When backing up my system I have been using this exclusions list: /dev/* /proc/* /sys/* /tmp/* /run/* /mnt/* /media/* /lost+found There are many sources online that suggest that "/lost+found" should be excluded from backups, but I can't seem to find a good explanation for why. I do not kno

Re: SOLVED

2023-07-18 Thread Default User
On Tue, 2023-07-18 at 19:25 -0400, Maureen L Thomas wrote: > So I was really getting pissed off with this whole mess.  I have > never had this much trouble with Linux since I started using it as > windows 3 something came out.  > I finally went on line and went to the Debian download site.  I > cl

Re: Upgrade to Debian 11 and still have the same problems.

2023-07-17 Thread Default User
On Sun, 2023-07-16 at 17:21 -0400, Maureen L Thomas wrote: > So I have been snooping around the system and found this message in > the lshw command: >  *-generic DISABLED >  description: Wireless interface >  product: RTL8821CE 802.11ac PCIe Wireless Network Adapter >  vendor: Realtek Semiconductor

Re: Migrating system from u-sd to nvme memory on arm64's?

2023-07-14 Thread Default User
On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 22:49 -0400, Carl Fink wrote: > On 7/12/23 22:23, Default User wrote: > > Now you tell me . . . > > > > In February, I transferred an existing Debian 11 setup to a new 64- > > bit > > x86 computer with an nvme ssd. I have a 1 Gb swap par

Re: Migrating system from u-sd to nvme memory on arm64's?

2023-07-12 Thread Default User
On Thu, 2023-07-13 at 08:45 +0800, jeremy ardley wrote: > > On 13/7/23 08:31, mick.crane wrote: > > I was wondering what these Nvme M2 things are and if can plug into > > motherboard or need an adaptor, are they like a RAM disk or > > something. > > mick > > > Depending on your motherboard you

Re: When to sudo apt clean?

2023-06-23 Thread Default User
On Fri, 2023-06-23 at 10:51 +0500, Stanislav Vlasov wrote: > 2023-06-23 4:44 GMT+05:00, Default User : > > > Other than that, is there any good reason not to do sudo apt clean? > > Only if you have many machines which share /var/cache/apt (via nfs > for example) >

When to sudo apt clean?

2023-06-22 Thread Default User
Hi! I have a separate /var partition, size 10Gb (actually, 9.1Gb per sudo df -h). It is now about 41% full; 3.5Gb used, 5.1Gb free, per sudo df -h. The biggest chunk of var used seems to be /var/cache/apt/archives, at about 1.7Gb. I am considering just running sudo apt clean (or sudo apt-get c

Re: Debian home page -> Download link broken:

2023-06-11 Thread Default User
On Sun, 2023-06-11 at 07:11 +0100, Tixy wrote: > On Sat, 2023-06-10 at 23:55 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > Debian's wiki says to use apt-get: > > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianUpgrade. Also see > > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/uptodate.html . > > > > Maybe it's time for a compl

Re: root password of debian live cd?

2023-05-30 Thread Default User
On Tue, 2023-05-30 at 00:05 -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: > > > On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 12:02 AM hlyg wrote: > > Thank bw! internet search also shows that live is password, but > > it's not > > correct > > > > > Live is the password you use with sudo as there is no root password > set.

Re: No space left on device ...

2023-05-18 Thread Default User
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 10:42 -0600, Charles Curley wrote: > On Thu, 18 May 2023 10:07:05 -0400 > Default User wrote: > > > If I am running systemd-timesyncd on a single-user, internet- > > connected > > computer, not needing to serve time signals to any other device,

Re: No space left on device ...

2023-05-18 Thread Default User
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 10:20 -0400, Dan Ritter wrote: > Default User wrote: > > On Wed, 2023-05-17 at 13:48 -0600, Charles Curley wrote: > > > On Wed, 17 May 2023 12:48:28 -0400 > > > Dan Ritter wrote: > > > > > > > Assuming you have network acce

Re: No space left on device ...

2023-05-18 Thread Default User
On Wed, 2023-05-17 at 13:48 -0600, Charles Curley wrote: > On Wed, 17 May 2023 12:48:28 -0400 > Dan Ritter wrote: > > > Assuming you have network access close to boot time, you might > > want to run an NTP daemon to get the time from a selection of > > other servers. > > Concur. > > > > > Debi

Re: Evolution email (problem?) (IMAP, Gmail, email compacting)

2023-04-30 Thread Default User
On Sun, 2023-04-30 at 20:47 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 06:26:53PM +0100, Tixy wrote: > > On Sun, 2023-04-30 at 11:19 -0400, Default User wrote: > > > (BTW, if anyone does have information about compacting folders in > > > Evolution, I

Re: Evolution email (problem?) (IMAP, Gmail, email compacting)

2023-04-30 Thread Default User
On Sun, 2023-04-30 at 18:26 +0100, Tixy wrote: > On Sun, 2023-04-30 at 11:19 -0400, Default User wrote: > > (BTW, if anyone does have information about compacting folders in > > Evolution, I would love to hear about it!) > > What is 'compacting', what is it meant to

Re: Thunderbird and font size used to display plain text e-mails?

2023-04-30 Thread Default User
On Sun, 2023-04-30 at 14:26 -0600, D. R. Evans wrote: > I have looked everywhere I can think of, and have been unable to find > an > answer -- among the ridiculous number of ways that fonts appear to be > controlled in Thunderbird -- that works for this issue :-( > > I recently changed to a large

Re: Evolution email (problem?) (IMAP, Gmail, email compacting)

2023-04-30 Thread Default User
On Sat, 2023-04-29 at 00:01 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: > For those who missed start of the thread: it is dedicated to IMAP > access > to Gmail and Evolution behavior. > > On 27/04/2023 23:15, Default User wrote: > > It stays in both folders, with > > only the one

Re: Evolution email (problem?)

2023-04-27 Thread Default User
On Thu, 2023-04-27 at 17:17 +0100, Tixy wrote: > On Wed, 2023-04-26 at 11:05 -0400, Default User wrote: > > Even if it did not work from a Live Debian session, it makes no > > sense > > to me that Evolution could be designed this way.  I see no good > > reason > &

Re: Evolution email (problem?)

2023-04-27 Thread Default User
On Thu, 2023-04-27 at 17:26 +0200, Michel Verdier wrote: > Le 27 avril 2023 Default User a écrit : > > > Anyway, it would be interesting to hear from Evolution users, to > > see if > > others experience the situation I have described.  I would find it > > hard >

Re: Evolution email (problem?)

2023-04-27 Thread Default User
On Thu, 2023-04-27 at 17:26 +0100, Tixy wrote: > On Thu, 2023-04-27 at 12:15 -0400, Default User wrote: > > If a message is in both of the folders "Inbox" and "All Mail", it > > CAN > > NOT be directly deleted from "All Mail". It stays in b

Re: Evolution email (problem?)

2023-04-27 Thread Default User
On Thu, 2023-04-27 at 22:25 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: > On 27/04/2023 21:38, Default User wrote: > > "All Mail" apparently assigned to all messages > > Do you expect that deleting from "All Mail" removes message from > another > folder to which you move

Re: Evolution email (problem?)

2023-04-27 Thread Default User
On Thu, 2023-04-27 at 09:22 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: > On 26/04/2023 22:05, Default User wrote: > > it absolutely refuses to delete email > > messages directly from the [Gmail]/All Mail folder of any email > > account. > > Disclaimer: I do not use evolution. > &g

Re: Evolution email (problem?)

2023-04-26 Thread Default User
On Wed, 2023-04-26 at 11:11 -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote: > Can't explain it, but it strikes me it's almost certainly a > permissions problem. > > Patrick > > > > > On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 11:06 AM Default User > wrote: > > Strange . . . >

Evolution email (problem?)

2023-04-26 Thread Default User
Strange . . . I run Debian 11 (Bullseye) Stable, up to date, Gnome 3 desktop environment. I recently set up Evolution email. Works okay. Two days ago, I realized that it absolutely refuses to delete email messages directly from the [Gmail]/All Mail folder of any email account. To delete a m

Re: /etc/fstab question (problem)?

2023-04-20 Thread Default User
On Thu, 2023-04-20 at 10:09 +0200, DdB wrote: > You got your plan mapped out. and i agree, except for one little > detail: > see below. - > > Am 19.04.2023 um 22:06 schrieb Default User: > > > I think, it is the case when reboot is safer. Open file > > > descrip

Re: /etc/fstab question (problem)?

2023-04-19 Thread Default User
On Wed, 2023-04-19 at 23:40 +, davidson wrote: > On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 Default User wrote: > > On Wed, 2023-04-19 at 16:56 -0400, Default User wrote: > > > On Wed, 2023-04-19 at 15:36 -0500, David Wright wrote: > > > > On Wed 19 Apr 2023 at 16:06:

[SOLVED] Re: /etc/fstab question (problem)?

2023-04-19 Thread Default User
On Wed, 2023-04-19 at 15:09 -0700, David Christensen wrote: > On 4/19/23 15:03, David Christensen wrote: > > On 4/19/23 14:26, Default User wrote: > > > On Wed, 2023-04-19 at 14:03 -0700, David Christensen wrote: > > > > On 4/19/23 13:06, Default User wrote: > &g

Re: /etc/fstab question (problem)?

2023-04-19 Thread Default User
On Wed, 2023-04-19 at 14:03 -0700, David Christensen wrote: > On 4/19/23 13:06, Default User wrote: > > On Wed, 2023-04-19 at 18:07 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: > > > On 19/04/2023 16:16, David Christensen wrote: > > > > On 4/18/23 20:16, Stefan Monnier wrote: >

Re: /etc/fstab question (problem)?

2023-04-19 Thread Default User
On Wed, 2023-04-19 at 16:56 -0400, Default User wrote: > On Wed, 2023-04-19 at 15:36 -0500, David Wright wrote: > > On Wed 19 Apr 2023 at 16:06:57 (-0400), Default User wrote: > > > > > Anyway, here is where I am at: > > > > > > I have two Clonezilla bac

Re: /etc/fstab question (problem)?

2023-04-19 Thread Default User
On Wed, 2023-04-19 at 15:36 -0500, David Wright wrote: > On Wed 19 Apr 2023 at 16:06:57 (-0400), Default User wrote: > > > Anyway, here is where I am at: > > > > I have two Clonezilla backups. > > 1) a full disk backup. > > 2) a "partitions"

Re: /etc/fstab question (problem)?

2023-04-19 Thread Default User
On Wed, 2023-04-19 at 18:07 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: > On 19/04/2023 16:16, David Christensen wrote: > > On 4/18/23 20:16, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > > > > You can also do > > > > > > mount --bind / /mnt > > > > > > and then look at /mnt/tmp. > > > No need to reboot into single-user mode fo

Re: /etc/fstab question (problem)?

2023-04-19 Thread Default User
On Wed, 2023-04-19 at 18:07 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: > On 19/04/2023 16:16, David Christensen wrote: > > On 4/18/23 20:16, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > > > > You can also do > > > > > > mount --bind / /mnt > > > > > > and then look at /mnt/tmp. > > > No need to reboot into single-user mode fo

Re: /etc/fstab question (problem)?

2023-04-18 Thread Default User
On Tue, 2023-04-18 at 16:53 -0700, David Christensen wrote: > On 4/18/23 14:42, Default User wrote: > > On Tue, 2023-04-18 at 13:03 -0700, David Christensen wrote: > > > On 4/18/23 07:59, Default User wrote: > > > > Hey, I have a strange situation! > > >

Re: /etc/fstab question (problem)?

2023-04-18 Thread Default User
On Tue, 2023-04-18 at 13:03 -0700, David Christensen wrote: > On 4/18/23 07:59, Default User wrote: > > Hey, I have a strange situation! > > > > I just realized that my /tmp partition is not being mounted at > > startup. > > Instead, I think the filesystem m

/etc/fstab question (problem)?

2023-04-18 Thread Default User
Hey, I have a strange situation! I just realized that my /tmp partition is not being mounted at startup. Instead, I think the filesystem may be allocating space in another partition (maybe /root?) for tmp stuff. I would like to return to the prior setup, where the /tmp partition is mounted at s

Re: New Dell Inspiron 15 3000 Series 3511 sound problem on Debian 11 Stable

2023-03-20 Thread Default User
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 11:06 AM Timothy M Butterworth < timothy.m.butterwo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 10:57 AM Jeffrey Walton > wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 7:55 PM Default User >> wrote: >> > >> > I just got a

Upgrade to Bookworm upon release, but now using backported kernel on Bullseye

2023-03-20 Thread Default User
Hi. I currently run Bullseye Stable using: linux-image-6.0.0-0.deb11.6-amd64 6.0.12-1~bpo11+1 amd64 Linux 6.0 for 64-bit PCs (signed) kernel. I plan to upgrade to Bookworm Stable shortly after release. Will I need to do anything differently? Any "gotcha's"?

[SOLVED] New Dell Inspiron 15 3000 Series 3511 sound problem on Debian 11 Stable

2023-03-20 Thread Default User
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 6:56 AM Anssi Saari wrote: > Default User writes: > > > xserver-xorg-video-cirrus_1.5.3-1+b3_amd64.deb for Debian Stable > (Bullseye) does seem to be at > > deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian bullseye main > > but that is not a backport. >

Re: New Dell Inspiron 15 3000 Series 3511 sound problem on Debian 11 Stable

2023-02-12 Thread Default User
On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 7:58 AM Anssi Saari wrote: > Default User writes: > > > The dumbed-down make-believe BIOS on the new computer lists the Audio > Controller as: > > "Cirrus Logic CS8409". > > So it looks like this is the actual sound hardware that&#x

Re: New Dell Inspiron 15 3000 Series 3511 sound problem on Debian 11 Stable

2023-02-11 Thread Default User
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 11:00 AM Anssi Saari wrote: > Default User writes: > > > BTW, > > sudo apt show firmware-sof-signed > > shows firmware-sof-signed as installed for both Debian Live 11.0 > > and Debian Live 11.6. : > > OK, next step is to run >

Re: New Dell Inspiron 15 3000 Series 3511 sound problem on Debian 11 Stable

2023-02-10 Thread Default User
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 12:37 PM Anssi Saari wrote: > Default User writes: > > > In Debian 11 "Live", lspci -nn reports: > > "00:1f.3 Audio device [0403]: Intel Tiger Lake-LP Smart Sound Technology > Audio Controller [8086:a0c8] (rev > > 20)". >

New Dell Inspiron 15 3000 Series 3511 sound problem on Debian 11 Stable

2023-02-09 Thread Default User
Hello to all! I just got a brand new Dell Inspiron 15 3000 Series 3511 laptop. Came with Windows (ugh!) preinstalled. My old Dell Inspiron 15 3000 Series 3542 laptop (made in 2014) just died. So this one should work, right? No. Unfortunately the new 3511 is quite different from the old 3542. I

Re: backing up backups

2022-04-18 Thread Default User
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 3:24 AM David Christensen wrote: > On 4/13/22 20:03, Default User wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 4:42 PM David Christensen wrote: > > >> As you find system administration commands that work, put them into > >> scripts: > >>

Re: backing up backups

2022-04-13 Thread Default User
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 4:42 PM David Christensen wrote: > On 4/13/22 09:20, Default User wrote: > > >> Hey guys, sorry for just getting back with you now. > >> Unfortunately, I am just now recovering from a self-inflicted computer > >> disaster. > >> &g

Re: backing up backups

2022-04-13 Thread Default User
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 12:09 PM Default User wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 12:03 PM David Christensen < > dpchr...@holgerdanske.com> wrote: > >> On 4/10/22 22:15, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: >> > On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 09:44:59PM -0700, David Chris

Re: backing up backups

2022-04-10 Thread Default User
On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 11:13 PM David wrote: > On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 at 12:59, Default User > wrote: > > > Then I try to use rsync to make an identical copy of backup device MSD1 > on an absolutely identical 4-Tb external usb hard drive, > > labeled MSD2, using this com

backing up backups

2022-04-10 Thread Default User
Hello! My setup: - single home x86-64 computer running Debian 11 Stable, up to date. - one 4-Tb external usb hard drive to use as a backup device, labeled MSD1. - another identical usb hard drive, labeled MSD2, to use as a copy of the backups on MSD1. - the computer and all storage devices are for

Re: backup directory/file exclusion pattern list for borgbackup

2021-10-03 Thread Default User
On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 2:55 AM Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > On Sb, 02 oct 21, 19:56:02, Default User wrote: > > > > And . . . I make a special point of excluding: > > /media > > /media/* > > /mnt > > /mnt/* > > > > Why? > > > > B

Re: backup directory/file exclusion pattern list for borgbackup

2021-10-02 Thread Default User
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 1:54 AM deloptes wrote: > > Default User wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > I want to try using borgbackup to do backups of my (only) user directory: > > /home/debian-user > > > > I just want to do so using Vorta, a GUI for borgbackup.

Re: backup directory/file exclusion pattern list for borgbackup

2021-09-25 Thread Default User
On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 8:04 PM Kushal Kumaran wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 25 2021 at 06:24:12 PM, Default User > wrote: > > Hello! > > > > I want to try using borgbackup to do backups of my (only) user directory: > > /home/debian-user > > > > I just wa

backup directory/file exclusion pattern list for borgbackup

2021-09-25 Thread Default User
Hello! I want to try using borgbackup to do backups of my (only) user directory: /home/debian-user I just want to do so using Vorta, a GUI for borgbackup. But I just need a good, general list of directory and file type exclusions that I can just cut and paste into the Exclude Patterns window in

Re: scanner recommendation

2021-04-24 Thread Default User
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 10:27 AM Russell wrote: > > Brian wrote: > > > As with all of these asking for recommendations type questions, there > > is little detail provided. For example, do you want a standalone scanner > > or would an MFD suit? > > > > sane-airscan supports all modern MFDs. Shoppi

Re: scanner recommendation

2021-04-19 Thread Default User
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021, 09:12 Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 08:48:12AM +0200, john doe wrote: > >You could choose a scanner that is 'complete'ly supported from the Sane > >(1) project > > > >1) www.sane-project.org/sane-mfgs.html#SCANNERS > > Excellent advice. For this reason I

scanner recommendation

2021-04-18 Thread Default User
Hi! It may be time for a new scanner. For years I have used a Visioneer OneTouch 7100 usb flatbed scanner on various x86 computers running various versions of Debian and simple-scan. Currently: Debian Unstable (updated, of course) Linux 5.10.0-6-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.28-1 (2021-04-09) x86_64

Re: Blind and Low-Vision UNIX Users Group

2021-03-06 Thread Default User
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021, 17:34 Dan Ritter wrote: > > Since I know we have some people on this list who might be > interested in this -- > > https://blvuug.org/ > > is the home of the new Blind and Low-Vision UNIX Users Group. > > They're just getting started. > > -dsr- > Thanks for the tip, Dan!

curious update situation

2020-08-13 Thread Default User
Please consider the following: dimwit@dimwit:~$ cat /etc/apt/sources.list # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 9.4.0 _Stretch_ - Official amd64 NETINST 20180310-11:21]/ buster contrib main non-free deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/unstable main contrib non-free # deb-src

Re: Apt-get vs Aptitude vs Apt

2020-08-13 Thread Default User
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 1:58 AM Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > On Ma, 11 aug 20, 15:33:53, Javier Barroso wrote: > > > > I swiched from aptitude to apt-get/apt some years ago > > > > aptitude need love :( > > > > My problem was mixing 64 and 32 bits packages. Seem aptitude didn't do a > > good job > >

Apt-get vs Aptitude vs Apt

2020-08-07 Thread Default User
Hey guys, Recently there was a thread about aptitude dependency resolution limitations. Years ago, I believe I read in the Debian documentation that aptitude was preferred to apt-get, because it seemed to have better dependency resolution. Now, we have apt, as well. So, all other things being e

Re: Bug #961990

2020-07-19 Thread Default User
On 2020-07-19 at 16:27, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> This has been going on since the beginning of June, 2020, with no end in >> sight. >> Bug #961990 - IIUC, no activity since 2020-06-02. >> > You show a session where you reject all the proposed solutions, but > I don't see any justification why you

Bug #961990

2020-07-19 Thread Default User
Hi. I'm running 64-bit Debian Unstable. This has been going on since the beginning of June, 2020, with no end in sight. Bug #961990 - IIUC, no activity since 2020-06-02. dimwit@dimwit:~$ date; sudo aptitude -Pvvv update Sun 19 Jul 2020 02:25:08 PM EDT Hit http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian unstabl

Re: Thank you [was: Reminder about the Debian Code of Conduct]

2020-06-25 Thread Default User
"Beware the censor, for in his heart, he deems himself your master. "

Re: technical terms overhaul

2020-06-19 Thread Default User
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020, 15:14 Eike Lantzsch wrote: > On the danger of starting a flame war ... > thinking about the article by Gunnar Wolf on Planet Debian > > instead of "whitelist" and "blacklist" I would like to propose the terms: > "allowlist" and "rejectlist" > instead of (for example on disk

Re: KDE run Dolphin as root?

2020-06-14 Thread Default User
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 4:12 AM Marco Möller wrote: > > On 09.06.20 23:55, Default User wrote: > > (...) > > Now, a final note. > > > > When I did my main install, it was a day or two before the release of > > Buster 10.0. I immediately upgraded to Unstable.

Re: KDE run Dolphin as root?

2020-06-09 Thread Default User
On Sunday, Jun 7, 2020, at 12:11, Kushal Kumaran wrote: > >Running > > sudo sh -c 'unset SUDO_USER; KDE_FULL_SESSION=true > dolphin' > > from a shell gets a dolphin window. Thanks, Kushal. That does work. For Dolphin, anyway. > There is some advice at > https://forum.kde.org/viewtopic.php?f=223

Re: KDE run Dolphin as root?

2020-06-06 Thread Default User
On Sat, Jun 6, 2020, 21:19 Kushal Kumaran wrote: > Default User writes: > > > Hi, all. > > > > As an experiment, I just installed Debian 10.4 Stable on a spare drive, > and > > installed kde on it. > > > > I have not tried kde in many years, so am

Re: KDE run Dolphin as root?

2020-06-06 Thread Default User
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020, 16:55 Default User wrote: > Hi, all. > > As an experiment, I just installed Debian 10.4 Stable on a spare drive, > and installed kde on it. > > I have not tried kde in many years, so am not really familiar with it. > Perhaps I am overlooking something o

KDE run Dolphin as root?

2020-06-05 Thread Default User
Hi, all. As an experiment, I just installed Debian 10.4 Stable on a spare drive, and installed kde on it. I have not tried kde in many years, so am not really familiar with it. Perhaps I am overlooking something obvious, but I can not seem to run Dolphin or Konqueror as root. Searching online, I

Re: gnome-disk-utility User Session Defaults issue

2020-05-11 Thread Default User
On Sat, May 09, 2020, at 22:34:30, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > UUID is the preferred method for automating such stuff[1], because they > are (for all practical purposes) unique, so it ensures there won't be > conflicts even when swapping drives between systems. > > Labels are more convenient for huma

Re: gnome-disk-utility User Session Defaults issue

2020-05-08 Thread Default User
On 2020-05-08, Cindy Sue Causey (butterflyby...@gmail.com) wrote: > My question is: Is that the only hard drive with partitions named like > that? Just ruling out that maybe there's some kind of conflict if two > hard drives have the same layout.. Cindy, there is only one drive in the computer, /

Re: gnome-disk-utility User Session Defaults issue

2020-05-08 Thread Default User
On Fri, May 8, 2020, 12:34 Tixy wrote: > On Fri, 2020-05-08 at 09:59 -0400, Default User wrote: > > Hi David. > > > > Yes, I made the labels for the partitions during the original > > installation: > > > > /dev/sda1 = / (primary partition) > > /dev/

Re: gnome-disk-utility User Session Defaults issue

2020-05-08 Thread Default User
Hi David. Yes, I made the labels for the partitions during the original installation: /dev/sda1 = / (primary partition) /dev/sda2 = (extended partition) /dev/sda5 = swap (logical partition) /dev/sda6 = /home (logical partition) So /dev/sda2 has no label, as it is just an extended partition

gnome-disk-utility User Session Defaults issue

2020-05-07 Thread Default User
Hi. I am using Debian Unstable (64-bit), Cinnamon desktop environment. --- lsblk output: NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT sda 8:00 111.8G 0 disk ├─sda1 8:1028G 0 part / ├─sda2 8:20 1K 0

  1   2   3   >