Harland Christofferson wrote:
I haven't seen my previous response so I am trying again.
I have installed openswan.
If you don't need all the features of IPSec, OpenVPN (
http://openvpn.sourceforge.net/
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/net/openvpn )is the way to go. I
found it to be 100 t
Andrea Vettorello wrote:
I think it depends on the theme, or better, how it define the
transient windows. I know this isn't a solution, but try with a
different sawfish theme, like microgui...
Andrea
P.S. my preferred one is finalstep...
Thanks, that did it!
-Brent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
I've been googling for a solution to my problem, and although I've been
finding what seems to be a troubled history between the two, I haven't
been able to find an answer to my problem.
When I open OpenOffice in Gnome/Sawfish, everything for the most part
works fine. However, if I click on an i
Lorenzo Prince wrote:
>I have an 11wave WaveBuddy PCMCIA wireless network card, and I want to use it
>with the 2.6.6-1-686 kernel on Debian Sid. I have the kernel-source-2.6 package
>and hav untarred it and symlinked the resulting directory to
>/usr/src/linux-2.6.6-1-686, which is apparently wher
Is it under a different name and I just can't find it? Is there
something that people recommend that I use instead?
Thanks,
Brent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stephen Touset wrote:
>I'm working on a fairly large program for a class, and now every time I
>run it, it segfaults.
>
>I've secluded the part that seems to cause the problems, and wrote a
>small file called test.cc, which contains a minimal implementation fo
>the code that brings up the segfault
Hello everyone. Like many on this list I'm sure, I end up being the
recipient of old computers that friends and family unload on me every
time the latest and greatest new thing comes out. A friend of mine just
gave me (another) old laptop that he's not using anymore and I'm trying
to figure out a u
Justin Guerin wrote:
>My CPU is 100% utilized, but no processes seem to be using the CPU. I can't
>seem to figure out what's causing the load. I know that something is,
>though, because xscreensaver is running very slow.
>
Some daemons (mysql comes to mind) won't show up under top, but of
cour
Jody Grafals wrote:
> Anyone seen this error befor ?
>
> "channel 1: open failed: administratively prohibited: open failed"
>
> I get it when I try to run this command
> ssh -f -g -n -b216.xxx.xxx.92 -N -L80:67.xxx.xxx.22.:80 -l root
> 67.xxx.xxx.22
You have to be root to be able to open port 80
Hello all, yes, I've seen the previous posts about klecker being down and all, but is
there no mirror of security? I didn't see anything on
http://www.debian.org/mirror/list. I'm kind in the situation where I finally convinced
the people I work with how cool and reliable debian is and they've al
Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> One thing I've come to think about: My ISP has suffered many
> DDoS-attacks, I have no idea why. However, could it be that they have
> installed a firewall on the router that makes this go so slow?
Possible. Maybe they've installed something like psad on their system. If
Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> However, the initial portscan takes an extremely long time... Actually,
> I haven't seen it finish, because I had to turn my computer off at
> night... :-) But something like 10 hours, it seems like it would need
> to do a portscan... WTF? There's is a progress bar, it
This may be a longshot, but are you using a wireless networking card? I get the same
kp when using linux-wlan-ng with some netgear NICs under heavy load.
-Brent
A. Loonstra wrote:
> For the second time during our nightly backup our kernel crashes
> completely. Since this is a production machine
Vivek Kumar wrote:
> I tried to mount the reiserfs filesytem and it was
> mounted. GREAT!!! But now my netowrk inteface is not coming up. I tried
> ifup command but itsays that it cannot find the module eth0. Somehow my
> netowrking got messed up now.
> Any Suggestion.
I had a similar problem when
Hello, I'm running sid i386. When I ran w this morning I noticed that w was reporting
a different number of users than it was actually showing me:
10:50:35 up 2 days, 15:52, 6 users, load average: 1.06, 1.12, 1.16
USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT
bmiller :0
15 matches
Mail list logo
