n a high numbered port. Login accounting
will (probably) not work correctly, but... The non-debianized source might
be easier to deal with if the target machines are not debian. The latest
source can be had from ftp.cs.hut.fi:/pub/ssh
--
Aaron Denney
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING
Daniel Martin at cush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aaron Denney) writes:
>
> > Why does /etc/ppp/ip-up unnecessarily ifconfig the ppp device? I don't
> > believe this is necessary, as ppp appears to set up the device properly
> > on its ow
, etc.)
--
Aaron Denney
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
ser groups,
> and world execute for public_html access). Is this an ssh bug?
Not as such. Ssh is perfectly reasonable in being paranoid about
permissions as it has no way of knowing that only you are in your
personal group. There is really no need for group write permission on
your directory
Stephen Zander wrote:
> Aaron Denney wrote:
> > This isn't quite the appropriate venue for such questions, as it is
> > a general unix/sed question and not very specific to Debian. In the
> > future try the newsgroup comp.unix.programmer or comp.unix.questions.
>
^^ are the quoted parts.
The \t is not quoted, but is interpreted by your shell, which replaces the \t
with an actual t. If you take out the inner quotes, it should work:
sed -e 's/\t/ /g' outfile
This will pass an actual \t to sed, which will interpret it as
I was wondering if there is any plan to move Debian over to
using PAM for logins and other authentication. I see that it
has been made a debian package and some packages do use it,
just not stuff like login.
--
Aaron Denney
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word
if [[ -f $i ]]; then
echo $i
mv $i ~/.rm
else
echo "$i cannot be removed."
fi
done
}
--
Aaron Denney
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
x the
problem from there (try hitting control-alt-F1). That might not work,
though, if xdm keeps on switching to X on restart. If this doesn't work
you can try booting with the option 'single' to lilo, or 'init=/bin/sh'
if that fails. They should let you login without xdm (or
the dpkg system does
work okay. I just suppose my view of how the software installation should go
is not quite the same as the dpkg one, although both ``work''.
Thanks to all who tried to answer my questions.
--
Aaron Denney
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
l it. Certainly just going ahead and having it
build the binary package and then installing that is feasible, and even
fairly easily automatable, but it looks like an unnecessary step.
Thank you for your replies.
--
Aaron Denney
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
think doing an installation after the build would be possible
without having to take the extra step of creating a binary package.
If this isn't the only way, could someone please explain how to go about
installing a binary package?
--
Aaron Denney
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e
12 matches
Mail list logo
