Re: Sorry for spamming the list

On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 1:55 AM wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 01:39:33AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > [...] > > > That doesn't make sense. Usenet and NNTP is a different protocol than > > mailing lists and various email protocols. Why would you expect > > protocols to cross pollinate? > >

iwlwifi bug in 6.12?

Hello, Anybody else seeing this in the current testing kernel? Cheers! -- Boyan Penkov Feb 07 01:12:33 themachine kernel: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: Feb 07 01:12:33 themachine kernel: #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode Feb 07 01:12:33 themachine kern

Re: Sorry for spamming the list

On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 01:39:33AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: [...] > That doesn't make sense. Usenet and NNTP is a different protocol than > mailing lists and various email protocols. Why would you expect > protocols to cross pollinate? Gateways. They live between protocols. In the concrete c

Re: Sorry for spamming the list

On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 9:27 PM Russell S. wrote: > > David Wright writes: > > > On Thu 06 Feb 2025 at 21:20:18 (+), Russell Stinnett wrote: > >> I didn't realize that the posts would be so delayed, or that they > >> were going through at all. I hoped that they would just outright fail > >> un

Re: how to prevent evolution from archiving mails?

On Thu, 2025-01-30 at 18:21 +0300, Andrii Kalashnykov wrote: > > > > > > > I'll see if I can make a bug report ... > > > > > > Also, try asking a question on the GNOME project forum [1] and/or > > > writing an e-mail to the evolution-users mailing list [2] — I’m > > > sure they’re more knowledgea

Re: Sorry for spamming the list

David Wright writes: > On Thu 06 Feb 2025 at 21:20:18 (+), Russell Stinnett wrote: >> I didn't realize that the posts would be so delayed, or that they >> were going through at all. I hoped that they would just outright fail >> until one finally went through and that would be it. >> >> So, a

Re: Sorry for spamming the list

On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 04:45:26PM -0600, David Wright wrote: > On Thu 06 Feb 2025 at 21:20:18 (+), Russell Stinnett wrote: > > I didn't realize that the posts would be so delayed, or that they > > were going through at all. I hoped that they would just outright fail > > until one finally went

Re: Sorry for spamming the list

On 7/2/25 05:20, Russell Stinnett wrote: So, again, I apologize for the spam. I don't know of another way to test it. Stop it, or you will go blind... .. Bret Busby Armadale West Australia (UTC+0800) ..

Re: Sorry for spamming the list

On Thu 06 Feb 2025 at 21:20:18 (+), Russell Stinnett wrote: > I didn't realize that the posts would be so delayed, or that they > were going through at all. I hoped that they would just outright fail > until one finally went through and that would be it. > > So, again, I apologize for the spam

Re: Sorry for spamming the list

On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 09:20:18PM +, Russell Stinnett wrote: > I didn't realize that the posts would be so delayed, or that they > were going through at all. I hoped that they would just outright fail > until one finally went through and that would be it. > Hi Russell, Maybe that's lesson #

Sorry for spamming the list

I didn't realize that the posts would be so delayed, or that they were going through at all. I hoped that they would just outright fail until one finally went through and that would be it. So, again, I apologize for the spam. I don't know of another way to test it. -- Thanks, Russell S.

Testing posting to the list

I'm trying to make it so that I can seemlessly post to the list from the group view in Gnus as if I was posting to the group. -- this is my clever sig.

Re: Unnamed Popup from Klaro about cookies

But as Kent said, if its going to produce popups it really, really needs to announce itself properly including a link to some docs that are written from the point of view of a user rather than the point of view of a website developer! :( It'll totally fail on my system (I hope), anyway, since I ba

Re: Testing posting to list from Gnus

[Also copied off-list because it is uncertain that this user is actually reading what is being sent :( ] Hi, Whatever you're doing is definitely not working. You probably need to register with the gateway - or just mail the list in the normal way and use gnus to *read* the group afterwards. All

Re: Testing posting to the list from Gnus

linux.debian.user is a moderated newsgroup in gateway with a mailing list. Your article has been examined by the automatic moderation program and has been refused because: this hierarchy accepts posts only from registered users. You can register for posting by subscribing to the linux-g...@lists.

Re: Testing posting to list from Gnus

linux.debian.user is a moderated newsgroup in gateway with a mailing list. Your article has been examined by the automatic moderation program and has been refused because: this hierarchy accepts posts only from registered users. You can register for posting by subscribing to the linux-g...@lists.

Re: testing apt upgrade 2.9.23 to 2.9.26 changes to sources.list

On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 08:53:49AM -0700, Charles Curley wrote: On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 10:42:27 -0500 Michael Stone wrote: >...except that, per the rest of the discussion in that bug, it almost >certainly won't be able to predict which signer to apply for each >sources.list entry. That you'll prob

Re: Testing email to the group

linux.debian.user is a moderated newsgroup in gateway with a mailing list. Your article has been examined by the automatic moderation program and has been refused because: this hierarchy accepts posts only from registered users. You can register for posting by subscribing to the linux-g...@lists.

Re: testing apt upgrade 2.9.23 to 2.9.26 changes to sources.list

Also, there is https://wiki.debian.org/SourcesList . Regards, Jörg.

Re: Unnamed Popup from Klaro about cookies

Its just a javascript application from whatever website you were on. https://www.klaro.org/docs/ All the best - - - Lucas Rufkahr https://lukerufkahr.com For UMSL inquiries: lr...@umsystem.edu Feb 6, 2025, 13:08 by we...@acu.edu: > On 2/6/25 13:06, Kent West wrote: > >> On 2/6/25 13:01, K

Re: testing apt upgrade 2.9.23 to 2.9.26 changes to sources.list

Hi, On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 08:27:54AM -0500, Dan Ritter wrote: > Charles Curley wrote: > > Another option would be to retain all comments, and let the user > > manually convert commented out entries. Simple, easy to do, and only a > > little obnoxious for the user. > > > > And for those who are

Unnamed Popup from Klaro about cookies

 A few times recently, while using Debian unstable with KDE on Wayland, browsing with Firefox Nightly, I've had a pop-up come up in the "System Tray" area that starts out with "A few settings are required to be able to use certain functions. This controls whether a service is allowed to set coo

Re: Unnamed Popup from Klaro about cookies

On 2/6/25 13:06, Kent West wrote: On 2/6/25 13:01, Kent West wrote:  A few times recently, while using Debian unstable with KDE on Wayland, browsing with Firefox Nightly, I've had a pop-up come up in the "System Tray" area that starts out with "A few settings are required to be able to use cer

Re: Unnamed Popup from Klaro about cookies

On 2/6/25 13:01, Kent West wrote:  A few times recently, while using Debian unstable with KDE on Wayland, browsing with Firefox Nightly, I've had a pop-up come up in the "System Tray" area that starts out with "A few settings are required to be able to use certain functions. This controls wheth

Re: hardware ebook readers (was Re: SMTP servers)

On Wed Feb 5, 2025 at 3:37 PM GMT, Eric S Fraga wrote: Sounds great. I would love to have this. Would this work with Koreader as well? It does, yes. I followed the following blog post: -- Please do not CC me for listmail. 👱🏻 Jonathan

Modernizing apt sources files

With the previous discussion on modernizing one's apt sources files, I went ahead and did it on two of my trixie installations. The two original sources files were preserved, which might be useful for some oddball installations. Note that sources.list, which resides in /etc/apt, is replaced by de

Re: testing apt upgrade 2.9.23 to 2.9.26 changes to sources.list

On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 08:53:49 -0700 Charles Curley wrote: > However, it is not in the man page for apt or apt-get. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1094784 -- Does anybody read signatures any more? https://charlescurley.com https://charlescurley.com/blog/

Re: testing apt upgrade 2.9.23 to 2.9.26 changes to sources.list

On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:30:02 + Joe wrote: > Why in the world bother making your own scripts when you can just do > > # apt modernize-sources > The following files need modernizing: > - /etc/apt/sources.list.d/google-chrome-beta.list > - /etc/apt/sources.list.d/google-earth-pro.list > -

Re: testing apt upgrade 2.9.23 to 2.9.26 changes to sources.list

Andy Smith wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 01:51:49AM -0500, songbird wrote: >> when doing the upgrade you do have the option of doing >> a test run to see what changes are made or not making the >> changes at that time. >> >> when going through this process the comments in >> sources

Re: testing apt upgrade 2.9.23 to 2.9.26 changes to sources.list

On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 10:42:27 -0500 Michael Stone wrote: > >...except that, per the rest of the discussion in that bug, it almost > >certainly won't be able to predict which signer to apply for each > >sources.list entry. That you'll probably have to add on your own. > > It even tells you that!

Re: testing apt upgrade 2.9.23 to 2.9.26 changes to sources.list

On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 10:22:17AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote: I haven't seen this hit yet (though I probably will next time I dist-upgrade against testing), but a comment in bug #1094263 leads me to suspect that there is now supposed to be an 'apt modernize-sources' sub-command, which looks like

Re: testing apt upgrade 2.9.23 to 2.9.26 changes to sources.list

On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 08:09:37 -0700 Charles Curley wrote: > On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:51:17 + > Joe wrote: > > > The long-term fix is a file standard.sources root:root 644 in > > /etc/sources.list.d containing: > > Is there anything that tells one how to make this conversion? Better > yet, a s

Re: testing apt upgrade 2.9.23 to 2.9.26 changes to sources.list

On 2025-02-06 at 10:09, Charles Curley wrote: > On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:51:17 + Joe wrote: > >> The long-term fix is a file standard.sources root:root 644 in >> /etc/sources.list.d containing: > > Is there anything that tells one how to make this conversion? Better > yet, a script or two to d

Re: testing apt upgrade 2.9.23 to 2.9.26 changes to sources.list

On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 08:09:37AM -0700, Charles Curley wrote: Is there anything that tells one how to make this conversion? Better yet, a script or two to do it for us? There will be a lot of people scrambling to convert at the last minute. Yes, current version prompts on what to do.

Re: testing apt upgrade 2.9.23 to 2.9.26 changes to sources.list

On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:51:17 + Joe wrote: > The long-term fix is a file standard.sources root:root 644 in > /etc/sources.list.d containing: Is there anything that tells one how to make this conversion? Better yet, a script or two to do it for us? There will be a lot of people scrambling to co

Re: testing apt upgrade 2.9.23 to 2.9.26 changes to sources.list

On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 08:54:28 -0500 Frank McCormick wrote: > On 2/6/25 8:20 AM, Charles Curley wrote: > > On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 07:53:07 + > > Andy Smith wrote: > > > >> Having said that, I am not sure how the complaint could be > >> addressed since from what I understand you are basically ask

Re: Issues with D-Link DWA-160 network adapter

On 2/6/25 06:06, Ceppo wrote: > On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 12:17:40PM -0500, e...@gmx.us wrote: >> On 2/5/25 10:16, Ceppo wrote: >> >> Also, is this USB or a card? If USB, does it have a case you can >> remove? > > It's USB, and I think I can't remove the outer plastic case without > breaking it. See

Re: testing apt upgrade 2.9.23 to 2.9.26 changes to sources.list

On Feb 06, 2025, Frank McCormick wrote: > > > On 2/6/25 8:20 AM, Charles Curley wrote: > > On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 07:53:07 + > > Andy Smith wrote: > > > > > Having said that, I am not sure how the complaint could be addressed > > > since from what I understand you are basically asking for other

Re: testing apt upgrade 2.9.23 to 2.9.26 changes to sources.list

On 2/6/25 8:20 AM, Charles Curley wrote: On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 07:53:07 + Andy Smith wrote: Having said that, I am not sure how the complaint could be addressed since from what I understand you are basically asking for otherwise valid but commented-out sources.list lines to be converted in

Re: testing apt upgrade 2.9.23 to 2.9.26 changes to sources.list

Charles Curley wrote: > On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 07:53:07 + > Andy Smith wrote: > > > Having said that, I am not sure how the complaint could be addressed > > since from what I understand you are basically asking for otherwise > > valid but commented-out sources.list lines to be converted into > >

Re: testing apt upgrade 2.9.23 to 2.9.26 changes to sources.list

On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 07:53:07 + Andy Smith wrote: > Having said that, I am not sure how the complaint could be addressed > since from what I understand you are basically asking for otherwise > valid but commented-out sources.list lines to be converted into > inactive deb822 files, which seems l

Re: Issues with D-Link DWA-160 network adapter

On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 12:17:40PM -0500, e...@gmx.us wrote: > On 2/5/25 10:16, Ceppo wrote: > > > At first I didn't bother to even look for a solution, since this > > happened only once in a few days. However, now it happens several > > times a day, and most often when I reach high download spee

Re: hardware ebook readers (was Re: SMTP servers)

Response below/inline for email Dan Ritter wrote: > (original email sent 5 Feb 2025 at 11:47) > > Koreader is happy to read from the filesystem, so sure. > > But what I have setup is a combo of two things: > > - an OPDS server to hand out books Thank you for this. I used to use calibre as an OP

Re: Dell Latitude 5400 + plasma - keyboard?

There is indeed a difference. Thisis the output for Plasma: xkb_keymap { xkb_keycodes { include "evdev+aliases(qwertz)" }; xkb_types { include "complete" }; xkb_compat{ include "complete" }; xkb_symbols { include "pc+de+ine

Re: Dell Latitude 5400 + plasma - keyboard?

No, I am running Plasma in X as well as XFCE. I am no friend of Wayland, so I avoiding it. Best Hans > So is this a difference between Wayland and X then? You run Plasma in > Wayland and XFCE in X since it only runs in X?

Re: Dell Latitude 5400 + plasma - keyboard?

Hans writes: > In console and in Plasma the Brightness can not be adjusted, but in XFCE it > can. However, I could not get, which keyboard setting XFCE is using, does pne > know? So is this a difference between Wayland and X then? You run Plasma in Wayland and XFCE in X since it only runs in X

Re: Root, sudo and installing packages [WAS Re: user is not in the suder's file]

On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 8:57 PM K0LNY ?? wrote: > Hi Andrew, > Using other distros, like Ubuntu and Raspbian, I would get tired of typing > sudo in front of everything, so I would just do sudo su and become root > for > everything, You do not need to do sudo su, you can just type su. > so I wo