Hi.
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 11:09:41PM -0400, Paul M. Foster wrote:
> Without setting directory and file permissions to 777, how do you
> allow the above? What combinations of groups, directory
> owners/permissions and file owners/permissions might make this
> possible?
Solution #1:
1) M
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 08:14:25PM -0400, lou wrote:
>
> On 9/21/21 3:49 PM, piorunz wrote:
> >.
> >Many Linux distributions are made that way. After all, we want to come
> >away from closed source software. Debian tries to avoid all closed
> >source and/or non-free software, as per The Debian Fre
On Mi, 22 sep 21, 00:15:48, Paul M. Foster wrote:
>
> On 9/21/21 11:42 PM, Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
> >
> > you can create a user group, add all developers to it and give this
> > group permissions to read and write to that particular folder
> > (/var/www/html/website).
> >
> This is more or les
On 9/22/21 07:15, Paul M. Foster wrote:
>
> On 9/21/21 11:42 PM, Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
>> On 9/22/21 06:09, Paul M. Foster wrote:
>>> Folks:
>>>
>>> This is probably a stupid question for many of you, but I've been
>>> struggling with it since I started using Linux in 1996.
>>>
>>> Say you have
On Tue, 21 Sep 2021 20:49:20 +0100
piorunz wrote:
Hello piorunz,
>On 21/09/2021 16:56, Brad Rogers wrote:
>> Finally, let us not forget that even the official installers seek to
>> install non-free blobs to get certain hardware working where
>> necessary. The installation inevitably stalls at th
On Ma, 21 sep 21, 20:14:25, lou wrote:
>
> On 9/21/21 3:49 PM, piorunz wrote:
> > .
> > Many Linux distributions are made that way. After all, we want to come
> > away from closed source software. Debian tries to avoid all closed
> > source and/or non-free software, as per The Debian Free Software
Paul M. Foster composed on 2021-09-22 00:10 (UTC-0400):
> However, as I said, this type of situation had to be common on old Unix
> systems, and they didn't have git. They had to have solved it some other
> way.
On 9/21/21 9:10 PM, Paul M. Foster wrote:
Yeah, I use git in other contexts. In this particular instance, when
these projects were created, git didn't exist. While I could implement
it here, the other user is on a Mac. I've had experience trying to
install "normal" software (like git) on a Mac
On 9/21/21 11:42 PM, Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
On 9/22/21 06:09, Paul M. Foster wrote:
Folks:
This is probably a stupid question for many of you, but I've been
struggling with it since I started using Linux in 1996.
Say you have a directory in which there are development files. A number
of us
On 9/21/21 8:53 AM, Tim Woodall wrote:
I would like to have some WORM memory for my backups. At the moment
they're copied to an archive machine using a chrooted unprivileged user
and then moved via a cron job so that that user cannot delete them
(other than during a short window).
My though was
On 9/21/21 11:26 PM, Charles Curley wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2021 23:09:41 -0400
"Paul M. Foster" wrote:
Say you have a directory in which there are development files. A
number of users will be creating, deleting and modifying the files
there. This is the type of situation which might have been
On Tue, 21 Sep 2021 23:09:41 -0400
"Paul M. Foster" wrote:
> Say you have a directory in which there are development files. A
> number of users will be creating, deleting and modifying the files
> there. This is the type of situation which might have been common on
> old Unix university systems.
On 9/22/21 06:09, Paul M. Foster wrote:
> Folks:
>
> This is probably a stupid question for many of you, but I've been
> struggling with it since I started using Linux in 1996.
>
> Say you have a directory in which there are development files. A number
> of users will be creating, deleting and mo
Folks:
This is probably a stupid question for many of you, but I've been
struggling with it since I started using Linux in 1996.
Say you have a directory in which there are development files. A number
of users will be creating, deleting and modifying the files there. This
is the type of situ
Hi Bob,
> I am currently running Fedora 31. Can I participate?
Yes definitely, Fedora 31 is supported, and there are .rpm packages
available on the site. All the different versions can be found here:
https://foldingathome.org/alternative-downloads/.
Feel free to join the team if you want as
On 9/21/21 3:49 PM, piorunz wrote:
.
Many Linux distributions are made that way. After all, we want to come
away from closed source software. Debian tries to avoid all closed
source and/or non-free software, as per The Debian Free Software
Guidelines (DFSG):
https://www.debian.org/social_contr
Steve McIntyre writes:
> In article
> you write:
>>I would like to have some WORM memory for my backups. At the moment
>>they're copied to an archive machine using a chrooted unprivileged user
>>and then moved via a cron job so that that user cannot delete them
>>(other than during a short wind
Hi Bob,
> I am currently running Fedora 31. Can I participate?
Yes definitely, Fedora 31 is supported, and there are .rpm packages
available on the site. All the different versions can be found here:
https://foldingathome.org/alternative-downloads/.
Feel free to join the team if you want as wel
On 9/21/21 1:08 PM, Alexis Geoffrey wrote:
Hello all,
For anyone who is unaware, the Folding@Home project is a distributed
computing project aimed to help scientists develop new therapeutics
for a variety of diseases by the means of simulating protein dynamics.
This includes the process of prote
Hello all,
For anyone who is unaware, the Folding@Home project is a distributed
computing project aimed to help scientists develop new therapeutics
for a variety of diseases by the means of simulating protein dynamics.
This includes the process of protein folding and the movements of
proteins, and
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 06:37:41PM +0100, Tim Woodall wrote:
A ransomware attack that exploits a zero day ssh vulnerability for
example wouldn't be a complete disaster - this is only home usage - but
it seems fairly trivial to create a 'worm' usb device using a pi. I
haven't tested yet but with a
On 21/09/2021 16:56, Brad Rogers wrote:
Finally, let us not forget that even the official installers seek to
install non-free blobs to get certain hardware working where necessary.
The installation inevitably stalls at that point. Hardly a good first
impression.
Many Linux distributions are ma
Marco Möller writes:
On 21.09.21 17:53, Tim Woodall wrote:
I would like to have some WORM memory for my backups. At the moment
they're copied to an archive machine using a chrooted unprivileged user
and then moved via a cron job so that that user cannot delete them
(other than during a short wi
On Tue, 21 Sep 2021 15:03:07 - (UTC)
Curt wrote:
Hello Curt,
>Unofficial denotes unsanctioned, unauthorized, unauthoritative, etc., so
>the term quite naturally makes some people a little wary.
And in the context of the installation ISOs, unfortunate. It works
well. Or at least, that is m
On Tue 21 Sep 2021 at 15:03:07 -, Curt wrote:
> On 2021-09-20, piorunz wrote:
> >>
> >> fedora includes firmware, and i think they are serious about open source
> >>
> >> why debian can't do the same?
> >
> > There is nothing wrong about "unofficial" installer with non-free
>
> Unofficial de
Hi,
Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> Write only storage - DVD-R or equivalent Blu-Ray -
> but make sure to end the session.
Do you have BD-R or DVD-R with unclosed sessions ?
(... and how come ? Burn programs normally close their sessions.)
If so, then i would be interested in the SCSI log of a medium
Hi,
Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > Write only storage - DVD-R or equivalent Blu-Ray
Tim Woodall wrote:
> I already do that but currently that means I have roughly one month of
> backups on network accessible storage before I write to disc.
I do a daily incremental backup on BD-R (plus three on BD-
On Tue, 21 Sep 2021, Marco M?ller wrote:
On 21.09.21 17:53, Tim Woodall wrote:
I would like to have some WORM memory for my backups. At the moment
they're copied to an archive machine using a chrooted unprivileged user
and then moved via a cron job so that that user cannot delete them
(other th
On Tue, 21 Sep 2021, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
Write only storage - DVD-R or equivalent Blu-Ray - but make sure to end the
session. Deletion - feed through a paper shredder.
I already do that but currently that means I have roughly one month of
backups on network accessible storage before I wr
On 9/21/21 10:21 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
. . .
WORM is Write *Once* , not Write *Only*
"Write only" storage is easy and fast - just throw things at /dev/null
and they can never be altered (or read back).
Quite.
Or to paraphrase something I said, that actually got published in some
magaz
On 21.09.21 17:53, Tim Woodall wrote:
I would like to have some WORM memory for my backups. At the moment
they're copied to an archive machine using a chrooted unprivileged user
and then moved via a cron job so that that user cannot delete them
(other than during a short window).
My though was t
In article
you write:
>I would like to have some WORM memory for my backups. At the moment
>they're copied to an archive machine using a chrooted unprivileged user
>and then moved via a cron job so that that user cannot delete them
>(other than during a short window).
Sorry to butt in, but I use
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 12:50:18PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> Well, chattr -i turns that off
>
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 04:29:07PM +, Toni Mas Soler wrote:
> > I use to backup my iPhone's photo library using a stfp connection (all in
> > the same directory in my PC). Thus, I can chattr +i
Well, chattr -i turns that off
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 04:29:07PM +, Toni Mas Soler wrote:
I use to backup my iPhone's photo library using a stfp connection (all in the
same directory in my PC). Thus, I can chattr +i the only directory needed and
nobody can remove.
I cannot understand why
I use to backup my iPhone's photo library using a stfp connection (all in the
same directory in my PC). Thus, I can chattr +i the only directory needed and
nobody can remove.
I cannot understand why chattr does not achieve you.
Toni Mas
GPG 3F42A21D84D7E950
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
I would like to have some WORM memory for my backups. At the moment
they're copied to an archive machine using a chrooted unprivileged user
and then moved via a cron job so that that user cannot delete them
(other than during a short window).
My though was to use a raspberry-pi4 to provide a USB
On 21/09/2021 16:03, Curt wrote:
On 2021-09-20, piorunz wrote:
fedora includes firmware, and i think they are serious about open source
why debian can't do the same?
There is nothing wrong about "unofficial" installer with non-free
Unofficial denotes unsanctioned, unauthorized, unauthorit
On 2021-09-20, piorunz wrote:
>>
>> fedora includes firmware, and i think they are serious about open source
>>
>> why debian can't do the same?
>
> There is nothing wrong about "unofficial" installer with non-free
Unofficial denotes unsanctioned, unauthorized, unauthoritative, etc., so
the term
On 2021-09-20, The Wanderer wrote:
>
> On 2021-09-20 at 03:21, David Christensen wrote:
>
>> Your message displays strangely on Thunderbird (oversized Courier=20
>> font?).
>
> In my case, it displays with unusually-small characters and what looks
> like a different font, not unusually large ones.
On Sun, 19 Sep 2021, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 01:22:30PM +0200, Roger Price wrote:
My Nvidia NVS 310 card with the nvidia 390.144 driver starts off perfectly,
but after two days freezes: no reaction to keyboard or mouse action.
This comes down, perhaps, to having both
On 2021-09-21 09:50:37 +0100, piorunz wrote:
> firejail is blocking access to USB devices or other peripherals by
> default, correct?
Well, not in Debian 11 (bullseye), but this is now the intent with
the current version in Debian/unstable, and I wasn't aware of this
(no announce in Debian's NEWS
On 21/09/2021 09:37, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2021-09-21 10:15:03 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
A few months ago, my webcam could be detected by the Zoom client.
But this is no longer the case. When trying the zoom test meeting,
I can't select any camera (I get "All cameras have been tested" /
On 2021-09-21 10:37:39 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Hmm... I'm using firejail, and there is the same issue with cheese.
> Thus this seems to be a regression in firejail.
However, using firejail with --profile=zoom solves the issue.
But I wonder why this is needed.
--
Vincent Lefèvre - Web:
On 2021-09-21 10:15:03 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> A few months ago, my webcam could be detected by the Zoom client.
> But this is no longer the case. When trying the zoom test meeting,
> I can't select any camera (I get "All cameras have been tested" /
> "Select Camera" / "Tested 0/0"), and af
A few months ago, my webcam could be detected by the Zoom client.
But this is no longer the case. When trying the zoom test meeting,
I can't select any camera (I get "All cameras have been tested" /
"Select Camera" / "Tested 0/0"), and after going to the next test,
the camera isn't available. My ma
45 matches
Mail list logo
