Re: Radeon opengl driver problem - buster

On 10/1/21 12:03 pm, Felix Miata wrote: You might be better off removing that file. A newer technology DDX driver than the Radeon is actually the upstream default: # inxi GISy Sy

Re: Radeon opengl driver problem - buster

Jeremy Ardley composed on 2021-01-10 10:58 (UTC+0800): > cat /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/20-radeon.conf > Section "Device" >     Identifier "Radeon" >     Driver "radeon" >     Option "TearFree" "on" > EndSection You might be better off removing that file. A newer technology DDX driver than the

Re: How i do upgrade my operating system to Debian “buster”?

On Sat 09 Jan 2021 at 15:25:17 (-0600), William Torrez Corea wrote: > My version actually is Debian 4.19.146-1 (2020-09-17) x86_64 GNU/Linux. You *are* running buster: that's the *kernel* version. Mine looks like this: $ uname -a Linux axis 4.19.0-13-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.19.160-2 (2020-11-28) x8

Re: megacli help

On 7/01/21 5:28 am, basti wrote: Hello, I want to set all my drives to RAID0 to use mdadm. Is there any advantage in that? I entirely agree with using mdadm rather than hardware raid, given the choice, since it allows for switching the disks into a system with a different card/adapter. But s

Re: Radeon opengl driver problem - buster

On 10/1/21 10:58 am, Jeremy Ardley wrote: The problem occurs under all desktop options, gnome, mate, wayland etc I run normal graphics except when the application wants to use opengl glxinfo name of display: :0 X Error of failed request:  BadValue (integer parameter out of range for operatio

Radeon opengl driver problem - buster

The problem occurs under all desktop options, gnome, mate, wayland etc I run normal graphics except when the application wants to use opengl glxinfo name of display: :0 X Error of failed request:  BadValue (integer parameter out of range for operation)   Major opcode of failed request:  152 (GL

Re: Monitor resolution wrong

Alexander V. Makartsev wrote on 1/9/21 6:22 PM: On 10.01.2021 04:08, Dennis Wicks wrote: Felix Miata wrote on 1/9/21 3:33 PM: Dennis Wicks composed on 2021-01-09 15:00 (UTC-0600): When I boot kernel 4.19.0-13-amd64 my monitor res is 1024x768. It should be 1680x1050 which I get when I boot int

Re: Monitor resolution wrong

Dennis Wicks composed on 2021-01-09 17:08 (UTC-0600): > Felix Miata wrote: >> This situation is often a case of missing firmware, but it's unusual that it >> happens simply due to a minor kernel upgrade. Please upload >> /var/log/Xorg.0.log >> from a -13 boot to http://pastebin.com/ or equivalen

Re: How i do upgrade my operating system to Debian “buster”?

On Sat, 2021-01-09 at 13:26 -0800, William Torrez Corea wrote: > My version actually is Debian 4.19.146-1 (2020-09-17) x86_64 > GNU/Linux. > See this: https://wiki.debian.org/DebianUpgrade -- john

Re: How i do upgrade my operating system to Debian “buster”?

Carl Fink writes: > I'm repeating the recommendation I've seen on this very list for > decades. It is an incorrect recommendation. Upgrading works well and is supported and recommended by Debian. -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA

Re: How i do upgrade my operating system to Debian “buster”?

On Sat, 2021-01-09 at 23:39 +0100, deloptes wrote: > Carl Fink wrote: > > > The recommendation is to reinstall instead. It's easier and doesn't > > take much more time. > > Please do not share your personal thoughts as recommendations. I > would never > reinstall my system. Please don't try to r

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

On 10/01/2021 11:33, gru...@mailfence.com wrote: and can i do that in stretch or do i need buster Thanks you so much. This is by far the best contribution to this thread. :-D Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Director Transient Software Limited New Zealand

Re: Monitor resolution wrong

On 10.01.2021 04:08, Dennis Wicks wrote: Felix Miata wrote on 1/9/21 3:33 PM: Dennis Wicks composed on 2021-01-09 15:00 (UTC-0600): When I boot kernel 4.19.0-13-amd64 my monitor res is 1024x768. It should be 1680x1050 which I get when I boot into kernel 4.19.0-12-amd64. Also, when I look at th

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

John Hasler wrote: > It's also important to understand that NNTP is a peer to peer protocol. > Any group of NNTP servers configured to connect to each other form a > network. Anyone can run an NNTP server. While it once required a VAX > with a T1 to act as a Usenet "backbone" site any desktop wi

Re: How i do upgrade my operating system to Debian ???buster????

William Torrez Corea wrote: > My version actually is Debian 4.19.146-1 (2020-09-17) x86_64 GNU/Linux. > Well, that's a Buster or buster-backports kernel. What does /etc/debian-version say? What are the contents of /etc/apt/sources.list ? -dsr-

Re: Monitor resolution wrong

Felix Miata wrote on 1/9/21 3:33 PM: Dennis Wicks composed on 2021-01-09 15:00 (UTC-0600): When I boot kernel 4.19.0-13-amd64 my monitor res is 1024x768. It should be 1680x1050 which I get when I boot into kernel 4.19.0-12-amd64. Also, when I look at the xfce display settings when I have -13 bo

Re: How i do upgrade my operating system to Debian “buster”?

Carl Fink wrote: > The recommendation is to reinstall instead. It's easier and doesn't > take much more time. Please do not share your personal thoughts as recommendations. I would never reinstall my system. The OP is asking specifically for help on upgrade and obviously showing the kernel versi

Re: Teamviewer and Wayland on Debian Buster Gnome desktop [SOLVED]

Yvan Masson wrote: > Or, if you did a "standard" install, a more friendly solution if you > don't like using the terminal: > - logout > - before login, click on the toothed wheel and choose Gnome on Xorg or > similar (I don't recall exactly) > - log back > You will then be using Gnome without Wayl

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

On Sat, 9 Jan 2021, mm wrote: On 1/9/21 6:27 PM, Marek Mosiewicz wrote: W?dniu sob, 09.01.2021 o?godzinie 15?33?+0100, u?ytkownik mm napisa?: Cheers, Please get your right wing propaganda elsewhere. If you deem yourself intelligent you have to revise your understanding of the words: 1. fre

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

On 1/9/21 6:27 PM, Marek Mosiewicz wrote: > W dniu sob, 09.01.2021 o godzinie 15∶33 +0100, użytkownik mm napisał: >> Cheers, >> >> Please get your right wing propaganda elsewhere. >> >> If you deem yourself intelligent you have to revise your >> understanding >> of the words: >> >> 1. freedom >>

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

I'm not sure this is the proper forum for this thread but it is something I have interest in. I also ran one of the early usenet nodes. One of the shames of usenet is that it was quite useful at one point and then it's signal to noise ratio went so far down it was unusable. Mailing lists such

Re: How i do upgrade my operating system to Debian “buster”?

William Torrez Corea writes: > My version actually is Debian 4.19.146-1 (2020-09-17) x86_64 GNU/Linux. It seems you might already be running Buster although that looks like a kernel version. You can check with lsb_release -d or the GUI program hardinfo.

Re: How i do upgrade my operating system to Debian “buster”?

On Sat, 2021-01-09 at 15:25 -0600, William Torrez Corea wrote: > My version actually is Debian 4.19.146-1 (2020-09-17) x86_64 > GNU/Linux. The recommendation is to reinstall instead. It's easier and doesn't take much more time. -- Carl Finkc...@finknetwork.com

Re: Monitor resolution wrong

Dennis Wicks composed on 2021-01-09 15:00 (UTC-0600): > When I boot kernel 4.19.0-13-amd64 my monitor res is > 1024x768. It should be 1680x1050 which I get when I boot > into kernel 4.19.0-12-amd64. Also, when I look at the xfce > display settings when I have -13 booted it has some generic > d

How i do upgrade my operating system to Debian “buster”?

My version actually is Debian 4.19.146-1 (2020-09-17) x86_64 GNU/Linux. -- With kindest regards, William. ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian - The universal operating system ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://www.debian.org ⠈⠳⣄

Monitor resolution wrong

Greetings; When I boot kernel 4.19.0-13-amd64 my monitor res is 1024x768. It should be 1680x1050 which I get when I boot into kernel 4.19.0-12-amd64. Also, when I look at the xfce display settings when I have -13 booted it has some generic display listed and only the 1024x768 res. When I am b

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

W dniu sob, 09.01.2021 o godzinie 15∶33 +0100, użytkownik mm napisał: > Cheers, > > Please get your right wing propaganda elsewhere. > > If you deem yourself intelligent you have to revise your > understanding > of the words: > > 1. freedom > > 2. speech > > I for sure will not tolerate this w

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

Larry Dighera writes: > In the early '80s I ran a usenet HHTP node under Xenix using B News > (written in shell script). I ran it on an Onyx (but only as leaf node). -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

Marek writes: > For example I have my own domain and I can switch email provider, so I > could switch provider of social network server. > In fact as URL is not only email aware you could also use for example > phone as identifier of your account and provide resolving of phone > number to social n

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

On Sat, 09 Jan 2021 12:03:50 -0600, John Hasler wrote: >Anyone can run an NNTP server. While it once required a VAX >with a T1 to act as a Usenet "backbone" site any desktop with broadband >can easily handle it now. Indeed. In the early '80s I ran a usenet HHTP node under Xenix using B News (

Re: Webcam resolution in VLC (and elsewhere)

On Sat 09 Jan 2021 at 08:19:36 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Sb, 09 ian 21, 00:13:06, Brian wrote: > > On Fri 08 Jan 2021 at 16:46:53 -0700, Charles Curley wrote: > > > > > > This is inappropriate on this list. Please take it elsewhere. Thank you. > > > > The political statement inciting vio

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

I mean complete implementation of social network via email. I'm aware of news groups. What I however mean is full decentralized implementation of Facebook like social network via email. Depopopularization of news groups is also because of advent of social media. Facebook group is simialiar to new

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

Larry Dighera writes: > Today, usenet still exists albeit a skeleton of its former > incarnation. There are free News Network Transfer Protocol (NNTP) > servers available such as nntp.aioe.org and free-usenet.com, and paid > servers like news.giganews.com. There are free news reading clients > su

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

I mean using private key, not to encrypt message, but to sign it. That is the case for fake likes and fake accounts.  GPG mutual addresses signing makes it much more diffcult to  create fake accounts. Cheers,    Marek Mosiewicz W dniu sob, 09.01.2021 o godzinie 08∶38 -0600, użytkownik Nicholas Ge

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

Sir, Are you suggesting that the usenet be re-invented? :-( Usenet is a decentralized e-mail based network system of communication conceived around the time that ARPANET was initiated ('70s) that has no central administrative body, and thus cannot be suppressed. Because of this inherent inabili

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

Cheers, Please get your right wing propaganda elsewhere. If you deem yourself intelligent you have to revise your understanding of the words: 1. freedom 2. speech I for sure will not tolerate this white-washing soup mouth-full BS. On 1/9/21 12:57 PM, Marek Mosiewicz wrote: > In case commerci

Re: Webcam resolution in VLC (and elsewhere)

On Saturday, January 09, 2021 07:25:57 AM David wrote: > Especially on mailing lists where we get to read the > stupid things over and over again. +1 (or more)

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

Email lists do not protect freedom of speech either. Encrypted email does not protect freedom of speech either. And there is no technological fix for failures in societies. On Sat, Jan 9, 2021, 8:27 AM Marek Mosiewicz wrote: > In case commercial social networks will not protect freedom of speach

po...@lists.debian.org

In case commercial social networks will not protect freedom of speach there is always option to use mailing lists. In fact I can imagine Twitter or Facebook as web based mail client which aggregates urls for messages publicated on anywhere in Web. Everbody who observes somebody will receive email

Re: simple-scan fails with Canon LiDE 300--except as root

On Sat 09 Jan 2021 at 13:49:07 +, Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum wrote: > Yes, I can at least scan. I'll keep fiddling, but the important thing > is that I can use it. > > OK, thank you so much for your help, and sorry for the top-post at the > end. I will probably consult the sane-airscan author,

Re: How automatic are backport package updates?

On Sat, 9 Jan 2021, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > In practice several important packages are updated quite regularly: […] Note that packages being updated is not always a good thing. Having the stability of a tested set to rely on is also appreciated. It’s also more important to have the security and

Re: simple-scan fails with Canon LiDE 300--except as root

Yes, I can at least scan. I'll keep fiddling, but the important thing is that I can use it. OK, thank you so much for your help, and sorry for the top-post at the end. On Saturday, January 9, 2021, 08:44:25 AM EST, Brian wrote: On Sat 09 Jan 2021 at 13:22:30 +, Dr. Jennifer Nussba

Re: simple-scan fails with Canon LiDE 300--except as root

On Sat 09 Jan 2021 at 13:22:30 +, Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum wrote: > > On Saturday, January 9, 2021, 08:07:37 AM EST, Brian > wrote: > > > On Sat 09 Jan 2021 at 12:55:07 +, Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum wrote: > > > > Can you scan by choosing airscan, eSCL (note the lower case e), from >

Re: simple-scan fails with Canon LiDE 300--except as root

On Sat 09 Jan 2021 at 12:55:07 +, Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum wrote: > >> On Saturday, January 9, 2021, 07:43:41 AM EST, Brian > wrote: > > On Sat 09 Jan 2021 at 12:31:43 +, Dr. > Jennifer Nussbaum wrote: > > > > >  On Saturday, January 9, 2021, 07:19:39 AM EST, Brian > > > wrote: > > 

Re: Teamviewer and Wyland on Debian Buster Gnome desktop

Le 07/01/2021 à 16:10, Dominik George a écrit : Hi, Thank you - how do I let Gnome run in X11 session? I am afraid the user would stick to Gnome. Set UseWayland=false in /etc/gdm3/*.conf -nik Or, if you did a "standard" install, a more friendly solution if you don't like using the termina

Re: simple-scan fails with Canon LiDE 300--except as root

On Sat 09 Jan 2021 at 12:31:43 +, Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum wrote: > On Saturday, January 9, 2021, 07:19:39 AM EST, Brian > wrote: > > > Install sane-airscan and give > > > > scanimage -L > $ scanimage -Ldevice `pixma:04A91913_47A8A4' is a CANON CanoScan LiDE 300 > multi-function peripheral

Re: Webcam resolution in VLC (and elsewhere)

On Sat, 9 Jan 2021 at 17:19, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > If you think something posted on debian-user is in violation of the > Debian Code of Conduct please contact the Debian Community Team. I've always found email signatures to be entirely pointless, except that they help me to identify people to

Re: simple-scan fails with Canon LiDE 300--except as root

On Sat 09 Jan 2021 at 03:53:28 +, Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum wrote: > Just to clarify what someone else in the thread asked about, the user > I'm running this under _does_ appear in the scanner group. For what you wish to achieve, being a member of the scanner group is completely unnecessary. Se

Re: Why is idle not detected?

Rainer Dorsch writes: > Is there a way to find out what is the holding back the idle detection? Some years ago I remember I had an indicator in KDE which clearly indicated the culprit. For me it was usually Chromium back then. I haven't seen that recently and I have no idea what provided that in