-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:08:11AM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
[...]
> But a user of an archived Debian release wouldn't get an updated apt
> which includes this new option. :-)
Quite right: the best (s)he can hope for is a workaround. Perhaps th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 01:06:02PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2018, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > Since it seems that an archived Debian release is bound to have an
> > expired key, would you agree that it'd be useful to have an option
On 06/19/2018 07:43 AM, Curt wrote:
On 2018-06-19, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
You either subscribe to Owlett's idiosyncratic, infuriatingly
wrong-headed, utterly intractable and narrow world or you do not.
I [the OP] state:
"Who?" "ME?" "Idiosyncratic?"
*ROFL*, SNICKER, CHUckle, chuckle ;/
On
On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 16:40:37 -0700
Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> On 19/06/18 04:00 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> > FWIW: I run old XP in a VM now. Actually, it performs better than
> > running it natively.
>
> You too? I also run XP in a VM, and file I/O is wonderfully fast.
> Even though XP think
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 08:57:14PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
That's why we bought a toaster oven. A toaster is more efficient at
toasting if the bread is thin enough, but a toaster oven performs
that role and many others too.
Except that it sucks for toast. :D
From: kamaraju kusumanchi
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 21:00:46 -0400
> The bug report says that it was fixed in 5.2.10~pre2-2 . You can try
> installing that version and see if that solves your problem.
This is in the current Debian 9.
peter@computer:~$ dpkg -l | grep r-guten
ii printer-driver-gu
Adam Cecile writes:
> I still thinks it *sucks* to have no alternative then considering
> packages signed by an expired key like unsigned packages
The key is expired, which means its creator no longer claims it as their
key. Any signatures found using that key, can no longer be known to be
m
On Tue 19 Jun 2018 at 12:43:44 (+), Curt wrote:
> On 2018-06-19, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Monday, June 18, 2018 11:27:55 PM Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >> So I think your cable is much less "Serial" than you think.
> >
> > Just because I'm tired of seeing this thread (even though I make an
On Wed 20 Jun 2018 at 11:12:18 (-0400), Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 11:04:01AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 02:27:24PM +0200, Adam Cecile wrote:
> > > Anyway, the command is apt-get install -y wget ca-certificates
> >
> > What happens if you remov
On Wed 20 Jun 2018 at 19:03:33 (-0400), mizuki wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018, 17:43 David Wright wrote:
> > On Wed 20 Jun 2018 at 11:31:20 (-0400), mizuki wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Apologies for my lousy copy and paste, it is Debian (not Ubuntu), see
> > > attached screenshot.
> > > When this e
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 2:40 PM, Markos wrote:
>
> As I prefer more stability than "updability" I will install the package:
>
> apt-get install python3-matplotlib
Mark has already given you some excellent advice. But in some
instances, just apt-getting a package is not sufficient.
For example, t
> I've reopened https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=748761
> but no response there.
>
The bug report says that it was fixed in 5.2.10~pre2-2 . You can try
installing that version and see if that solves your problem.
--
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi | http://raju.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Blog
Hi,
Since upgrading from Debian 8 to 9, CUPS printing has failed
with this log message.
"/usr/lib/cups/filter/rastertogutenprint.5.2" not available: No such file or
directory
Whereas,
peter@computer:~$ ls -ld /usr/lib/cups/filter/rastertogutenprint.5.2
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 42972 Feb 16 2016
On 19/06/18 04:00 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
FWIW: I run old XP in a VM now. Actually, it performs better than
running it natively.
You too? I also run XP in a VM, and file I/O is wonderfully fast. Even
though XP thinks it's working with NTFS, on the metal it's actually a
Linux file system
The image dated at Mar 4th 2018 which is the latest avaialble at upstream
ftp.debian.org (file sizes, time stamps all matched with the upstream).
Thanks
Mizuki
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018, 17:43 David Wright wrote:
> On Wed 20 Jun 2018 at 11:31:20 (-0400), mizuki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Apologies for
writes:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:37:19AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
>> In theory, [allow-weak=yes] should work, but I haven't actually tested
>> this.
>
> Since it seems that an archived Debian release is bound to have an
> expired key, would you agree that it'd be useful to have an option
>
On Wed 20 Jun 2018 at 11:31:20 (-0400), mizuki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apologies for my lousy copy and paste, it is Debian (not Ubuntu), see
> attached screenshot.
> When this error, drop to a shell and run 'uname -r' returned *4.9.0-4.amd64*
> ,
> I believe the kernel in Archive Mirror is higher 4.9.0-6
Oh nice, i'll check tomorrow or on Friday, thanks for this suggestion. Could
help a lot with third parties repo using weak timestamp also.
On June 20, 2018 7:37:19 PM GMT+02:00, Don Armstrong wrote:
>On Tue, 19 Jun 2018, Adam Cecile wrote:
>> On 06/19/2018 10:48 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
>> > On
On Wed, 20 Jun 2018, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> Since it seems that an archived Debian release is bound to have an
> expired key, would you agree that it'd be useful to have an option to
> accept such a key?
Probably. I would not put my personal development time into if existing
features don't alre
Hello,
I know thats a bit offtopic.
I have raspian as router os, all works fine expect ferm on start /reboot.
If I use the default systemd.service on startup it hangs with "job
waiting ... " without timeout and won't boot to login prompt.
If I invoke the service with
/etc/systemd/system/ferm.ser
On 2018-06-20, wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 05:04:33PM +, Curt wrote:
>> On 2018-06-20, wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> What does this do?
>>
>> -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
>
> NOTE: this is just from what I understand from the man page,
> apt.conf(5). This would disable to dis
Again, this is aim to disable Release timestamp validation, not related to gpg
:/
On June 20, 2018 7:04:33 PM GMT+02:00, Curt wrote:
>On 2018-06-20, wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 02:27:24PM +0200, Adam Cecile wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> I still thinks it *sucks* to have no alternative the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:37:19AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
[...]
> Hrm; it looks like apt has its own internal version of gpgv which
> actually tests the time.
Ah, at last someone in the know :-)
Thanks!
> In theory, [allow-weak=yes] should wo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 05:04:33PM +, Curt wrote:
> On 2018-06-20, wrote:
[...]
> What does this do?
>
> -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
NOTE: this is just from what I understand from the man page,
apt.conf(5). This would disable
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018, Adam Cecile wrote:
> On 06/19/2018 10:48 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Jun 2018, Adam Cecile wrote:
> > > That's a pity, don't you think so ? I think Debian should renew the
> > > archive key, so we can still verify packages signatures.
> > You can still verify them.
On 2018-06-20, wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 02:27:24PM +0200, Adam Cecile wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> I still thinks it *sucks* to have no alternative then considering
>> packages signed by an expired key like unsigned packages
>
> That was my impression too: there should be a separate option
Exactly, thank you.
Actually I've been contributing to Debian a lot some time ago and I don't think
I've been rude or something, so please show some respect.
On June 20, 2018 5:57:45 PM GMT+02:00, "Roberto C. Sánchez"
wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 11:16:46AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>> On
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 11:16:46AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 11:12:18AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > The output appears to be from a step in a Dockerfile.
>
> Then the Docker users should know how to use their stupid Dockers and
> shouldn't require hand-holding
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 11:12:18AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>> The output appears to be from a step in a Dockerfile.
>
> Then the Docker users should know how to use their stupid Dockers and
> shouldn't require hand-holding from non-Docker mailing lists.
Is "set it o
Hi,
Apologies for my lousy copy and paste, it is Debian (not Ubuntu), see
attached screenshot.
When this error, drop to a shell and run 'uname -r' returned *4.9.0-4.amd64*
,
I believe the kernel in Archive Mirror is higher 4.9.0-6. That's why this
is likely a bug to me.
Thanks.
8606B41B-3A50-4E
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 11:12:18AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> The output appears to be from a step in a Dockerfile.
Then the Docker users should know how to use their stupid Dockers and
shouldn't require hand-holding from non-Docker mailing lists.
Or IRC channels.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 11:04:01AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 02:27:24PM +0200, Adam Cecile wrote:
> > Anyway, the command is apt-get install -y wget ca-certificates
>
> What happens if you remove the -y option?
>
The output appears to be from a step in a Dockerfile. R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 02:27:24PM +0200, Adam Cecile wrote:
[...]
> I still thinks it *sucks* to have no alternative then considering
> packages signed by an expired key like unsigned packages
That was my impression too: there should be a separ
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 02:27:24PM +0200, Adam Cecile wrote:
> Anyway, the command is apt-get install -y wget ca-certificates
What happens if you remove the -y option?
On 06/20/2018 02:17 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 08:47:39AM +0200, Adam Cecile wrote:
---> Running in 2300490ebb96
You didn't show the command that you typed. That makes it harder to
give solutions.
W: GPG error: http://archive.debian.org squeeze Release: The following
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 04:50:34PM +0300, David Baron wrote:
> Attached ntp.conf
> Attached service.text
>
OK, so your NTP servers are:
pool 0.debian.pool.ntp.org iburst
pool 1.debian.pool.ntp.org iburst
pool 2.debian.pool.ntp.org iburst
pool 3.debian.pool.ntp.org iburst
What happens if you do:
Attached ntp.conf
Attached service.text
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018, 12:44 PM Mike wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:22:38PM +0300, David Baron wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > > Cannot find valid servers. I have the conf and hosts files from the
> > > > distro.(Sid)
> > >
> > > Can you show the conf
On 06/20/2018 10:08 AM, john doe wrote:
On 6/20/2018 9:55 AM, Adam Cecile wrote:
On 06/20/2018 09:43 AM, john doe wrote:
On 6/20/2018 8:47 AM, Adam Cecile wrote:
On 06/20/2018 08:39 AM, john doe wrote:
On 6/19/2018 10:55 PM, Adam Cecile wrote:
On 06/19/2018 10:48 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
On
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 08:47:39AM +0200, Adam Cecile wrote:
> ---> Running in 2300490ebb96
You didn't show the command that you typed. That makes it harder to
give solutions.
> W: GPG error: http://archive.debian.org squeeze Release: The following
Is a warning. You can tell by the giant W.
On 06/20/2018 08:39 AM, john doe wrote:
On 6/19/2018 10:55 PM, Adam Cecile wrote:
On 06/19/2018 10:48 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018, Adam Cecile wrote:
That's a pity, don't you think so ? I think Debian should renew the
archive key, so we can still verify packages signatures.
Y
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:22:38PM +0300, David Baron wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > > Cannot find valid servers. I have the conf and hosts files from the
> > > distro.(Sid)
> >
> > Can you show the config file because not all have machine running SID
> > or show ntpq -p ?
> >
> > > Fix?
> >
> > Ntpq -p
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018, 12:01 PM Alexandre GRIVEAUX
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > Cannot find valid servers. I have the conf and hosts files from the
> > distro.(Sid)
>
> Can you show the config file because not all have machine running SID
> or show ntpq -p ?
>
> > Fix?
>
>
>
> Ntpq -p yields "Connection
On 6/20/2018 9:55 AM, Adam Cecile wrote:
On 06/20/2018 09:43 AM, john doe wrote:
On 6/20/2018 8:47 AM, Adam Cecile wrote:
On 06/20/2018 08:39 AM, john doe wrote:
On 6/19/2018 10:55 PM, Adam Cecile wrote:
On 06/19/2018 10:48 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018, Adam Cecile wrote:
Th
On 06/20/2018 09:43 AM, john doe wrote:
On 6/20/2018 8:47 AM, Adam Cecile wrote:
On 06/20/2018 08:39 AM, john doe wrote:
On 6/19/2018 10:55 PM, Adam Cecile wrote:
On 06/19/2018 10:48 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018, Adam Cecile wrote:
That's a pity, don't you think so ? I think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 09:43:03AM +0200, john doe wrote:
[...]
> As other as pointed out if the expiration date is not extended on
> the key your out of luck! :)
>
> https://www.debian.org/News/2011/20110209
Yes, exactly. Keys *have* to expire at
On 6/20/2018 8:47 AM, Adam Cecile wrote:
On 06/20/2018 08:39 AM, john doe wrote:
On 6/19/2018 10:55 PM, Adam Cecile wrote:
On 06/19/2018 10:48 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018, Adam Cecile wrote:
That's a pity, don't you think so ? I think Debian should renew the
archive key, so w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 09:22:22AM +0200, Adam Cecile wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> GPG key that signed the Squeeze repo is now expired. How should I
> handle this properly ? Despite the key is expired, it use to be
> valid and I don't like much the idea of
Cannot find valid servers. I have the conf and hosts files from the
distro.(Sid)
Fix?
48 matches
Mail list logo
