Hi,
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 08:30:44PM +0200, deloptes wrote:
> I don't have experience with puppet.
I am in the process of migrating a Puppet setup that's been in use
and development for ~8 years to Ansible.
Although it is a fairly simple manifest, managing only 47 hosts, the
rate of change wit
On 28/03/18 00:19, Brian wrote:
> I eventually settled on masterpasswordapp
> because the re-creation aspect appealed to me, it was actively
> maintained, the author's well-thought arguments were convincing
> and (insofar as I could judge) it is secure.
>
> But it did take some time to come to a d
On 2018-03-28 02:50, Jean-Baptiste Thomas wrote:
After apt-get update, attempting to install ntp tries to
download version 1:4.2.8p10+dfsg-3+deb9u1 and fails. It tries
to download +deb9u1 because
$ aptitude show ntp
Package: ntp
Version: 1:4.2.8p10+dfsg-3+deb9u1
State: not installed
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 07:50:03PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Thomas wrote:
> After apt-get update, attempting to install ntp tries to
> download version 1:4.2.8p10+dfsg-3+deb9u1 and fails. It tries
> to download +deb9u1 because
>
> $ aptitude show ntp
> Package: ntp
> Version: 1:4.2.8p10+dfsg-3+d
On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 19:50:03 +0200 (CEST) Jean-Baptiste Thomas said:
> How is this possible ? I'm confused.
In my Buster system the situation is like this:
~$ apt-cache policy ntp
ntp:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 1:4.2.8p10+dfsg-6
Version table:
1:4.2.8p10+dfsg-6 500
500 http
Morel Bérenger wrote:
> I am not really constrained about mass storage (I mean, embedding a
> Debian system on 1Gb is easy enough, and our systems does not have less
> than 4Gb) but on bandwidth, so I guess I'm better to go with the
> smallest (considering that no, python is not needed in our syst
After apt-get update, attempting to install ntp tries to
download version 1:4.2.8p10+dfsg-3+deb9u1 and fails. It tries
to download +deb9u1 because
$ aptitude show ntp
Package: ntp
Version: 1:4.2.8p10+dfsg-3+deb9u1
State: not installed
[...]
and it fails because the version of the packag
Curt composed on 2018-03-27 16:42 (UTC):
> Siard wrote:
>> solitone wrote:
>>> # systemctl poweroff
>>> However, with the latter the system does shut down, although the
>>> machine does not power off (I have to physically press the off
>>> button).
>> Here, 'systemctl poweroff', as user or as
On Tue, 27 Mar 2018, solitone wrote:
> What's the current best practice to shut down the system? In the old
> days I used to:
> # shutdown - h now
>
> but then I read of the systemd way:
> # systemctl poweroff
>
> However, with the latter the system does shut down, although the
> machine does not
On 2018-03-27, Siard wrote:
> solitone wrote:
>> # systemctl poweroff
>>
>> However, with the latter the system does shut down, although the
>> machine does not power off (I have to physically press the off
>> button).
>
> Here, 'systemctl poweroff', as user or as root, does power off the
> machi
solitone wrote:
> # systemctl poweroff
>
> However, with the latter the system does shut down, although the
> machine does not power off (I have to physically press the off
> button).
Here, 'systemctl poweroff', as user or as root, does power off the
machine, both in stable and testing. So the qu
On Mon 26 Mar 2018 at 23:18:05 (-0700), James Powell wrote:
> I was referred here by reportbug, which says
>
> "If you don't know what package the bug is in, please contact
> debian-user@lists.debian.org for assistance."
>
> I have a bug to report (see emails below) against /usr/share/dict but
>
solitone wrote:
> What's the current best practice to shut down the system? In the old
> days I used to:
> # shutdown - h now
>
> but then I read of the systemd way:
> # systemctl poweroff
>
> However, with the latter the system does shut down, although the machine
> does not power off (I have to p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 02:44:18PM +0200, Morel Bérenger wrote:
> Le Tue, 27 Mar 2018 12:15:41 +0200,
> a écrit :
[...]
> > It really depends on your needs/tastes/team.
[...]
> I am not really constrained about mass storage (I mean, embedding a
>
Le Tue, 27 Mar 2018 12:15:41 +0200,
a écrit :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:10:10AM +0200, Morel Bérenger wrote:
> > Le Mon, 26 Mar 2018 20:48:31 +0200,
> > deloptes a écrit :
> >
> > > Morel Bérenger wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have several q
What's the current best practice to shut down the system? In the old
days I used to:
# shutdown - h now
but then I read of the systemd way:
# systemctl poweroff
However, with the latter the system does shut down, although the machine
does not power off (I have to physically press the off button).
Hi,
I have a buster laptop with gnome-shell (3.28.0-1). After doing a "apt
dist-upgrade", my laptop freeze when connecting to an external screen
through the dock.
It seems that the CPU start to go high, as the fan increase its speed.
Which file should I look to to better investigate the topic ?
On Tuesday, March 27, 2018 08:47:10 AM rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 27, 2018 04:08:07 AM Joe wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 17:38:33 -0400
> >
> > rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > Yes, at least I think so, unless there is some standard for how
> > > > > to handle passwords (inc
On Tuesday, March 27, 2018 04:08:07 AM Joe wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 17:38:33 -0400
>
> rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > Yes, at least I think so, unless there is some standard for how
> > > > to handle passwords (including changing them) on websites. I
> > > > suspect that there isn't. There
On Tuesday, March 27, 2018 03:57:24 AM Joe wrote:
> Something I haven't seen mentioned: KeePassX does a kind of poor man's
> two-factor authentication, allowing the use of both a password and an
> arbitrary file in its encryption. So it's possible to store the file on
> your computer(s) and carry t
On Tuesday, March 27, 2018 12:56:24 AM Kushal Kumaran wrote:
> Set the PASSWORD_STORE_DIR environment variable to point to your
> location of choice. This is mentioned in the "Environment Variables"
> section of the pass(1) manpage.
Thanks! I missed that.
On Mon 26 Mar 2018 at 21:02:48 -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks to all who replied!
>
> I thought I'd summarize where I am:
>
> I like three of the suggestions (from what I've seen / investigated
> (slightly)
> so far, but with some comments:
>
>* pass: appeals to me a lot--the
On Tue 27 Mar 2018 at 10:28:29 +0200, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote:
> Ok now I am completely blocked. It results from the thread on the
> bugreport that:
> - I tried all I was advised, it does not work
> - The upstream devs explain Debian is responsible
> - No answer from Debian Printing team.
You
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:10:10AM +0200, Morel Bérenger wrote:
> Le Mon, 26 Mar 2018 20:48:31 +0200,
> deloptes a écrit :
>
> > Morel Bérenger wrote:
> >
> > > I have several questions about the cfengine3 package that can be
> > > found in Debian.
Le Mon, 26 Mar 2018 20:48:31 +0200,
deloptes a écrit :
> Morel Bérenger wrote:
>
> > I have several questions about the cfengine3 package that can be
> > found in Debian.
>
> if you have not to maintain legacy, I recommend ansible or puppet.
>
May I ask why? I must admit I don't know all t
Hi,
Ok now I am completely blocked. It results from the thread on the
bugreport that:
- I tried all I was advised, it does not work
- The upstream devs explain Debian is responsible
- No answer from Debian Printing team.
Well, I am out of idea and, as often, people upstream explain it is
Debian :
On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 17:38:33 -0400
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Yes, at least I think so, unless there is some standard for how
> > > to handle passwords (including changing them) on websites. I
> > > suspect that there isn't. There may be some commonality in
> > > websites generated
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 09:23:11AM +0200, Morel Bérenger wrote:
[...]
> Oh, I was confused by all my manipulations, I guess at some point I
> installed something from the outside, sorry for that
>
Le Mon, 26 Mar 2018 23:22:37 +0200,
a écrit :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 03:33:19PM +0200, Morel Bérenger wrote:
> > Le Mon, 26 Mar 2018 08:54:22 -0400,
> > Greg Wooledge a écrit :
> >
> > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 10:37:08AM +0200, Morel Bé
On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 21:02:48 -0400
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks to all who replied!
>
> I thought I'd summarize where I am:
>
> I like three of the suggestions (from what I've seen / investigated
> (slightly) so far, but with some comments:
>
>* pass: appeals to me a lot--the one pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:18:05PM -0700, James Powell wrote:
> Hi Debian-user,
>
> I was referred here by reportbug, which says
>
> "If you don't know what package the bug is in, please contact
> debian-user@lists.debian.org for assistance."
>
> I
On 2018-03-27, felmon davis wrote:
>
> a lot of the old grammatical categories have died out; the "dangling
> modifier" error has gone the way of the "split infinitive".
>
> f.
Yeah old Norman himself died out too I'm afraid, few years back.
--
Bah, the latest news, the latest news is not the l
32 matches
Mail list logo
