-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 02:44:18PM +0200, Morel Bérenger wrote: > Le Tue, 27 Mar 2018 12:15:41 +0200, > <to...@tuxteam.de> a écrit :
[...] > > It really depends on your needs/tastes/team. [...] > I am not really constrained about mass storage (I mean, embedding a > Debian system on 1Gb is easy enough, and our systems does not have less > than 4Gb) but on bandwidth, so I guess I'm better to go with the > smallest (considering that no, python is not needed in our systems and > so, absent), cfengine3 according to you? True. I do usually use "size" as a very rough metric for "complexity", so I tend to look first at the smallest package. That said... > Also, I'm the only one at work which have ever heard of that kind > of tools, so I'm basically free to take whatever I want, and I've never > really cared about «coolness» of systems. > If I could only work with softwares that are older than me and simple > enough to not require updates every 2 months, I would be a happy coder. ... I've seen others using puppet and ansible, but can't provide you with first-hand experience, sorry. > Thanks for the informations. I wish I could be more helpful, sorry. Cheers - -- tomás -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlq6VBgACgkQBcgs9XrR2kbGhACeLqjMXRQDj2EXH3INj+DEE2oh 5zoAn1TWxyaPMlsMOTy7ygcnr0QLHT0x =NzS2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
