On 20.03.2016 23:57, Igor Cicimov wrote:
Did you bring eth0 and eth1 up?
Why should I do it when script must do this all?
Sudo -i opens a session as root with environment as if you did su - except
your non-root admin user doesn't have to know the root password.
Wolf Halton
Atlanta Cloud Technology
Cybersecurity & Disaster Recovery Solutions
Mobile/Text 678-687-6104
--
Sent from my iPhone. Creative word completi
On 03/20/2016 04:00 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
It had one - on sda. It wanted the one on sdb as well. I wanted the one on
sdb left alone. I got what I wanted when I insisted, and the resultant
installation was quite happy just using the one disk. And the swap partition
on sdb kept its UUID intact.
Because in Debian you're probably not mentioned in /etc/sudoers. If
your user account were frank, going to root using su you could do
something like:
echo 'frank ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD:ALL' >>/etc/sudoers .
then type exit to get back to the frank account and type:
sudo -H -i and see what happens.
On 03/20/2016 07:10 PM, Celejar wrote:
Laptop:
RX packets:922215 errors:0 dropped:1967 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:1186319 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:724785210 (691.2 MiB) TX bytes:1311193642 (1.2 GiB)
NAS:
On 03/20/2016 03:40 AM, Adam Wilson wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 05:28:55 +0100
Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello Forum:
On 20/03/16 04:42, Michael Milliman wrote:
On 03/19/2016 09:40 PM, lina wrote:
shutdown -h now
doesn't work. it still reboot.
This sounds like an issue with the hardware
On 03/20/2016 03:26 AM, Adam Wilson wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 19:30:57 +
Joe wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 19:57:56 +0100
Sven Arvidsson wrote:
On Sat, 2016-03-19 at 18:38 +, Joe wrote:
I've never seen sudo installed by default in any Debian, and I
begin with expert minimal netinst
On 03/20/2016 04:08 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2016 15:35:54 David Christensen wrote:
I'm curious about "2 new drives". What's the intended purpose of the
machine? What drive(s) are already installed? Any spares on the
shelf?
Some, but with 60k plus spinning hours on them.
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 13:48:23 -0700
David Christensen wrote:
> On 03/20/2016 11:07 AM, Celejar wrote:
> > FWIW, I'm getting these:
> >
> > Tx excessive retries:392922 Invalid misc:5439
> >
> > [Rx invalids are all 0]
>
> What machine? What file or tool?
Laptop - reported by 'iwconfig'
> What
On Sun 20 Mar 2016 at 12:23:03 (+0300), Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:09:51 -0500
> David Wright wrote:
[list snipped]
> With this much work, it would probably be easier just to do a wipe and
> re-install, since the process you described basically nukes the system
> down to the bar
On 21/03/16 12:14, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Is there a Linux CLI gnuplot-ish program to do maps?
>
> For example, one puts in a file that one wants a black and white
> PNG not bigger than some size, showing the Pacific Ocean including
> Hawaii and Easter Island?
>
I think gmt (Generic Mapping Tools
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 08:49:47PM +0100, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Bob Holtzman wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 08:04:19PM +0100, Sven Hartge wrote:
> >> Bob Holtzman wrote:
>
> >> > apt-get -t jessie-backports install icedove gives "icedove is already
> >> > the newest version". Same with icedo
On Sun 20 Mar 2016 at 12:08:02 (+0300), Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:20:03 -0500
> David Wright wrote:
>
> > On Fri 18 Mar 2016 at 13:03:52 (+), Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > On Friday 18 March 2016 12:55:26 Jarle Aase wrote:
> > > > Den 11. mars 2016 19:36, skrev Lisi Reisz:
> >
Is there a Linux CLI gnuplot-ish program to do maps?
For example, one puts in a file that one wants a black
and white PNG not bigger than some size, showing the
Pacific Ocean including Hawaii and Easter Island?
--
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
On Sunday 20 March 2016 15:35:54 David Christensen wrote:
> On 03/20/2016 10:45 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > One of the problems I have is architecture related, synaptic thinks
> > for some unfathomable to me reason, that this is an i386 machine.
> > But its not, currently running kernel 3.16.0-0.
On Sunday 20 March 2016 22:00:01 David Wright wrote:
> On Sun 20 Mar 2016 at 11:54:20 (+0300), Adam Wilson wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:21:58 +
> >
> > Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > On Friday 18 March 2016 20:49:55 David Wright wrote:
> > > > It's far more likely that you forgot to format the p
On Sunday 20 March 2016 22:15:16 David Wright wrote:
> On Sun 20 Mar 2016 at 11:53:43 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
> > The problem with that is that unless you edit fstab before the initial
> > reboot, (difficult to do)
>
> The d-i has a shell available. The file is /target/etc/fstab so
> no diffic
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 12:35:54PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
> On 03/20/2016 10:45 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >Or should I bite the bullet, go buy 2 new drives and do a fresh x86_64
> >install?
> I'm curious about "2 new drives". What's the intended purpose of the
> machine? What drive(s) a
On Sun 20 Mar 2016 at 11:53:43 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
> The problem with that is that unless you edit fstab before the initial
> reboot, (difficult to do)
The d-i has a shell available. The file is /target/etc/fstab so
no difficulty there.
What some people *might* find difficult is fiddli
On Sun 20 Mar 2016 at 11:54:20 (+0300), Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:21:58 +
> Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> > On Friday 18 March 2016 20:49:55 David Wright wrote:
> > > It's far more likely that you forgot to format the partition, if
> > > that's indeed what you wanted to do.
> >
>
On 21 Mar 2016 5:13 am, "Mimiko" wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> Recently I want to extend my existing bond to be also a bridge to use
qemu-kvm. As seen in examples on net this is my `interfaces` file content:
> auto lo
> iface lo inet loopback
>
> auto eth0
> iface eth0 inet manual
> # bond-master bo
On 03/20/2016 11:07 AM, Celejar wrote:
FWIW, I'm getting these:
Tx excessive retries:392922 Invalid misc:5439
[Rx invalids are all 0]
What machine? What file or tool?
What does 'ifconfig' report on the various machines?
David
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 03:11:34PM +0100, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Stephen Allen wrote:
>
> > Lot of changes to Apt recently - this warning has been around a few days
> > now:
>
> > W:
> > gpgv:/var/lib/apt/lists/dl.google.com_linux_chrome_deb_dists_stable_Release.gpg:
> > The repository is insuffic
Bob Holtzman wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 08:04:19PM +0100, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Bob Holtzman wrote:
>> > apt-get -t jessie-backports install icedove gives "icedove is already
>> > the newest version". Same with icedove-extension.
>>
>> > The installed version is 38.6.0-1~deb amd64 and t
On 03/20/2016 10:45 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
One of the problems I have is architecture related, synaptic thinks for
some unfathomable to me reason, that this is an i386 machine. But its
not, currently running kernel 3.16.0-0.bpo.4-amd64, and no currently
installed 32 bit application has a proble
On Sunday 20 March 2016 19:15:51 Brian wrote:
> Being under pressure to complete the task set doesn't lend itself to
> considered action and burning a CD can be fraught.
Granted.
> The quality of the
> disk, the burning and the accuracy of reading the burnt disk are things
> to take into account
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 08:04:19PM +0100, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Bob Holtzman wrote:
>
> > apt-get -t jessie-backports install icedove gives "icedove is already
> > the newest version". Same with icedove-extension.
>
> > The installed version is 38.6.0-1~deb amd64 and the version in jessie
> > ba
On Sunday 20 March 2016 18:59:14 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 20 March 2016 14:51:03 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 March 2016 18:43:03 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > And since all this is also going to bring in systemd,
> >
> > Why??
> >
> > Lisi
>
> How is that avoidable?
>
> Cheers, Gene Heske
On Sun 20 Mar 2016 at 12:02:14 +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Saturday 19 March 2016 01:27:33 David Wright wrote:
> >
> > At this point, you also mentioned repartitioning, reformatting and
> > wiping a disk thoroughly.
> >
> > In the last post (which I commented on when the second paragraph was
> >
On Sunday 20 March 2016 14:53:02 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Sunday 20 March 2016 18:43:03 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > And since all this is also going to bring in systemd, and I've not a
> > clue if the real app, one that must run, the sim version of linuxcnc
> > will run on a jessie install.
>
> You can
On Sunday 20 March 2016 18:53:02 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Sunday 20 March 2016 18:43:03 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > And since all this is also going to bring in systemd, and I've not a clue
> > if the real app, one that must run, the sim version of linuxcnc will run
> > on a jessie install.
>
> You can i
On Sunday 20 March 2016 14:51:03 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Sunday 20 March 2016 18:43:03 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > And since all this is also going to bring in systemd,
>
> Why??
>
> Lisi
How is that avoidable?
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ba
On Sunday 20 March 2016 14:39:41 Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 20/03/2016 17:56, Gene Heskett a écrit :
> > Now, I do note that sdb has a re-allocated sector count of 25, but
> > no clue as to how many spares are left
>
> You can estimate it from the initial and current normalized values of
> the at
On 2016-03-20 at 14:51, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Sunday 20 March 2016 18:43:03 Gene Heskett wrote:
>
>> And since all this is also going to bring in systemd,
>
> Why??
Because a new Debian install, with current install media, installs
systemd. You can go out of your way and take extra steps to re
On Sunday 20 March 2016 18:43:03 Gene Heskett wrote:
> And since all this is also going to bring in systemd, and I've not a clue
> if the real app, one that must run, the sim version of linuxcnc will run
> on a jessie install.
You can install 32 bit Wheezy - though I agree that I wouldn't at this
On Sunday 20 March 2016 18:43:03 Gene Heskett wrote:
> And since all this is also going to bring in systemd,
Why??
Lisi
Hi
On 21/03/2016 2:22 AM, arian wrote:
> another simple bandwidth check:
> # host1: nc -l 8090 > /dev/zero
> # host2: dd if=/dev/zero | nc host1 8090
Okay, I'm trying the following.
On host 1
# ssh -f name-in-config -L 18090:localhost:8090 'nc -l 8090 > /dev/zero'
The "name-in-config" is setup
On Sunday 20 March 2016 13:54:09 Dan Ritter wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 01:45:04PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Greetings all;
> >
> > One of the problems I have is architecture related, synaptic thinks
> > for some unfathomable to me reason, that this is an i386 machine.
> > But its not,
Le 20/03/2016 17:56, Gene Heskett a écrit :
Now, I do note that sdb has a re-allocated sector count of 25, but no
clue as to how many spares are left
You can estimate it from the initial and current normalized values of
the attribute.
Remaining = raw value * norm. value / (init. norm. value
On Sunday 20 March 2016 15:53:43 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 20 March 2016 07:47:02 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 March 2016 09:34:53 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > On Sunday 20 March 2016 04:54:20 Adam Wilson wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:21:58 +
> > > >
> > > > Lisi Reisz wrote:
Hello.
Recently I want to extend my existing bond to be also a bridge to use
qemu-kvm. As seen in examples on net this is my `interfaces` file content:
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet manual
# bond-master bond0
auto eth1
iface eth1 inet manual
# bond-maste
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:31:24 -0700
David Christensen wrote:
...
> But, I still recommend Category 5E cables.
>
>
> >> It's not clear if you are doing an apples-to-apples comparison. Perhaps
> >> iperf isn't measuring what you think it is.
> >
> > That's exactly what I'm asking: what is iperf
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 01:45:04PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greetings all;
>
> One of the problems I have is architecture related, synaptic thinks for
> some unfathomable to me reason, that this is an i386 machine. But its
> not, currently running kernel 3.16.0-0.bpo.4-amd64, and no current
On 03/20/2016 06:45 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> One of the problems I have is architecture related, synaptic thinks for
> some unfathomable to me reason, that this is an i386 machine. But its
> not, currently running kernel 3.16.0-0.bpo.4-amd64, and no currently
> installed 32 bit application has
Greetings all;
One of the problems I have is architecture related, synaptic thinks for
some unfathomable to me reason, that this is an i386 machine. But its
not, currently running kernel 3.16.0-0.bpo.4-amd64, and no currently
installed 32 bit application has a problem.
But now all the browser
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 16:22:58 +0100
arian wrote:
>
> > No - I've been using the default: 'iperf -c host' on laptop, 'iperf
> > -sD' on router, NAS.
> >
> > Actually, this morning I've been getting about 17-20 Mbps between the
> > laptop and NAS. I tried bidirectional testing ('iperf -d -c ho
On Sunday 20 March 2016 09:45:36 Felix Miata wrote:
> Gene Heskett composed on 2016-03-20 05:34 (UTC-0400):
> > Adam Wilson wrote:
> >> On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:21:58 + Lisi Reisz wrote:
> >> > No. I checked and double checked that the partitions on the disk
> >> > which I wanted to use for ins
On 03/20/2016 06:10 AM, Celejar wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 18:01:58 -0700
David Christensen wrote:
Perhaps the NAS has an automatic crossover feature on it's Gigabit port.
If you do a computer-cable-computer test, you will want a (category
5E) crossover cable.
If they weren't doing crossov
On Sunday 20 March 2016 07:47:02 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Sunday 20 March 2016 09:34:53 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 March 2016 04:54:20 Adam Wilson wrote:
> > > On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:21:58 +
> > >
> > > Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > > On Friday 18 March 2016 20:49:55 David Wright wrote:
> >
> No - I've been using the default: 'iperf -c host' on laptop, 'iperf
> -sD' on router, NAS.
>
> Actually, this morning I've been getting about 17-20 Mbps between the
> laptop and NAS. I tried bidirectional testing ('iperf -d -c host',
> and the results actually remained constant.
That s
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 04:03:32PM +1100, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> On 20 Mar 2016, John Hasler wrote:
> >doug writes:
> >> su allows someone with a root password (and nobody else) to make
> >> system modifications, etc., which might harm the operation of the
> >> system. Sudo basically allows any
On 20/03/16 10:30 AM, Sven Hartge wrote:
Frank McCormick wrote:
Installed 64 bit version of Stretch yesterday and noticed this morning
I am apparently missing some firmware.
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-4.4.0-1-amd64
W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/tigon/tg3_tso5.bi
On 20/03/16 10:37 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Frank McCormick a écrit :
Installed 64 bit version of Stretch yesterday and noticed this morning
I am apparently missing some firmware.
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-4.4.0-1-amd64
W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/tigon/tg3_t
On 20/03/16 10:33 AM, Charlie Kravetz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 10:12:45 -0400
Frank McCormick wrote:
Installed 64 bit version of Stretch yesterday and noticed this morning
I am apparently missing some firmware.
update-initramfs: Generating /boo
On 2016-03-17, Ric Moore wrote:
>
> The only stupid question is one not asked, Anyone is free to respond or
> not respond, as long as the question is asked following the norms. Ric
>
The only stupid question is one not asked?
--
Hypertext--or should I say the ideology of hypertext?--is ultrade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 10:12:45 -0400
Frank McCormick wrote:
>Installed 64 bit version of Stretch yesterday and noticed this morning
>I am apparently missing some firmware.
>
>update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-4.4.0-1-amd64
>W: Possible miss
Adam Wilson a écrit :
> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 12:51:56 +0100
> Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>
>> Did you try to boot a non-EFI capable USB boot media, such as a Debian
>> live image or a Debian installation image with the EFI partition
>> deleted ?
(I guess that just changing the EFI partition type ID t
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 14:43:00 +0100
arian wrote:
>
> > Here's the part that baffles me - these are with the laptop connected
> > to the router wirelessly:
> >
> > Laptop - router:~11.8 Mbps
> > Laptop - NAS: ~14.7 Mbps
> >
> > Once again, these numbers vary widely, but are in
Frank McCormick a écrit :
> Installed 64 bit version of Stretch yesterday and noticed this morning
> I am apparently missing some firmware.
>
> update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-4.4.0-1-amd64
> W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/tigon/tg3_tso5.bin for module tg3
> W: Possible m
Frank McCormick wrote:
> Installed 64 bit version of Stretch yesterday and noticed this morning
> I am apparently missing some firmware.
> update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-4.4.0-1-amd64
> W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/tigon/tg3_tso5.bin for module tg3
> W: Possible miss
On Sun 20 Mar 2016 at 17:08:11 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 12:19:55 +
> Brian wrote:
>
> > On Sun 20 Mar 2016 at 12:08:02 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:20:03 -0500
> > > David Wright wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri 18 Mar 2016 at 13:03:52 (+0
Installed 64 bit version of Stretch yesterday and noticed this morning
I am apparently missing some firmware.
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-4.4.0-1-amd64
W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/tigon/tg3_tso5.bin for module tg3
W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/tigon/t
Stephen Allen wrote:
> Lot of changes to Apt recently - this warning has been around a few days
> now:
> W:
> gpgv:/var/lib/apt/lists/dl.google.com_linux_chrome_deb_dists_stable_Release.gpg:
> The repository is insufficiently signed by key
> 4CCA1EAF950CEE4AB83976DCA040830F7FAC5991 (weak digest)
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 12:19:55 +
Brian wrote:
> On Sun 20 Mar 2016 at 12:08:02 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:20:03 -0500
> > David Wright wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri 18 Mar 2016 at 13:03:52 (+), Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > > On Friday 18 March 2016 12:55:26 Jarle Aas
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 11:47:02 +
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Sunday 20 March 2016 09:34:53 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 March 2016 04:54:20 Adam Wilson wrote:
> > > On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:21:58 +
> > >
> > > Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > > On Friday 18 March 2016 20:49:55 David Wright wro
Lot of changes to Apt recently - this warning has been around a few days
now:
W:
gpgv:/var/lib/apt/lists/dl.google.com_linux_chrome_deb_dists_stable_Release.gpg:
The repository is insufficiently signed by key
4CCA1EAF950CEE4AB83976DCA040830F7FAC5991 (weak digest)
How do I fix?
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 12:51:56 +0100
Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Adam Wilson a écrit :
> >
> > There is a potential problem also where modern machines (with UEFI
> > boot) fail to install off USB without UEFI, meaning that if you
> > want a UEFI-free install, you have to use optical media.
>
> I h
On 03/17/2016 07:42 AM, Rastko wrote:
Hi,
When browsing through Synaptic custom filters,
the right-hand side didn't reflect the selection on the left.
(eg. same checkbox set for diffrent filter name selection)
When i clicked OK, the filter actually changed to what was
displayed, but that was
On 14/03/16 00:23, David Niklas wrote:
I was most particularly interested in weather the (clear), cherry key
switches last. No one mentioned them.
Cherry make the explicit, measurable claim that their keyswitches have a
minimum service life measured in tens of millions of keystrokes. Twenty
m
raspbian is not mainline debian. Maybe ask on raspbian support channels?
> vgchange -a y
> service lvm2 start
> mount -a
why the service lvm2 start? is lvm service disabled?
please provide output of those commands.
> Every time after a reboot the boot sequence aborts and sshd is not up (maybe
Gene Heskett composed on 2016-03-20 05:34 (UTC-0400):
Adam Wilson wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:21:58 + Lisi Reisz wrote:
> No. I checked and double checked that the partitions on the disk
> which I wanted to use for installation were all marked with the F
> for format, and that nothi
> Here's the part that baffles me - these are with the laptop connected
> to the router wirelessly:
>
> Laptop - router: ~11.8 Mbps
> Laptop - NAS: ~14.7 Mbps
>
> Once again, these numbers vary widely, but are in line with the laptop
> - router numbers.
>
> But here's the kicker: O
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 15:47:57 +1300
Richard Hector wrote:
...
> FWIW, most cabling professionals (of which definitely I'm not one)
> don't make their own cables unless they absolutely have to. Factory
> ones are so much more reliable.
>
> Riser cable, being intended for fixed installation, is so
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 18:01:58 -0700
David Christensen wrote:
> On 03/18/2016 09:48 AM, Celejar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to understand the throughput across the different links of
> > my little home network, and am perplexed by the measured wireless
> > throughput.
> >
> > The three main d
>> >> Every time since I installed the system,
>> >
>> > Which one? Jessie? Testing (Stretch)?, Unstable?
>> >
>>
>> Jessie stable;
>>
>> > Which desktop, if any?
>>
>> on my new iMac.
>>
>> >
>> > What computer?
>> >
>> > During the install, what options did you choose? Or did you just
>> > use
On Wednesday 16 March 2016 20:49:28 Brian wrote:
> But the vast majortiy of users are not using the ancient machines you
> and I have. The OP is at liberty to indicate whether her machine falls
> into this class. A round shiny disc could be her only solution to
> booting a Debian image.
In this ca
On Sun 20 Mar 2016 at 12:08:02 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:20:03 -0500
> David Wright wrote:
>
> > On Fri 18 Mar 2016 at 13:03:52 (+), Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > On Friday 18 March 2016 12:55:26 Jarle Aase wrote:
> > > > Den 11. mars 2016 19:36, skrev Lisi Reisz:
> >
On Saturday 19 March 2016 01:27:33 David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 18 Mar 2016 at 22:21:58 (+), Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Friday 18 March 2016 20:49:55 David Wright wrote:
> > > It's far more likely that you forgot to format the partition, if
> > > that's indeed what you wanted to do.
> >
> > No.
Adam Wilson a écrit :
>
> There is a potential problem also where modern machines (with UEFI
> boot) fail to install off USB without UEFI, meaning that if you want a
> UEFI-free install, you have to use optical media.
I have a rather old (~2007) UEFI motherboard which does the opposite :
its UEFI
On Sunday 20 March 2016 09:34:53 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 20 March 2016 04:54:20 Adam Wilson wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:21:58 +
> >
> > Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > On Friday 18 March 2016 20:49:55 David Wright wrote:
> > > > It's far more likely that you forgot to format the partitio
Den 15. mars 2016 21:38, skrev deloptes:
I agree with you more or less, however languages like python or perl
open doors to pretend-to-be-programmers. I've seen more often bad
python/perl code than c/c++. My observations are also that there is
always a penalty, even if you compile the script
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 05:31:18 -0400
Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 20 March 2016 04:43:17 Adam Wilson wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 20:50:05 +0800
> >
> > lina wrote:
> > > I tried
> > >
> > > 1] systemctl poweroff
> > >
> > >
> > > 2] GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet"
> > >
> > > to quit
On Sunday 20 March 2016 04:54:20 Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:21:58 +
>
> Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Friday 18 March 2016 20:49:55 David Wright wrote:
> > > It's far more likely that you forgot to format the partition, if
> > > that's indeed what you wanted to do.
> >
> > No. I
On Sunday 20 March 2016 04:43:17 Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 20:50:05 +0800
>
> lina wrote:
> > I tried
> >
> > 1] systemctl poweroff
> >
> >
> > 2] GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet"
> >
> > to quite splash acpi=force
> >
Thats a typu, s/b quiet. But I always take that and "splash"
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:09:51 -0500
David Wright wrote:
> On Thu 17 Mar 2016 at 16:18:14 (-0700), William Lee Valentine wrote:
> > I have installed Debian 2.6.32-5-686 on two machines. One, a custom
> > machine, has a Pentium III processor running at 800 megahertz, and
> > has 500 megabytes of mem
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 18:40:27 +
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 18 March 2016 17:55:50 Ric Moore wrote:
> > On 03/18/2016 01:22 PM, David Christensen wrote:
> > > On 03/18/2016 01:21 AM, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> > >> On Thu, 2016-03-17 at 19:27 -0700, David Christensen wrote:
> > >>> Debian
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:20:03 -0500
David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 18 Mar 2016 at 13:03:52 (+), Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Friday 18 March 2016 12:55:26 Jarle Aase wrote:
> > > Den 11. mars 2016 19:36, skrev Lisi Reisz:
> > > > I have been reading this thread a bit at a time. I am
> > > > bem
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:21:58 +
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 18 March 2016 20:49:55 David Wright wrote:
> > It's far more likely that you forgot to format the partition, if
> > that's indeed what you wanted to do.
>
> No. I checked and double checked that the partitions on the disk
> whic
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:49:55 -0500
David Wright wrote:
> On Wed 16 Mar 2016 at 14:49:44 (+0300), Adam Wilson wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 22:41:14 + Lisi Reisz
> > wrote:
> >
> > > So - if you want to format an existing partition properly, so the
> > > stuff on it actually goes, use Gpa
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 20:50:05 +0800
lina wrote:
> I tried
>
> 1] systemctl poweroff
>
>
> 2] GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet"
>
> to quite splash acpi=force
>
> The syslog error is as below:
>
> Mar 19 20:04:36 debian kernel: [0.221101] ACPI Error: No handler
> for Region [CMS0] (8
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 22:00:46 +0800
lina wrote:
> p# shutdown -f now
> Code should not be reached 'Unhandled option' at
> ../src/systemctl/systemctl.c:6316, function shutdown_parse_argv().
> Aborting.
> Aborted
Try running "poweroff" as root.
pgpFdiK9O0GrX.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signa
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 10:42:54 +0800
lina wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 12:19 AM, Patrick Bartek
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 19 Mar 2016, lina wrote:
> >
> >> Every time since I installed the system,
> >
> > Which one? Jessie? Testing (Stretch)?, Unstable?
> >
>
> Jessie stable;
>
> > Which
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 05:28:55 +0100
Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello Forum:
>
> On 20/03/16 04:42, Michael Milliman wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 03/19/2016 09:40 PM, lina wrote:
> >> shutdown -h now
> >>
> >> doesn't work. it still reboot.
> >>
> > This sounds like an issue with the hardware or BIOS
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 00:16:38 +
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Saturday 19 March 2016 23:37:05 Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > On Sat, 19 Mar 2016, David Christensen wrote:
> > > On 03/19/2016 05:40 AM, lina wrote:
> > > > Every time since I installed the system,
> > > >
> > > > every time I tried Shut
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 20:27:03 +0100
Jiri 'Ghormoon' Novak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the line in /usr is there by default (in package) and is not applied,
> until I copy it to /etc. that's the strange part.
>
> Gh.
>
> arian wrote:
> > No idea of wordpress, but
> >
> >> there is: /usr/share/wordpress/w
I tried shutdown -hP now
not work.
As I mentioned in another thread. This is a new iMac, I have installed
debian but still keep the Mac OS.
There is no problem to shut it down when I was in Mac OS.
But in debian, no way I can really shut down except switching off the power.
I tried to enter th
On Thu 17 Mar 2016 at 16:18:14 (-0700), William Lee Valentine wrote:
> I have installed Debian 2.6.32-5-686 on two machines. One, a custom
> machine, has a Pentium III processor running at 800 megahertz, and has
> 500 megabytes of memory; the other is an IBM Mpro Intellistation 6229
> with a Pentiu
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016, at 09:45, The Wanderer wrote:
>> In my case, it meant that a microcode update which was/is needed on my
>> combination of CPU and motherboard was not being applied. This appeared
>
> What processor is this
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 16:03:32 +1100
Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> On 20 Mar 2016, John Hasler wrote:
> >doug writes:
> >> su allows someone with a root password (and nobody else) to make
> >> system modifications, etc., which might harm the operation of the
> >> system. Sudo basically allows anyone
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 19:30:57 +
Joe wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 19:57:56 +0100
> Sven Arvidsson wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2016-03-19 at 18:38 +, Joe wrote:
> > > I've never seen sudo installed by default in any Debian, and I
> > > begin with expert minimal netinstalls of stable, and I've n
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
