On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 09:40:44PM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> The mount unit requires the device to mount. How to do this with a luks
> disk ? And how to mount hen, with the password entered in the ssh
> session and not on the console ?
It would be something like 'sudo systemctl start my-mount-se
Hi.
On Sun, 12 Oct 2014 02:53:37 +0200
lee wrote:
> Reco writes:
>
> > 3) User Alice goes away, but keeps her session in place, locking the
> > screen.
> >
> > 4) User Bob logs in another X session.
>
> How does Bob log in while the screen is locked?
Either by selecting 'Switch session' in
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 09:05:14PM -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> Among other things, legitimate MTAs have MX records.
Not necessarily. In the absence of an MX record an A record is perfectly
legitimate.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubsc
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Chris Bannister
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:53:03AM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
>> 2014/10/13 2:14 "Andrei POPESCU" :
>> >
>> > On Du, 12 oct 14, 10:30:52, The Wanderer wrote:
>> > > On 10/12/2014 at 10:07 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Any program t
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:53:03AM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
> 2014/10/13 2:14 "Andrei POPESCU" :
> >
> > On Du, 12 oct 14, 10:30:52, The Wanderer wrote:
> > > On 10/12/2014 at 10:07 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > >
> > > > Any program that requires additional scripting just to get it running
> > > >
On 12/10/2014, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Sb, 11 oct 14, 23:09:20, Bret Busby wrote:
>> >
>> > Definitely, I'm using my TV as external monitor sometimes. Could you
>> > please attach your Xorg.0.log? Inlining works as well if you take care
>> > not to break long lines.
>>
>> What is the path to th
On 10/10/2014, Bret Busby wrote:
> This will probably show as a new thread, due to me correcting a
> spelling error in the Subject field of the message.
>
> On 08/10/2014, Joe wrote:
>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:23:55 +0800
>> Bret Busby wrote:
>>
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> I have a 23" monitor, that I want
On 10/12/2014 10:24 PM, lee wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle writes:
>
>> Among other things, legitimate MTAs have MX records. Anti-spam routines
>
> Who prevents a MUA from having an MX record and sending a HELO that
> matches the RDNS entry? And what are these "other things" you're
> referring to?
>
Jerry Stuckle writes:
>> On 10/12/2014 9:56 AM, lee wrote:
>>> Jerry Stuckle writes:
>>
>>> If you don't know the difference between an MTA and an MUA, there is no
>>> way I can help you.
>>
>> I'm not asking what the difference is but what difference it makes when
>> this setting is involved.
Jerry Stuckle writes:
> Among other things, legitimate MTAs have MX records. Anti-spam routines
Who prevents a MUA from having an MX record and sending a HELO that
matches the RDNS entry? And what are these "other things" you're
referring to?
--
Again we must be afraid of speaking of daemon
Harry Putnam writes:
> lee writes:
>
> [...]
>
> Thanks for the tips.
>
>>> SMTP>> EHLO 2xd
>
>> That's an invalid helo string.
>
> Is a valid one made up of just the full fqdn?
See https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2821#section-4.1.1.1
It says to either use the fqdn or, if not possible, an IP
Harry Putnam writes:
> Martin Read writes:
>
>> On 12/10/14 14:52, lee wrote:
>>> Harry Putnam writes:
>>>
Can any of you experienced exim4 hands interpret this output?
>>>
>>> Reading RFC-821 would tell you more.
>>
>> Reading RFC 2821 would be even better, since RFC 821 is obsoleted by
>
Jonathan Dowland writes:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 02:45:44PM -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> > And if so, is that not acquired from /etc/hosts?
> snip
>> Egad ... I just noticed that was from a different machine... but the
>> format is the same on all of mine. So still should stand as something
On 10/12/2014 2:11 PM, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 12 Oct 2014 at 18:45:42 +0200, lee wrote:
>
>> Martin Read writes:
>>
>>> On 12/10/14 15:53, lee wrote:
And when they are filtered, does the sender get a message telling him
that their message hasn't been delivered?
>>>
>>> The requirement in
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 9:24 AM, lee wrote:
> Joel Rees writes:
>
>> (But in this case, absolutely requiring a response would be building a
>> DOS and potential privacy vulnerability into the message
>> infrastructure. The RFCs really should be stored with a summary of
>> relevant comments.)
>
>
On 10/12/2014 1:37 PM, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 12 Oct 2014 at 15:56:05 +0200, lee wrote:
>
>> Jerry Stuckle writes:
>>
>>> If you don't know the difference between an MTA and an MUA, there is no
>>> way I can help you.
>>
>> I'm not asking what the difference is but what difference it makes when
>>
On 10/12/2014 10:18 AM, lee wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle writes:
>
>> On 10/8/2014 8:42 PM, lee wrote:
>>> Jerry Stuckle writes:
>>>
On 10/6/2014 7:30 PM, lee wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle writes:
>
>> For instance, MUAs typically connect on port 587 (at least that is the
>> recommendat
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Martin Read wrote:
> On 12/10/14 01:43, lee wrote:
>>
>> Reco writes:
>>
>>>
>>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/tree/src/core/dbus-manager.c?id=3731acf1acfb4a6eb68374a5b137f3b368f63381#n638
>>
>>
>> Ah, this is a wonderful example :) My assumptions a
Joel Rees writes:
> (But in this case, absolutely requiring a response would be building a
> DOS and potential privacy vulnerability into the message
> infrastructure. The RFCs really should be stored with a summary of
> relevant comments.)
Could you explain how an MTA would create a privacy vul
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 7:04 AM, lee wrote:
> Bas Wijnen writes:
>
>> [Moving this to -project, where it belongs; please follow up only
>> there, not on -user or -devel.]
Uhm, might I ask, ${what}-project ?
Oh.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2014/10/
Is that going to be appreciated?
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:28 PM, lee wrote:
> Steve Litt writes:
>
>> A) Tell everyone it's a moderated list
>> B) Send the poster a short reason why his post has been moderated.
>
> It would be against RFC-821 to silently drop messages.
That's why RFCs aren't/shouldn't be consider hard standar
Am 13.10.2014 um 00:21 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 12.10.2014 um 19:01 schrieb Luca Perico:
>> Hi
>> After 3,14 gnome shell update (i use debian jessie) i have see synaptic
>> p.m, very slow to show the package list at startup and also when i change
>> the package list (i.e "all" to "removable" ev
On 10/08/2014 09:36 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
On 10/08/2014 at 09:18 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 12:16:25 +0300 Andrei POPESCU
wrote:
I was specifically asking about a reference for "Thorsten Glaser
was ordered not to bring up alternate inits...".
I'll restate the URL I gave in
2014/10/13 2:45 "Steve Litt" :
>
> On Sun, 12 Oct 2014 09:33:43 +0100
> Martin Read wrote:
>
> > On 12/10/14 04:12, Peter Zoeller wrote:
> > > But the nice
> > > thing is shell scripting is simplistic easy to learn and understand.
> >
> > I refer the audience to David A. Wheeler's essay[1] on how
Bas Wijnen writes:
> [Moving this to -project, where it belongs; please follow up only
> there, not on -user or -devel.]
>
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 06:18:01PM +0200, lee wrote:
>> Why doesn't Debian just do a GR on this issue?
>
> Because for a GR, a member of Debian has to request it and it nee
On Du, 12 oct 14, 18:47:09, lee wrote:
> Andrei POPESCU writes:
>
> > On Mi, 08 oct 14, 16:01:37, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> >>
> >> The tech-ctte exploration was extremely thorough, entirely transparent and
> >> I
> >
> > In addition, the tech-ctte took special precautions to make sure their
>
2014/10/13 2:14 "Andrei POPESCU" :
>
> On Du, 12 oct 14, 10:30:52, The Wanderer wrote:
> > On 10/12/2014 at 10:07 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > > Any program that requires additional scripting just to get it running
> > > is insufficiently advanced.
> > >
> > > (you can quote me on that)
> >
>
just as a general comment, ufw is workable
almost out of the box, it has a gui interface
gufw. a while ago i used the arno-iptables-
firewall script as that also did what i needed
to have done.
my problem is that i tend to not do much
with things once they are set up and working
so whatever
2014/10/12 23:07 "Andrei POPESCU" :
>
> On Sb, 11 oct 14, 21:40:49, Steve Litt wrote:
> >
> > From my viewpoint, shellscripts were never intended to be big, huge
> > programs. To me, they just glue together commands, and have a few
> > rudimentary branching and looping constructs.
>
> Isn't that li
On Du, 12 oct 14, 14:24:32, Steve Litt wrote:
>
> Because it can run in the foreground, it's a prime candidate for
> daemontools (or one of the daemontools-inspired programs like nosh,
> etc).
$ apt-cache show nosh
E: No packages found
> So if you don't like brand new top level directories, igno
Am 12.10.2014 um 19:01 schrieb Luca Perico:
> Hi
> After 3,14 gnome shell update (i use debian jessie) i have see synaptic
> p.m, very slow to show the package list at startup and also when i change
> the package list (i.e "all" to "removable" even with a short package list).
> If i stop Caribou S
On Mon 13 Oct 2014 at 07:42:58 +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> On 13/10/2014 5:48 AM, Brian wrote:
> > Not a single one of these people have a *genuine* problem with systemd
> > on Debian. The first port of call for genuine problems with systemd is
> > the mailing list at pkg-systemd-maintainers
On Sun 12 Oct 2014 at 22:34:22 +0100, Brian wrote:
Having a body to a mail is much better. (Or maybe not if the content
is of no interest. :))
On Sat 11 Oct 2014 at 21:37:50 -0700, koanhead wrote:
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/12102014223323.1fb1b60c1...@desktop.copernicus.demon.co.uk
On Sun 12 Oct 2014 at 14:45:44 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Harry Putnam writes:
>
> > lee writes:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Thanks for the tips.
> >
> >>> SMTP>> EHLO 2xd
> >
> >> That's an invalid helo string.
> >
> > Is a valid one made up of just the full fqdn?
> >
> > And if so, is that not
On Sun 12 Oct 2014 at 19:56:08 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 02:45:44PM -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
> > > And if so, is that not acquired from /etc/hosts?
> snip
> > Egad ... I just noticed that was from a different machine... but the
> > format is the same on all of min
On 10/11/2014 12:49 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Sb, 11 oct 14, 12:19:29, Marty wrote:
>Could it be that a modular design for such complex tasks becomes too
>difficult to *do it right*?
I don't know, but I think given its history, the burden of proof is on
monolithic, not modular design. A bet
On 13/10/2014 5:48 AM, Brian wrote:
> On Mon 13 Oct 2014 at 05:02:15 +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> Not a single one of these people have a *genuine* problem with systemd
> on Debian. The first port of call for genuine problems with systemd is
> the mailing list at pkg-systemd-maintainers.lists.
http://zfsonlinux.org/faq.html#WhatKernelVersionsAreSupported
On October 10, 2014 9:20:50 PM EDT, lee wrote:
>John Holland writes:
>
>> I'm having very good results using their repo and DKMS system to
>build
>> support into kernel modules. It's very easy to set up. I'm using it
>> with Linux 3.2
I've been running Zfsonlinux.org zfs on debian for maybe two years. I don't
have root fs on zfs. I keep a working copy of the system dirs I have mounted on
zfs on ext3. (Var and usr). ONE time, the dkms had problems and I was glad I
had those extra copies (rsync from the zfs ones in a cron job)
On 10/11/2014 12:49 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Sb, 11 oct 14, 12:19:29, Marty wrote:
>Could it be that a modular design for such complex tasks becomes too
>difficult to *do it right*?
I don't know, but I think given its history, the burden of proof is on
monolithic, not modular design. A bet
Joe writes:
[...]
>> (I'm not sure if this output means it worked or it failed. I can tell
>> you that nothing is showing up at the other end)
>>
>> Can any of you experienced exim4 hands interpret this output?
>> Did the Authentication work or fail?
>
> The message was transmitted and accepte
Le 11/10/2014 18:45, Steve Litt a écrit :
> On Sat, 11 Oct 2014 13:38:05 +0300
> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
>> On Vi, 10 oct 14, 19:51:50, Erwan David wrote:
>>> I want to have a system which boots, and starts a subset of daemons.
>>>
>>> Then afterward I ssh to it, do something which 1) mount an enc
Le 11/10/2014 20:20, Jonathan Dowland a écrit :
>> On 10 Oct 2014, at 18:51, Erwan David wrote:
>>
>> how can I do this with systemd ?
> You'd write a systemd unit for the mount operation (there's a mount type)
> which wasn't hooked into the default multiuser target.
The mount unit requires the
On Sun, 12 Oct 2014 19:48:29 +0100
Brian wrote:
>
> Not a single one of these people have a *genuine* problem with systemd
> on Debian. The first port of call for genuine problems with systemd
> is the mailing list at
> pkg-systemd-maintainers.lists.alioth.debian.org.
>
I don't expect this on
On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 19:18:33 -0400
Harry Putnam wrote:
Sorry, I missed this thread originally.
>
> (I'm not sure if this output means it worked or it failed. I can tell
> you that nothing is showing up at the other end)
>
> Can any of you experienced exim4 hands interpret this output?
> Did t
On Sun 12 Oct 2014 at 21:07:11 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> Le 12/10/2014 21:01, Brian a écrit :
> >
> > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
> >
> > Do you have a link which says otherwise?
> >
> I did a mismatxh with the liste on freedesktop.org
>
> However my point stays th
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 09:07:11PM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> However my point stays the saem : those are not lists for system
> administrators, but foir systemd maiuntainers. I am not a systemd
> maintainer, thus this list is not for me.
>
> systemd is of interedt for ALL debian users, do you th
On Sun, 12 Oct 2014 11:16:54 -0700
Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Oct 2014, Steve Litt wrote:
> > This essay practically screams out for somebody to write a C program
> > that takes an argument of an arbitrary string, finds all files in a
> > directory, and returns a long string with those fil
Le 12/10/2014 21:01, Brian a écrit :
> On Sun 12 Oct 2014 at 20:50:00 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
>
>> Le 12/10/2014 20:48, Brian a écrit :
>>> On Mon 13 Oct 2014 at 05:02:15 +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>>>
> You seem to be ignoring some facts:
Believe me, I tried to ignore all the noise
On Sun 12 Oct 2014 at 20:50:00 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> Le 12/10/2014 20:48, Brian a écrit :
> > On Mon 13 Oct 2014 at 05:02:15 +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> >
> >>> You seem to be ignoring some facts:
> >> Believe me, I tried to ignore all the noise of the systemd threads, then
> >> I decid
[Moving this to -project, where it belongs; please follow up only
there, not on -user or -devel.]
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 06:18:01PM +0200, lee wrote:
> Why doesn't Debian just do a GR on this issue?
Because for a GR, a member of Debian has to request it and it needs to
be seconded by at least 5
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 02:45:44PM -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
> > And if so, is that not acquired from /etc/hosts?
snip
> Egad ... I just noticed that was from a different machine... but the
> format is the same on all of mine. So still should stand as something
> to critique/
Debian's exim4 wil
On Sun, 12 Oct 2014 19:02:08 +0100
Martin Read wrote:
> On 12/10/14 18:13, John Hasler wrote:
> > Martin Read writes:
> >> I'm not seeing a serious problem with that function.
> >
> > You have no problem with an 1800 line function?
>
> The thing that you are asking me if it is the case is not th
Harry Putnam writes:
> lee writes:
>
> [...]
>
> Thanks for the tips.
>
>>> SMTP>> EHLO 2xd
>
>> That's an invalid helo string.
>
> Is a valid one made up of just the full fqdn?
>
> And if so, is that not acquired from /etc/hosts?
>
> /etc/hosts
>
> 127.0.0.1dv.local.lan dvl
Le 12/10/2014 20:48, Brian a écrit :
> On Mon 13 Oct 2014 at 05:02:15 +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>
>>> You seem to be ignoring some facts:
>> Believe me, I tried to ignore all the noise of the systemd threads, then
>> I decided to look a bit further -- perhaps you should too.
>>
>>> - you don't
On Mon 13 Oct 2014 at 05:02:15 +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> > You seem to be ignoring some facts:
>
> Believe me, I tried to ignore all the noise of the systemd threads, then
> I decided to look a bit further -- perhaps you should too.
>
> > - you don't speak for the users, at least not for
Don Armstrong writes:
> On Sun, 12 Oct 2014, Steve Litt wrote:
>> This essay practically screams out for somebody to write a C program
>> that takes an argument of an arbitrary string, finds all files in a
>> directory, and returns a long string with those files separated by the
>> arbitrary strin
Martin Read writes:
> On 12/10/14 14:52, lee wrote:
>> Harry Putnam writes:
>>
>>> Can any of you experienced exim4 hands interpret this output?
>>
>> Reading RFC-821 would tell you more.
>
> Reading RFC 2821 would be even better, since RFC 821 is obsoleted by
> RFC 2821.
Thanks.
I pounded thr
lee writes:
I accidentally let my prior response get away before I remembered to
ask these questions.
[...]
>> LOG: MAIN
>> <= ha...@2xd.local.lan U=harry P=local S=569
>> $ delivering 1Xauru-0003TT-Fh
>> R: smarthost for rea...@newsguy.com
>> T: remote_smtp_smarthost for rea...@newsguy.com
On Sun, 12 Oct 2014 17:07:01 +0300
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Sb, 11 oct 14, 21:40:49, Steve Litt wrote:
> >
> > From my viewpoint, shellscripts were never intended to be big, huge
> > programs. To me, they just glue together commands, and have a few
> > rudimentary branching and looping constru
lee writes:
[...]
Thanks for the tips.
>> SMTP>> EHLO 2xd
> That's an invalid helo string.
Is a valid one made up of just the full fqdn?
And if so, is that not acquired from /etc/hosts?
/etc/hosts
127.0.0.1dv.local.lan dvlocalhost
10.0.0.9 dv.local.lan dv
On Sun, 12 Oct 2014 15:33:48 +0300
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Sb, 11 oct 14, 17:41:28, Steve Litt wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Oct 2014 22:28:31 +0300
> > Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Really? How do you write an initscript that restarts your daemon
> > > automatically in case it fails for som
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Sb, 11 oct 14, 21:40:49, Steve Litt wrote:
From my viewpoint, shellscripts were never intended to be big, huge
programs. To me, they just glue together commands, and have a few
rudimentary branching and looping constructs.
Isn't that like buying IKEA furniture, but whe
On Sun 12 Oct 2014 at 18:47:09 +0200, lee wrote:
> Andrei POPESCU writes:
>
> > On Mi, 08 oct 14, 16:01:37, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> >>
> >> The tech-ctte exploration was extremely thorough, entirely transparent and
> >> I
> >
> > In addition, the tech-ctte took special precautions to make su
On Sun, 12 Oct 2014, Steve Litt wrote:
> This essay practically screams out for somebody to write a C program
> that takes an argument of an arbitrary string, finds all files in a
> directory, and returns a long string with those files separated by the
> arbitrary string.
You seem to be looking fo
On Sun, 12 Oct 2014 19:06:11 +0900
Joel Rees wrote:
> Hmm. Let's comment that for people newer to scripting than I am.
>
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Steve Litt
> wrote:
> > ### RUN THE DAEMON ###
> > exec envuidgid slitt envdir ./env setuidgid slitt \
> > /d/at/python/littcron/l
On Sun 12 Oct 2014 at 18:45:42 +0200, lee wrote:
> Martin Read writes:
>
> > On 12/10/14 15:53, lee wrote:
> >> And when they are filtered, does the sender get a message telling him
> >> that their message hasn't been delivered?
> >
> > The requirement in RFC 2821 (the successor to RFC 821 which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 13/10/2014 4:22 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 13 oct 14, 02:50:18, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>> There is an amazing level of resistance to care what us users and
>> sysadmins think of the changes dictated by the vote of the Tech CTTE and
>> suc
On 12/10/14 18:13, John Hasler wrote:
Martin Read writes:
I'm not seeing a serious problem with that function.
You have no problem with an 1800 line function?
The thing that you are asking me if it is the case is not the thing I said.
I have a problem with 1800 line functions in general; th
On 10/12/2014 at 01:42 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Oct 2014 09:33:43 +0100 Martin Read
> wrote:
>
>> On 12/10/14 04:12, Peter Zoeller wrote:
>>
>>> But the nice thing is shell scripting is simplistic easy to learn
>>> and understand.
>>
>> I refer the audience to David A. Wheeler's essa
Andrei POPESCU writes:
> On Mi, 08 oct 14, 16:01:37, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>>
>> The tech-ctte exploration was extremely thorough, entirely transparent and I
>
> In addition, the tech-ctte took special precautions to make sure their
> decision is over-ridable by simple majority (50% + 1), des
Martin Read writes:
> On 12/10/14 15:53, lee wrote:
>> And when they are filtered, does the sender get a message telling him
>> that their message hasn't been delivered?
>
> The requirement in RFC 2821 (the successor to RFC 821 which you've
> recently been referring to) section 4.2.5 that a serve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 13/10/2014 3:45 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
> My understanding is that the only filtering which has been stated to be
> being used is not keyword-based, but thread-based. That is, if the post
> is in a thread which has been added to the filter list, t
On Sun, 12 Oct 2014 09:33:43 +0100
Martin Read wrote:
> On 12/10/14 04:12, Peter Zoeller wrote:
> > But the nice
> > thing is shell scripting is simplistic easy to learn and understand.
>
> I refer the audience to David A. Wheeler's essay[1] on how to handle
> filenames correctly in shell scrip
On Sun 12 Oct 2014 at 15:56:05 +0200, lee wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle writes:
>
> > If you don't know the difference between an MTA and an MUA, there is no
> > way I can help you.
>
> I'm not asking what the difference is but what difference it makes when
> this setting is involved. Can you provide
On Sun, 12 Oct 2014, Gary Roach wrote:
> Thanks for your help. As suggested, I first ran debsum on kate and
> libreoffice. All check sums were OK.
It's most likely not libreoffice or kate itself, but one of its
dependencies. Something like:
aptitude search -F '%p' '?reverse-Depends(libreoffice)~i
On Lu, 13 oct 14, 02:50:18, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> I've also put it to that person (assuming the one
> whom email me is the list-master), that we need a list where we can talk
> more freely about our concerns -- this list seems to have been over
> reaching on it's goals since ... forever, now th
Hello,
I just installed Jessie on one of my partitions. Most of the stuff works
just fine, but I'm having problem playing HTML5 videos on Youtube in
Iceweasel. I can't even watch webm videos from here:
http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/debian-meetings/2014/debconf14/webm/
It looks like video is playing i
Hi
After 3,14 gnome shell update (i use debian jessie) i have see synaptic
p.m, very slow to show the package list at startup and also when i change
the package list (i.e "all" to "removable" even with a short package list).
If i stop Caribou Synaptic work very good
I have also noted this :
1) Car
On Du, 12 oct 14, 17:18:10, Joe wrote:
>
> You basically have two options, to use a firewall tool, or to hack a
> script yourself. The existing tools, last time I looked, aren't really
> that versatile, they are intended to make simple firewalls using a GUI.
> That's reasonable, because once you w
Martin Read writes:
> I'm not seeing a serious problem with that function.
You have no problem with an 1800 line function?
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact li
On Du, 12 oct 14, 10:30:52, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 10/12/2014 at 10:07 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> > Any program that requires additional scripting just to get it running
> > is insufficiently advanced.
> >
> > (you can quote me on that)
>
> Part of the tradeoff for power is responsibility -
On Sun, 12 Oct 2014 03:05:59 +0200
lee wrote:
> Steve Litt writes:
>
> > pingaddr=8.8.8.8
> > pingaddr=192.168.100.96
>
> Why is this is defined multiple times?
Mistake!
The 8.8.8.8 isn't needed. That's a test of Internet connectivity, when
what I wanted was to test LAN connectivity, which
On 10/12/2014 at 12:30 PM, Joe wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 02:50:18 +1100 Andrew McGlashan
> wrote:
>> I could be speaking too soon, but either the list has died down a
>> little on systemd as a result of people having enough of trying to
>> bang their head against a brick wall -- or the filter
On 12/10/14 01:43, lee wrote:
Reco writes:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/tree/src/core/dbus-manager.c?id=3731acf1acfb4a6eb68374a5b137f3b368f63381#n638
Ah, this is a wonderful example :) My assumptions about the code were right.
Does all/most of systemd look like that?
I'm n
david...@ling.ohio-state.edu writes:
> Or, in other words, threads deemed off-topic by listmaster@l.d.o may
> be frozen, or locked.
It's just another very short-sighted thing because depending on the
viewpoint expressed, the post may be off-topic or not.
--
Again we must be afraid of speaking
Jonathan Dowland writes:
> The tech-ctte exploration was extremely thorough, entirely transparent and I
> cannot think of any example of a more transparent decision making process in
> any other Linux community. Not only that, but the entire decision could be
> overridden by a GR, which *any* de
When something is antiquated or junk, becomes a troubleshooting problem
or leaves room for mockery, or sucks, then there is no reason not to say
it. Straining to bend everything into a stream of euphemisms is
counterproductive, and nobody can know what is being talked about
because it's buried un
On Saturday 11 October 2014 11:43:05 Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Sb, 11 oct 14, 00:28:24, helpseekingtour...@gmx.net wrote:
> >Hi
> >Tried to re-install Debian 7.6 wheezy from USB-Stick on a Lenovo
> >ThinkPad T420. At the step 'Detect network hardware' pops up the
> >message 'No Eth
On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 02:50:18 +1100
Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>
> Yes, but I think the mail is properly delivered and not filtered by
> the receiving mail list server; it is later checked over by some
> process of the list-master [automatic, scripted, manual or a
> combination thereof] -- yes, we n
On 10/11/2014 06:28 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 07 Oct 2014, Gary Roach wrote:
After cloning my bad drive to a new one and installing the new drive
(see previous messages titled excessive CPU usage) i am left with the
following problem:
Kate and libreoffice.writer refuse to open and give t
On Friday 10 October 2014 14:31:26 Marius Gavrilescu wrote:
> Rob Owens writes:
> > Is there an apt command that will tell me why package X was installed?
> > For instance, was it manually installed, or installed as a
> > dependency/recommends of package Y?
>
> aptitude why
I like to look (again
On Sun, 12 Oct 2014 15:20:27 +0100
Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> Quite. It is ALL there. I keep hoping that something will be the
> basics for beginners (which is where we started on this thread).
> Teaching notes for college sounded great.
>
You basically have two options, to use a firewall tool,
On 10/11/2014 06:28 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 07 Oct 2014, Gary Roach wrote:
After cloning my bad drive to a new one and installing the new drive
(see previous messages titled excessive CPU usage) i am left with the
following problem:
Kate and libreoffice.writer refuse to open and give t
On 13/10/2014 2:34 AM, Martin Read wrote:
> On 12/10/14 15:53, lee wrote:
>> And when they are filtered, does the sender get a message telling him
>> that their message hasn't been delivered?
>
> The requirement in RFC 2821 (the successor to RFC 821 which you've
> recently been referring to) secti
On 12/10/14 15:53, lee wrote:
And when they are filtered, does the sender get a message telling him
that their message hasn't been delivered?
The requirement in RFC 2821 (the successor to RFC 821 which you've
recently been referring to) section 4.2.5 that a server which issues a
2yz completio
On 12/10/14 14:52, lee wrote:
Harry Putnam writes:
Can any of you experienced exim4 hands interpret this output?
Reading RFC-821 would tell you more.
Reading RFC 2821 would be even better, since RFC 821 is obsoleted by RFC
2821.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.deb
On 10/12/2014 9:56 AM, lee wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle writes:
>
>> On 10/8/2014 8:17 PM, lee wrote:
>>> Jerry Stuckle writes:
>>>
On 10/6/2014 7:10 PM, lee wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle writes:
>
>>>dc_relay_nets
>>> A list of machines for which we serve as smarthost.
>>
Steve Litt writes:
> pingaddr=8.8.8.8
> pingaddr=192.168.100.96
Why is this is defined multiple times?
--
Hallowed are the Debians!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
