B. Alexander wrote:
I've got an issue with a sid box that I have been maintaining for a
while. This is my workstation, and I have noticed a growing number of
broken packages, unmet dependencies and conflicts. I have been using
safe-upgrade for months now, hoping that it would work itself out ov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Merciadri Luca wrote:
> John Hasler wrote:
>> What do you mean by "real protection"? If they possess a copy that they
>> can read they can print it. It should be obvious that there is nothing
>> you can do to stop them.
>>
> Not so obvious, simply
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Merciadri Luca wrote:
> Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
>> Why would an
>> honest soul ever allow information to be read, but not printed?
>>
> To maintain honesty? An honest soul (i.e. me, here) has to send some
> data to some dishonest person.
The pro
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
When I do 'aptitude full-upgrade' I get 1 broken package:
The following packages are BROKEN:
python-twisted-conch
and 1 package with unmet dependencies:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
python-twisted-conch: Depends: python-twisted-core (>= 10.0.0-3)
Mark Allums wrote:
I noticed OP's post contained g++. My Sid is also trying to uninstall
g++. Without me posting about 8k worth of useless diagnostics, would
you happen to know the reason why?
I'm not seeing the problem, currently my unstable/testing system is
fully up-to-date and nothin
On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 20:34 -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> Alan Ianson writes:
> > All the stuff at debian-multimedia can't be included in debian for
> > various reasons, mostly freedom I think, so you won't find it in
> > debian at all. It's made for debian but it isn't debian.
>
> Most of it is Fre
On 4/19/2010 10:20 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2010-04-19 21:47, Mark Allums wrote:
[snip]
Webkit 2.0 is imminent. Perhaps they are considering moving to it.
According to various sources, it is the bee's knees.
Beyond crude process separation, what are it's benefits over v1?
I don't know.
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:02:40PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote:
> On Saturday 17 April 2010 00:09:28 Michael Elkins wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 08:15:38PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote:
> > >What I'm trying to do is pretty simple. Getting it to work is turning out
> > > not to be. What I wan
On 2010-04-19 21:47, Mark Allums wrote:
[snip]
Webkit 2.0 is imminent. Perhaps they are considering moving to it.
According to various sources, it is the bee's knees.
Beyond crude process separation, what are it's benefits over v1?
--
Dissent is patriotic, remember?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
On 4/19/2010 9:46 PM, Mark Allums wrote:
On 4/19/2010 9:00 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:01:41 -0400 (EDT), Andrew Malcolmson wrote:
Couldn't say why they switched, but I find pages in Epiphany 2.29 in
Squeeze look vivid compared with the Gecko version.
I have switched back
On 4/19/2010 7:53 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 22:59:29 -0400 (EDT), Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2010-04-17 21:32, Stephen Powell wrote:
Why did they switch from gecko to webkit anyway? It was working so well.
I still use it in Lenny. But not in Squeeze. Not anymore.
http://en.
On 4/19/2010 9:00 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:01:41 -0400 (EDT), Andrew Malcolmson wrote:
Couldn't say why they switched, but I find pages in Epiphany 2.29 in
Squeeze look vivid compared with the Gecko version.
I have switched back and forth between epiphany and iceweasel
On 2010-04-19 20:40, Stephen Powell wrote:
[snip]
Hmm. Well, if they were going to design a brand new browser from scratch
today, you make a good case for webkit. But they already had a browser
that was working well with gecko. Why switch now? It's a lot of pain
for very little gain, it seem
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:01:41 -0400 (EDT), Andrew Malcolmson wrote:
> Couldn't say why they switched, but I find pages in Epiphany 2.29 in
> Squeeze look vivid compared with the Gecko version.
I have switched back and forth between epiphany and iceweasel several
times, on the same computer and moni
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 04:12:14AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2010-04-19 02:58, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> >>>It's a 2.6 kernel, so Etch.
> >
> >>"Plonk"
> >>
> >
> >Why plonk me? Surely this is not the last Etch machine out there? In
> >any case, I could probably convince him to upgrade if you think
Alan Ianson writes:
> All the stuff at debian-multimedia can't be included in debian for
> various reasons, mostly freedom I think, so you won't find it in
> debian at all. It's made for debian but it isn't debian.
Most of it is Free Software but encumbered by actively-enforced
patents. d-mm.o ha
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:25:02 -0400 (EDT), Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2010-04-19 19:53, Stephen Powell wrote:
>> Maybe I'm slow, Ron, but I don't follow you. The above link appears to
>> give the origins of webkit, but I didn't see anything there about why
>> epiphany-browser decided to switch from ge
On 2010-04-19 19:53, Stephen Powell wrote:
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 22:59:29 -0400 (EDT), Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2010-04-17 21:32, Stephen Powell wrote:
Why did they switch from gecko to webkit anyway? It was working so well.
I still use it in Lenny. But not in Squeeze. Not anymore.
http://en.wik
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 00:00 +0200, Clive McBarton wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On 2010-04-19 16:19, Clive McBarton wrote:
> > [snip]
> >>
> >> How come there is no link anywhere on debian.org pointing to
> >> debian-multimedia.org? Anything to
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 22:59:29 -0400 (EDT), Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 2010-04-17 21:32, Stephen Powell wrote:
>>>
>>> Why did they switch from gecko to webkit anyway? It was working so well.
>>> I still use it in Lenny. But not in Squeeze. N
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 22:59:29 -0400 (EDT), Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2010-04-17 21:32, Stephen Powell wrote:
>>
>> Why did they switch from gecko to webkit anyway? It was working so well.
>> I still use it in Lenny. But not in Squeeze. Not anymore.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebKit#Origins
Merciadri Luca wrote:
> Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
>> Pdf "anti-features" are fake security. Don't trust on them, never.
> And what do you suggest if one wants some real protection _and_ the
> benefits of a format like PDF? Thanks.
The PDF specification itself recommends using external encryption in
Merciadri Luca dijo [Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 05:32:51PM +0200]:
> > Pdf "anti-features" are fake security. Don't trust on them, never.
> And what do you suggest if one wants some real protection _and_ the
> benefits of a format like PDF? Thanks.
Thing is, PDF is a printing-oriented format. It is a cl
On 4/19/2010 8:28 AM, Wolodja Wentland wrote:
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 09:16 -0400, B. Alexander wrote:
I've got an issue with a sid box that I have been maintaining for a while. This
is my workstation, and I have noticed a growing number of broken packages,
unmet dependencies and conflicts. I ha
On 2010-04-19 17:00, Clive McBarton wrote:
[snip]
I understand that point of view. But it is a point of view that will
make people stay away from d-m (and pretty much all other repos for that
matter).
It would help a lot if the key of d-m (package
debian-multimedia-keyring) was in the debian re
On 4/18/2010 3:27 PM, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 15:15:53 -0500
Ron Johnson wrote:
Hello Ron,
Plz show us a link to a USB adapter that plugs into a PC's serial port.
I've never even looked for one. I'm just going what by Dotan wrote. By
the sounds of it, he's not seen the set
On 4/19/2010 4:29 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2010-04-19 04:24, Dotan Cohen wrote:
Why plonk me? Surely this is not the last Etch machine out there? In
any case, I could probably convince him to upgrade if you think that
Etch is not up to the task.
You completely missed (probably because gmail's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2010-04-19 16:19, Clive McBarton wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> How come there is no link anywhere on debian.org pointing to
>> debian-multimedia.org? Anything to establish a chain of trust. As it is,
>> I looked and looked but didn't fi
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 23:36:12 +0200, Clive McBarton wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
>> I was a KDE 3.5.x user for long time (2003-2010) but switched to GNOME
>> as soon as the first KDE 4.0 came to scene (it was not intended for
>> end- users but *we had* to deal with it and the result was many people
>>
On 2010-04-19 16:17, Merciadri Luca wrote:
Russ Allbery wrote:
I think people are not understanding why users use this feature in some
environments.
/
Yes, sometimes it's a misguided attempt at DRM, but I've more often seen
it inside a workplace as defense in depth against *mistakes*. One
On Monday 19 April 2010 16:36:12 Clive McBarton wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
> > I was a KDE 3.5.x user for long time (2003-2010) but switched to GNOME as
> > soon as the first KDE 4.0 came to scene (it was not intended for end-
> > users but *we had* to deal with it and the result was many people
> >
You sent just to me. I'm sending back to the list and CC'ing you.
On Monday 19 April 2010 16:27:08 B. Alexander wrote:
> Thank you for this. I knew that aptitude had a an ncurses interface, but to
> be honest, it looked too similar to dselect, which dredged up some bad
> memories from about 10 ye
On 2010-04-19 16:30, Clive McBarton wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
There use to be a "preloader", but I don't see it anymore.
There was a feature where GNOME or KDE would pre-load OOo at DE
startup. That way, it *appears* that OOo loads much faster, even though
it was really just shifted.
There'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Camaleón wrote:
> I was a KDE 3.5.x user for long time (2003-2010) but switched to GNOME as
> soon as the first KDE 4.0 came to scene (it was not intended for end-
> users but *we had* to deal with it and the result was many people
> searched another
On 2010-04-19 16:19, Clive McBarton wrote:
[snip]
How come there is no link anywhere on debian.org pointing to
debian-multimedia.org? Anything to establish a chain of trust. As it is,
I looked and looked but didn't find. Even when searching for
"multimedia" on debian.org, it does not mention deb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> There use to be a "preloader", but I don't see it anymore.
>>
> There was a feature where GNOME or KDE would pre-load OOo at DE
> startup. That way, it *appears* that OOo loads much faster, even though
> it was really just shift
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Clive McBarton wrote:
> [snip]
>
> Can you check your installed version of libavcodec51? That's one of the
> things which d-m modifies.
>
Unfortunately, it is not my machine and I don't have access to it for a
while. I only had the machine for a short while which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Liam O'Toole wrote:
>> Adding debian-multimedia.org breaks a couple of things. Including vlc. I
>> don't know why they don't fix their repository.
>>
>> I'm curious if many people use debian-multimedia. Is it trustworthy?
>>
>>
>
> I have been using d
Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> I think people are not understanding why users use this feature in some
> environments.
>
/
> Yes, sometimes it's a misguided attempt at DRM, but I've more often seen
> it inside a workplace as defense in depth against *mistakes*. One might,
> for instance, mark a docume
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Camaleón writes:
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:47:02 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote:
>
>> Vincent Danjean wrote:
>
> (...)
>
>>> So, what would be the use case to allow a someone to read the
>>> information but not print it ? In any case, printing it would b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark wrote:
> I also have been using debian-multimedia for LAME mp3 and am very thankful
> for its existence.
Yes, it's useful for that. Though if it's just lame, it's probably
simpler to compile the source than to add a repo.
> without the debian-
I Rattan wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Merciadri Luca wrote:
>
> Life is simpler than that:
>
>pdf ->postscript ->print
>
> So, do not make the report available!!
I had thought about it, but the guy won't think about it, fortunately.
But you're right. There are many ways for this. Thanks.
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:47:21PM +0430, Nima Azarbayjany wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The page at http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/ shows 717 open
> bugs against the next release while the page at the following link:
>
> http://bts.turmzimmer.net/details.php?bydist=squeeze&sortby=packages&ignmer
On Monday 19 April 2010 08:16:02 B. Alexander wrote:
> I've got an issue with a sid box that I have been maintaining for a while.
> This is my workstation, and I have noticed a growing number of broken
> packages, unmet dependencies and conflicts. I have been using safe-upgrade
> for months now, ho
On 19/04/10 15:34, B. Alexander wrote:
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Wolodja Wentland<
I assume that this will allow aptitude to take actions which are more to
your liking as you obviously don't like the ones proposed by aptitude
when you run safe-upgrade.
safe-upgrade just does the upgra
On 2010-04-19 12:43 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Are bugs which are marked as done taken into account before a
> release?
Yes, they are.
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arch
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Merciadri Luca wrote:
Vincent Danjean wrote:
My reason is quite complicated, and is really justified. Briefly, one
person that I know needs to have some report I wrote, but this person
should not be able neither to print it nor to extract content from it,
for a simple reas
On 2010-04-19 13:11, Sthu Deus wrote:
Thank You for Your time and answer, Ron:
What version is that? v3.2 from Sid opens much faster than any
other version I've seen.
3.2.0-4
For me, that version performs much better than an other than the old
1.x ones.
"Hang" has a specific meaning.
D
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 01:16:23 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> Thank You for Your time and answer, Camaleón:
>
>>As Ron already said, review your system specs.
>>
>>OOo needs a lot of ram the first time it opens, and keeps consuming a
>>good quantity of your system resources as long as is loaded.
>
> Wo
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:47:02 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote:
> Vincent Danjean wrote:
(...)
>> So, what would be the use case to allow a someone to read the
>> information but not print it ? In any case, printing it would be more
>> or less convenient but it will always be possible if it is display
B. Alexander wrote:
I've got an issue with a sid box that I have been maintaining for a
while. This is my workstation, and I have noticed a growing number of
broken packages, unmet dependencies and conflicts. I have been using
safe-upgrade for months now, hoping that it would work itself out ov
Hi all,
The page at http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/ shows 717 open bugs
against the next release while the page at the following link:
http://bts.turmzimmer.net/details.php?bydist=squeeze&sortby=packages&ignmerged=on&ignbritney=on&pseudopackages=on&new=7&refresh=1800
lists only 344 b
Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> Merciadri Luca wrote:
>
>
> The real protection would be not to send that information.
I was not able to do it, because of `human' and organizational reasons.
I had no choice!
> Why would an
> honest soul ever allow information to be read, but not printed?
>
To ma
Thank You for Your time and answer, Camaleón:
>As Ron already said, review your system specs.
>
>OOo needs a lot of ram the first time it opens, and keeps consuming a
>good quantity of your system resources as long as is loaded.
Wow! What a product!
>In OOo 2.4 there is a "quick launch" option
Wolodja Wentland wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 19:04 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote:
>
>
> A very unique and inventive hostname - if that is the output of 'uname
> -a'
>
That is, objectively, the reason why one tries to find an unique
hostname, but we will all agree on the special character o
Thank You for Your time and answer, Ron:
>What version is that? v3.2 from Sid opens much faster than any
>other version I've seen.
3.2.0-4
>"Hang" has a specific meaning.
>Do you mean "seemingly does nothing"?
Correct, just hangs for a while (no any responses) then opens the document.
>Upgra
Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> Merciadri Luca wrote:
> > Ionreflex wrote:
> >> [quote]
> >> Linux lol 2.4.27-3-586tsc #1 Tue Dec 5 22:06:26 UTC 2006 i586 GNU/Linux
> >> [/quote]
> > What does `lol' mean here?
>
> I guess it's just the hostname of the computer in question.
>
Special, but funny. Must b
John Hasler wrote:
> Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
>
>
> Merciadri Luca writes:
>
>
> What do you mean by "real protection"? If they possess a copy that they
> can read they can print it. It should be obvious that there is nothing
> you can do to stop them.
>
Not so obvious, simply because if t
Elias Gabriel Amaral da Silva wrote:
> 2010/4/19 Merciadri Luca :
>
>
>
> Or paper and pencil.
>
That needs some determination.
> I know that for some cases this 'restriction through inconvenience' is
> sufficient in practice, but this should not be achievable with free
> software, even if le
James Zuelow wrote:
>
>
>
>
> That's not a technical problem, it's a management problem.
>
I totally agree.
> If you can't trust this person to not forward information when he shouldn't,
> then they should not be involved.
>
_should_. But I am not the person who decides. I am not neit
Merciadri Luca wrote:
> Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
>> Twas brillig at 17:32:51 19.04.2010 UTC+02 when
>> luca.mercia...@student.ulg.ac.be did gyre and gimble:
>>
>> >> Pdf "anti-features" are fake security. Don't trust on them, never.
>> ML> And what do you suggest if one wants some real protection _
Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
> Pdf "anti-features" are fake security. Don't trust on them, never.
Merciadri Luca writes:
> And what do you suggest if one wants some real protection _and_ the
> benefits of a format like PDF? Thanks.
What do you mean by "real protection"? If they possess a copy that the
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 19:04 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote:
> I have no answer to your question, but I am wondering...
>
> Ionreflex wrote:
> > [quote]
> > Linux lol 2.4.27-3-586tsc #1 Tue Dec 5 22:06:26 UTC 2006 i586 GNU/Linux
> > [/quote]
> What does `lol' mean here? Is it some version of somethi
Merciadri Luca wrote:
> I have no answer to your question, but I am wondering...
NB: Apparently, the original post you replied to was to debian-laptop,
not debian-user...
--
Johannes
In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the
humble reasoning of a single individual.
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Merciadri Luca wrote:
> Ionreflex wrote:
>> [quote]
>> Linux lol 2.4.27-3-586tsc #1 Tue Dec 5 22:06:26 UTC 2006 i586 GNU/Linux
>> [/quote]
> What does `lol' mean here?
I guess it's just the hostname of the computer in question.
- --
Johannes
In que
2010/4/19 Merciadri Luca :
> I know that it is _always_ possible (with some determination) to extract
> content, by some way, of a PDF (even if screenshots were to never work,
> you can still use a camera). Principally, the most important aspects of
Or paper and pencil.
> such security features
Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> In article <4bcc77a3.9080...@student.ulg.ac.be> you wrote:
>
>
> It is simply not possible to publish something and protect it. The best
> protection in that case is reputation.
>
Please read my other message, which explains the situation I am/was
facing. On the mere
Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 15:52 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote:
>
>
> At least Evince can be convinced to provide this "feature", if you
> toggle /apps/evince/override_restrictions
>
>
No problem. Thanks.
--
Merciadri Luca
See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merci
I have no answer to your question, but I am wondering...
Ionreflex wrote:
> [quote]
> Linux lol 2.4.27-3-586tsc #1 Tue Dec 5 22:06:26 UTC 2006 i586 GNU/Linux
> [/quote]
What does `lol' mean here? Is it some version of something, or did you
simply put this over there because you have some sense of
Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:39:03PM +0700, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
>
>
> This is one of the reasons why people who seek to use DRM will not allow their
> software to be made for Free Software Platforms. DRM is not in the best
> interest of the users/re-users of content. And by
Vincent Danjean wrote:
> On 19/04/2010 17:32, Merciadri Luca wrote:
>
>
> If you have free software (ie software you have the sources and are able
> to recompile) and if you can get the information on the screen, then it is
> only a matter of programmation to be able to have it on printer. So,
>
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:39:03PM +0700, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
>
> Twas brillig at 17:32:51 19.04.2010 UTC+02 when
> luca.mercia...@student.ulg.ac.be did gyre and gimble:
>
> >> Pdf "anti-features" are fake security. Don't trust on them, never.
> ML> And what do you suggest if one wants some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Camaleón writes:
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:31:30 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote:
>
>> I have written a PDF that I have blocked for printing, etc. Acrobat
>> Reader won't print it, because of the restrictions defined on the PDF
>> file's content. However,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Camaleón writes:
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:52:36 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote:
>
>> Camaleón writes:
>>
>>> Open GConf editor and navigate to "/apps/gnome-power-manager/backlight/
>>> idle_brightness". You can tweak many things from there.
>
>> Will t
Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> Twas brillig at 17:32:51 19.04.2010 UTC+02 when
> luca.mercia...@student.ulg.ac.be did gyre and gimble:
>
> >> Pdf "anti-features" are fake security. Don't trust on them, never.
> ML> And what do you suggest if one wants some real protection _and_ the
> ML> benefits of a
Hi,
I'm trying to redirect from a site to another, and it worksbut i want
that when it redirects it shows the original address and not the destination
address, the line that i have at the moment and works without hide the
redirection is:
RewriteRule ^/(.*) http://openmeetings.innovagroup.es:
MediaOggi: Crea il tuo social network personale
Create il vostro social network con Media Oggi !
Fai clic sul link per partecipare:
http://mediaoggi.ning.com/?xgi=4uzEKMbb6ybzwB&xg_source=msg_invite_net
If your email program doesn't recognize the web address above as an acti
sethurf wrote:
> Jon Dowland wrote:
>
>> sethurf wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Would you have any solution for me ? I don't know what to do... Maybe
>>> there is a big big bug/fault in a hosted file for a hosted website.
>>>
>>>
>> Yes, one of the sites you are hosting has a problem whic
Twas brillig at 17:32:51 19.04.2010 UTC+02 when
luca.mercia...@student.ulg.ac.be did gyre and gimble:
>> Pdf "anti-features" are fake security. Don't trust on them, never.
ML> And what do you suggest if one wants some real protection _and_ the
ML> benefits of a format like PDF? Thanks.
There
Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
> Pdf "anti-features" are fake security. Don't trust on them, never.
And what do you suggest if one wants some real protection _and_ the
benefits of a format like PDF? Thanks.
--
Merciadri Luca
See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/
I use PGP. If there is a
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Wolodja Wentland <
wentl...@cl.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 09:16 -0400, B. Alexander wrote:
> > I've got an issue with a sid box that I have been maintaining for a
> while. This
> > is my workstation, and I have noticed a growing number of b
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:52:36 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
>
>> Open GConf editor and navigate to "/apps/gnome-power-manager/backlight/
>> idle_brightness". You can tweak many things from there.
> Will this modification be taken into account directly?
Yes, changes should take
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:31:30 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote:
> I have written a PDF that I have blocked for printing, etc. Acrobat
> Reader won't print it, because of the restrictions defined on the PDF
> file's content. However, KPDF accepts printing it, and extracting
> content from it, etc., even
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:00:54 +0200, Enrique Matías Sánchez (Quique) wrote:
> I've bought a Samsung n210 netbook, which has an Intel GMA 3150 graphics
> card.
>
> I've installed Debian testing on it, and KDE 4.4 from experimental.
> Unfortunately the graphical interface doesn't work properly.
>
>
Merciadri Luca schreef:
Neil Williams wrote:
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:31:30 +0200
Merciadri Luca wrote:
Anti-features like locking and password protection are not supported
and, if implemented, could make the free software tools appear non-free
by restricting the functionality available to
I Rattan wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Merciadri Luca wrote:
>
> yes.
Thanks. I assume that this is for the same reason as Mr. Williams
pointed out. Are _all_ the free PDF viewers running under Debian in
accordance with this principle?
--
Merciadri Luca
See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.a
Neil Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:31:30 +0200
> Merciadri Luca wrote:
>
>
>
> Anti-features like locking and password protection are not supported
> and, if implemented, could make the free software tools appear non-free
> by restricting the functionality available to the user. In t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Camaleón writes:
> On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 16:33:32 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote:
>
>> As stated in the title, the light on my Asus EEE 1000HE automatically
>> and randomly reduces some seconds after I have set it to its maximum
>> level. Why? That must b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Camaleón writes:
> On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 16:33:32 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote:
>
>> As stated in the title, the light on my Asus EEE 1000HE automatically
>> and randomly reduces some seconds after I have set it to its maximum
>> level. Why? That must b
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Merciadri Luca wrote:
Hi,
I have written a PDF that I have blocked for printing, etc. Acrobat
Reader won't print it, because of the restrictions defined on the PDF
file's content. However, KPDF accepts printing it, and extracting
content from it, etc., even if these actio
Hi,
I have written a PDF that I have blocked for printing, etc. Acrobat
Reader won't print it, because of the restrictions defined on the PDF
file's content. However, KPDF accepts printing it, and extracting
content from it, etc., even if these actions are unauthorized with
acroread. Is it normal?
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 09:16 -0400, B. Alexander wrote:
> I've got an issue with a sid box that I have been maintaining for a while.
> This
> is my workstation, and I have noticed a growing number of broken packages,
> unmet dependencies and conflicts. I have been using safe-upgrade for months
>
Hi,
I've bought a Samsung n210 netbook, which has an Intel GMA 3150 graphics card.
I've installed Debian testing on it, and KDE 4.4 from experimental.
Unfortunately the graphical interface doesn't work properly.
When xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.11.0-1 is installed, the X window
system doesn't st
I've got an issue with a sid box that I have been maintaining for a while.
This is my workstation, and I have noticed a growing number of broken
packages, unmet dependencies and conflicts. I have been using safe-upgrade
for months now, hoping that it would work itself out over time. However,
this h
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Israel Garcia wrote:
> Hi again:
>
> I have a big NFS partition shared and mounted on 3 debian serves
> (mountpoint /snapshosts). NFS partition es ext3 and I have a backup
> script, on every server, which makes a tar from some lvm snaphost .
> I mean, my 3 serve
On 2010-04-12 12:55:59 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-04-12 12:21 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
> > Moreover, with the current status of module-init-tools, it seems
> > that the broken version will get into squeeze anyway (at least,
> > there doesn't seem to be anything to prevent that) if
Florian Kulzer schreef:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 23:27:41 +0200, Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Hal is certainly no longer working, see #567389. Yet, udev now also
>> stopped working...
>
> OK, I think I understand a little bit better how this is supposed to be
> working now. Try to add
> Yes. If you used a semi-competent MUA, you'd see that.
>
I know, they all have their tradeoffs. Thanks.
--
Dotan Cohen
http://bido.com
http://what-is-what.com
Please CC me if you want to be sure that I read your message. I do not
read all list mail.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user
On 19 April 2010 12:15, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2010-04-19 02:54, Dotan Cohen wrote:
>>>
>>> So, is does this SC reader (a) serial-over-USB or (b) USB-over-serial?
>>>
>>
>> I should imagine (b), but I have not gotten there yet to see.
>>
>
> Then he probably is clueless.
>
Well, he is turning to
On 2010-04-19 04:24, Dotan Cohen wrote:
Why plonk me? Surely this is not the last Etch machine out there? In
any case, I could probably convince him to upgrade if you think that
Etch is not up to the task.
You completely missed (probably because gmail's web interface so incredibly
sucks) why he
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
