Bill Marcum wrote:
...
> echo $TERM
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ echo $TERM
cygwin
Thanks -- I looked at $TERM and tried setting it to ansi; top was the same, and
the PageUp and PageDown keys stopped working for less. I agree that it likely
has something to do with the terminal type, and seem to
Paul E Condon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 01:57:56AM +0200, David Jardine wrote:
> > The enormous confusion arising from the release of sarge seems
> > to have arisen from the use of the words "stable" and "testing".
>
> I am not a Debian developer. I am a user. But I know e
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 09:12:33PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
> debian users:
>
> When I ssh into one of my Debian 3.0 boxes from WinXP Pro/ Cygwin, top
> works as expected.
>
>
> When I ssh into my Debian 3.1 box from WinXP Pro/Cygwin, top seems to be
> inserting multiple line feeds at the
I installed Sarge on a HP Evectra.
http://images.google.ca/images?q=evectra
When I did this I used a Logitech USB / Optical Wheel Mouse.
Took the little fellow downstairs and changed the mouse to a Logitech
two button serial mouse, D-shaped 9 pin.
Been running:
dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86 to
Colin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> David Jardine wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 08:12:27PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> >>>Somebody who was running stable didn't want woody to be replaced
> >>>by sarge without his being asked. Somebody running testing didn't
> >>>want to move from sarge to etch autom
Marc Wilson wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 10:22:06PM +0200, Tom wrote:
>
>
>>[Thursday 09 June 2005 20:33] James Miller
>>(Re: gnome-panel .. gone .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>>
>>
>>
>>>PS A newly-discovered ancient Chinese proverb: when Debain releases,
>>>wise man running unstable do
Robert Brockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
> > thing is a pain in the but. At least on the Linux machines it is
> > straightforward and I set those up when I can to use keys instead of
> > passwords.
>
> May I introduce you to ssh-agent and ssh-add.
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 10:22:06PM +0200, Tom wrote:
> [Thursday 09 June 2005 20:33] James Miller
> (Re: gnome-panel .. gone .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > PS A newly-discovered ancient Chinese proverb: when Debain releases,
> > wise man running unstable does not dist-upgrade hastily :)
>
>
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:09:12 -0700, "Roger B.A. Klorese " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> The majority of people involved in the actual discussion are involved
> in the actual discussion and don't need to be reminded ten minutes
> later what was just posted.
Sure they do, because they read 50 messag
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 22:51:51 -0400, Patrick Wiseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On 6/10/05, John Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Would you write programs backwards? I would hate to write a
>> backwards compiler to compile your backwards programs.
> Doesn't everyone write their programs backw
Paul Johnson writes:
> But they're not modems, they're bridges or routers.
They contain DSL modems in addition to bridges and/or routers. Look up how
DSL works.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
debian users:
When I ssh into one of my Debian 3.0 boxes from WinXP Pro/ Cygwin, top works as
expected.
When I ssh into my Debian 3.1 box from WinXP Pro/Cygwin, top seems to be
inserting multiple line feeds at the end of each line:
4 root 5 -10 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.01 kh
On Friday 10 June 2005 05:03 pm, Fernando Cacciola wrote:
> *snip*
> The first thing that shocked me was that I couldn't make a directory via
> Konqueror except inside my home dir (is hard to "undumb" oneself from a
> MS universe ;).
> But OK, I suppose you just don't use Konqueror to do that :-)
>
Nicos Gollan wrote:
On Wednesday June 8 2005 20:50, Jim Hall wrote:
Because printing in Linux and I are not on the best of terms, I sort of
expected to see something more CUPS related. I say that because in the
CUPS setup I've done so far I didn't see any lpr commands.
So there we have a(not
On Friday 10 June 2005 07:21 pm, Rob Bochan wrote:
> I've been running Sid with KDE 3.4 from the alioth.debian.org repository
> for several weeks now. Can anyone tell me what will/should happen once KDE
> 3.4 makes its way into Sid? Will I have to uninstall and then reinstall the
> proper KDE packa
>>What's next?
> Almut Behrens wrote:
Personally, I'd make Firefox "print to file", and then take a closer
look at the resulting PostScript file. First thing to check is whether
you can view that file using gs or gv. In case that works, the problem
might be with some incorrect device specific
Geronimo!
http://de.geocities.com/futuragrl?s=xxx&m=gfibjW-PRfS.YbRQR,gfibjW,VSd
In order to exist just once in the world, it is necessary never again
to exist.
Xenical medication is used with a reduced-calorie diet to help
significantly overweight persons lose weight.
It also helps to
Joe Potter wrote:
You want to see the context. You want to see the flow of the discussion
--- like we did years ago before you had to cave due to all the suites
who can do no better.
Sorry, but I'm not too slow to remember the substance of 95% of the
conversations I have with my co-workers.
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 10:40:50PM +0200, Fernando Cacciola wrote:
Hi people,
I'm new to debian (knoppix 3.8.1 on HDD) and to linux in general.
I installed it on HD without troubles (well, only after I realized that
my dev/hda1 was mounted from startup becasue I have
Kent West wrote:
Jochen Schulz wrote:
Fernando Cacciola:
P.S.: To what debian does knoopix 3.8.1 installed on hd corresponds to?
Knoppix is always a mixture of stable, testing and unstable. You can
only tell that for each single package. Some of them are patched
versions, which you
On Friday 10 June 2005 10:17 pm, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Friday June 10 2005 8:08 am, Phil Dyer wrote:
> > plonk!
>
> Oh, please. Can we possibly get any more childish? Please don't
> advertise your filters, it tends to cause headers to evolve.
I have to agree with Paul 100% on this one. I've
Jochen Schulz wrote:
Fernando Cacciola:
I'm new to debian (knoppix 3.8.1 on HDD) and to linux in general.
Welcome. :-)
So far everything works like a charm, except for one thing, the system
is configured to disallow root login...
Where? You are trying to login as root via your display
I've given up and gone back to 2.4.29. I'm going to try get the latest kernel
source 2.6.11 and try that. Maybe something has been fixed since 2.6.8.
I did try to solve this issue by getting the official (sarge) kernel image
2.6.8-k7-smp but still ran into the same problem.
Anyone have some ins
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 08:09:12PM -0700, Roger B.A. Klorese wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
> >However, given the that majority
> >of people invloved in the actual *discussion* are reading it a mail or
> >news reader, it is better to cater to that group. The fact these
> >discussion are ar
On 6/10/05, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Learn to format your posts properly. Paragraphs start with an empty
> line and should be written in conversational order like in normal
> written English. See standard RFC1855.
"Standard," huh? It's called "Netiquette _Guidelines_." And I q
Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thursday 09 June 2005 05:26 pm, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> >
> > So a top-poster is concerned about him or herself not doing extra work.
> > A bottom-poster is concerned with improving the quality of reading for
> > others.
>
> That's the most self-serving, se
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
However, given the that majority
of people invloved in the actual *discussion* are reading it a mail or
news reader, it is better to cater to that group. The fact these
discussion are archived on the web is really a side effect.
-
The majority of people involved i
On 6/10/05, John Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would you write programs backwards? I would hate to write a backwards
> compiler to compile your backwards programs.
Doesn't everyone write their programs backwards? Don't you _start_ at the end?
I guess it depends on what you mean by backwar
On Friday June 10 2005 8:08 am, Phil Dyer wrote:
> plonk!
Oh, please. Can we possibly get any more childish? Please don't
advertise your filters, it tends to cause headers to evolve.
--
Paul Johnson
Email and Instant Messenger (Jabber): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ursine.ca/~baloo/
pgpc1FxlKd
On Friday June 10 2005 9:06 am, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
> My Sylpheed-claws puts the cursor at the top of replies. I think
> it's so I may enjoy trimming out the irrelevant before I post below
> the points to which I refer.
Yes, that's why most mailers put the cursor at the top. You're
expected t
On Friday June 10 2005 9:49 am, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> But excessive trimming, so that it becomes hard to figure out
> what went where, is a problem.
But that's not a problem, diff does it all the time...
--
Paul Johnson
Email and Instant Messenger (Jabber): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ursine.ca/~ba
On Friday June 10 2005 8:52 am, David Nicholls wrote:
> gpgkeys: key EB6AF9F2ED602A59 not found on keyserver
> Hi,
>
> I've got a few Debian (sarge) boxes connected to isp's via either
> ADSL modems (dlink dsl-300t's) or with a internal pci adsl modems.
That's nice. But they're not modems, they'r
Learn to format your posts properly. Paragraphs start with an empty
line and should be written in conversational order like in normal
written English. See standard RFC1855.
On Friday June 10 2005 2:56 pm, Michael Z Daryabeygi wrote:
> I think that one of my personal strengths is my ability to
On Friday June 10 2005 2:45 pm, Olle Eriksson wrote:
> More importantly, I think it would be difficult to use
> bottom-posting with html mail or rtf text or whatever it is called.
Only in inadequate mailers. Mutt, gnus, kmail and likely most other
mailers get it right. If your mailer can't quo
On Friday June 10 2005 8:46 am, Roger B.A. Klorese wrote:
> Joe Potter wrote:
> >That, of course, is the main point you made. I put all this in the
> > lap of Bill Gates --- the miserable ass. He is never happy unless
> > he is destroying some standard and replacing it with crap of some
> > kind.
>
Jan Leewe Behrendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Am Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2005 21:18 schrieb Jacob S:
> > On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 14:34:53 -0400
> >
> > Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thursday 09 June 2005 12:55 pm, David Jardine wrote:
> > > > be getting out of hand :)
> > > > us a lecture on
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 17:56:04 -0400, Michael Z Daryabeygi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
[...]
> No one leaves the entire thread intact as one reply follows another.
> So I think the argument of context is bogus.
Long threads with multiple branches (like this one). You reach the end
of one branch, a
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 21:09:25 -0400, Patrick Wiseman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But I also code a good bit, and appreciate the need to do that
> in an orderly (essentially vertical) way
Programmers know that "sequence" is the first of three fundamental
elements of programming.
> I'm still a b
Colin wrote:
whole picture.
Nah, I can't buy this argument. When I look to see what entries I can put
in my sources.list file, I actually take a web browser and look at the
directory it comes from. In the "dists" directory, I can see that
"testing" and "stable" are links to names like
On 6/10/05, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday June 10 2005 8:40 am, you wrote:
> > Paul Johnson wrote:
> > >It's
> > >preserved for posterity and not everybody wants to read a whole
> > >thread to figure out what solved some random printing problem.
> >
> > But, in fact, most peop
Marty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>More than I even want to think about, actually. Like I said before,
>what I've been doing for years always seems to work. :-)
The only thing I've ever changed is which release named
subdirectory /etc/apt/sources.list points to, over several Debian
release cyc
On 6/9/05, I <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just upgraded all my extensions (from within Firefox), and now
> Firefox comes up, but is completely unresponsive. I suspect that one
> of the extensions is bad or incompatible with another. Any advice on
> how I can remove them all and then selectivel
On 2005-06-09 17:15:31 -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> I just upgraded all my extensions (from within Firefox), and now
> Firefox comes up, but is completely unresponsive. I suspect that one
> of the extensions is bad or incompatible with another. Any advice on
> how I can remove them all and the
David Jardine wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 08:12:27PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
>>>Somebody who was running stable didn't want woody to be replaced
>>>by sarge without his being asked. Somebody running testing didn't
>>>want to move from sarge to etch automatically. (Sid seems to be
>>>the on
On Friday June 10 2005 8:40 am, you wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> >It's
> >preserved for posterity and not everybody wants to read a whole
> >thread to figure out what solved some random printing problem.
>
> But, in fact, most people use web-based archives in which that's
> exactly how they acces
On 6/10/05, Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 12:46:20PM -0700, Caleb Walker wrote:
> > Carl Fink wrote:
> >
> > >Just out of curiosity: you do realize that "LCD" is an insult, right?
> > >
> > >
> > What is LCD?
>
> Least Common Denominator.
_Lowest_ Common Denomina
I've been running Sid with KDE 3.4 from the alioth.debian.org repository for
several weeks now. Can anyone tell me what will/should happen once KDE 3.4
makes its way into Sid? Will I have to uninstall and then reinstall the
proper KDE packages from the proper Debian repository or will it stay th
On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, Christian Christmann wrote:
#opera
deb http://deb.opera.com/opera testing non-free
This one returns:
Err http://deb.opera.com testing/non-free Packages
404 Not Found [IP: 193.69.116.22 80]
Ign http://deb.opera.com testing/non-free Release
Failed to fetch
http://deb.ope
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 12:46:13AM +0200, Christian Christmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> that's my current sources.list.
> Do you think it's OK? Or are any entries missing to run
> the testing dev tree?
>
Running testing right now is not a good idea, unless you really want to
test and file bug reports.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 07:34:49PM -0400, Mitchell Laks wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I saw all the articles on the switch of testing to etch and release of sarge
> as stable.
>
Wow. All of them? How many were there :-)
> I am one of many who has been running a desktop tracking sid for months.
>
> Just b
Hi,
that's my current sources.list.
Do you think it's OK? Or are any entries missing to run
the testing dev tree?
deb http://ftp.univie.ac.at/systems/linux/debian/debian/ testing main
deb-src http://ftp.univie.ac.at/systems/linux/debian/debian/ testing main
deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/
Hi!
I saw all the articles on the switch of testing to etch and release of sarge
as stable.
I am one of many who has been running a desktop tracking sid for months.
Just before the release, how far apart were sid and testing? were the only
things in sid = bug fixes for sarge?
This is relevant
David Jardine wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 06:31:29PM -0400, Marty wrote:
David Jardine wrote:
>And I still don't understand where you got your apt.conf file
>from - it was you wasn't it, Marty (teacher's pet :{ ).
>
If I did it was some years ago and I don't recall. But why did you
call m
I have an idea!
On 6/10/05, Ben Chong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Exactly. Ignore top post messages if they irritate you. Like this one. :-)
Why Not
> Same approach for people (top posters) who have difficulty strolling down
> multiple pages to extract relevant info.
Just post
> The point i
On 6/10/05, David Jardine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 06:31:29PM -0400, Marty wrote:
> > David Jardine wrote:
> > >And I still don't understand where you got your apt.conf file
> > >from - it was you wasn't it, Marty (teacher's pet :{ ).
> > >
> >
> > If I did it was some y
Marty wrote:
Colin Ingram wrote:
Apt uses its default behavior if you don't have an apt.conf file. As
for version this default behavior is to update to the newest version
available.
It seems like you are referring to package version. I was referring to
Debian version, e.g. sarge, etch,
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 08:46:27PM +0530, Joydeep Bakshi wrote:
> *dmesg|grep vesa* shows ---> vesafb: probe of vesafb0 failed with error -6
>^
I'm not really knowledgable in this area, but I saw this message on my
box a
hello,
sorry to answer that late - I faced the same problem and solved it this
way:
Like you did, let the script 'alsaconf' handle all tunings
%sudo alsaconf
then, use (found by using 'apropos alsa', and man) the save function,
called with
%sudo alsactl store
soundproblems then stay fixed af
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 06:31:29PM -0400, Marty wrote:
> David Jardine wrote:
> >And I still don't understand where you got your apt.conf file
> >from - it was you wasn't it, Marty (teacher's pet :{ ).
> >
>
> If I did it was some years ago and I don't recall. But why did you
> call me a "teache
On Friday 10 June 2005 22:28, Robert Wolfe wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, shatam bhattacharya wrote:
> > hello list,
>
> I am using a DSL-502T (Dlink make) router with a Realtek
> ethernet card to connect to the net on a sarge system. The settings are
> working fine. Recently I installed
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 04:10:08PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> This appeared today on the debian-user email list. I am curious
> so I looked for the email by Massimo Dentico in the debian-user
> email archive. I did not find it there. Where did this discussion
> come from? It seems it may have go
David Jardine wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 05:39:54PM -0400, Marty wrote:
John Hasler wrote:
>Marty writes:
>>I still don't understand where apt gets the Debian version.
>
>Why do you think it cares?
I thought apt "knew" about debian version. If the "version" is only a
classification for gro
Colin Ingram wrote:
Marty wrote:
Colin Ingram wrote:
On a side note: I installed sarge fresh a couple of months ago and I
didn't have a /etc/apt/apt.conf file or /etc/apt/preferences. I
created both by hand.
This is all very mysterious to me, all these people lacking an
apt.conf file.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 05:39:54PM -0400, Marty wrote:
> John Hasler wrote:
> >Marty writes:
> >>I still don't understand where apt gets the Debian version.
> >
> >Why do you think it cares?
>
> I thought apt "knew" about debian version. If the "version" is only a
> classification for grouping .d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roberto C. Sanchez said:
> Pretty much. And since most now do S/MIME and PGP/MIME instead of the
> old ASCII inline, if they don't it shows up as some random attachment,
> instead of a bunch of crap at the top and bottom of a message.
The thing with
Marty wrote:
Colin Ingram wrote:
On a side note: I installed sarge fresh a couple of months ago and I
didn't have a /etc/apt/apt.conf file or /etc/apt/preferences. I
created both by hand.
This is all very mysterious to me, all these people lacking an
apt.conf file.
I wonder how apt can
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:45:43PM +0200, Olle Eriksson wrote:
>
> More importantly, I think it would be difficult to use bottom-posting with
> html mail or rtf text or whatever it is called. And while plain text is
> better in most situations, I have to admit there are situations where
> forma
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 05:03:52PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:57:48PM +0200, David Jardine wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:19:19AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> >
> > > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 09:16:39AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > > > > Since
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:02:46PM +0100, Lee Braiden wrote:
> On Friday 10 Jun 2005 21:57, David Jardine wrote:
> > I had this problem a week or two ago (I think I reported it in
> > panic on this list). It went away as suddenly as it appeared, but
> > I'd be interested to know how GPG solves the
I think that one of my personal strengths is my ability to objectively
listen to both sides of an argument. But as much as I try, I can't
understand bottom posters.
How are you reading lists? I use an email client (thunderbird). When I
read a thread, I start at the beginning. Sometimes inter
Please stop using Sid, if you can. You should progress slowing from Stable,
through Testing, to Unstable according to your level of experience and
hardware requirements.
Good advice Robert. For the time being, though, I think I will stick to
Sid, at least until I recover from the recent major
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 05:55:40PM -0400, Craig Russell wrote:
>
> Still having the same problem. Any suggestions are welcome. I am continuing
> to
> experiment but since it takes 30 minutes + for each compilation if I'm
> missing
> something stupid I'd really appreciate the help. I've done
On Friday 10 June 2005 17.46, Roger B.A. Klorese wrote:
> Joe Potter wrote:
> >That, of course, is the main point you made. I put all this in the lap
> >of Bill Gates --- the miserable ass. He is never happy unless he is
> >destroying some standard and replacing it with crap of some kind.
>
> Outlo
John Hasler wrote:
Marty writes:
I still don't understand where apt gets the Debian version.
Why do you think it cares?
I thought apt "knew" about debian version. If the "version" is only a
classification for grouping .deb files in the archives/repositories, then
it raises many more questio
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 04:27:26PM -0500, Thomas Stivers wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 05:19:12 PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:05:04PM +0100, Lee Braiden wrote:
> > > I would like to always sign my emails, but I always worry that people
> > > will
> > > disl
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 02:08:52PM -0600, Dave Babb wrote:
> OK..OK.
>
> I get it..
>
> If I'm understanding what all of the responses have said the
> way>
>
>
> Stability, robustness, testing, testing, more testing, cautious deployment of
> new stuff, and keep all of the various
Tony Godshall wrote:
>>>I'm running kernel 2.4.18-bf2.4 on my computers. Filesystem is RaiserFS
>>>3.6.25. What I need to do for upgrading kernel to 2.6.x
>
>
>
>>If you are going to build the kernel from source, don't forget to
>>also build Reiserfs into the kernel.
>
> ...
>
> Or not. init
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, shatam bhattacharya wrote:
hello list,
I am using a DSL-502T (Dlink make) router with a Realtek ethernet
card to connect to the net on a sarge system. The settings are working fine.
Recently I installed bittorrent by apt
apt-get install bittorrent-gui.
But when
Also..
Re downloading all 14 images
I have been listening to my daughter for something more manageable for her.
I have been watching Debian (after receiving many favorable recommendations)
The day Sarge hit the streets, and I downloaded ALL of the images on
release day #1
OK..OK.
I get it..
If I'm understanding what all of the responses have said by the way>
Stability, robustness, testing, testing, more testing, cautious
deployment of new stuff, and keep all of the various architectures in sync.
The responses indicate that Debian is a distro to
Craig Russell wrote:
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 05:54:21PM -0400, Craig Russell wrote:
Trying to compile the 2.6.8 kernel from the debian source package
(patched) and I keep on running into this problem after reboot. I
have gone back and checked to make sure that t
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 05:19:12 PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:05:04PM +0100, Lee Braiden wrote:
> > I would like to always sign my emails, but I always worry that people will
> > dislike the extra overhead, and maybe find it hard to read. Do most
> > clients
> > I'm running kernel 2.4.18-bf2.4 on my computers. Filesystem is RaiserFS
> > 3.6.25. What I need to do for upgrading kernel to 2.6.x
> If you are going to build the kernel from source, don't forget to
> also build Reiserfs into the kernel.
...
Or not. initrd.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 17:17 -0400, Joe Potter wrote:
--snip--
> You want to see the context. You want to see the flow of the discussion
> --- like we did years ago before you had to cave due to all the suites
> who can do no better. Gates is a cancer, and the after life will be warm
> in his case i
On Friday 10 June 2005 01:14 pm, ROBIN KRISE wrote:
> I am not very techno wiz on this computer so please forgive my novice
> approach. I do believe I have a bug. I tried to access my email at
> yahoo.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and it came up with "you have a
> bug"...report to but report. I did a
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:05:04PM +0100, Lee Braiden wrote:
> On Friday 10 Jun 2005 22:03, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > 3. Tell people that you *always* GPG sign your messages or encrypt to
> > them and that if they receive a message "from" your email address that
> > is neither signed nor encryp
Roger B.A. Klorese wrote:
> Joe Potter wrote:
>
>> That, of course, is the main point you made. I put all this in the lap
>> of Bill Gates --- the miserable ass. He is never happy unless he is
>> destroying some standard and replacing it with crap of some kind.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> Outlook does it t
On Friday 10 Jun 2005 22:03, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> 3. Tell people that you *always* GPG sign your messages or encrypt to
> them and that if they receive a message "from" your email address that
> is neither signed nor encrypted, they can safely discard it without even
> looking.
>
> It is by
On Friday 10 Jun 2005 21:57, David Jardine wrote:
> I had this problem a week or two ago (I think I reported it in
> panic on this list). It went away as suddenly as it appeared, but
> I'd be interested to know how GPG solves the problem - and what the
> best source of documentation is for GPG.
G
Exactly. Ignore top post messages if they irritate you. Like this one. :-)
Same approach for people (top posters) who have difficulty strolling down
multiple pages to extract relevant info.
The point is : if you think that the posting has info that is important enough,
you will make the effort
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:57:48PM +0200, David Jardine wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:19:19AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
> > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 09:16:39AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > > > Since last night my in-box is being filled up by dozens of bounced
> > > > messages
Carl Fink wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 12:46:20PM -0700, Caleb Walker wrote:
>
>>Carl Fink wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Just out of curiosity: you do realize that "LCD" is an insult, right?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>What is LCD?
>
>
> Least Common Denominator.
I thought it was Last Chick Drunk.
--Joe
--
To
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:19:19AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 09:16:39AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > > Since last night my in-box is being filled up by dozens of bounced
> > > messages. Evidently someone or something is spoofing my address and
> > > sending
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 12:46:20PM -0700, Caleb Walker wrote:
> Carl Fink wrote:
>
> >Just out of curiosity: you do realize that "LCD" is an insult, right?
> >
> >
> What is LCD?
Least Common Denominator.
--
Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you attempt
Carl Fink wrote:
Just out of curiosity: you do realize that "LCD" is an insult, right?
What is LCD?
--
Caleb Walker
Top Gun Drywall Supply, Inc.
559-276-5161
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marty writes:
> I still don't understand where apt gets the Debian version.
Why do you think it cares?
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 10 June 2005 13:37, Guillaume TESSIER was heard to say:
> Thanks Curt!
You're very welcome.
> I guess many users choose sarge testing cause woody was pretty
> outdated.
Yep. And they were warned, many times in many forums, that when Sarge
went "stable" then "testing" would be a nightm
On Friday 10 June 2005 04:01 pm, Thomas Stivers wrote:
>
> While I can perhaps understand posting a "That does the job" message for
> archival purposes. I really don't understand why anyone would send a
> post containing "thank you," "I agree," 'no," "yes," Etc. to a list of
> thousands. These one-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 02:17:48 PM -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> I don't know if anyone has noticed that I don't top post. (Actually, I might
> -- if I'm responding with a quick "Thank you," I may put it at the top. If a
> post solves the proble
Marty wrote:
Guillaume TESSIER wrote:
Apt can fonction without [apt.conf]. Unless you have specific network
settings (like access through proxy) then you don't need it. Either
its an empty file either it's not there. If you use testing it might
be there of not depending of the moment of your
1 - 100 of 254 matches
Mail list logo
