contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
502851: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=502851
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libsoprano4
Version: 2.1+dfsg.1-1
Severity: wishlist
I tried to use nepomukserver
Modestas Vainius wrote:
> tags 502851 wontfix
> thanks
>
> Hello
>
> As Ana said, this bug has zero chances of being fixed because soprano has a
> usable and less painful to package virtuoso backend now.
But how to use virtuoso now? What must be installed to get rid of the slow
redland stuff? w
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Robert Wohlrab wrote:
> But how to use virtuoso now? What must be installed to get rid of the slow
> redland stuff? why isn't the soprano stuff not recommending any virtuoso-
> server?
because virtuoso-opensource package (6.1) was very recently added to Debian.
Ev
tags 502851 wontfix
thanks
Hello
As Ana said, this bug has zero chances of being fixed because soprano has a
usable and less painful to package virtuoso backend now.
--
Modestas Vainius
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 502851 wontfix
Bug #502851 {Done: Modestas Vainius } [libsoprano4]
libsoprano4: build sesame2 backend
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
502851: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=502851
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libsoprano4
Version: 2.1+dfsg.1-1
Severity: wi
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 08:07:20PM +0100, Robert Wohlrab wrote:
> retitle 502851 [libsoprano4] Build Virtuoso backend
> thanks
>
> It seems to be a better solution to use Virtuoso backend because it has less
> dependencies to package
First of all, somebody else has renamed the bug back to the or
Your message dated Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:34:13 +0100
with message-id <200903102234.14120.robert.wohl...@gmx.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#502851: Better ask for Virtuoso backend
has caused the Debian Bug report #502851,
regarding libsoprano4: build sesame2 backend
to be marked as done.
This
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 502851 -1
Bug#502851: [libsoprano4] Build Virtuoso backend
Bug 502851 cloned as bug 519171.
> retitle 502851 libsoprano4: build sesame2 backend
Bug#502851: [libsoprano4] Build Virtuoso backend
Changed Bug title to `libsoprano4:
retitle 502851 [libsoprano4] Build Virtuoso backend
thanks
It seems to be a better solution to use Virtuoso backend because it has less
dependencies to package
--
Robert Wohlrab
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Hi.
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 01:08:21AM +0100, Armin Berres wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Feb 09 08:22, Ramon Antonio Parada wrote:
> > Anybody tryed the new Virtuoso backend? Just to give ideas, maybe
> > would be easier to backport it.
>
> This one isn't even finished yet.
> This is 4.3 material...
>
FY
On Thu, 26 Feb 09 08:22, Ramon Antonio Parada wrote:
> Anybody tryed the new Virtuoso backend? Just to give ideas, maybe
> would be easier to backport it.
This one isn't even finished yet.
This is 4.3 material...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Anybody tryed the new Virtuoso backend? Just to give ideas, maybe
would be easier to backport it.
--
Ramon Antonio Parada
Skype: ramon.parada
Spain: +34 651 948819
US: +1 (310) 651-8072
http://ramonantonio.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
block 502851 by 512396
thanks
Michael Biebl wrote:
> Why not simply ship the precompiled sesame jar (in non-free) in the
> meantime?
If we went that route we could put almost all of Debian, especially a lot of
Java software, in non-free and just save a lot of work and compilation time...
I thin
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 502851 by 512396
Bug#512396: ITP: sesame -- framework for storage, inferencing and querying of
RDF data
Bug#502851: [libsoprano4] Build sesame2 backend
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs of 502851 added: 512396
> thanks
St
Sune Vuorela wrote:
> But upstreams sources ship precompiled jars of java libraries not present in
> the archive.
>
> The "primary" jar is openrdf-sesame-2.1.2-onejar.jar which actually embeds a
> lot of other jars (java people apparantly like embedded code copies).
> Someone dug up that it is p
On Wednesday 28 January 2009 06:13:20 Michael Biebl wrote:
> Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > On Monday 20 October 2008 11:41:16 Robert Wohlrab wrote:
> >> Package: libsoprano4
> >> Version: 2.1+dfsg.1-1
> >> Severity: wishlist
> >>
> >> I tried to use nepomukserver with kde and had to notice that it was
>
Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On Monday 20 October 2008 11:41:16 Robert Wohlrab wrote:
>> Package: libsoprano4
>> Version: 2.1+dfsg.1-1
>> Severity: wishlist
>>
>> I tried to use nepomukserver with kde and had to notice that it was extreme
>> slow - different to what I experienced on other distributions. T
On Monday 20 October 2008 11:41:16 Robert Wohlrab wrote:
> Package: libsoprano4
> Version: 2.1+dfsg.1-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> I tried to use nepomukserver with kde and had to notice that it was extreme
> slow - different to what I experienced on other distributions. The problem
> is that it sear
Package: libsoprano4
Version: 2.1+dfsg.1-1
Severity: wishlist
I tried to use nepomukserver with kde and had to notice that it was extreme
slow - different to what I experienced on other distributions. The problem is
that it searches for /usr/share/soprano/plugins/*backend.desktop and can only
f
20 matches
Mail list logo
