On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 08:07:20PM +0100, Robert Wohlrab wrote: > retitle 502851 [libsoprano4] Build Virtuoso backend > thanks > > It seems to be a better solution to use Virtuoso backend because it has less > dependencies to package
First of all, somebody else has renamed the bug back to the original Subject. If you are not longer waiting for the sesame2 backend (that has almost null changes of being packaged), you can close the bug, but it does not make too much sense to rename it to ask for another backend support that has not been yet released with soprano. When soprano is *released* with virtuoso if we do not package it, then you can ask for it. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
