Re: Bug#671565: Wheezy: Iceweasel no longer using busy cursor as per KDE cursor theme

2012-05-11 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:11:33PM -0700, T Elcor wrote: > --- On Thu, 5/10/12, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > Do you mean mouse cursor? > > Yes. > > > I don't remember having seen a busy mouse cursor at all when waiting > > for servers. > > You probabl

Re: Bug#671565: Wheezy: Iceweasel no longer using busy cursor as per KDE cursor theme

2012-05-11 Thread Mike Hommey
Version: 12.0-1 On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 06:23:25PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:11:33PM -0700, T Elcor wrote: > > --- On Thu, 5/10/12, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > > Do you mean mouse cursor? > > > > Yes. > > > > >

Bug#544600: iceweasel-l10n should use same l10n package names as kde-l10n

2012-04-01 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 09:49:12AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > reassign 544600 kde-l10n > thanks > > On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 03:27:52PM +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote: > > On 10:50 Sat 09 Oct , Daniel Baumann wrote: > > DB> ping. > > > > I was in vac

Re: Link-time optimization in debian packages

2011-06-05 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 01:18:43PM +0200, Emil Langrock wrote: > Hi, > > I have currently the problem that I have to use large, computing intensive > applications [1,2]. These are usually implemented in many source files. I > used > in the past pseudo c files which include all other c files [3]

Re: Bug#570579: xulrunner: please reconsider recommends for GNOME packages

2010-02-22 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 01:28:32PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 22 February 2010, Mike Hommey wrote: > > Could you send the output for reportbug --template xulrunner-1.9.1 on > > your machine ? > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: squeeze/sid > APT pref

Re: Bug#570579: xulrunner: please reconsider recommends for GNOME packages

2010-02-22 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:33:12PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 22 February 2010, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 06:47:44AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > > I guess for the icon issue you mean #561902? I don't see any problem > > > with the sea

Re: Bug#570579: xulrunner: please reconsider recommends for GNOME packages

2010-02-22 Thread Mike Hommey
y Mike. > > On Saturday 20 February 2010, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:18:09PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > > But I question if the Recommends of those packages is policy compliant > > > as Recommends should only be used for packages "that wou

Bug#437354: libqt4-dev: Put qmake into its own package

2007-08-15 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 01:30:41PM -0400, Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jan Michael Alonzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hi! I'm currently trying to build gnome + webkit without distro-specific > > packages. But for this I need "qmake" which is part of libqt4-dev. The > > problem

Bug#294271: Upgrading to RC

2005-02-08 Thread Mike Hommey
> As discussed on #d-d, these bugs should be RC. (The firefox one is > already RC) Note to self: don't do stuff while tired. So let's go for a more detailed justification. IDN is widely broken due to the fact that registrars don't do their job. But it's not widely used, first reason being that I

Bug#294271: Upgrading to RC

2005-02-08 Thread Mike Hommey
severity 294274 grave severity 294271 grave thanks As discussed on #d-d, these bugs should be RC. (The firefox one is already RC) Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Processed: Re: Bug#246120: /usr/bin/svn-inject: svn-inject can't deal with tarballs without primary subdirectory

2004-04-30 Thread Mike Hommey
reassign 246210 kdvi severity 246210 normal thanks Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 246210 svn-buildpackage Bug#246210: kdvi: wrong menu location Bug reassigned from package `kdvi' to `svn-buildpackage'. severity 246210 wishlist Bug#

Bug#246210: Bug#246120: /usr/bin/svn-inject: svn-inject can't deal with tarballs without primary subdirectory

2004-04-29 Thread Mike Hommey
reassign 246210 svn-buildpackage severity 246210 wishlist tag 246210 patch thanks Eduard Bloch wrote: If I provide an harmless patch to svn-inject to make the same circumventions, would you actually apply it ? Yup, as clean perl code please. Attached to this mail is a patch to svn-inject de