quot;libqtgui4-perl based frontend
> might need to be removed") then.
That's now fixed, so as far as debconf is concerned you can remove
qt4-perl.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 10:23:49AM +0800, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> 2018-07-25 5:51 GMT+08:00 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
> :
> > On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 at 14:04, Colin Watson wrote:
> >> Simple enough: once you've installed the new version, "dpkg-reconfigure
&g
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 01:43:09PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> El jueves, 19 de julio de 2018 07:08:43 -03 Colin Watson escribió:
> > Sorry for dropping this on the floor for so long! I've reviewed this
> > and tested it on a Debian KDE stretch system
mmit.
Nowadays, task-kde-desktop happens to pull debconf-kde-helper in via
apper, so most people probably have it; but we should probably
explicitly add it to the task.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
move-saddr_t-typedef.patch
2015-12-24 17:39:52.0 +
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+Description: Remove the saddr_t typedef
+ This clashes with system headers on s390x.
+Author: Colin Watson
+Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/805157
+
ytecode.diff
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+Index: b/cmake/modules/PythonMacros.cmake
+===
+--- /dev/null
b/cmake/modules/PythonMacros.cmake
+@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
++# Python macros
++# ~~~~~
++# Copyright (c) 2007, Simon Edwards
++# Cloned-and-hacked by Colin Watson , removing byte
degree of sense for Debian as well since dh_python2
removes .pyc files anyway, so it's just a waste of time to byte-compile
them during package builds. However, it would be nice if this macro
were smart enough to handle __pycache__ in the Python 3 case as well.
Thanks,
--
Colin W
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=440420
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdebase/+bug/44548
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -Nru kdebase-3.5.8.dfsg.1.orig/debian/control.in kdebase-3.5.8.dfsg.1/debian/control.in
--- kd
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 09:08:47PM -0400, Christopher Martin wrote:
> On July 8, 2004 07:18, Colin Watson wrote:
> > kdelibs should make it into testing tonight, along with the whole
> > enormous cupsys transition which has been blocking a lot of packages.
> > If you guys hav
,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sters, so bugs against
individual packages for priority problems often confuse people (i.e.
they try to change the priority in the package and get confused when
this doesn't work straight off because the override file still has the
old value ...).
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 05:14:56PM +0100, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> Colin Watson writes:
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 04:35:32PM +0100, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> >> Good idea !
>
> > This means that kdelibs 3.2 will probably propagate to testing
> > tonight,
ave had problems.
>
> > It has been built and uploaded manually on 24-Mar. - How about
> > closing the bug and letting kdelibs propagate to testing?
>
> Good idea !
This means that kdelibs 3.2 will probably propagate to testing tonight,
*without* kdebase 3.2. W
sts.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2004/debian-devel-announce-200402/msg00015.html
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 11:26:25AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 03:30:42AM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > If you happen to have a non i386 arch system please try building kde on
> > it and if you are a debian developer upload the result to experimental.
>
these (by hand; must get round to setting up sbuild or
pbuilder) on powerpc, and have uploaded arts to experimental.
I notice that kdelibs build-depends on libdb4.1-dev, while kdebase
build-depends on libdb4.0-dev. Was this a mistake, or is it deliberate
for some reason?
--
just had bug #232605 fixed, which needs to be built
redland is waiting for perl
perl needs to be built on m68k, but has problems (#233175)
spiralsynthmodular is 7 days old; needs 10
So, getting there ...
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
eta-gnome2, so that can't be so easily swept aside ...
Fun for all the family.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 02:42:26PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 05:43:07PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Probably the biggest task remaining for sarge as I see it is getting
> > meta-kde and all its dependencies ready. Now, I know there are various
>
w?
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s build machine and not on any
buildds.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 04:14:27PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 11:27:44AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I fully agree with Nathanael's position here. Uploading KDE 3.2 at this
> > point will probably kill your chances of getting a working KDE in sarg
> a very prolonged time to even get built. And if packages aren't built on
> all archs then they obviously can't migrate to sarge.
Anthony explicitly allowed arm, s390, and sparc to slip while their
build daemons were behind.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
its magic file
> then both Gnome and KDE could send their changes to upstream and
> everyone benefit from it, instead of just forking it.
Isn't this what's in the /usr/share/misc/file directory?
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
yourself have no time,
then perhaps one of the other people forming the maintenance group can
do it?
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ts
size and the length of time it takes to build, it really doesn't make
sense to be too conservative either.
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
34, #214535).
This is a job for versioned Replaces:, not versioned Conflicts:.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 08:05:06PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 06:11:31AM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 05:10:14PM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > > The current[1] status of KDE in sid is below. Hopefully the
> > > buildd
Those can be ignored pretty
efficiently by the buildds until a new version is available, and in the
meantime testing can proceed by users and by other buildds.
kdebase is really getting urgent. :(
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
29 matches
Mail list logo
