Le Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 11:09:55PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer a
écrit :
> On Wednesday 08 January 2014 08:33:31 Charles Plessy wrote:
> > No comment from the GNOME and KDE teams ? What do you think of the
> > corrections that I proposed below, and of the patch in general ?
>
> No
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will rep
On Tuesday 07 January 2014 23:09:55 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 January 2014 08:33:31 Charles Plessy wrote:
> > No comment from the GNOME and KDE teams ? What do you think of the
> > corrections that I proposed below, and of the patch in general ?
>
> Not to be ta
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will rep
On Wednesday 08 January 2014 08:33:31 Charles Plessy wrote:
> No comment from the GNOME and KDE teams ? What do you think of the
> corrections that I proposed below, and of the patch in general ?
Not to be taken as "KDE team" reply, but here's my opinion.
On Sunday 05 January 2014 14:53:12 Charl
No comment from the GNOME and KDE teams ? What do you think of the corrections
that I proposed below, and of the patch in general ?
Cheers,
-- Charles
Le Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 08:40:33AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> Hi Steve, Jonathan, and Josselin,
>
> thanks to the two first of you for y
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 734514 minor
Bug #734514 [libqtcore4] Suggests no longer existing libicu48
Severity set to 'minor' from 'important'
> tags 734514 + pending
Bug #734514 [libqtcore4] Suggests no longer existing libicu48
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopp
Seems QtCore is already doing the right thing and loading libicu52 from
what I can see from a strace:
open("/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libicui18n.so.52", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 3
open("/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libicuuc.so.52", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 3
open("/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libicudata.so.52
Package: libqtcore4
Version: 4:4.8.5+git192-g085f851+dfsg-2
Severity: important
libicu had a transition [1] and the libicu48 library package no longer
exists. It seems to be superseded by libicu52
Please update the Suggests accordingly.
Since this is a Suggests, I assume libqtcore dlopen's the l
On Tuesday 07 January 2014 15:41:26 Orgad Shaneh wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <
[snip]
>
> Qt Creator 3.0 built with Qt4 is lacking some important features, like the
> Welcome page and Qml-related plugins...
If I switch Creator to Qt 5 many archs wi
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <
perezme...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 January 2014 09:57:46 Orgad Shaneh wrote:
> [snip]
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm sorry, this is the wrong package. It used to be in qtdeclarative, but
> > moved to qtquick1.
> >
> > Anyway, the
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <
perezme...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday 06 January 2014 23:23:46 Orgad Shaneh wrote:
> > Package: qtdeclarative5-private-dev
> > Version: 5.2.0-5
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Dear Maintainer,
> >
> > The private headers shou
12 matches
Mail list logo
