Package: ark
Version: 3.3.2-1
I am using Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 unstable, kernel 2.6.9-1-686 and libc6
2.3.2.ds1-16.
Version: ark 2.4.0
Version: KDE 3.3.2
Version: Qt 3.3.3
Problem:
If file name contains national symbols, they will be replaced with relevant
symbols from "latin1" codepage.
Attemp
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 10:38 +0100, Adeodato Simà wrote:
> Hi Alex!
Hello!
>
> We need some more information to understand what has happened, could
> you please provide? (See questions below).
>
> > apt fails to install because of the file conflict (see subject).
>
> - What package does
Hi ho,
> Uhm, when a package disappears (kontact-plugins), Replaces should be
> enough.
My understanding is that Replaces is used when some files move from one
package to another (as happens all the time with kdelibs, base, office,
etc), whereas Conflicts/Replaces is used when one package co
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 291251
Bug#291251: CAN-2005-0064: Arbitrary code execution in kpdf
Bug#291270: kpdf: vulnerable to CAN-2005-0064, buffer overflow in xpdf
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tags 291251 -sid
Bug#291251: CAN-2005-0064: Arbitrary code executio
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 15:10, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> kppp has an _absolute_ dependency on ppp (Christopher says so, and he
> knows better than I), so there you go with the Depends. OTOH, see
> Bug#289189 for an example where using Depends: would help some people,
> but it is not don
> I understand your concern, but the real problem is that metapackages are a
> crude solution to a general problem. If you don't need one of the
> packages installed by a metapackage, you could simply uninstall the
> metapackage. Perhaps, though, a nicer solution would be for the
> metapackages to
On February 2, 2005 08:36, Michail Bachmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 February 2005 14:11, Christopher Martin wrote:
> > Believe me, we get a ton of reports from new users whose packages
> > don't work because they didn't install the Recommends. But that's not
> > why I made kppp depend on ppp - I d
* Michail Bachmann [Wed, 02 Feb 2005 14:15:51 +0100]:
> > BTW, kppp without ppp is a nice window in your desktop useless.
> So what? Do I have to use it?
You have a point, but: what determines if we put something as Depends
or as Recommends is not what will confuse our users less. What
det
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 13:46, Matías Costa wrote:
> > Maybe it would be better if kdenetwork would only recommend kppp and not
> > depend on it, but I can see a rationale in that decision, kdenetwork
> > being a metapackage and used by different kind of users.
>
> That's it, you can make ha
On February 2, 2005 04:04, Michail Bachmann wrote:
> > If you're on a LAN, why are you using kppp? It would be helpful if
> > you could explain your situation in more detail.
>
> Because unfortunately there is a dependency relation which leads to
> kppp: kde->kdenetwork->kppp.
OK.
> Maybe it woul
El Miércoles 02 Febrero 2005 10:04, Michail Bachmann escribió:
> On Wednesday 02 February 2005 03:09, Christopher Martin wrote:
> > On February 1, 2005 18:23, Michail Bachmann wrote:
> > > The dependency on ppp changed from Recommends in 3.3.1-2 to Depends in
> > > 3.3.2-1.
> > >
> > > Since KDE is
* Stephen Gran [Tue, 01 Feb 2005 22:50:54 -0500]:
> > reassign 292997 kontact
> > retitle 292997 doesn't handle upgrades from the old kontact-plugins package
> > * Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-02 09:56]:
> > > > Maybe upgrades aren't handled properly. I'm CCing Ben.
> > > The materia
* Alex Gould [Mon, 31 Jan 2005 11:44:44 -0500]:
> Package: kontact-plugins
> Version: 4:3.2.3-2
> Severity: important
> Subject: /usr/lib/kde3/kcm_kontactknt.so is also in package kontact
Hi Alex!
We need some more information to understand what has happened, could
you please provide? (See qu
* Christopher Martin [Tue, 01 Feb 2005 21:09:42 -0500]:
> If you're on a LAN, why are you using kppp? It would be helpful if you
> could explain your situation in more detail.
$ apt-get install kde
;-)
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
Listening to: Manolo
> Change Recommends to Requires
It's actually Depends...
> I think that IMAP access is pretty fundamental to KMail.
Yes, I agree. However, the definitions of Depends and Recommends are pretty
clear:
---
Depends
This declares an absolute dependency. A package will not be configured unless
all
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 03:09, Christopher Martin wrote:
> On February 1, 2005 18:23, Michail Bachmann wrote:
> > The dependency on ppp changed from Recommends in 3.3.1-2 to Depends in
> > 3.3.2-1.
> >
> > Since KDE ist perfectly useable on a LAN without ppp I dont understand
> > the reason f
16 matches
Mail list logo
