Itai Seggev writes:
> Will this be fixed in the next upload of kdelibs (hopefully 3.2-1)?
Prolly not, because we ( or at least: I ) have no idea what's causing it.
Do you perhaps know ?
cheers
domi
Some of the packages were changed to Needs-Build so hopefully they will
be built soon. Maybe I will be able to upload KDE 3.2.0 by the end of
the week. :)
Chris
kdebase 3.1.5-2
---
mipsel - failed - needs retry with unbuilt qt-x11-free (see below) (Feb 4)
s390- failed - bad kernel heade
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 09:43:26AM -0500, Josh Metzler wrote:
> > If anyone wants to ever see KDE 3.2 get into sid someone will need to
> > persuade the buildd admins to retry the packages below so that KDE
> > 3.1.5 can go into sarge...
> >
> > Chris
>
> Actually, it looks to me like all of these
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package knode
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: knode
> tags 230490 upstream
Bug#230490: knode: Allow reordering of filtering rules
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> forwarded 230490 http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74731
Bug#230490: knod
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package konqueror
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: konqueror
> reopen 203722
Bug#203722: konqueror: *Frequent* SIGFPE on Alpha
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bu
package knode
tags 230490 upstream
forwarded 230490 http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74731
thanks
domi
Karsten M Self writes:
> Package: knode Version: 4:2.2.2-14.6 Severity: wishlist
> Currently it's not possible to reorder scoring rules from within the
> scooring rules edit dialog.
> As
Your message dated Mon, 09 Feb 2004 18:07:50 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#203722: How to handle the -mieee SIGFPE problem in normal
Debian packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Mon, 09 Feb 2004 18:12:57 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#231339: [kregexpeditor] Old package libkregexpeditor not
removed on upgrade
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
package konqueror
reopen 203722
thanks
Steve Langasek writes:
>> I'm currently looking at the following bug report
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=203722 about a
>> frequent SIGFPE on an alpha machine. I guess we all know the cause
>> of this bug, namely the non-standard alp
Your message dated Mon, 09 Feb 2004 17:47:51 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#231284: kwin: /etc/gdm/Sessions/KDE not executable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package kmail
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: kmail
> tags 188552 +fixed-upstream
Bug#188552: kmail: Verifying gpg signatures: '>From' becomes 'From' and breaks
signatures
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 04:54:06PM +0100, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> Please respect the Mail-Followup-To, as I'm not subscribed to this
> list, and the discussion is relevant to #203722.
> I'm currently looking at the following bug report
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=203722
Peter Nuttall writes:
> On Monday 09 February 2004 12:46, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
>> Hello Peter,
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 04:25:10PM +, Peter Nuttall wrote:
>> > Thanks for reporting the bug. can you tell be if the same problem
>> > happens within kde itself?
>>
>> Mmh, that'll be diffic
package kmail
tags 188552 +fixed-upstream
thanks
domi
Adrian von Bidder writes:
> tags +pending thanks
> The "> From" signature verifying problem is fixed in KDE3.2 (at
> least in the 3.1.95 pkgs from p.d.o/~ccheney/)
Great, thanks for this extra information. By the way, if you want to
change
Your message dated Mon, 09 Feb 2004 17:36:39 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#231901: kdm: /etc/X11/default-display-manager filled
wrongly
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package kdeprint
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: kdeprint
> retitle 230209 foomatic: foomatic-ppdfile broke BC by losing -t parameter
Bug#230209: kdeprint: Can't add printer using printmgr, printer driver can't be
found.
Changed Bug title.
> reassign
kdm or xserver-xfree86 can't be responsible for X-System not starting, because
they do very well with kernel 2.4.24-2. I think the problem is due to the
configuration of kernel-image-2.6.0-1-686 version: 2.6.0-2 and my report
should better have been sent to Herbert Xu, its maintainer.
Greetings
Hello,
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 03:35:39PM +, Peter Nuttall wrote:
> The reason I asked was becuase kde has this thing called DCOP which lets kde
> programs talk to each other (like IPC in a tty). I was thinking that it
> wasn't running in wmaker. (klauncher is part of this). You could check i
package kdeprint
retitle 230209 foomatic: foomatic-ppdfile broke BC by losing -t parameter
reassign 230209 foomatic-db-engine
thanks
Hi,
I'm reassigning this bug to the package containing foomatic-ppdfile
because it's a pretty important bug to break BC imho.
cheers
domi
Eric Lavarde writes:
>
Dominique Devriese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm currently looking at the following bug report
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=203722 about a
> frequent SIGFPE on an alpha machine. I guess we all know the cause
> of this bug, namely the non-standard alpha FPU semantics.
>
Hi,
Please respect the Mail-Followup-To, as I'm not subscribed to this
list, and the discussion is relevant to #203722.
I'm currently looking at the following bug report
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=203722
about a frequent SIGFPE on an alpha machine. I guess we all know the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package konqueror
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: konqueror
> tags 203722 -help,moreinfo
Bug#203722: konqueror: *Frequent* SIGFPE on Alpha
Tags were: help moreinfo
Tags removed: help, moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
On Monday 09 February 2004 12:46, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Hello Peter,
>
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 04:25:10PM +, Peter Nuttall wrote:
> > Thanks for reporting the bug. can you tell be if the same problem happens
> > within kde itself?
>
> Mmh, that'll be difficult. Since it only happens somet
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package klipper
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: klipper
> tags 231863 +confirmed, fixed-upstream
Bug#231863: klipper: 'Open with Mozilla' fails
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed, fixed-upstream
> tags 218673 -patch
Bug#218673: passes bad st
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package konqueror
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: konqueror
> tags 182067 +fixed-upstream
Bug#182067: konqueror: subscript tag causes render error
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if y
> If anyone wants to ever see KDE 3.2 get into sid someone will need to
> persuade the buildd admins to retry the packages below so that KDE
> 3.1.5 can go into sarge...
>
> Chris
Actually, it looks to me like all of these packages have been building
since Thursday or Friday. What happened to t
Package: kdm
Version: 4:3.1.3-1
Severity: important
Hi,
after several "apt-get upgrade" (testing) kdm didnt start and executing
"/etc/init.d/kdm start" results in
"Not starting K Desktop Manager (kdm); it is not the default display manager."
(As well as xdm -- no other window managers installed)
> kdeartwork-theme-desktop and kdeartwork-theme-icon conflicts.
You can safely remove the -desktop package, it's just a dummy upgrade
package.
AIUI the woody backports were built with a slightly incorrect checkout
of debian/, hence the problem.
b.
Hello Peter,
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 04:25:10PM +, Peter Nuttall wrote:
> Thanks for reporting the bug. can you tell be if the same problem happens
> within kde itself?
Mmh, that'll be difficult. Since it only happens sometimes, this would
mean I would have to use KDE for a longer time which
Hello
I am writing you because Volkan Yazici pointed me to a beautiful photography
that would fit well into Debian. So I did contact the photographer (Hi Jakub)
and asked him to release the photography under a free license which he did
(artistic).
The photography I am talking about is this her
See the kdebase log on s390, at:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=kdebase&ver=4%3A3.1.5-2&arch=s390&stamp=1076056706&file=log&as=raw
:
This looks like a glibc/linux-kernel-headers bug, since the problems are
coming from sys/user.h, which is a perfectly legitimate header to include.
I don't
Hello,
kdeartwork-theme-desktop and kdeartwork-theme-icon conflicts.
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/kdeartwork-theme-desktop_4%3a3.2.0-0woody1_all.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/icons/Locolor/index.theme', which is also in
package kdeartwork-theme-icon
libwmf
Sorry, the bug has already been reported and fixed.
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=218673)
The reportbug tool didn't show the list of outstanding bugs.
regards
tom
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Package: kmail
Version: 4:3.1.4-1
Severity: important
When submitting an email (no authentication, no encryption) the
SMTP-Server responds:
"5.0.0 Need RCPT (recipient)" (of course there is one in the mail ..)
When using authentication and encryption (Plain, TLS), kmail reports:
"Could not con
Package: klipper
Version: 4:3.1.3-1
Severity: normal
When copying a URL in a KDE-Program (e.g. knode), klipper pops up, when
I chose 'Open with Mozilla' klipper hands the URL over to mozilla.
Mozilla then has 'http://example.com' (with single-quotes.) in the
address field
and alerts: "The URL i
35 matches
Mail list logo
