Re: oo 1.1 beta2

2003-06-10 Thread jan . palic
Hi .. I build OpenOffice.org on Debian-PPC (unstable) ... You can get it from: http://sevdalia.hajvan.net/~palic/OpenOffice.org/1.1/ until OOo1.1 is already uploaded. I build it with the recent libc from unstable, not 2.3.2. I have a look an mail you, when I have a solution for the ld.so ass

Re: oo 1.1 beta2

2003-06-06 Thread Jan-Hendrik Palic
Kevin .. thnx .. I willl look at it and mail you then .. Regards Jan On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 03:44:21PM -0400, Kevin B. Hendricks wrote: >Hi Jan, > >Does your version of glibc-2.3.2 have the following changes in them from >glibc-2.3.1? These were the only changes from

Re: oo 1.1 beta2

2003-06-06 Thread Kevin B. Hendricks
Hi Jan, Does your version of glibc-2.3.2 have the following changes in them from glibc-2.3.1? These were the only changes from glibc-2.3.1 that existed and they need to be there to fix a limit on the total number of symbols that can be relocated. Kevin --- dl-runtime.c2002-09-18 14:4

Re: oo 1.1 beta2

2003-06-06 Thread Jan-Hendrik Palic
Hoi .. On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 08:54:03PM +0200, Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote: >Hoi .. Jack .. >On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 11:56:33AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: >> How did your last attempt at building 1.1 beta2 turn out? >>Did upgrading to glibc 2.3.2-1 help resolve your build issues >>on debian ppc

Re: oo 1.1 beta2

2003-06-06 Thread Jan-Hendrik Palic
Hoi .. Jack .. On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 11:56:33AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: > How did your last attempt at building 1.1 beta2 turn out? >Did upgrading to glibc 2.3.2-1 help resolve your build issues >on debian ppc sid? Build was fine .. it ran through but I get at setup with binutils 2.13.90 a