Kevin ..
thnx .. I willl look at it and mail you then ..
Regards
Jan
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 03:44:21PM -0400, Kevin B. Hendricks wrote:
>Hi Jan,
>
>Does your version of glibc-2.3.2 have the following changes in them from
>glibc-2.3.1? These were the only changes from glibc-2.3.1 that existed and
>they need to be there to fix a limit on the total number of symbols that can
>be relocated.
>
>Kevin
>
>--- dl-runtime.c 2002-09-18 14:49:18.000000000 -0400
>+++ ../../glibc-2.3.2/elf/dl-runtime.c 2003-02-07 14:41:12.000000000 -0500
>@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> /* On-demand PLT fixup for shared objects.
>- Copyright (C) 1995-1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>+ Copyright (C) 1995-2002, 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This file is part of the GNU C Library.
>
> The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@
> {
> const ElfW(Half) *vernum =
> (const void *) D_PTR (l, l_info[VERSYMIDX (DT_VERSYM)]);
>- ElfW(Half) ndx = vernum[ELFW(R_SYM) (reloc->r_info) & 0x7fff];
>+ ElfW(Half) ndx = vernum[ELFW(R_SYM) (reloc->r_info)] & 0x7fff;
> const struct r_found_version *version = &l->l_versions[ndx];
>
> if (version->hash != 0)
>@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@
> {
> const ElfW(Half) *vernum =
> (const void *) D_PTR (l,l_info[VERSYMIDX (DT_VERSYM)]);
>- ElfW(Half) ndx = vernum[ELFW(R_SYM) (reloc->r_info) & 0x7fff];
>+ ElfW(Half) ndx = vernum[ELFW(R_SYM) (reloc->r_info)] & 0x7fff;
> const struct r_found_version *version = &l->l_versions[ndx];
>
> if (version->hash != 0)
>
>On Friday 06 June 2003 15:30, Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote:
>> Hoi ..
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 08:54:03PM +0200, Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote:
>> >Hoi .. Jack ..
>> >
>> >On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 11:56:33AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> >> How did your last attempt at building 1.1 beta2 turn out?
>> >>Did upgrading to glibc 2.3.2-1 help resolve your build issues
>> >>on debian ppc sid?
>> >
>> >Build was fine .. it ran through but I get at setup with binutils 2.13.90
>> > and 2.14.x that:
>> >
>> >register uno component:
>> > /mnt/develop/Debian/OpenOffice/package/openoffice.org1.1-1.1beta2/debian/
>> >tmp//usr/lib/openoffice1.1/program/libdbu644lp.soInconsistency detected by
>> > ld.so: dl-runtime.c: 75: fixup: Assertion `((reloc->r_info) & 0xff) ==
>> > 21' failed!
>> >
>> >after press ctrl+c
>> >
>> >make: *** [debian/stampdir/setup] Interrupt
>> >libtricks, when sending message: Invalid argument
>> >libtricks, when sending message: Invalid argument
>>
>> I had a look at it and found this in libc-2.3.2 ...
>> (it is not a binutilsprob .. ;) )
>>
>> ./glibc-2.3.2/elf/dl-runtime.c:
>> 74: /* Sanity check that we're really looking at a PLT relocation. */
>> 75: assert (ELFW(R_TYPE)(reloc->r_info) == ELF_MACHINE_JMP_SLOT);
>>
>> Anyone has a hint, where to look for it?
>>
>> Thnx
>> Jan
>
--
.''`. Jan-Hendrik Palic |
: :' : ** Debian GNU/ Linux ** | ** OpenOffice.org ** ,.. ,..
`. `' http://www.debian.org | http://www.openoffice.org ,: ..` `
`- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ' ` `
pgpRi2yL4zFG1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
